抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用

罗薇

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.180042

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用

综合研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-27

- 抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用
- Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling
- 广东工业大学学报 2018年35卷第4期页码：51-55
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东工业大学　管理学院,广东,广州,510520
  2. 广东工业大学　大数据战略研究院,广东,广州,510006
- 作者简介：
  
  罗薇(1980–)，女，讲师，博士，主要研究方向为统计调查与数据分析
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BTJ037);广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目(GD15XGL09)
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.180042
  中图分类号： C811
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗薇. 抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 51-55.

Luo Wei. Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling[J]. 2018, 35(4): 51-55.
罗薇. 抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 51-55. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.180042.

Luo Wei. Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling[J]. 2018, 35(4): 51-55. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.180042.

摘要

建立了以计量误差作为随机变量的一般性计量误差模型

从方差和计量偏差两类误差效应来对误差进行分解

进一步从方差中分离出计量方差

包括简单计量方差和相关计量方差

以及抽样方差

并得出上述误差的计算公式和估计方法. 针对抽样实践中最常见的调查员误差

结合调查员分配方式

提出使得重复调查中计量结果的相关系数尽可能小是控制相关计量方差的关键

而增加子样本中调查员的数量可以有效减少调查员方差.

Abstract

With measurement error modeled as the random variables

a general measurement error model is presented. It decomposes the errors into variance and measurement bias. The variance can be further decomposed into measurement variance and sampling variance. The measurement variance is composed with simple measurement variance and correlated measurement variance. The calculation formula and estimation method of the above errors are obtained. According to the most common interviewer effects in survey practice

combined with investigator assignments

it is proposed that the low correlation coefficient of measurement results in repeated surveys is the key to control the correlation measurement variance

and that increasing the sub-sample interviewers can effectively reduce investigator variance.

关键词

Keywords

references

SARNDL C E, SWENSSON B, WRETMAN J H. Model assisted survey sampling [M]. New York: Springer, 2003: 601-614.

BUZAS J S, STEFANSKI L A, TOSTESON T D. Measurement error [M]. New York: Springer, 2014: 1241-1282.

LOKEN E, GELMAN A. Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis [J]. Science, 2017, 355(6325): 584-585.

WANG H, JIN Y J. Error effects analysis approach for statistical data accuracy evaluation [J]. Statistics Information Forum, 2009, 24(9): 10-16.

FERRO C A T, FRICKER T E. A bias-corrected decomposition of the brier score [J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2012, 138(668): 1954-1960.

SCHOOT R V D, SCHMIDT P, BEUCKELAER A D, et al . Editorial: measurement invariance [J ] . Front Psychol, 2015, 6: 1064.

ROOVER D, TIMMERMAN K, MARIEKE E, et al . What's hampering measurement invariance [J ] . Front Psychol, 2015, 5: 604.

YU C, ZHANG S, FRIEDENREICH C, et al . Using repeated measures to correct correlated measurement errors through orthogonal decomposition [J ] . Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 2017, 46(23): 11604-11611.

BLATTMAN C, JAMISON J, KOROKNAY-PALICZ T, et al . Measuring the measurement error: a method to qualitatively validate survey data [J ] . Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 120: 99-112.

ABOWD J M, STINSON M H. Estimating measurement error in annual job earnings: a comparison of survey and administrative data [J]. Review of Economics Statistics, 2013, 95(5): 1451-1467.

BIEMER, PAUL P, GROVES R M, et al . Interviewer, respondent, and regional office effects on response variance: a statistical decomposition [J ] . Applied Physics Letters, 2016, 86(7): 074104-074104.

WANG K L. Measurement models and measurement methods for interviewer errors [J]. Statistics Decision, 2009, 298(22): 11-12.

HANSON R H, MARKS E S. Influence of the interviewer on the accuracy of survey results [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958, 53(283): 635-655.

ELLIOTT M R, WEST B T. “Clustering by Interviewer”: a source of variance that is unaccounted for in single-stage health surveys [J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, 182(2): 118-126.

DIJKSTRA W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects [J]. Quality and Quantity, 1983, 17(3): 179-187.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

SCA-YOLO: 基于可变形卷积与上下文感知注意力的实时目标检测

多套餐共享储能模式下考虑功率互济的社区联盟优化运行策略

多尺度对比嵌入增强的自适应入侵检测模型

基于高效时序建模的RGB-T跟踪

基于PSI技术的福州市地面形变监测与影响因素分析