
空天飞行空气动力科学与技术全国重点实验室,绵阳,621000
Published:2025
移动端阅览
刘姝怡, 陈曦, 万兵兵, 等. 有攻角圆锥边界层横流失稳分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(2): 86−95.
LIU Shuyi, CHEN Xi, WAN Bingbing, et al. Crossflow instability analysis of boundary layer on a yawed cone[J]. 2025, 43(2): 86-95.
刘姝怡, 陈曦, 万兵兵, 等. 有攻角圆锥边界层横流失稳分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(2): 86−95. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0087
LIU Shuyi, CHEN Xi, WAN Bingbing, et al. Crossflow instability analysis of boundary layer on a yawed cone[J]. 2025, 43(2): 86-95. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0087.
横流失稳是复杂三维边界层转捩的主要机制之一。针对马赫数6条件下常规风洞实验工况的6°攻角尖锥边界层,利用二维全局稳定性分析( two-dimensional global stability analysis
BiGlobal)方法和面推进抛物化稳定性方程(three-dimensional parabolized stability equations
PSE3D)从多维稳定性分析的角度开展了横流失稳分析,并与一维线性稳定性理论(linear stability theory
LST)和直接数值模拟(direct numerical simulation
DNS)结果进行对比。结果显示,横流模态主要分布在背风面,但随着幅值的增长,模态扰动仍可显著影响迎风面区域;非定常横流模态比准定常横流模态更不稳定,且波角更小;相较于BiGlobal,基于PSE3D得到的
N
值略低,但两者主频相近,表明非平行效应削弱了横流扰动的增长,但并不改变扰动主频;基于LST的
N
值远大于全局稳定性分析得到的
N
值,一方面体现了两种方法对扰动增长定义的差异,另一方面也反映了三维效应的影响,因此不同的稳定性分析方法对确定转捩的
N
值影响显著。
The crossflow instability is one of the main transition mechanisms in complex three-dimensional boundary layers
though it is still far from being fully understood. In the present study
the two-dimensional global stability analysis (BiGlobal) and plane-marching three-dimensional parabolized stability equations (PSE3D) were employed for the crossflow instability in the boundary layer of a sharp cone at 6° angle of attack under the Mach 6 wind tunnel exp
erimental conditions. The results were compared with those of the one-dimensional linear stability theory (LST) and direct numerical simulation (DNS). It is shown that the crossflow mode is mainly distributed on the leeward side
yet can still remarkably affect the windward side as its amplitude increases downstream. The most unstable travelling crossflow mode is more amplified and has a smaller wave angle than the stationary crossflow mode. PSE3D obtains a slightly lower
N
factor than that obtained by BiGlobal
while the two have similar peak frequencies
indicating that the non-parallel effect weakens the growth of crossflow disturbance
without changing the peak frequency of disturbance. The
N
factor obtained by LST is significantly larger than those from global stability analyses
reflecting the difference in the definition of the growth rate between those two methods as well as the influence of three-dimensional effects. Therefore
different stability analysis methods have a significant impact on determining the transition
N
factor.
CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al . Hypersonic boundary layer transition: What we know, where shall we go[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015 , 35 ( 3 ): 311 − 337 (in Chinese).
SU C H . Progress in key scientific problems of hypersonic bounary-layer transition prediction: Receptivity, evolution of disturbances and transition criterion[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 355 − 367 (in Chinese).
LEE C B, CHEN S Y . Recent progress in the study of transition in the hypersonic boundary layer [J ] . National Science Review, 2019 , 6 ( 1 ): 155 − 170 .
HENDERSON R O. Crossflow transition at Mach 6 on a cone at low angles of attack[D]. USA: Purdue University, 2014.
NEEL I T, LEIDY A, TICHENOR N R, et al. Influence of environmental disturbances on hypersonic crossflow instability on the HIFiRE-5 elliptic cone[C]// 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018.
HEMBLING E, WIRTH J, SEMPER M. Hypersonic crossflow investigation on the HIFiRE-5 elliptic cone[C]// AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, VIRTUAL EVENT. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021.
WARD C A C. Crossflow instability and transition on a circular cone at angle of attack in a Mach-6 quiet tunnel[D]. USA: Purdue University, 2014.
WARD C, HENDERSON R, SCHNEIDER S P. Secondary instability of stationary crossflow vortices on an inclined cone at Mach 6[C]// 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Dallas, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015.
XU G L, LIU G, CHEN J Q, et al . Role of freest ream slow acoustic waves in a hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2018 , 56 ( 9 ): 3570 − 3584 .
ADAMCZAK D, KIMMEL R, PAULL A, et al. HIFiRE-1 flight trajectory estimation and initial experimental results[C]//17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011.
KIMMEL R, ADAMCZAK D, PAULL A, et al. HIFiRE-1 preliminary aerothermodynamic measurements[C]// 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011.
WAN B B, TU G H, YUAN X X, et al . Identification of traveling crossflow waves under real hypersonic flight conditions[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2021 , 33 ( 4 ): 044110 .
