1. 广东工业大学 管理学院,广东,广州,510520
2. 广东工贸职业技术学院,广东,广州,510510
范明明(1993–),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为技术创新与管理、新型研发机构
刘贻新(1976–),男,研究员,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为颠覆性创新、可持续转型和新型研发机构,E-mail:21412531@qq.com
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
范明明, 刘贻新, 杨诗炜, 张光宇. 广东省新型研发机构绩效评价研究——基于DEA模型的效率分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 114-122.
Fan Ming-ming, Liu Yi-xin, Yang Shi-wei, et al. Research on Performance Evaluation of New R&D Institutions in Guangdong Province Efficiency Analysis Based on DEA Model[J]. 2022, 39(6): 114-122.
范明明, 刘贻新, 杨诗炜, 张光宇. 广东省新型研发机构绩效评价研究——基于DEA模型的效率分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 114-122. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210031.
Fan Ming-ming, Liu Yi-xin, Yang Shi-wei, et al. Research on Performance Evaluation of New R&D Institutions in Guangdong Province Efficiency Analysis Based on DEA Model[J]. 2022, 39(6): 114-122. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.210031.
基于政府管理视角和机构自身发展视角,构建广东省新型研发机构绩效评价指标体系,并采用数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA)方法对广东省新型研发机构进行绩效评价。研究发现,不同地区、不同属性以及不同研发类型的新型研发机构在投入产出效率上具有显著差异。并在研究结果基础上提出相应对策建议,为后续管理和高质量发展提供理论支持与实践指导。
Based on the perspective of government management and the development of institutions themselves
this paper constructs the evaluation index system of new RD institutions in Guangdong Province
and evaluates the performance of new RD institutions in Guangdong Province by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method
It is found that there are significant differences in the input-output efficiency of the new-type RD institutions in different regions
different attributes and different types of RD. On the basis of the research results
the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the follow-up management and high-quality development.
CHEN B M, LIU G W, DING M L. Current situation and policy suggestions of new research and development organizations in China [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2013(3): 27-31.
ZHANG G Y, LI R Y, LIU Y X, et al . Aresearch on improvement strategy of Guangzhou industrial competitiveness based on “Bow String Arrow”model [J ] . Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2018, 35(6): 1-8,17.
CHEN X, LONG Y F. Main modes and suggestions on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements of new RD institutions in Guangdong [J]. Science and Technology Management Research., 2017, 37(4): 101-105.
HUANG S F, ZHANG G Y. A research on difficulties and mechanism of new RD institutions to cultivate disruptive technologies [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2020, 37(2): 22-29.
陈红梅. 新型研发机构运行机制研究[D]. 广州: 中共广东省委党校, 2016.
LI J H, WANG J W, WANG Z X. Analysis on the current situation and policy suggestion of new RD institutions in Guangdong province [J]. Technology and Innovation Management., 2018, 39(3): 267-270.
TONG H, TANG H J, TANG H. Research on evaluation index system of scientific research in researchuniversity [J]. Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences), 2005(3): 46-49.
GUO B T, WANG S B, WANG J N, et al . Research on evaluation system of new RD institutions based on network analytic hierarchy process [J ] . Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(10): 72-79.
JIANG M Q, QIU S. Research onevalution index system of planning implementation of the national independent innovation demonstration zone—taking Tianjin national independent innovation demonstration zone as an example [J]. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2021, 42(2): 102-108.
朱熊. 科研院所绩效管理与评价研究[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2014.
MENG W, SONG J J. A study on performance evaluation of new RD institutions: dual perspective of resource dependence and social influence [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(8): 20-31.
CHEN X, LI B C, YE C X. Research on evaluation index system of competitiveness of new RD institutions in Guangdong Province [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(1): 70-76.
SUN W X, CHEN C, GAO F, et al . Overview of performance evaluation research of China's new RD institutions: based on the evaluation process [J ] . Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(23): 100-107.
CHEN H X, JIANG C, LUO L H, et al . The performance evaluation system design of new RD institutions achievement transformation and diffusion [J ] . Journal of Information, 2018, 37(8): 162-171,113.
WANG B J, WU Y F. The performance evaluation of collaborative innovation among regional industryuniversity and research institutions: from the perspective of factor analysis [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(1): 66-71.
汤静. 基于DEA模型的江苏各区域科研机构绩效评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2013.
LI Q, WEI H C, ZHU L J, et al . Application of super-DEA fusion analytic hierarchy process in performance evaluation of universitylaboratory construction [J ] . Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2020, 39(12): 233-237,279.
CHARNES A, COOPER W W, SEIFORD L. Extremal principles and optimization dualities for khinchin-kullback-leibler estimation [J]. Optimization, 1978, 9(1): 21-29.
ANDERSON P, PETERSEN N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1993, 39(10): 1179-1297.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621