广东工业大学 计算机学院,广东,广州,510006
邓杰航(1979–),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为图像处理和模式识别,E-mail:dengjiehang@163.com
顾国生(1978–),男,讲师,主要研究方向为多媒体信息安全和图像处理,E-mail:gsgu@gdut.edu.cn
网络首发:2021-09-10,
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
邓杰航, 袁仲鸣, 林好润, 顾国生. 协同超像素和视觉显著性的图像质量评价[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2021, 38(5): 33-39.
Deng Jie-hang, Yuan Zhong-ming, Lin Hao-run, et al. Superpixel and Visual Saliency Synergetic Image Quality Assessment[J]. 2021, 38(5): 33-39.
邓杰航, 袁仲鸣, 林好润, 顾国生. 协同超像素和视觉显著性的图像质量评价[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2021, 38(5): 33-39. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210036.
Deng Jie-hang, Yuan Zhong-ming, Lin Hao-run, et al. Superpixel and Visual Saliency Synergetic Image Quality Assessment[J]. 2021, 38(5): 33-39. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210036.
为实现全参考图像质量客观评估与人类主观评估更高的一致性
本文提出了协同超像素和视觉显著性双重策略的图像质量评价方法。该方法通过融合4个图像特征相似度得到局部图像质量得分。这4个相似度分别是超像素局部亮度相似度、超像素局部色度相似度、视觉显著性相似度和Scharr梯度相似度。为了解决过去的评价方法中不同的特征相似度仅凭经验确定参数的问题
提出相似度量参数修正模型对各相似度的参数进行自适应调整。最终的质量得分由视觉显著性构造的加权函数与局部质量得分池化获得。大量的比较实验表明
本文方法的综合性能表现优异
与主观评估具有更高的相关性。
In order to achieve higher consistency between objective and subjective evaluation of image quality
a full-reference image quality evaluation method based on a synergetic strategy between superpixel and visual saliency is proposed. This method obtains the image quality score by pooling four similarities of the image features. The four similarities are: the superpixel-based local luminance similarity
the superpixel-based local chrominance similarity
the visual saliency similarity
and the Scharr gradient similarity. In particular
a parameter correction model is proposed to adaptively adjust the parameters of each similarity
to address the problem of determining the parameters of each similarity empirically. The visual saliency is introduced to design a weighting function to fuse the four similarities to obtain the global quality score. A large number of comparative experiments show that the proposed method outperforms the baseline full-reference image quality assessment methods
and has a higher correlation with the subjective evaluation.
WANG Z, BOVIK A C. Modern image quality assessment[M]. New York: Morgan and Claypool Publishing Company, 2006.
CHU J, CHEN Q, YANG X C. Review on full reference image quality assessment algorithms [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2014, 31(1): 13-22.
WANG Z, BOVIK A C. Mean squared error: love it or leave it? [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2009, 26(1): 98-17.
GAO F Y, HE L H. No-reference image quality assessment based on deep network and visual characteristics [J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 42(3): 20-26.
MA H L, ZHANG L Y. No-reference Tone-mapper image quality assessment based on human eye perception [J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2020, 37(7): 158-164.
CUI L. Reduced-reference image quality assessment base on multi-feature similarity fusion [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Science Technology, 2019, 37(6): 160-164.
WU S H, BAO Y D, CHEN G, et al . Reduced-reference crop image quality assessment based on random Gabor feature [J ] . Computer and Modernization, 2020(5): 70-74.
WANG Z, BOVIK A C, SHEIKH H R, et al . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612.
WANG Z, SIMONCELLI E P, BOVIK A C. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment[C]//The Thirty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. Pacific Grove, CA: IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2003: 1398-1402.
WANG Z, LI Q. Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment [J]. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 2011, 20(5): 1185-1198.
ZHANG L, ZHANG L, MOU X Q, et al . FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment [J ] . IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 2011, 20(8): 2378-2386.
LARSON E C, CHANDLER D M. Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy [J]. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2010, 19(1): 011006.
XUE W F, ZHANG L, MOU X Q, et al . Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptu al image quality index [J ] . IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 2014, 23(2): 684-695.
SUN W, LIAO Q M, XUE J H, et al . SPSIM: a superpixel-based similarity index for full-reference image Quality Assessment [J ] . IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 2018, 27(9): 4232-4244.
ZHANG L, SHEN Y, LI H Y. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment [J]. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, 2014, 23(10): 4270-4281.
GAO J Y, LIU W Y, YAN Z G. Object tracking combined with attention and feature fusion [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2019, 36(4): 18-23.
HAREL J, KOCH C, PERONA P. Graph-based visual saliency[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 Conference. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. Vancouver: MIT Press, 2007: 545-552.
ACHANTA R, SHAJI A, SMITH K et al . SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(11): 2274-2281.
ZHANG X D, FENG X C, WANG W W et al . Edge strength similarit y for image quality assessment [J ] . IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2013, 20(4): 319-322.
GAO M J, DANG H S, WEI L L et al . Combining global and local variation for image quality assessment [J ] . Acta Automatica Sinica, 2020, 46(12): 1-10;.
GAO M J, DANG H S, WEI L L, et al . Visual saliency induced local image quality metrics [J ] . Scientia Sinica (Technological), 2019, 49(11): 1350-1360.
SHI C Y, LIN Y D. Objective image quality assessment based on image color appearance and gradient features [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 401-41.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621