不同地形条件下的AW3D30、SRTM3和ASTER GDEM高程精度分析

魏德宏; 崔家武

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.200152

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同地形条件下的AW3D30、SRTM3和ASTER GDEM高程精度分析

更新时间：2026-05-27

- 不同地形条件下的AW3D30、SRTM3和ASTER GDEM高程精度分析
- An Elevation Accuracy Analysis of AW3D30, SRTM3 and ASTER GDEM under Different Terrain Conditions
- 广东工业大学学报 2021年38卷第3期页码：91-96
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院,广东,广州,510006
  2. 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院,广东,广州,510060
- 作者简介：
  
  魏德宏(1966–)，男，讲师，主要研究方向为工程测量，E-mail：weidh2011@163.com
  崔家武(1992–)，男，硕士，主要研究方向为测绘数据并行处理，E-mail：864885814@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(41674006)
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.200152
  中图分类号： P228.1
- 网络首发：2021-05-10，
  
  纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏德宏, 崔家武. 不同地形条件下的AW3D30、SRTM3和ASTER GDEM高程精度分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2021, 38(3): 91-96.

Wei De-hong, Cui Jia-wu. An Elevation Accuracy Analysis of AW3D30, SRTM3 and ASTER GDEM under Different Terrain Conditions[J]. 2021, 38(3): 91-96.
魏德宏, 崔家武. 不同地形条件下的AW3D30、SRTM3和ASTER GDEM高程精度分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2021, 38(3): 91-96. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.200152.

Wei De-hong, Cui Jia-wu. An Elevation Accuracy Analysis of AW3D30, SRTM3 and ASTER GDEM under Different Terrain Conditions[J]. 2021, 38(3): 91-96. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.200152.

摘要

以广东部分山地丘陵为研究区域

分析了数字高程模型AW3D30、SRTM3 V4.1和ASTER GDEM V3的高程精度。利用车载动态PPP技术对沿广州、惠州、韶关、清远约730 km的线路进行了数据采集

并由CSRS-PPP定位服务系统解算得到动态点的WGS84坐标

再通过重力场模型EIGEN-6C4将动态点的大地高转换为正常高

最后对3种数字高程模型进行高程检核。结果表明: AW3D30、SRTM3 V4.1和ASTER GDEM V3的平均误差分别为0.55、0.17、1.59 m

均方根误差分别为3.78、5.84、8.88 m。3种数字高程模型的平均误差在不同海拔区间差异明显

其中AW3D30在不同海拔区间的平均误差振幅相对较小

在2.18 m以内; SRTM3 V4.1的平均误差与海拔为负相关关系

平均误差随着海拔的升高由正值逐渐转为负值; ASTER GDEM V3的平均误差在(0 m

250 m]海拔区间为2 m左右

在(250 m

800 m]区间为–2.28 m。AW3D30的均方根误差与标准差整体上随着海拔的升高而减小

SRTM3 V4.1随着海拔的升高而增大

ASTER GDEM V3无显著规律

在(100 m

250 m]区间优于7.69 m

在其余区间优于9.86 m。

Abstract

The elevation accuracy of AW3D30 SRTM3 v4.1 and ASTER GDEM V3 are analyzed through the area of the mountainous hills in parts of Guangdong. The data of 730 km lines along Guangzhou

Huizhou

Shaoguan and Qingyuan are collected by vehicle dynamic PPP

the WGS84 coordinates of dynamic points calculated by CSRS-PPP positioning service system

geodetic height of dynamic points converted into normal height by gravity field model EIGEN-6C4

and finally

the elevation of three digital elevation models are checked. The results show that the average errors of AW3D30

SRTM3 v4.1 and ASTER GDEM V3 are

respectively

0.55

0.17 and 1.59 m

and the root mean square 3.78

5.84 and 8.88 m. The average error amplitude of AW3D30 in different altitudes is relatively small

within 2.18 m; the average error of SRTM3 v4.1 has a negative correlation with altitude

and the average error gradually changes from positive value to negative value with the increase of altitude; the average error of ASTER GDEM V3 is within (0 m

2.18 m] altitude range and is about 2 m and -2.28 m in (250 m

800 m] range. The root mean square error and standard deviation of AW3D30 decrease with the increase of altitude

while SRTM3 v4.1 increases with the increase of altitude. ASTER GDEM V3 has no significant rule

which is better than 7.69 m in (100 m

250 m]

and better than 9.86 m in other regions.

关键词

Keywords

references

TANG G A. Progress of DEM and digital terrain analysis in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(9): 1305-1325.

ULLAH S, FAROOQ M, SARWAR T, et al . Flood modeling and simulations using hydrodynamic model and ASTER DEM—a case study of Kalpani River [J ] . Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(6): 439(page1-11).

MIN K. Analysis of application of global digital elevation model data to foreign railway survey and design [J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 2019, 45(3): 16-19.

YANG H L. Research method of rapidly updating airborne LiDAR DEM using digital photogrammetry technology [J]. Survey World, 2019(3): 27-31.

WAN J, LIAO J J, XU T, et al . Accuracy evaluation of SRTM data based on ICESat / GLAS altimeter data: a case study in the Tibetan Plateau [J ] . Remote Sensing for Land Resources, 2015, 27(1): 100-105.

ZHAO S, CHENG W, ZHOU C, et al . Accuracy assessment of the ASTER GDEM and SRTM3 DEM: an example in the Loess Plateau and North China Plain of China [J ] . International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2011, 32(23): 8081-8093.

YU Z J, LIU B, JIANG Q G, et al . Comparison and analysis of elevation data based on RTK [J ] . Global Geology, 2019, 38(2): 549-555.

李征航, 黄劲松. GPS测量与数据处理[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2009.

HIRT C. Efficient and accurate high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis of gravity field Functionals at the Earth’s surface using the gradient approach [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2012, 86(9): 729-744.

YUAN X Q, LI G Y, GAO X M, et al . Evaluation of AW3D 30 m DSM data elevation quality and precision validation of typical region [J ] . Geomatics Spatial Information Technology, 2018, 41(4): 98-101.

RODRIGUEZ E, MORRIS C S, BELZ J E. A global assessment of the SRTM performance [J]. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing, 2006, 72(3): 249-260.

LI P, LI Z H, SHI C, et al . Quality evaluation of 1 arc second version SRTM DEM in China [J ] . Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2016(9): 24-28.

CUI J W, ZHANG X F, WANG F, et al . Method research on reference frame and epoch transformation of GNSS precise point positioning Result [J ] . Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2018, 38(2): 172-175.

XU G R, ZHOU J Y, ZHU Z Y. Choice and accuracy analysis of optimal earth gravity field model in Guangdong region [J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2013, 33(5): 25-28.

WU W J, ZHANG S F, ZHAO S M. Analysis and comparison of SRTM1 DEM and ASTER GDEM V2 data [J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017, 19(8): 1108-1115.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于路况参数的混合动力机车能量管理策略研究

基于高效时序建模的RGB-T跟踪

基于PSI技术的福州市地面形变监测与影响因素分析

SCA-YOLO: 基于可变形卷积与上下文感知注意力的实时目标检测

具守恒量波动方程的循环双子网物理信息神经网络