广东工业大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东,广州,510006
陈文彬(1992–),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为InSAR与形变监测
网络首发:2018-03-09,
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
陈文彬, 王华, 吴希文. 1″与3″SRTM DEM在珠江三角洲地区InSAR形变监测中的应用效果比较[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(2): 41-45.
Chen Wen-bin, Wang Hua, Alex Hay-Man Ng. A Comparison of 1″ and 3″ SRTM DEM on InSAR Deformation Monitoring in the Pearl River Delta[J]. 2018, 35(2): 41-45.
陈文彬, 王华, 吴希文. 1″与3″SRTM DEM在珠江三角洲地区InSAR形变监测中的应用效果比较[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(2): 41-45. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.170097.
Chen Wen-bin, Wang Hua, Alex Hay-Man Ng. A Comparison of 1″ and 3″ SRTM DEM on InSAR Deformation Monitoring in the Pearl River Delta[J]. 2018, 35(2): 41-45. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.170097.
2014年9月
美国逐步向全球用户免费开放了1″(约30 m)分辨率的SRTM DEM(Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model)数据. 为了比较其与之前发布的3″(约90 m)分辨率SRTM DEM数据对InSAR(Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar)形变监测结果的差异
本文采用欧空局Envisat卫星的雷达影像
分析这两种不同分辨率的DEM对珠江三角洲地区单个干涉图和多个干涉图获得的平均速率的差异. 研究结果显示: 1″与3″DEM对单个干涉图形变量结果的差异与基线长度有关
以垂直基线长度为50 m的干涉图为例
其差值分布在±4 mm之间
其中89%介于±1 mm; 由于多个干涉图的垂直基线随机分布
DEM对于整个轨道多干涉图获得的平均速率影响分布在±4 mm/a之间
其中90%介于±1 mm/a; 差异明显的区域主要在地形起伏较大的山区. 因此
本文认为1″与3″ SRTM DEM对珠三角地区InSAR形变监测结果的差异并不显著.
The United States gradually released the 1″(about 30 m) SRTM DEM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model)data to global users in September 2014. To compare the difference between 1″ and previously released 3″(about 90 m) SRTM DEM data on InSAR(Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar)
interferograms are produced by using radar images from the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Envisat and the influence of different DEM on the single interferogram and the average velocity of multiple interferograms covering the Pearl River Delta region analyzed. The results show that the difference between 1″and 3″DEM on the single interferogram is proportional to the length of the perpendicular baseline. For an interferometric pair with perpendicular baseline of 50 m
for example
the difference is distributed within ±4 mm
and 89% of which is within ±1 mm. Due to the random distribution of the perpendicular baselines for multiple interferograms in a track
the difference of the average rate obtained from all the interferograms is within ±4 mm/yr
and 90% of which is within ±1 mm /yr. Therefore
it is concluded that 1″ and 3″SRTM DEM have no significant difference on InSAR deformation monitoring in the Pearl River Delta.
VÖRÖSMARTY C J, SYVITSKI J, DAY J, et al . Battling to save the world’s river deltas[J ] . Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2009, 65(2): 31-43.
BAMLER R 1. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry[J]. Inverse Problems, 1998, 14(4): 12-13.
ROSEN P A, HENSLEY S, JOUGHIN I R, et al . Synthetic aperture radar interferometry[J ] . Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000, 88(3): 333-382.
HANSSEN R F. Radar Interferometry[M].Germany: Springer, Dordrecht, 2001: 9-60.
SIMONS M, ROSEN P. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar geodesy[J]. Treatise on Geophysics, 2007, 3(6): 391-446.
SANSOSTI E, CASU F, MANZO M, et al . Space‐borne radar interferometry techniques for the generation of deformation time series: An advanced tool for Earth's surface displacement analysis[J ] . Geophysical Research Letters, 2010, 37(20): 20305.
HOOPER A, BEKAERT D, SPAANS K, et al . Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation[J ] . Tectonophysics, 2012, 514(1): 1-13.
WANG H, WRIGHT T J, YU Y, et al . InSAR reveals coastal subsidence in the Pear l River Delta, China[J ] . Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 191(3): 1119-1128.
JAFARI F, JAVADI S, GOLMOHAMMADI G. Numerical simulation of groundwater flow and aquifer-system compaction using simulation and InSAR technique: Saveh basin, Iran[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(9): 833.
JAFARI F, PIRBAZARI S J, KARIMI N. Forecasting of Subsidence due to groundwater over exploitation using MODFLOW and interferometry technique in Radar imagery[C]//E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress. Netherlands:[s.n.], 2015.
EZQUERRO P, HERRERA G, MARCHAMALO M, et al . A quasi-elastic aquifer deformational behavior: Madrid aquifer case study[J ] . Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 519(3): 1192-1204.
HEIMLICH C, GOURMELEN N, MASSON F, et al . Uplift around the geothermal power plant of Landau (Germany) as observed by InSAR monitoring[J ] . Geothermal Energy, 2015, 3(1): 2.
DI T F, BATTAGLIA M, NOLESINI T, et al . Shifts in the eruptive styles at Stromboli in 2010-2014 revealed by ground-based InSAR data[J ] . Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 13569.
ZHANG J Z, HUANG H J, BI H B. Land subsidence in the modern Yellow River Delta based on InSAR time series analysis[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75(3): 2385-2397.
DEGUCHI T, NARITA T. Monitoring of land deformation due to oil production by InSAR Time series analysis using PALSAR data in bolivarian republic of venezuela[C]// Prooceding Fringe 2015 Workshop. Frascati, Italy:[s.n.], 2015.
NUGMANOV I, OLGA C. Monitoring of land surface displacements within the areas with intensnsive oil production using satellite remote sensing data[C]//Prooceding Fringe 2015 Workshop. Italy, Frascati:[s.n.], 2015.
FARR T G, ROSEN P A, CARO E, et al . The shuttle radar topography mission[J ] . Reviews of Geophysics, 2007, 45(2): 33.
ROSEN P A, HENSLEY S, PELTZER G, et al . Updated repeat orbit interferometry package released[J ] . Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2004, 85(5): 47.
GOLDSTEIN R M, ZEBKER H A, WERNER C L. Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping[J]. Radio Science, 1988, 23(4): 713-720.
KRUSKAL J B. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem[J]. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1956, 7(1): 48-50.
DIJKSTRA E W. A note on two problems in connection with graphs[J]. Numerische Mathematics, 1959, 1(1): 269-271.
WANG H, YU Y P, JIANG L L. Monitoring land subsidence in Guangzhou and Foshan using InSAR[J]. Science of Surveying Mapping, 2014, 39(7): 67-71.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621