LI Bin, CHU Shibo, ZHA Hao, et al. Research on the aerodynamic performance of compressor blades considering fluid-structure interaction effects[J]. 2025, 43(8): 119-129.
LI Bin, CHU Shibo, ZHA Hao, et al. Research on the aerodynamic performance of compressor blades considering fluid-structure interaction effects[J]. 2025, 43(8): 119-129.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0115.
Research on the aerodynamic performance of compressor blades considering fluid-structure interaction effects
To precisely quantify the aeroelastic coupling effects in transonic blades and reveal their flow mechanisms
this study employs the self-developed fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation software AENS to analyze the FSI characteristics of the NASA Rotor 67 transonic fan blade. By analyzing the static aerodynamic elastic deformation of transonic rotor blades
key deformation parameters of the blades were resolved to further investigate the influence of blade deformation on static aerodynamic performance. Results indicate that blade deformation under combined centrifugal and aerodynamic loads manifests primarily as bending-sweep deformation
accompanied by changes in the installation angle and radial deformation. The bending-sweep deformation increases the radial component of the aerodynamic load
causing the separation zone to expand from the leading edge to the trailing edge near the blade tip. The change in incidence angle shifts the channel shock upstream at high spanwise locations. Radial deformation alters the tip clearance
increasing the tip leakage vortex angle and exacerbating losses induced by primary and secondary leakage flows. Collectively
these effects reduce the total pressure ratio and adiabatic efficiency by 1.18% and 1.78% respectively at near-stall conditions compared to the rigid blade. Validation confirms that AENS demonstrates good predictive capability in compressor FSI analyses
highlighting its significant engineering value.
关键词
Keywords
references
WANG S B, LI S B, SONG X Z. Static aeroelastic analysis of a transonic compressor blade based on fluid-structure interaction method[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2016, 38(1): 38−42 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-15-170
XU W H, LAI J, MA Y X. Preface of theme articles on fluid-structure interaction mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(3): 521−523 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-24-090
XING R T, CUI R J. Overview of fluid-structure interaction mechanics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 1997, 27(1): 19−38 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.1997.01.002
YIN L, JIANG J C, ZHANG L X. Monolithic approach to thermal fluid-structure interaction with nonconforming interfaces[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2012, 33(2): 211−222. doi: 10.1007/s10483-012-1544-x
LANGER U, YANG H D. Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction problems with hyperelastic models: A monolithic approach[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2018, 145: 186−208. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2016.07.008
WICK T, WOLLNER W. Optimization with nonstationary, nonlinear monolithic fluid-structure interaction[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2021, 122(19): 5430−5449. doi: 10.1002/nme.6372
DEGROOTE J, BATHE K J, VIERENDEELS J. Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction[J]. Computers Structures, 2009, 87(11-12): 793−801. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013
HEIL M, HAZEL A L, BOYLE J. Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: Segregated versus monolithic approaches[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2008, 43(1): 91−101. doi: 10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6
HE T. Numerical solution techniques for fluid-structure interaction simulations: A brief review and discussion[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(4): 184−190 (in Chinese).
QIAN R J, DONG S L, YUAN X F. Advances in research on fluid-structure interaction theory[J]. Spatial Structures, 2008, 14(1): 3−15 (in Chinese).
WILSON M J, IMREGUN M, SAYMA A I. The effect of stagger variability in gas turbine fan assemblies[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(2): 404−411. doi: 10.1115/1.2437776
KALLESØE B, HANSEN M. Some effect of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability[C]// 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. AIAA, 2009: AIAA 2009-839. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-839
DOSSENA V, D’IPPOLITO G, PESATORI E. Stagger angle and pitch-chord ratio effects on secondary flows downstream of a turbine cascade at several off-design conditions[C]// Proceeding of Volume 5: Turbo Expo 2004, Parts A and B, Vienna, Austria. ASMEDC, 2004: 1429−1437. doi: 10.1115/gt2004-54083
WANG H L, XI G. Influence of centrifugal blade deformation on impeller aerodynamic performance[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2009, 43(5): 46−50 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-987X.2009.05.010
DU Z X, HAN S H, LIU Y Q, et al. Fluid-solid interaction strength and vibration of compressor blade[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement Diagnosis, 2013, 33(5): 789−793, 910 (in Chinese).
ZHENG Y, TIAN X, YANG H. Impact of blade deflection on aerodynamic performance of a transonic fan[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(7): 1621−1627 (in Chinese).
WANG S B, LI S B, SONG X Z. Effects of rotor-stator interaction on static aeroelasticity of a transonic compressor blade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(2): 341−347 (in Chinese).
WANG X C. Finite element method[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003 (in Chinese) .
BLAZEK J. Computational fluid dynamics-principles and applications [M]. Third Edition, Elsevier Science, 2015.
ZHOU X, LI S X, SUN S L, et al. Advances in the research on unstructured mesh deformation[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(5): 547−561 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2011-5-lxjzJ2011-050
ZHAO Y, TAI J, AHMED F. Simulation of micro flows with moving boundaries using high-order upwind FV method on unstructured grids[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2002, 28(1): 66−75. doi: 10.1007/s00466-001-0271-1
GAO Y S, WU Y Z, XIA J. A discrete adjoint-based approach for airfoil optimization on unstructured meshes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(2): 244−249,265 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2011.0306
BENTLEY J L. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1975, 18(9): 509−517. doi: 10.1145/361002.361007
WANG S B, LI S B, SONG X Z. Investigations on static aeroelastic problems of transonic fans based on fluid–structure interaction method[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2016, 230(7): 685−695. doi: 10.1177/0957650916668456
Fluid-structure interaction characteristics of butterfly flexible flapping wings in the forward flight
Advances in machine learning for wind-induced fluid-structure interaction of large-scale structures
Fluid-structure interaction simulation of parachute inflation based on an immersed boundary method and large eddy simulation
Vortex-induced vibration characteristics of harbor seal whisker under different wakes
Review of multiphase flow and fluid-structure interaction of high-speed water entry
Related Author
Zhang Yang
Zhang Tiejun
Guo Chengpeng
Zhu Hanxi
XU Nan
ZHANG Zeyu
ZHOU Xuxi
WHANG Haowei
Related Institution
AVIC Aerodynamics Research Institute, Shenyang
College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters of The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of The Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin