
1. 西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,710072
2. 飞行器基础布局全国重点实验室,西安,710072
3. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 空天技术研究所,绵阳,621000
Published:2025
移动端阅览
郑海波, 高超, 何成军, 等. 不同偏径比S弯喷管流固耦合特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(11): 66−76.
ZHENG Haibo, GAO Chao, HE Chengjun, et al. Fluid-structural interaction characteristics of serpentine nozzles with different offset ratios[J]. 2025, 43(11): 66-76.
郑海波, 高超, 何成军, 等. 不同偏径比S弯喷管流固耦合特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(11): 66−76. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0116
ZHENG Haibo, GAO Chao, HE Chengjun, et al. Fluid-structural interaction characteristics of serpentine nozzles with different offset ratios[J]. 2025, 43(11): 66-76. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0116.
S弯喷管几何构型显著不同于传统轴对称喷管,其具有壁面曲率变化大,内部气动载荷分布不均匀程度高等特点,这导致具有薄壁结构的S弯喷管容易发生流固耦合现象。为深入探究S弯喷管的流固耦合现象及其对喷管推力性能的影响规律,本文设计了出口斜切的不同偏径比(
ψ
= 0.28~0.58)双S弯喷管,并构建了双向流固耦合模型,通过超声速平板颤振算例验证了模型准确性。结果表明,不同偏径比S弯喷管结构场与流场之间相互影响剧烈,耦合后,喷管变形呈由内向外、整体向下的变形形式,变形量随偏径比增大而逐渐减小,最大变形位置始终出现在喷管出口下壁面中间位置(在偏径比
ψ
= 0.34 时
z
方向最大变形位移占喷管出口高度的16.7%)。在气动性能方面,喷管沿程截面面积增大,并由初始收敛型转变为收敛-扩张型,喉道面积与偏径比近似呈线性分布,随偏径比增大而逐渐减小。流固耦合作用导致喷管第二S弯段与出口等直段连接处局部高速流动区扩大且向下游移动,进而使得下游压力峰值减小甚至消失。在推力性能方面,未耦合时,随喷管偏径比
ψ
从0.28增大至0.58,喷管推力系数由0.978 减小至 0.960;耦合后,相比未耦合工况喷管推力系数增加(
ψ
= 0.34时,推力系数增幅约为 0.6%),推力矢量角减小(
ψ
= 0.52 时,推力矢量角最大减幅约为 23.6%),但是两者随偏径比变化趋势与未耦合工况下一致,均随偏径比增大而逐渐减小。
The geometric configurations of serpentine nozzles differ significantly from conventional axisymmetric nozzles
characterized by substantial variations in the wall curvature and an S-shaped centerline. This configuration results in uneven distribution of internal aerodynamic load. Serpentine nozzles are gen
erally thin-walled structures to reduce aircraft’s weight. Consequently
the fluid-structural interaction (FSI) becomes a prominent phenomenon in serpentine nozzles
playing an important role in aircraft design. To examine the FSI phenomenon in serpentine nozzles and its impact on thrust performance
this paper introduces double serpentine nozzles with varying offset ratios. A two-way FSI framework is then established and validated. Subsequent analysis focuses on the deformation characteristics of the nozzle and their effects on the aerodynamic loads on the nozzle wall. Furthermore
the influence of FSI on thrust performance is explored. The results reveal that the FSI phenomenon is evident under different offset ratios. There are two types of nozzle deformation: inward-outward and top-down
with the deformation decreasing gradually with the increase of offset ratio. Notably
the maximum deformation consistently occurs at the middle of the lower wall of the nozzle outlet. Regarding the aerodynamic performance
the nozzle's cross-sectional area expands
transitioning from an initial convergence configuration to a convergence-expansion one. Both the throat area and offset ratio decrease approximately linearly with the increase of the offset ratio. The FSI causes the local high-speed flow region at the junction of the second inflection and the outlet to expand and move downstream
leading to a reduction or even elimination of the downstream pressure peak. In terms of thrust performance
the thrust coefficient increases (when
ψ
= 0.34
the increase is approximately 0.6%)
and the thrust vector angle decreases (when
ψ
= 0.52
the reduction in thrust vector angle is approximately 23.6%). But the variation trend of both with the offset ratio is consistent with that under uncoupled conditions
and both decrease gradually with increasing offset ratio.
