
武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,武汉,430081
Published:2026
移动端阅览
贾晓峰, 黄雯, 胡传新, 等. 考虑近距离海洋下垫面影响的对称风机翼型静气动特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 128−136.
Jia Xiaofeng, Huang Wen, Hu Chuanxin, et al. Static aerodynamic characteristics of symmetrical wind turbine airfoils considering the influence of near-ocean underlying surface[J]. 2026, 44(1): 128-136.
贾晓峰, 黄雯, 胡传新, 等. 考虑近距离海洋下垫面影响的对称风机翼型静气动特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 128−136. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0164
Jia Xiaofeng, Huang Wen, Hu Chuanxin, et al. Static aerodynamic characteristics of symmetrical wind turbine airfoils considering the influence of near-ocean underlying surface[J]. 2026, 44(1): 128-136. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0164.
为探究海洋下垫面对近海面静态风机翼型气动特性的干扰机理,以NACA0012对称翼型为研究对象,采用流体体积分数模型构建风浪-翼型耦合场,结合翼型升力系数时频特征和表面流场,分析不同风浪参数、翼型与静水面相对距离下的静气动特征,揭示近距离海洋下垫面对大攻角静态翼型气动特征的干扰机理。研究发现:海洋下垫面通过附加攻角
β
间接影响近海面翼型气动特性,与风场相比,风浪场中翼型的静态失速攻角减小,其减小量取决于附加攻角平均值;海洋下垫面对翼型各流动阶段均存在干扰,但显著抑制了大攻角翼型涡的发展,导致前缘漂移涡与尾缘脱落涡发展的机制存在差异,前者是由海洋下垫面干扰引起的长周期高强度漂移现象,后者由大攻角翼型自身的流动分离特性主导,表现为短周期低强度脱落,且风浪场翼型尾涡脱落频率均小于风场翼型的涡脱频率(0.537 Hz);翼型距静水面30 m时,海洋下垫面的干扰效应显著减弱,出现独立的尾缘涡脱落频率(0.430 Hz),且涡形态更复杂。本文研究对提高大型浮式风机安全性能具有一定的借鉴意义。
This paper presents a numerical investigation into the effects of the ocean underlying surface (OUS) on the static aerodynamic characteristics of a symmetric NACA0012 airfoil near the sea surface
utilizing the volume of fluid (VOF) model. The interference of OUS on the static aerodynamic characteristics of NACA0012 is thoroughly studied by examining the time-frequency characteristics of lift coefficients and flow field characteristics under different wind-wave conditions. Results show that the interference exerted by OUS originates from an additional angle of attack. Root mean square (RMS) values of the airfoil lift coefficients and the additional angle of attack exhibit a similar variation trend with wave height and wind speed. The airfoil's static stall angle of attack in the wind-wave field is smaller than that in the wind field
with the decrement depending on the mean value of the additional angle of attack. The interference of OUS persists throughout all flow stages of the airfoil
but it significantly suppresses the development of airfoil vortices only at high angles of attack
leading to different development mechanisms for leading-edge drift vortices and trailing-edge shedding vortices. The former is a long-period (wave period of 4.5 s)
high-intensity drift disturbed by OUS
while the latter is a short-period
low-intensity shedding induced by the flow separation around the high angles of attack of airfoil itself. Notably
the shedding frequency of trailing edge vortices in the wind wave field is 0.537 Hz lower than that in the wind field. When the airfoil is positioned 30 meters above the still water surface
an independent trailing-edge vortex shedding frequency of 0.430 Hz appears
accompanied by a more complex vortex shape. The findings of this study shed light on improving the safety performance of large floating wind turbines.
Lee C Y, Chen S S. Stable boundary layer and its impact on tropical cyclone structure in a coupled atmosphere–ocean model[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2014, 142(5): 1927−1944. doi: 10.1175/mwr-d-13-00122.1
Ke S T, Ge Y J, Wang T G, et al. Wind field simulation and wind-induced responses of large wind turbine tower-blade coupled structure[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2015, 24(8): 571−590. doi: 10.1002/tal.1200
Zhong Wei, Wang Tongguang. Numerical analysis of transition effect on stall performance of wind turbine airfoils and blades[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(3): 385−390 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2011.03.021
Zhao Aobo, Zheng Guannan, Huang Chengde, et al. Flutter characteristics of ground effect wings[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(17): 265−274 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2023.17.033
Qu Q L, Wang W, Liu P Q, et al. Airfoil aerodynamics in ground effect for wide range of angles of attack[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4): 1048−1061. doi: 10.2514/1.j053366
Qin Xuguo, Liu Peiqing, Qu Qiulin. Numerical simulation on aerodynamics of airfoil flying over wavy water surface[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 37(3): 295−299,304 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1016/S1872-2040(10)60412-4
Hu H D, Ma D L. Airfoil aerodynamics in proximity to wavy ground for a wide range of angles of attack[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(19): 6773. doi: 10.3390/app10196773
Mi Baigang, Zhan Hao. Numerical simulation of aircraft dynamic stability characteristics flying over ground and water surface[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2017, 21(11): 1348−1355 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2017.11.004
Han Long, Chen Yangling, Wang Fuxin, et al. Numerical simulation and aerodynamic analysis of airfoil flying over wave ground at high grade sea condition[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014, 48(8): 1127−1133 (in Chinese).
Yang Xiaopei, Wang Wei, Jiang Boyan, et al. Wake vortex shedding flow analysis of two-dimension airfoil with different Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(10): 96−104,112 (in Chinese).
Liu Zhiyong, Luo Zhenbing, Yuan Xianxu, et al. Review of controlling flow separation over airfoils with periodic excitation[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2020, 50(0): 221−248 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-19-019
Samara F, Johnson D A. Dynamic stall on pitching cambered airfoil with phase offset trailing edge flap[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(7): 2844−2856. doi: 10.2514/1.j059115
Li Yinran, Zhao Li, Li Deshun, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of blade airfoil under yaw condition[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 326−333 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2020-1221
Li Deshun, He Ting, Wang Qing. Influence of particle diameter on dynamic stall characteristics of wind turbine airfoil[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(12): 207−213 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1232
Zhang Y, Ye J J, Huang X H, et al. Aerodynamic performances of the wind turbine airfoils in the condition of low wind speed[J]. International Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 2020, 8(1): 1−8. doi: 10.12677/ijfd.2020.81001
Wang Shuo, Ke Shitang, Zhang Wei, et al. Research on the characteristics of wave load distribution of offshore wind turbine foundations under the combined action of wind, wave and current[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2022, 26(5): 653−666 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2022.05.005
Phillips O M. On the generation of waves by turbulent wind[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1957, 2: 417−445. doi: 10.1017/S0022112057000233
Sheldahl R E, Klimas P C. Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines[R]. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States), 1981.
Mcalister K, Pucci S L, Mccroskey W J, et al. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections. volume 2. Pressure and force data[R]. NASA-TM-84245-VOL-2, 1982. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830003778
Hu C X, Zhao L, Guan X L, et al. Mitigation mechanism of torsional vortex-induced vibrations using aerodynamic countermeasures: Case study on a typical closed-box girder[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 318: 118611. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118611
Yu Chunfang, Jing Hongmiao, Wang Yangxue, et al. Numerical study on the aerodynamic forces and flow around a circular cylinder under streamwise sinusoidal inflow condition[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(6): 216−224 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2024.06.023
Wang Qing, Zhao Qijun, Zhao Guoqing. Unsteady aerodynamic characteristic analysis of rotor airfoil under variational free stream velocity condition[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(2): 364−372 (in Chinese) . doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.02.014
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621