郭欢, 徐玉杰, 张新敬, 郭丛, 陈海生. 蓄热式压缩空气储能系统变工况特性[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.180596
引用本文: 郭欢, 徐玉杰, 张新敬, 郭丛, 陈海生. 蓄热式压缩空气储能系统变工况特性[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.180596
GUO Huan, XU Yu-jie, ZHANG Xin-jing, GUO Cong, CHEN Hai-sheng. Off-design Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage System With Thermal Storage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.180596
Citation: GUO Huan, XU Yu-jie, ZHANG Xin-jing, GUO Cong, CHEN Hai-sheng. Off-design Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage System With Thermal Storage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.180596

蓄热式压缩空气储能系统变工况特性

Off-design Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage System With Thermal Storage

  • 摘要: 接入可再生能源和电网负荷波动、环境条件改变及系统自身特性等因素使压缩空气储能(compressedairenergy storage,CAES)系统长期处于变工况运行状态。对目前先进的蓄热式压缩空气储能(CAESwiththermalstorage,TS-CAES)系统进行变工况特性研究,建立完善的部件及系统整体变工况模型,并为充分分析其变工况过程,将系统分为压缩段、膨胀段和系统整体3个层面,且采用多种(火用)效率评价压缩段和膨胀段。揭示了质量流量、功率、(火用)效率、热水温度、排水温度、各级压比/膨胀比、换热器温差/压损等关键参数在储能/释能过程中的变化规律。发现滑压较定压运行系统效率提高了2.08个百分点。

     

    Abstract: Compressed air energy storage(CAES) systems always work under off-design conditions due to the factors such as: 1) fluctuation of renewable energy and grid load, 2)variations of ambient temperature and pressure, 3)self-characteristics change of the system components. In this paper, an advanced compressed air energy storage system with thermal storage is studied for its off-design performance.Comprehensive off-design models are established for both components and the entire system. In order to explore the off-design process in depth, the system analysis is divided in to three parts: compression, expansion and the entire system analysis. Moreover, several kinds of exergy efficiency are presented, which could be used to evaluate the compression and expansion sections more properly. The variations of key parameters with time in charge and discharge processes are revealed, including mass flow rate, power, exergy efficiency,hot water temperature, temperatures at exit, pressure/expansion ratio of each stage, and temperature difference/pressure loss of the heat exchangers. It is also found that the system efficiency of sliding-pressure operation mode is 2.08 percents higher than that of constant pressure operation modes.

     

/

返回文章
返回