横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究

陈涛; 杨雪强; 刘攀; 郑丽婷; 周若洋

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.190064

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究

更新时间：2026-05-27

- 横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究
- Study on Passive Earth Pressure of Retaining Wall in Transversely Isotropic Soil
- 广东工业大学学报 2020年37卷第6期页码：85-91
- 作者机构：
  
  广东工业大学　土木与交通工程学院,广东,广州,510006
- 作者简介：
  
  陈涛(1990–)，男，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为岩土工程检测及数值计算
  杨雪强(1966–)，男，教授，博士，主要研究方向为岩土本构关系及边坡稳定等，E-mail：xqyfls@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2017M622635)
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.190064
  中图分类号： TU432
- 网络首发：2020-11-02，
  
  纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈涛, 杨雪强, 刘攀, 郑丽婷, 周若洋. 横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 85-91.

Chen Tao, Yang Xue-qiang, Liu Pan, et al. Study on Passive Earth Pressure of Retaining Wall in Transversely Isotropic Soil[J]. 2020, 37(6): 85-91.
陈涛, 杨雪强, 刘攀, 郑丽婷, 周若洋. 横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 85-91. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.190064.

Chen Tao, Yang Xue-qiang, Liu Pan, et al. Study on Passive Earth Pressure of Retaining Wall in Transversely Isotropic Soil[J]. 2020, 37(6): 85-91. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.190064.

摘要

大多天然土体具有横观各向同性的特点

在同一个模型中

采用分块处理的方法来讨论横观各向同性土的被动土压力变化; 基于最小二乘法原理和组构张量理论

研究位移一次和分步多次施加两种方法

计算土体大主应力方向与沉积面法线方向之间的夹角变化

得到模型分块后各分块新的土体强度参数

和

进而分析各向异性下的被动土压力变化。研究表明: 考虑土体横观各向同性后

达到极限平衡时土体经多次位移施加得到的被动土压力比一次位移施加要小

且接近库伦土压力理论解; 土体沉积面倾斜对被动土压力的影响要比沉积面水平时引起的影响更为显著; 4种屈服准则下得到的被动土压力的差异大小与理论分析相符合。

Abstract

Most natural soils have the characteristics of transverse isotropy. Using the method of block processing in the same model to discuss the change of passive earth pressure of transverse isotropic soils

based on the principle of least squares and the theory of fabric tensor

the two methods of one-step and multi-step displacement applications are studied to calculate the angle change between the direction of the major principal stress of the soil and the normal direction of the sedimentary surface. New soil strength parameters

and

in each block are obtained

and then the change of passive earth pressure under soil anisotropy is analyzed. When reaching the passive limit equi

librium state in the transverse isotropy soil

the research shows that the passive earth pressure obtained by applying multi-step displacement method

which is close to the theoretical solution of Coulomb's passive soil pressure

is smaller than that of applying one-step displacement method. The change of earth pressure is more significant when the sedimentary surface being oblique than that of the sedimentary surface being horizontal. The differences in passive earth pressures obtained under the four type yield criteria are consistent with theoretical analyses.

关键词

Keywords

references

顾慰慈. 挡土墙土压力计算手册[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2004.

TSAGAELIZ V. Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface [J]. Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, 1965, 2(4): 197-200.

FANG Y, ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(8): 317-333.

陈页开. 挡土墙上土压力的试验研究和数值分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2001.

LI X M, JIANG M J. Discrete element simulation of active earth pressure of retaining wall under two displacement modes [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2010, 6(1): 60-64.

TATSUOKA F, SAKAMOTO M, KAWAMURA T, et al . Strengthand deformation characterstics of sand in plane strain compression at extremely low pressures [J ] . Soils Foundations, 2008, 26(1): 65-84.

ZENG Q Y, ZHOU J. Particle flow simulation of passive earth pressure under different wall displacement modes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005(S1): 43-47.

CHEN Y K. Experimental study and numerical analysis of earth pressure on retaining wall [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002(8): 1275.

YANG X Q, LI Z S, YAN Q H, et al . Failure criterion of transversely isotropic rock materials [J ] . Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(12): 359-333.

YANG X Q, ZHANG L J, YAN Q H, et al . Failure criterion of transversely isotropic rock materials [J ] . Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(3): 304-310.

ZHAO W. Application of least squares method in direct shear test of Soil [J]. Journal of Armed Police Forces College, 2009(6): 67-68.

LI Y G, ZHOU H Z. Finite element analysis of passive earth pressure in non-limit state of translational retaining wall [J]. Shanxi Water Resources Science Technology, 2017(4): 1-2.

KURUKULASURIYA L C, ODA M, KAZAMA H. Anisotropy of undrained shear strength of an over-consolidated soil by triaxial and plane strain test [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(1): 21-29.

刘亚栋. 考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2018.

XU R Q, CHEN Y K, YANG Z X, et al . Experimental study on passive earth pressure model of rigid retaining wall [J ] . Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002(5): 569-575.

ZHAO G H. Finite element analysis of earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Cryogenics Technology, 2012, 34(6): 129-130.

YANG X Q, LING P P, XIANG S H. Study on stability of soil slope based on Drucker-Prager failure criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(4): 865-870.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性分析

框架——片筏——地基共同作用的三维有限元分析研究

坡顶局部荷载下边坡的二维和三维稳定分析(Ⅰ)——强度折减的有限元法

多尺度对比嵌入增强的自适应入侵检测模型

基于数字混频的脉冲式激光测距方法的研究与实现