利用消费者浏览行为识别品牌竞争关系研究

刘洪伟; 梁周扬; 左妹华; 陆丹; 范梦婷; 何锐超

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.190063

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

利用消费者浏览行为识别品牌竞争关系研究

综合研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-27

- 利用消费者浏览行为识别品牌竞争关系研究
- Research on Identifying Brand Competition Relationships with Consumer Browsing Behavior
- 广东工业大学学报 2019年36卷第5期页码：1-6, 13
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东工业大学管理学院,广东,广州,510520
  2. 惠州学院建筑与土木工程学院,广东,惠州,516007
- 作者简介：
  
  刘洪伟(1962−)，男，教授，博士，博士生导师，主要研究方向为信息系统、商务数据分析
  左妹华(1986−)，女，讲师，博士研究生，主要研究方向为信息系统. E-mail：zuomeihua123@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671048);国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BJL025);惠州学院社科资助项目(hzu201725)
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.190063
  中图分类号： TP391.4
- 网络首发：2019-08-21，
  
  纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘洪伟, 梁周扬, 左妹华, 陆丹, 范梦婷, 何锐超. 利用消费者浏览行为识别品牌竞争关系研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(5): 1-6, 13.

Liu Hong-wei, Liang Zhou-yang, Zuo Mei-hua, et al. Research on Identifying Brand Competition Relationships with Consumer Browsing Behavior[J]. 2019, 36(5): 1-6, 13.
刘洪伟, 梁周扬, 左妹华, 陆丹, 范梦婷, 何锐超. 利用消费者浏览行为识别品牌竞争关系研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(5): 1-6, 13. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.190063.

Liu Hong-wei, Liang Zhou-yang, Zuo Mei-hua, et al. Research on Identifying Brand Competition Relationships with Consumer Browsing Behavior[J]. 2019, 36(5): 1-6, 13. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.190063.

摘要

为了能在包含近百种同类品牌、几千种同品牌产品的电商平台中全面识别品牌间和品牌内产品的竞争性市场结构

根据共现理论

从消费者的在线浏览行为出发

将在线消费者同一浏览行为中共现的品牌和产品视为相互竞争关系

利用社交网络从消费者浏览行为的角度识别品牌间和品牌内产品间的竞争关系. 分析结果显示

相对于品牌间的竞争强度而言

品牌内产品的同质化竞争更激烈. 该结果对品牌内产品的生产线管理具有重要的实践意义

相对于着重关注品牌间竞争关系的企业而言

品牌生产企业更应将时间和精力放在品牌内生产线的长度设计上

以便快速提升品牌的市场竞争力.

Abstract

In order to completely identify the competitive market structure of products inter-brands and intra-brands on e-commerce platforms

which contain nearly 100 similar brands and thousands of products of the same brand. Based on the co-occurrence theory

a study is conducted on the brands and products appearing in the same browsing behavior of online consumers as competing relationships from the online browsing behavior of consumers

and social networks are used to visualize inter-brand and intra-brand competition from the perspective of consumer browsing behavior. The analysis results show that the homogenization competition of products intra-brands is more serious than that of inter-brands. This result has important practical significance for the production line management of products within the brand. Compared with focusing on the competitive relationship between inter-brands

brand manufacturers should put more time and energy into the design of the length of production line of intra-brands

so as to rapidly enhance the brand's market competitiveness.

关键词

Keywords

references

中国互联网络信息中心. 第41次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R]. 北京: 中国互联网络信息中心, 2018: 63-64.

BAILEY J P. Intermediation and electronic markets: aggregation and pricing in internet commerce[D]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.

BRYNJOLFSSON E, SMITH M D. Frictionless commerce? a comparison of internet and conventional retailers [J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(4): 563-585.

CLEMONS E K, HANN I H, HITT L M. Price dispersion and differentiation in online travel: an empirical investigation [J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(4): 534-549.

GHOSE A, YAO Y. Using transaction prices to re-examine price dispersion in electronic markets [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010, 22(2): 269-288.

BRYNJOLFSSON E, SIMESTER D. Goodbye Pareto Principle, hello Long Tail: the effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales [J]. Management Science, 2006, 57(8): 1373-1386.

LI B, LI X, LIU H. Consumer preferences, cannibalization, and competition: evidence from the personal computer industry [J]. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 2018, 42(2): 661-678.

ERDEM T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data [J]. Marketing Science, 1996, 15(4): 359-378.

GREWAL D R. An alternative efficient representation of demand-based competitive asymmetry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(7): 755-766.

DESARBO W S, GREWAL R, WIND J. Who competes with whom? a demand-based perspective for identifying and representing asymmetric competition [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 101-129.

KIM J B, ALBUQUERQUE P, BRONNENBERG B J. Mapping online consumer search [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, 48(1): 13-27.

NETZER O, FELDMAN R, GOLDENBERG J, et al . Mine your own business: market-structure surveillance through text mining [J ] . Marketing Science, 2012, 31(3): 521-543.

KIM J B, ALBUQUERQUE P, BRONNENBERG B J, et al . The probit choice model under sequential search with an application to online retailing [J ] . Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016, 26(1): 61-73.

YAO W M, FAHMY S. Flow-based partitioning of network testbed experiments [J]. Computer Networks, 2014, 58(15): 141-157.

RAPPUOLI R, ADEREM A. A 2020 vision for vaccines against HIV, tuberculosis and malaria [J]. Nature, 2011, 473(7348): 463-471.

RINGEL D M, SKIERA B. Visualizing asymmetric competition among more than 1000 products using big search data [J]. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(3): 511-534.

YANG J M, ZHOU L, ZHOU L Q. Competitive relationships of auto industry and rivalry actions of car community enterprises in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2013, 10(1): 49-55.

XIE F J, CUI W T, WU X P. The model of competitive relationship network of express enterprises and its structural properties [J]. Systems Engineering, 2017, 35(7): 101-106.

MOE W W. An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to internet clickstream data [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2006, 43(4): 680-692.

IWANAGA J, NISHIMURA N, SUKEGAWA N, et al . Estimating product-choice probabilities from recency and frequency of page views [J ] . Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 99(C): 157-167.

URBAN G L, HULLAND J S, WEINBERG B D. Premarket forecasting for new consumer durable goods: model [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57(2): 47-63.

DESARBO W S, MANRAI A K, MANRAI L A. Non-spatial tree models for the assessment of competitive market structure: an integrated review of marketing and psychometric literature [J]. Handbooks in Operations Research Management Science, 1993, 5(5): 193-257.

CHO S, CHONG A. Co-query volume as a proxy for brand relatedness [J]. Industrial Management Data Systems, 2018, 118(4): 930-944.

NEWMAN M E J. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks [J]. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2003, 69(6): 066133.

FORTUNATO S, BARTHELEMY M. Resolution limit in community detection [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(1): 36-41.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于在线用户行为的产品非对称竞争市场结构研究

基于图模一体化技术的配电网可靠性评估

基于大数据运输集团生产运营决策系统的构建及应用

并行最小割算法及其在金融社交网络中的应用

国内移动电子商务领域前沿动态研究