EN英国政府驱动的新能源差价合约设计及对中国的启示
The design of government-driven renewable energy contracts for difference in the UK electricity market and their implications for China
- 中国电力 2026年59卷第3期 页码：74-83
- 作者机构：
1. 广西电力交易中心有限责任公司,广西,南宁,530013
2. 华南理工大学 电力学院,广东,广州,510641
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：教育部人文社会科学研究专项基金资助项目（25JD710009）。
DOI：10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202409001
中图分类号：-
网络首发：2026-03-16，
纸质出版：2026-03-16
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
崔长江, 李煜鹏, 邓雯丽, 李世民, 秦丽娟, 荆朝霞. 英国政府驱动的新能源差价合约设计及对中国的启示[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(3): 74-83.
CUI Changjiang, LI Yupeng, DENG Wenli, et al. The design of government-driven renewable energy contracts for difference in the UK electricity market and their implications for China[J]. 2026, 59(3): 74-83.
崔长江, 李煜鹏, 邓雯丽, 李世民, 秦丽娟, 荆朝霞. 英国政府驱动的新能源差价合约设计及对中国的启示[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(3): 74-83. DOI： 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202409001.
CUI Changjiang, LI Yupeng, DENG Wenli, et al. The design of government-driven renewable energy contracts for difference in the UK electricity market and their implications for China[J]. 2026, 59(3): 74-83. DOI： 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202409001.
摘要
随着新型电力系统与电力现货市场建设同步推进，稳妥有序推动新能源参与电力市场，同时设计支持其可持续发展的机制是需要重点研究的问题。英国差价合约的实践经验具有重要的借鉴意义。对英国差价合约的参与方、主要流程及概念进行阐述，对机组分类、行政执行价计算、合约分配、参考价计算等方法进行总结和分析，提出适合中国新能源发展的政府授权差价合约设计建议，包括：根据政策目的分为衔接新能源保障性政策的衔接型合约以及用于解决新能源相关外部性问题的主动型合约两类；合约目标需要关注市场力控制和结算试运行阶段不同市场模式的衔接；设计参考价时需要考虑中国现货市场的模式及中长期交易的管制现状；合约量尽量采用事前确定模式等。
Abstract
With the simultaneous advancement of new power systems and electricity spot markets
a critical challenge lies in ensuring the secure and orderly integration of new energy into the electricity market while establishing mechanisms that underpin its sustainable development. The UK's experience with contracts for difference (CfD) offers valuable insights in this context. This paper elucidates the key participants
primary processes
and fundamental concepts of the UK's CfD mechanism. Methodologies related to unit classification
administrative strike price calculation
contract allocation
and reference price determination are systematically summarized and analyzed. Building on this analysis
a government-driven CfD framework tailored to China's new energy development is proposed. Key recommendations emphasize the categorization of contracts into two types based on policy objectives
including transitional contracts to align with existing new energy support policies and proactive contracts to address new energy externalities. The objectives of contracts should focus on market power mitigation and the coordination of diverse market modes during the settlement trial phase. Reference price design is recommended to account for China's spot market structure and regulatory realities in medium and long-term transaction
while contract volumes are suggested to adopt ex-ante allocation modes.
关键词
Keywords
references
2SCHLECHT I, MAURER C, HIRTH L. Financial contracts for differences: the problems with conventional CfDs in electricity markets and how forward contracts can help solve them[J]. Energy Policy, 2024, 186, 113981.
3WILD P. Determining commercially viable two-way and one-way 'contract-for-difference' strike prices and revenue receipts[J]. Energy Policy, 2017, 110, 191- 201.
4骆子雅, 季天瑶, 荆朝霞, 等. 电力差价合约机制设计与应用[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43 (8): 2743- 2751.
LUO Ziya, JI Tianyao, JING Zhaoxia, et al. Design and application of contract for difference in electricity market[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43 (8): 2743- 2751.
5SIMSHAUSER P. On the impact of government-initiated CfD's in Australia's national electricity market[R]. Cambridge: Energy Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge, 2019.
6KRISTIANSEN T. Pricing of contracts for difference in the Nordic market[J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32 (9): 1075- 1085.
7许玉婷, 周前, 荆朝霞, 等. 欧洲远期跨境输电权机制分析及其对中国的启示[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (1): 38- 48.
XU Yuting, ZHOU Qian, JING Zhaoxia, et al. European forward cross-border transmission right mechanism analysis and its enlightenment to China[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (1): 38- 48.
8KEE E D. Vesting contracts: a tool for electricity market transition[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2001, 14 (6): 11- 22.
9ADACHI C, ROWLANDS I H. The role of policies in supporting the diffusion of solar photovoltaic systems: experiences with Ontario, Canada's renewable energy standard offer program[J]. Sustainability, 2010, 2 (1): 30- 47.
10肖谦, 杨再敏, 杨悦勇, 等. 国外电力差价合约模式及其启示[J]. 广东电力, 2020, 33 (2): 27- 34.
