1. 广东工业大学 机电工程学院,广东,广州,510006
2. 深圳职业技术学院 汽车与交通学院,广东,深圳,518055
彭美春(1963–),女,教授,博士,主要研究方向为汽车节能与排放,E-mail:mcpeng@gdut.edu.cn
网络首发:2022-03-10,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
彭美春, 叶伟斌, 邹康聪, 李君平, 黄文伟. 加载减速法分析柴油车NOx与烟度净化效果[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 84-90. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210041.
Peng Mei-chun, Ye Wei-bin, Zou Kang-cong, et al. An Analysis of NOx and Smoke Purification Effect for Diesel Vehicles Based on Lugdown Cycle[J]. 2022, 39(2): 84-90. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210041.
彭美春, 叶伟斌, 邹康聪, 李君平, 黄文伟. 加载减速法分析柴油车NOx与烟度净化效果[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 84-90. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210041. DOI:
Peng Mei-chun, Ye Wei-bin, Zou Kang-cong, et al. An Analysis of NOx and Smoke Purification Effect for Diesel Vehicles Based on Lugdown Cycle[J]. 2022, 39(2): 84-90. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210041. DOI:
研究简易工况加载减速法判别选择性催化还原系统(Selective Catalyst Reduction
SCR)、废气再循环(Exhaust Gas Recirculation
EGR)、颗粒捕集器(Diesel Particulate Filter
DPF)、氧化催化器(Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
DOC)净化柴油车的氮氧化物(NO
x
)与烟度排放的效果。对116辆次匹配上述净化技术的国V、国VI重型柴油货车进行加载减速排放检测,比较NO
x
、烟度排放值,评价净化技术的净化效果,分析最大的轮边功率对应的转鼓线速度点(100% Actual Velocity of Maximum Wheel Power
100%VelHPMax)、最大的轮边功率对应的转鼓线速度80%点(80%VelHPMax)两种测试工况下排放的差异。发现EGR与SCR集成技术对NO
x
的净化效果明显优于单一SCR或EGR技术,SCR技术优于EGR技术。配置EGR与SCR集成技术、单SCR技术车辆在100%VelHPMax 工况下NO
x
体积分数高于80%VelHPMax工况,单EGR技术则相反。配置DOC与DPF集成技术的柴油车辆烟度排放显著低于单DOC技术的车辆。测试的柴油车辆排气烟度光吸收系数,100%VelHPMax工况下均高于80%VelHPMax工况。结果表明,加载减速法能有效分辨净化技术对柴油车排放净化效果的差异。
The purification effect of selective catalyst reduction (SCR)
exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)
diesel particulate filter (DPF) and diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) on nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) and smoke of diesel vehicle
s was studied by short cycle lugdown. It was performed lugdown emission test of NO
x
and smoke opacity for 116 heavy-duty diesel trucks in line with China V and China VI emission standards
equipped with the above exhaust purification technologies. It was compared the emission data of vehicles
the purification effect of the purification technology evaluated
the difference of emissionsbetween100%VelHPMax and 80%VelHPMax test condition analyzed. It is found that the purification effect of EGR and SCR integrated technology on NO
x
is obviously better than single technology SCR or EGR
and the SCR is better than EGR. For vehicles equipped with EGR and SCR integrated technology and single technology SCR
the NO
x
volume concentration is higher at 100% VelHPMax than 80% VelHPMax
while with single technology EGR is opposite. The smoke opacity value of diesel vehicles equipped with DOC and DPF integrated technology is significantly lower than single technology DOC. The smoke optical absorption coefficient of diesel vehicles inspected is higher at 100% VelHPMax than 80% VelHPMax. The results show that lugdown cycle test can distinguish effective the difference of purification effect of emission purification technologies of diesel vehicles.
生态环境部. 中国机动车环境管理年报(2020年)[R]. 北京: 中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020.
SHAN W P, YU Y B, ZHANG Y, et al . Research progress in exhaust purification technology of heavy diesel vehicles in China [J ] . Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(10): 1672-1677.
GUAN B, ZHAN R, LIN H, et al . Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines [J ] . Environ Manage, 2015, 154: 225-58.
DHAL D, MOHAN P. Simultaneous abatement of diesel soot and NO x emissions by effective catalysts at low temperature: an overview [J ] . Catalysis Reviews, 2018, 60(3): 437-496.
WANG Q, ZHOU M X, TU F Y. Test study of reducing vehicular diesel engine NO x emission with Urea-SCR system [J ] . Tractor Farm Transporter, 2011, 38(5): 36-39,42.
ZHANG P W, XIONG R, WU J, et al . A Study of the effect of low pressure EGR system on gasoline direct injection engine performance [J ] . Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2020, 37(5): 82-86.
GE Y S, ZHAO W, WANG J F, et al . Effects of diesel oxidation catalyst on emission from diesel [J ] . Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2012, 32(5): 460-464.
JIAO P H, LI Q, ZHANG W, et al . Research on emission characteristic test of motor vehicle DOC-DPF system [J ] . Journal of Tianjin Vocational Institutes, 2017, 19(8): 68-72.
中华人民共和国生态环境部. GB17691-2018重型柴油车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段)[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2018.
PENG M C, ZHANG W L, LI Y L, et al . Analysis of NO x emissions from road operation of diesel trucks equipped with SCR [J ] . Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(1): 320-325.
YU W L, YE W L, LONG H Y, et al . Influential factors of the real driving emission for light-duty gasoline vehicles [J ] . J Automotive Safety and Energy, 2020, 11(1): 135-142.
中华人民共和国生态环境部. GB3847-2018柴油车污染物排放限值及测量方法(自由加速法及加载减速法)[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2018.
WANG J F, YIN H, DING Y, et al . Research of NO x emission test method for in-use diesel vehicles [J ] . Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2015, 5(5): 407-410.
XU C, LIU J, JU L, et al . Research of NDIR applied on measuring NO x emission from in-use diesel vehicles [J ] . Environmental Monitoring in China, 2019, 35(3): 28-33.
GUO H S, GUAN M, JING X J, et al . The influence of Urea-SCR technology on NO x conversion rate and NH 3 emission [J ] . Vehicle Engine, 2011(3): 55-59,64.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621