
Published Online:07 July 2025,
Published:2025
移动端阅览
刘冰, 刘孝海, 朱丽, et al. 多层次灰色体系下光伏建筑改造项目评价研究[J]. 2025, 46(6): 478-485.
刘冰, 刘孝海, 朱丽, et al. 多层次灰色体系下光伏建筑改造项目评价研究[J]. 2025, 46(6): 478-485. DOI: doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0239.
针对光伏建筑改造项目缺乏统一标准评价体系的问题
在以往光伏建筑经济效益和综合效益评价相关研究的基础上
构建多层次灰色体系构造光伏建筑改造项目评价矩阵
并将熵权法、灰色关联法和优劣解距离法(TOPSIS法)三者结合
建立直观可行的研究模型
对位于天津市的某机关办公建筑系列改造方案进行比较和评估。研究结果表明
基于多层次灰色体系下建立的光伏建筑评价模型方便有效
实现了改造方案的量化分析
可用于该项目光伏方案的后续改进及其他光伏建筑改造项目的评价。在光照条件良好的典型办公建筑屋顶和立面安装光伏
可实现“净零能耗建筑”的目标
达到超过60%的全年自给率。
PV building renovation projects currently lack a unified standard evaluation system. Therefore
on the basis of previous studies related to the evaluation of economic and comprehensive benefits of photovoltaic buildings
the evaluation matrix of photovoltaic building renovation projects is established by constructing a multilevel grey system. The system combines the entropy weight method
grey correlation method and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS method) to establish an intuitive and feasible research model to compare and evaluate the series of renovation plans of an office building of a certain government agency located in Tianjin. The research results show that the PV building evaluation model established under the multilevel grey system is convenient and effective
and achieves quantitative analysis of the retrofit scheme. The model is used for the subsequent improvement of the PV scheme of this project and the evaluation of other PV building retrofit projects. Installing PV on the roof and façade of a typical office building with good lighting conditions can achieve the goal of a “net-zero-energy building”
with an annual self-sufficiency rate of more than 60 percent.
清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告-2023(城市能源系统专题)[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2023.
鲁小松, 吕燕捷, 彭杨柳, 等. 既有建筑轻量化零能耗改造技术路径研究: 以海南省某建筑为例[J]. 建筑节能(中英文), 2023, 51(10): 125-131.
中国建筑科学研究院有限公司.开启建筑产能新时代: 中国建研院光电示范建筑正式落成[J]. 建筑节能(中英文), 2021, 49(12): 20.
ZIEMBA P, SZAJA M.Fuzzy decision-making model for solar photovoltaic panel evaluation[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(13): 5161.
CHU B J, LIN L, YE Y J, et al.Research on comprehensive benefit evaluation of photovoltaic power generation based on matter element extension model[C]//International Conference on Optoelectronic Materials and Devices (ICOMD 2021). Guangzhou, China, 2022: 7.
LIU D, LI G G, ZENG W, et al.Research on comprehensive benefit post evaluation of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects based on FCM and SVM[J]. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 2019, 281(1): 012034.
王天东, 何子睿, 单晓芳, 等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的光电光热制冷系统评价与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(9): 229-235.
徐伟, 刘振领, 王华智, 等. 基于LCOE模型的农村光伏系统社会经济效益评价: 以北京郊区屋顶分布式光伏项目为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(9): 208-217.
梁涛, 杨改文, 董玉兰, 等. 基于灰色关联度的变权组合模型的齿轮箱温度故障预测[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(12): 199-207.
杨雨莹, 任晓芬, 张景, 等. 基于改进AHP-TOPSIS的村镇太阳能+生物质能联合供暖综合评价[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(2): 342-350.
张军, 梁川. 基于灰色关联系数矩阵的TOPSIS模型在水环境质量评价中的应用[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2009, 41(4): 97-101.
SAATY R W.The analytic hierarchy process: what it is and how it is used[J]. Mathematical modelling, 1987, 9(3-5): 161-176.
张虎, 田茂峰. 信度分析在调查问卷设计中的应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2007, 23(21):25-27.
刘竞妍, 张可, 王桂华. 综合评价中数据标准化方法比较研究[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2018, 36(6): 84-85.
HWANG C L, YOON K S.Multiple attribute decision making[M]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981.
GB 55015—2021, 建筑节能与可再生能源利用通用规范[S].
JIANG Y H, FANG M S, LIU Z Q, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of power quality based on an improved TOPSIS method considering the correlation between indices[J]. Applied sciences, 2019, 9(17): 3603.
杨宝臣, 陈跃. 基于变权和TOPSIS方法的灰色关联决策模型[J]. 系统工程, 2011, 29(6): 106-112.
0
Views
2
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621