XIAO Qian, YANG Zaimin, YANG Yueyong, et al. Contract for difference models in foreign electricity markets and the enlightenment[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2020, 33 (2): 27- 34.
11何川, 杨立兵, 李晓刚, 等. 北欧电力金融市场差价合约研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2008 (4): 53- 54.
HE Chuan, YANG Libing, LI Xiaogang, et al. Research of CfDs in Nordic financial electricity markett[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2008 (4): 53- 54.
12李莉, 谭忠富, 李宁, 等. 煤电差价合约及其合作效益优化分配的博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18 (4): 133- 139.
LI Li, TAN Zhongfu, LI Ning, et al. The contracts for difference between coal producers and electricity generators and its optimal cooperation benefit distributing model based on game theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010, 18 (4): 133- 139.
13张粒子, 王进, 陈传彬, 等. 电力现货市场环境下政府授权差价合同结算机制研究[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45 (4): 1337- 1346.
ZHANG Lizi, WANG Jin, CHEN Chuanbin, et al. Settlement mechanism of CFDs authorized by government under environment of electricity spot market[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45 (4): 1337- 1346.
14白云霄, 许遵楠, 季天瑶, 等. 北欧电力衍生品市场对中国电力中长期市场建设的启示[J]. 南方电网技术, 2025, 19 (8): 70- 80.
BAI Yunxiao, XU Zunnan, JI Tianyao, et al. Inspiration of the Nordic Electricity Derivatives Market for the construction of China′s medium and long-term electricity market[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2025, 19 (8): 70- 80.
15吴明兴, 王宁, 王浩浩, 等. 双轨制下电力现货市场政府授权合约分解优化模型与方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (9): 15- 26.
WU Mingxing, WANG Ning, WANG Haohao, et al. A decomposition and optimization method for government-authorized contracts in a dual-track spot electricity market based on game equilibrium[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (9): 15- 26.
16徐程炜. 适应现货市场过渡的政府授权合约分解方法与财务表现分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
XU Chengwei. Decomposition model and settlement analysis of government-authorized contracts for the spot market transition period[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021.
17HUANG C, DU Z, JI T, et al. Design of power generation capacity adequacy mechanism based on revenue call options[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8, 1283- 1293.
18ZHU J, CHEN B, JI T, et al. Transitional revenue scheme for high-cost generator unit in Guangdong electricity market based on government authorized contracts[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2024, 10 (1): 208- 221.
19尚楠, 辜炜德, 刘双全, 等. 服务南方区域电力市场建设的典型市场模式评述: 社会福利视角下的机理分析及建模测算[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (1): 14- 27.
SHANG Nan , GU Weide, LIU Shuangquan , et al. Review of typical modes for the construction of southern regional power market: theoretical analysis and modeling calculation from the perspective of social welfare[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (1): 14- 27.
20KOZLOV N. Contracts for difference: risks faced by generators under the new renewables support scheme in the UK[J]. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 2014, 7 (3): 282- 286.
21WELISCH M, POUDINEH R. Auctions for allocation of offshore wind contracts for difference in the UK[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147, 1266- 1274.
22ONIFADE T T. Hybrid renewable energy support policy in the power sector: the contracts for difference and capacity market case study[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 95, 390- 401.
23荆朝霞, 李煜鹏, 赵昱宣, 等. 能源系统低碳转型背景下的混合电力市场体系结构与设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48 (11): 24- 36.
JING Zhaoxia, LI Yupeng, ZHAO Yuxuan, et al. Architecture and design of hybrid electricity market system under background of low-carbon transformation of energy system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48 (11): 24- 36.
24马新顺, 文福拴, 倪以信, 等. 有差价合约日前市场中计及风险约束的最优报价策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2004 (4): 4- 9, 27.
MA Xinshun, WEN Fushuan, NI Yixin, et al. Risk-constrained optimal bidding strategies for generation companies in day-ahead electricity markets with contract for difference[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004 (4): 4- 9, 27.
25赵学顺, 戴铁潮, 黄民翔. 电力市场中风险规避问题的研究(二)——差价合约分析系统的实现[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2001 (8): 16- 19.
ZHAO Xueshun, DAI Tiechao, HUANG Minxiang, et al. Study on risk evasion in electricity market part two implementation of an analytical system of the contract for differences[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2001 (8): 16- 19.
28WALKER S L. Can the GB feed-in tariff deliver the expected 2% of electricity from renewable sources?[J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 43, 383- 388.
29GAO M Z, FAN C T, KAI J J, et al. Sustainable photovoltaic technology development: step-by-step guidance for countries facing PV proliferation turmoil under the feed-in tariff scheme[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 43, 156- 163.
35VEENSTRA A T, MULDER M. Impact of contracts for differences for non-carbon electricity generation on efficiency of electricity market[J]. Energy Economics, 2024, 136, 107674.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
AI问答- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies