ZHAO Lin, LIU Peng, CUI Wei. Intelligent prediction model for reduced-order dynamic modes of velocity field around a 1∶5 rectangular section[J]. 2025, 43(5): 124-133.
ZHAO Lin, LIU Peng, CUI Wei. Intelligent prediction model for reduced-order dynamic modes of velocity field around a 1∶5 rectangular section[J]. 2025, 43(5): 124-133.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0031.
Intelligent prediction model for reduced-order dynamic modes of velocity field around a 1∶5 rectangular section
Although the research on flow around bluff body sections can obtain the characteristics of the velocity field through particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods
it is limited by the Reynolds number effect
onsite test conditions
and the accuracy of numerical simulation. However
the full-scale bridge surface pressure measurement technology is mo
re engineering practical. Building upon the inherent coupling between the surface pressure field and velocity field of bridge sections
this paper proposes a reduced-order correlation and prediction model for the velocity field of a 1:5 rectangular section using surface pressure distribution. The developed model integrates dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) and a BP neural network to: (1) extract pressure and velocity field modes across Reynolds numbers (
1000
–
20000
); (2) establish their mapping relationship through an implicit neural network; and (3) achieve velocity field prediction from pressure data. Validation results at
Re
=
6000
show prediction errors of merely 0.06 m/s (lateral) and 0.02 m/s (vertical) at the reference point [1.5
0
]
demonstrating the model's effectiveness. This research provides valuable insights for wake flow field reconstruction and aerodynamic measure evaluation in bridge sections.
关键词
Keywords
references
KUTA J N, BRUNTON S L, BRUNTON B W, et al. Dynamic mode decomposition: Data-driven modeling of complex systems [M]. PhiladelphiaPAUnited States: SIAM-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2016.
ZHANG W F, ZHANG Z T, ZHANG X X. Numerical investigation on the wind-field-dependence property of bridge section aerodynamic admittances[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(4): 677−686,694(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2016.0067
LIU Z J, YANG Y X. Flow field mechanism and air energy characteristic of H-shape section in flutter[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(4): 110−116,141(in Chinese).
FRANDSEN J B. Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(1): 95−129. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00059-3
LI H, LAIMA S J, OU J P, et al. Investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a suspension bridge with two separated steel box girders based on field measurements[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(6): 1894−1907. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.017
JIN X W, CHENG P, CHEN W L, et al. Prediction model of velocity field around circular cylinder over various Reynolds numbers by fusion convolutional neural networks based on pressure on the cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(4): 047105. doi: 10.1063/1.5024595
HU C X, ZHAO L, GE Y J. A simplified vortex model for the mechanism of vortex-induced vibrations in a streamlined closed-box girder[J]. Wind and Structures, 2021, 32(4): 309−19. doi: 10.12989/was.2021.32.4.309
HU C X, ZHAO L, GE Y J. Multiple-order vertical vortex-induced vibration mechanism of a typical streamlined closed-box girder[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 227: 105066. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105066
KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Dynamic mode decomposition and its applications in fluid dynamics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 163−179 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0134
DU M H, TIAN L L, ZHU C L. IDDES simulations of flow separation around the iced airfoil and its modal analysis[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(11): 46−55(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0140
SCHMID P J. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 656: 5−28. doi: 10.1017/s0022112010001217
KOU J Q, ZHANG W W, GAO C Q. Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(9): 2679−2689(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0003
HU C X, ZHAO L, GUAN X L, et al. Mitigation mechanism of torsional vortex-induced vibrations using aerodynamic countermeasures: Case study on a typical closed-box girder[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 318: 118611. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118611
SCHEWE G. Reynolds-number-effects in flow around a rectangular cylinder with aspect ratio 1: 5[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 39: 15−26. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.02.013
NAKAMURA Y, OHYA Y, OZONO S, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of vortex shedding from elongated rectangular cylinders at low Reynolds numbers 200−103[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1996, 65(1-3): 301−308. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00048-2
BERRONE S, GARBERO V, MARRO M. Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds number flows past rectangular cylinders based on adaptive finite element and finite volume methods[J]. Computers Fluids, 2011, 40(1): 92−112. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.08.014
HOURIGAN K, THOMPSON M C, TAN B T. Self-sustained oscillations in flows around long blunt plates[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2001, 15(3-4): 387−398. doi: 10.1006/jfls.2000.0352
WU B, LI S P, LI K, et al. Large-eddy simulation of the near wake of a 5∶1 rectangular cylinder in oscillating flows at Re = 670[J ] . Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196: 104050. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104050
BRUNO L, SALVETTI M V, RICCIARDELLI F. Benchmark on the aerodynamics of a rectangular 5∶1 cylinder: An overview after the first four years of activity[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 126: 87−106. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.01.005