
1. 澳门大学 科技学院,澳门,999078
2. 南方科技大学 工学院,深圳,518000
Published:2026
移动端阅览
陈莹, 刘志强, 蔡忠亚, 等. 基于曲率涡度诊断的涡旋演化与水体交换机制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 70−77.
Chen Ying, Liu Zhiqiang, Cai Zhongya, et al. Eddy evolution and water exchange mechanisms based on curvature vorticity diagnostics[J]. 2026, 44(8): 70-77.
陈莹, 刘志强, 蔡忠亚, 等. 基于曲率涡度诊断的涡旋演化与水体交换机制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 70−77. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0093
Chen Ying, Liu Zhiqiang, Cai Zhongya, et al. Eddy evolution and water exchange mechanisms based on curvature vorticity diagnostics[J]. 2026, 44(8): 70-77. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0093.
中尺度涡旋在海洋动力与物质输运过程中扮演核心角色,其旋转结构对水体的交换和输运具有重要调控作用。本文基于高分辨率数值模拟,结合曲率涡度动力诊断,分析了气旋式与反气旋式涡旋的动力演化过程及其对水体交换的影响。结果显示,涡旋在表层形成稳定的闭合流场,可有效“捕获”水体,显著延长其暴露时间,并表现出强烈的垂向依赖性,暴露时间和空间分布由表层的类圆形向中、底层的集中不对称结构演化。在涡旋边界,涡旋中心Ekman抽吸与混合增强共同维持了涡旋的水体封闭性与边界交换活性。曲率涡度动力诊断显示,旋转结构影响了暴露时间的分布,但气旋式和反气旋式涡旋的动力演化过程存在明显差异。反气旋式涡旋的形成初期由倾斜项主导,稳定阶段转为由拉伸项维持;而气旋式涡旋更早进入不稳定阶段,其发展主要受输送项与涡管拉伸控制。
Mesoscale eddies play a central role in ocean dynamics and material transport
with their rotational structures exerting significant regulatory effects on water exchange and transport processes. Based on high-resolution numerical simulations combined with curvature vorticity diagnostics
this study analyzes the dynamic evolution of cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies and their influence on water exchange. The results show that eddies form stable
closed circulation structures at the surface
effectively “trapping” water masses and significantly prolonging their exposure time. Meanwhile
the distribution of exposure time exhibits strong vertical dependence
with the spatial distribution evolving from a near-circular pattern at the surface to a more concentrated and asymmetric structure in the middle and bottom layers. At the eddy periphery
central Ekman suction and enhanced mixing jointly maintain both the enclosed nature of the eddy and the exchange activity along its boundary. Curvature vorticity diagnostics reveal that while the rotational structure strongly influences the distribution of exposure time
the dynamic evolution of cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies differs markedly. The early stage of anticyclonic eddy formation is dominated by the banking term
transitioning to dominance by the stretching term during the stable phase. In contrast
cyclonic eddies enter the unstable stage earlier
with their development mainly controlled by transport term and vortex stretching.
Yuan Y, Jalón-Rojas I, Wang X H. Response of water-exchange capacity to human interventions in Jiaozhou Bay, China[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2021, 249: 107088. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107088
Shang J C, Sun J, Tao L, et al. Combined effect of tides and wind on water exchange in a semi-enclosed shallow sea[J]. Water, 2019, 11(9): 1762. doi: 10.3390/w11091762
Pitcher G C, Figueiras F G, Hickey B M, et al. The physical oceanography of upwelling systems and the development of harmful algal blooms[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2010, 85(1-2): 5−32. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.02.002
Ranjbar M H, Jandaghi A M, Nazarali M. A modeling study of the impact of increasing water exchange rate on water quality of a semi-enclosed bay[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 136: 177−184. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.05.024
Regnier P, Resplandy L, Najjar R G, et al. The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle[J]. Nature, 2022, 603(7901): 401−410. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04339-9
Bauer J E, Cai W J, Raymond P A, et al. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean[J]. Nature, 2013, 504(7478): 61−70. doi: 10.1038/nature12857
Bell G D, Keyser D. Shear and curvature vorticity and potential-vorticity interchanges: interpretation and application to a cutoff cyclone event[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1993, 121(1): 76−102. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1993)1210076:sacvap2.0.co;2
Smith W P, Nicholls M E. On the creation and evolution of small-scale low-level vorticity anomalies during tropical cyclogenesis[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2019, 76(8): 2335−2355. doi: 10.1175/jas-d-18-0104.1
Martin J E. Quasi-geostrophic diagnosis of the influence of vorticity advection on the development of upper level jet-front systems[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2014, 140(685): 2658−2671. doi: 10.1002/qj.2333
Tory K J, Dare R A, Davidson N E, et al. The importance of low-deformation vorticity in tropical cyclone formation[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(4): 2115−2132. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-2115-2013
Viúdez Á, Haney R L. On the shear and curvature vorticity equations[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1996, 53(22): 3384−3394. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)0533384:otsacv2.0.co;2
Viúdez Á, Haney R L. On the relative vorticity of the Atlantic jet in the alboran sea[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1997, 27(1): 175−185. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1997)0270175:otrvot2.0.co;2
Chew F. The interaction between curvature and lateral shear vorticities in a mean and an instantaneous Florida Current, a comparison[J]. Tellus, 1975, 27(6): 606−618. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v27i6.10187
Chew F. The turning process in meandering currents: a case study[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1974, 4(1): 27−57. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1974)0040027:ttpimc2.0.co;2
Ochoa J, Niiler P P. Vertical vorticity balance in meanders downstream the agulhas retroflection[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2007, 37(6): 1740−1744. doi: 10.1175/jpo3064.1
Song Y H, Haidvogel D. A semi-implicit ocean circulation model using a generalized topography-following coordinate system[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 115(1): 228−244. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1189
Ji J L, Dong C M, Liu X H, et al. Influence of oceanic mesoscale eddy on the atmospheric boundary layer based on an idealized model[J]. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2022, 202: 105146. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2022.105146
Wang Y F, Dong J H, Ji C Z, et al. Dependence of submesoscale simulation on turbulence closure schemes in the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS)[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2022, 180: 102120. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.102120
Mellor G L, Yamada T. Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1982, 20(4): 851−875. doi: 10.1029/rg020i004p00851
Takeoka H. Fundamental concepts of exchange and transport time scales in a coastal sea[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 1984, 3(3): 311−326. doi: 10.1016/0278-4343(84)90014-1
Elhez É J M, Deleersnijder É. The boundary layer of the residence time field[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2006, 56(2): 139−150. doi: 10.1007/s10236-006-0067-0
Delhez é J M, Heemink A W, Deleersnijder É. Residence time in a semi-enclosed domain from the solution of an adjoint problem[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2004, 61(4): 691−702. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.07.013
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621