SHI J, ZHOU L, XU J Y, et al. Experimental study on infrared radiation characteristics and matching performance of low-observable nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2024, 40(3): 354−367. doi: 10.2514/1.b38879
AN C H, KANG D W, BAEK S T, et al. Analysis of plume infrared signatures of S-shaped nozzle configurations of aerial vehicle[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 53(6): 1768−1778. doi: 10.2514/1.c033685
WANG M X, ZHOU L, SHI J W, et al. Flow separation characteristics of S-shaped convergent-divergent nozzle under overexpanded condition[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2024, 45(9): 71−82 (in Chinese).
SUN P, ZHOU L, WANG Z X, et al. Influences of geometric parameters on serpentine nozzles for turbofan[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023, 136: 108224. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108224
SUN X L, WANG Z X, ZHOU L, et al. Flow characteristics of double serpentine convergent nozzle with different inlet configuration[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2018, 140(8): 082602. doi: 10.1115/1.4038793
SUN P, ZHOU L, WANG Z X, et al. Effect of aspect ratio and swirl angle on temperature distribution of double serpentine nozzle for turbofan[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 391−403 (in Chinese).
CROWE D S, MARTIN C L Jr. Hot streak characterization of high-performance double-serpentine exhaust nozzles at design conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(3): 501−511. doi: 10.2514/1.b37235
HUI Z H, SHI J W, ZHOU L, et al. Experimental investigation of serpentine nozzles for turbofan[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 117: 106892. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106892
HUI Z H, SHI J W, ZHOU L, et al. Effect of inclination angle on the film cooling in a serpentine nozzle with strong adverse pressure gradient[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(4): 046114. doi: 10.1063/5.0147749
WANG B, HAO P, TIAN K, et al. Advances in lightweight design and experimental methods for aerospace structures[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2023, 44(4): 596−606 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2023.04.013
ZHOU H C, TAN H J, LI X P. Unique design method of subsonic inlet with complex cross-sectional shape[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(6): 1357−1363(in Chinese).
LEE C, BOEDICKER C. Subsonic diffuser design and performance for advanced fighter aircraft[C]// Aircraft Design Systems and Operations Meeting, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1985: AIAA 1985−3073. doi: 10.2514/6.1985-3073
RAJKUMAR P, CHANDRA SEKAR T, KUSHARI A, et al. Flow characterization for a shallow single serpentine nozzle with aft deck[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2017, 33(5): 1130−1139. doi: 10.2514/1.b36341
SHI J W, HUI Z H, ZHOU L, et al. Flow separation control of an ultra-compact S-shaped convergent-divergent nozzle using the blowing method[J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 17(6). doi: 10.47176/jafm.17.6.2398
CROWE D S. Hot streak characterization in serpentine exhaust nozzles [D]. Department of the Air Force Air University, 2014.
SMITH J, DALENBRING M. Aeroelastic simulation of S-duct dynamics using structure coupled CFD [C]// 25th International Congress of The Aeronautical Sciences. Hamburg. 2006.
DALENBRING M, SMITH J. Simulation of S-duct dynamics using fluid-structure coupled CFD[C]// 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: AIAA2006–2981. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-2981
URBANCZYK P S, ALONSO J J, NIGAM N, et al. Coupled multiphysics analysis for design of advanced exhaust systems[C]// 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: AIAA 2017–0799. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0799
DEATON J D, GRANDHI R V. Significance of geometric nonlinearity in the design of thermally loaded structures[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(4): 1226−1234. doi: 10.2514/1.c032872
GU R, XU J L, ZHAO Q, et al. Primary analysis of fluid-structure interaction of adjustable single expansion ramp nozzle with different cowl position[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(3): 300−306 (in Chinese).
SUN P, ZHOU L, WANG Z X, et al. Fluid-structure interaction characteristic of double serpentine nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(10): 153−162 (in Chinese).
LI Q L, ZHOU L, SUN P, et al. Influence mechanism of aspect ratio on fluid-structure interaction characteristics of serpentine nozzle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(14): 628204 (in Chinese).
CHENG W. Prediction and optimization design method of infrared radiation characteristics of S-bend nozzle[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019 (in Chinese).
SUN X L. Study on design and performance evaluation method of low detectable S-bend nozzle[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018 (in Chinese).
CHEN H P, JU S J, WANG X W, et al. Uncertainty quantification analysis of aerodynamic force and heat for air vehicle due to freestream variation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2024, 42(9): 114−123 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0051
GORDNIER R, VISBAL M. Development of a three-dimensional viscous aeroelastic solver for nonlinear panel flutter[C]// Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000: AIAA 2000–2337. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-2337
GUO Y, LIU W, LI J, et al. Aircraft design handbook [M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1997 (in Chinese).
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621