
西北工业大学 飞行器基础布局全国重点实验室,西安,710072
Published:2026
移动端阅览
杨龙源, 魏新元, 曾竹青, 等. 大展弦比飞行器突风响应数值计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(4): 114−124.
Yang Longyuan, Wei Xinyuan, Zeng Zhuqing, et al. Numerical simulation on gust responses of high aspect ratio aircraft[J]. 2026, 44(4): 114-124.
杨龙源, 魏新元, 曾竹青, 等. 大展弦比飞行器突风响应数值计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(4): 114−124. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0206
Yang Longyuan, Wei Xinyuan, Zeng Zhuqing, et al. Numerical simulation on gust responses of high aspect ratio aircraft[J]. 2026, 44(4): 114-124. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0206.
大展弦比飞行器在受到突风扰动后,机翼弯矩、扭矩等载荷的重新分布容易引起气动与结构之间的强耦合,同时原有的飞行姿态与稳定性也会受到影响。为了准确获取大展弦比飞行器受突风扰动后的动态载荷分布与姿态响应,本文以展弦比为20的平直机翼+平尾构型为研究对象,综合考虑突风扰动下气动、结构、纵向姿态响应带来的影响,完成了飞行器在1-cos典型离散突风不同幅值下的多学科耦合数值模拟,并进一步研究了不同学科对动态载荷分布及姿态响应的影响规律。研究发现,耦合不同学科后计算的载荷分布和响应结果,相比于单一学科计算结果,其变化量存在线性叠加关系;但随着突风扰动不断增强,这种线性叠加关系将不再成立。在飞行器的载荷设计阶段,本文采用的多学科方法可作为飞行器突风设计的准确评估手段,用于评估突风对飞行器产生的影响。
The bending moment and torque of a high aspect ratio (AR) wing are redistributed when encountering gust turbulence
leading to the strong coupling of aerodynamics and structural dynamics. Affected by gust encounter
the original attitude and stability of the aircraft may also change. In order to obtain the aircraft dynamic load distribution and flight dynamic response accurately during gust encounter
multidisciplinary numerical simulations were conducted on a wing-and-tail configuration with a straight wing of AR = 20 under different amplitudes of the typical 1-cos gust
comprehensively considering the effects of aerodynamics
structural dynamics
and longitudinal attitude response. The impact of different disciplines on the dynamic load distribution and attitude response was explored. The results show that there is a linear superposition relationship for the responses after coupling different disciplines. With the increase of gust amplitude
this linear superposition relationship is no longer valid. In the aircraft load design stage
the multidisciplinary method adopted in this paper can serve as an accurate assessment tool for gust design
evaluating the impact of gust disturbances on the aircraft.
Ritter M, Jones J, Cesnik C E. Enhanced modal approach for free-flight nonlinear aeroelastic simulation of very flexible aircraft[C]//Proc of the 15th Dynamics Specialists Conference, San Diego, California, USA. AIAA, 2016: AIAA 2016-1794. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1794
Li Yonghong. Gust load alleviation by fluidic actuators on a blended-wing-body configuration[D]. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield University, 2020.
Patil M J, Hodges D H, Cesnik C E S. Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(1): 88−94. doi: 10.2514/2.2738
Wang L B, Xie C C, Yang C. Static aeroelastic analysis of flexible aircraft with large deformations[C]//Proc of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Boston, Massachusetts. AIAA, 2013: AIAA 2013-1893. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-1893
Zhao D Q, Yang Z C, Zeng X N, et al. Wind tunnel test of gust load alleviation for a large-scale full aircraft model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(4): 201−216. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2022.06.016
Yang Chao, Qiu Qisheng, Zhou Yitao, et al. Review of aircraft gust alleviation technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 208−248(in Chinese).
Wales C, Jones D, Gaitonde A. Prescribed velocity method for simulation of aerofoil gust responses[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(1): 64−76. doi: 10.2514/1.c032597
Gao Kun, Guo Tongqing, Ji Zhehan, et al. Numerical simulations of airfoil gust response and alleviation based on split velocity method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(4): 84−95(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0123
Zhan Hao, Qian Weiqi. Numerical simulation of gust response for airfoil and wing[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(4): 531−536(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2007.04.022
Xu Xiaoping, Zhang Yanjing. Study of the wing gust response for based-CFD method[J]. Aircraft Design, 2011, 31(2): 20−24(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4599.2011.02.005
Gan W B, Guan C X, Zhuang J J, et al. Research status of aerodynamic design for integrated propulsion and airframe in near-space high-altitude long-endurance (HALE) UAVs[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2025, 43(11): 79−96. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0180shu
Sun Zhiwei. Investigation of the problems in multidisciplinary design of high altitude long endurance unmanned aerial vehicle[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016(in Chinese).
Gu Ning. CFD-based gust response and alleviation research of aircraft wing[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013(in Chinese).
Bekemeyer P, Ripepi M, Heinrich R, et al. Nonlinear unsteady reduced-order modeling for gust-load predictions[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(5): 1839−1850. doi: 10.2514/1.j057804
Meirovitch L. Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1991, 14(5): 1008−1013. doi: 10.2514/3.20743
Meirovitch L. Analytical methods in vibrations[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
Cooke J M, Zyda M J, Pratt D R, et al. NPSNET: flight simulation dynamic modeling using quaternions[J]. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1992, 1(4): 404−420. doi: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.4.404
Milne, R D. Dynamics of the deformable aeroplane: Reports and memoranda: No. 3345[R]Ministry of Aviation, Aeronautical Research council, 1962.
Jr Yates E C. AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response: candidate configuration I. wing 445.6: NASA-TM-100492[R]. AGARD, 1987.
Lee-Rausch E M, Batina J T. Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32(2): 416−422. doi: 10.2514/3.46732
Pahlavanloo P. Dynamic aeroelastic simulation of the AGARD 445.6 wing using edge: FOI-R-2259-SE[R]. 2007.
Yates E, Wynne E, Farmer M. Measured and calculated effects of angle of attack on the transonic flutter of a supercritical wing[C]//Proc of the 23rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA. AIAA, 1982: AIAA 1982-647. doi: 10.2514/6.1982-647
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621