温作鹏, 程方圆, 陈轩. 海上升压站上部节点加强方案优化与计算方法[J]. 南方能源建设, 2023, 10(4): 174-183. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.04.018
引用本文: 温作鹏, 程方圆, 陈轩. 海上升压站上部节点加强方案优化与计算方法[J]. 南方能源建设, 2023, 10(4): 174-183. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.04.018
WEN Zuopeng, CHENG Fangyuan, CHEN Xuan. Refinement and Calculation Method for Stiffener Scheme for Topside Joints of Offshore Step-Up Station[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2023, 10(4): 174-183. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.04.018
Citation: WEN Zuopeng, CHENG Fangyuan, CHEN Xuan. Refinement and Calculation Method for Stiffener Scheme for Topside Joints of Offshore Step-Up Station[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2023, 10(4): 174-183. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.04.018

海上升压站上部节点加强方案优化与计算方法

Refinement and Calculation Method for Stiffener Scheme for Topside Joints of Offshore Step-Up Station

  • 摘要:
      目的  海上升压站上部组块的圆管-工字钢节点数量众多,构造形式复杂,一般结构设计软件无法对其进行校核,亟需可行的校核设计方法与加强构造方案的优化研究。
      方法  选取海上升压站上部组块的典型圆管-工字钢节点建立简化模型,并为该简化模型设计5种加劲肋构造方案。采用有限元软件仿真方法,对模型分别施加轴压位移、面内转角、面外转角这3种典型的位移加载工况,对5种加劲肋方案的塑性发展情况和破坏形式进行分析。选取某纵向加劲肋方案,依据规范规定假定加劲肋的有效受力截面,对复杂荷载作用下加劲肋应力校核提出简化计算方法,并采用有限元方法进行验证。
      结果  结果表明,无加强的圆管-工字钢节点无法满足“强节点弱构件”的设计要求,采取加劲肋等加强措施是必要的。纵向加劲肋方案具有更高的承载力与更好的经济性,纵向加劲肋对于梁腹板受剪承载力至关重要,而横向加劲肋无法提高受剪承载力。有限元分析给出的应力分布情况与简化计算方法的假定是一致的,简化计算方法给出的应力水平高于有限元分析的结果,表明该方法是可行且偏于安全的。
      结论  纵向加劲肋方案是较优的节点加强方案。应用所提出的简化计算方法,可对纵向加劲肋方案进行高效的校核。

     

    Abstract:
      Introduction  The topside module of an offshore step-up station usually has numerous tube-I section joints with complicated structure, which cannot be checked by general structural design software. Hence, a feasible checking design method and refinement of stiffener schemes are in need.
      Method  A simplified model based on typical tube-I section joints of the topside module of an offshore step-up station was established, and five stiffener schemes were designed for it. Based on the finite element software simulation method, three typical displacement loading conditions, i.e., axial compression displacement, in-plane rotation, and out-of-plane rotation, were applied to analyze the plastic zone development and failure modes of the five stiffener schemes. For the longitudinal stiffener scheme selected, the effective stress section of the stiffener was assumed based on existing codes, and a simplified calculation method for stiffener stress check under complicated loads was proposed. The results were examined using the finite element method.
      Result  The results show that the unstiffened tube-I section joint cannot satisfy the design principle of "strong joint and weak member", and it is necessary to take stiffening measures such as stiffeners. The longitudinal stiffener scheme performs better in terms of bearing capacity and economical efficiency. Longitudinal stiffeners are essential for the shearing capacity of beam webs, while the transverse stiffeners cannot enhance shearing capacity. Finite element analysis indicates that the stress distribution is consistent with the assumption of the simplified calculation method, and the simplified calculation method predicts higher stress levels than the finite element results, which means the proposed simplified calculation method is feasible and safer.
      Conclusion  The longitudinal stiffener scheme is a better stiffening scheme for the joint. The proposed simplified calculation method can be adopted to check the longitudinal stiffener scheme efficiently.

     

/

返回文章
返回