李镓睿, 陈衡, 赵淑媛, 潘佩媛, 吴礼宁. 基于等离子体气化的医疗垃圾制备氢气/甲醇系统性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(9): 28-40. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0775
引用本文: 李镓睿, 陈衡, 赵淑媛, 潘佩媛, 吴礼宁. 基于等离子体气化的医疗垃圾制备氢气/甲醇系统性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(9): 28-40. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0775
Li Jiarui, Chen Heng, Zhao Shuyuan, Pan Peiyuan, Wu Lining. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF HYDROGEN/METHANOL PRODUCTION SYSTEM BASED ON PLASMA GASIFICATION OF MEDICAL WASTE[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 28-40. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0775
Citation: Li Jiarui, Chen Heng, Zhao Shuyuan, Pan Peiyuan, Wu Lining. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF HYDROGEN/METHANOL PRODUCTION SYSTEM BASED ON PLASMA GASIFICATION OF MEDICAL WASTE[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 28-40. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0775

基于等离子体气化的医疗垃圾制备氢气/甲醇系统性能分析

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF HYDROGEN/METHANOL PRODUCTION SYSTEM BASED ON PLASMA GASIFICATION OF MEDICAL WASTE

  • 摘要: 为实现医疗垃圾无害化、减量化和资源化处理,提高医疗垃圾的能质利用效率,提出基于等离子体气化的医疗垃圾制备氢气/甲醇系统,其中产氢系统(方案A)将医疗垃圾转化为氢气;产氢气和甲醇双燃料系统(方案B)将医疗垃圾转化为氢气和甲醇。所有方案均采用30 t/d等离子体气化炉,并从热力学和经济学角度评估和比较综合效益。结果表明,方案A和方案B的流程效率分别达到70.07%和67.96%,但由于废气的循环利用,方案B的系统效率比方案A高出2.19个百分点。相较于方案B,方案A的动态投资回报期更短(为4.40 a),净现值相对更高(为25556.62万元)。

     

    Abstract: To achieve the harmless, reduced, and resourceful treatment of medical waste while enhancing energy and material utilization efficiency, a hydrogen/methanol production system based on plasma medical waste gasification technology is proposed to produce hydrogen/methanol. Among them, the hydrogen production system(scheme A) converts medical waste into hydrogen;The dual fuel system of hydrogen and methanol production(scheme B) converts medical waste into hydrogen and methanol. All schemes use a 30 t/d plasma gasifier and are evaluated and compared from a thermodynamic and economic point of view. The results show that the process efficiencies of scheme A and scheme B reach 70.07% and 67.96%, respectively. Due to the recycling of waste gas, the system breakdown efficiency of scheme B is 2.19 percentage points higher than that of scheme A. Compared with scheme B, scheme A has a shorter dynamic payback period of 4.40 years and a relatively higher net present value of 255.57 million yuan.

     

/

返回文章
返回