金硕, 郭世瑞, 杨宇晨, 吴子威, 张晓星, 张瑞. 直流电压下盆式绝缘子表面电荷对沿面闪络的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2025, 51(3): 1180-1190. DOI: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240056
引用本文: 金硕, 郭世瑞, 杨宇晨, 吴子威, 张晓星, 张瑞. 直流电压下盆式绝缘子表面电荷对沿面闪络的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2025, 51(3): 1180-1190. DOI: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240056
JIN Shuo, GUO Shirui, YANG Yuchen, WU Ziwei, ZHANG Xiaoxing, ZHANG Rui. Effect of Surface Charge on Surface Flashover of Basin-type Insulator Under DC Voltage[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2025, 51(3): 1180-1190. DOI: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240056
Citation: JIN Shuo, GUO Shirui, YANG Yuchen, WU Ziwei, ZHANG Xiaoxing, ZHANG Rui. Effect of Surface Charge on Surface Flashover of Basin-type Insulator Under DC Voltage[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2025, 51(3): 1180-1190. DOI: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240056

直流电压下盆式绝缘子表面电荷对沿面闪络的影响

Effect of Surface Charge on Surface Flashover of Basin-type Insulator Under DC Voltage

  • 摘要: 直流电压下GIS盆式绝缘子表面的电荷积聚会引起电场畸变,降低绝缘裕度,在电压极性反转过程中电场畸变情况更加严重,发生沿面闪络等故障的风险将进一步提升。围绕上述问题,该文以缩比盆式绝缘子为主要研究对象,采用有限元仿真研究了正、负电压下以及极性反转电压下的盆式绝缘子表面电荷分布特性,并结合闪络试验揭示了电荷分布对闪络电压的影响。研究结果表明,电荷密度随着加压时间的增大而增加,导致闪络电压降低,正极性电压下闪络电压最大可下降9.3%,负极性电压下闪络电压最大可下降10.7%;在负极性转正极性过程中,闪络电压最大可下降12.3%,而在正极性转负极性过程中,闪络电压最大可下降29.4%;且闪络电压与电荷密度表现为负相关。

     

    Abstract: The accumulation of charges on the surface of GIS basin-type insulators under DC voltage can cause electric field distortion, reduce insulation margin, and make the electric field distortion more severe during voltage polarity reversal. The risk of surface flashover and other faults will further increase. Based on the above issues, this paper focuses on the study of downsized basin-type insulators, and uses finite element simulation to study the surface charge distribution characteristics of basin-type insulators under positive voltages, negative voltages, and polarity reversal voltages. Combined with flashover tests, the impact of charge distribution on flashover voltage is revealed. The research results show that the charge density increases with the increase of stating voltage time, leading to a decrease in flashover voltage. Under positive polarity voltages, the maximum flashover voltage can decrease by 9.3%, and under negative polarity voltages, the maximum flashover voltage can decrease by 10.7%. During the transition from negative polarity to positive polarity, the maximum flashover voltage can decrease by 12.3%, while during the transition from positive polarity to negative polarity, the maximum flashover voltage can decrease by 29.4%. Meanwhile, the flashover voltage is negatively correlated with the charge density.

     

/

返回文章
返回