KIMMEL R L, ADAMCZAK D W, BORG M P, et al . First and fifth hypersonic international flight research experimentation's flight and ground tests[J ] . Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2019 , 56 ( 2 ): 421 − 431 .
CHEN J F, LING G, ZHANG Q H, et al . Infrared thermography experiments of hypersonic boundary-layer transition on a 7° half-angle sharp cone[J ] . Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020 , 34 ( 1 ): 60 − 66 (in Chinese).
YATES H B, TUFTS M W, JULIANO T J . Analysis of the hypersonic cross-flow instability with experimental wavenumber distributions[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020 , 883 : A50 .
YATES H B, MATLIS E H, JULIANO T J, et al . Plasma-actuated flow control of hypersonic crossflow-induced boundary-layer transition[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2020 , 58 ( 5 ): 2093 − 2108 .
CRAIG S A, SARIC W S . Crossflow instability in a hypersonic boundary layer[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016 , 808 : 224 − 244 .
CRAIG S A, SARIC W S . Crossflow instability on a yawed cone at Mach 6[J ] . Procedia IUTAM, 2015 , 14 : 15 − 25 .
DONG S W, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al . Wall pressure beneath a transitional hypersonic boundary layer over an inclined straight circular cone[J ] . Advances in Aerodynamics, 2020 , 2 ( 1 ): 29 .
WANG Q, XIANG X H, DONG S W, et al . Wall temperature effects on the hypersonic boundary-layer transition over an inclined, blunt cone[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2023 , 35 ( 2 ): 024107 .
SARIC W S, REED H L, WHITE E B . Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003 , 35 : 413 − 440 .
PEREZ E, REED H L, KUEHL J. Instabilities on a hypersonic yawed straight cone[C]// 43rd Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013.
SU C H, ZHOU H. Transition prediction of supersonic and hypersonic cone boundary layer with angle of attack[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica Astronomica), 2009, 39(6): 874882(in Chinese).
YUAN X J, LI G L, LIU Z Y, et al . Study of the instability characteristic in the boundary layer of a hypersonic blunt cone at low angle of attack[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011 , 26 ( 12 ): 2805 − 2811 (in Chinese).
SONG R J. Flow stability and disturbance evolution of hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2020(in Chinese).
SONG R J, ZHAO L, HUANG Z F . Improvement of the parabolized stability equation to predict the linear evolution of disturbances in three-dimensional boundary layers based on ray tracing theory[J ] . Physical Review Fluids, 2020 , 5 ( 3 ): 033901 .
HUANG Z F, WAN B B, DUAN M C . Progresses in engineering application research on hypersonic flow stability and transition[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 368 − 378 (in Chinese).
THEOFILIS V . Global linear instability[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011 , 43 : 319 − 352 .
DE TULLIO N, PAREDES P, SANDHAM N D, et al . Laminar–turbulent transition induced by a discrete roughness element in a supersonic boundary layer[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013 , 735 : 613 − 646 .
PAREDES P, GOSSE R, THEOFILIS V, et al . Linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over an elliptic cone[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016 , 804 : 442 − 466 .
LAKEBRINK M T, BORG M P. Traveling crossflow wave predictions on the HIFiRE-5 at Mach 6: Stability analysis vs . quiet tunnel data[C ] // 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016.
LIU S Y, WAN B B, YUAN X X, et al . Linear modal global instabilities of hypersonic flow over an inclined cone[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2022 , 34 ( 7 ): 074108 .
CHEN X, DONG S W, TU G H, et al . Boundary layer transition and linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over a lifting body[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022 , 938 : A8 .
CHEN X, DONG S W, TU G H, et al . Global stability analyses of Mack mode on the windward face of a hypersonic yawed cone[J ] . Physical Review Fluids, 2023 , 8 ( 3 ): 033903 .
ZHANG L, DONG S, LIU S, et al . Stability analysis of streamwise vortices over a blunt inclined cone under a hypersonic flight condition[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2022 , 34 ( 7 ): 074107 .
CHEN X, CHEN J Q, DONG S W, et al . Stability analyses of leeward streamwise vortices for a hypersonic yawed cone at 6 degree angle of attack[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 299 − 307 (in Chinese).
LI X L . Direct numerical simulation techniques for hypersonic turbulent flows[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015 , 36 ( 1 ): 147 − 158 (in Chinese).
LI X H, CHEN J Q, HUANG Z F, et al . Stability analysis and transition prediction of streamwise vortices over a yawed cone at Mach 6[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2020 , 32 ( 12 ): 124110 .
ZHANG L G, WAN B B, DONG S W, et al . Wall temperature effects on the stability of leeward vortices of a blunt inclined cone[J ] . Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2024 , 40 ( 7 ): 123563 .
ZHOU H, ZHAO G F. Hydrodynamic stability[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004: 6667(in Chinese).
WAN B B, CHEN X, CHEN J Q, et al . Applications of HyTEN software for predicting three-dimensional boundary-layer transition in typical hypersonic models[J ] . Aerospace Technology, 2023 ( 1 ): 150 − 158 (in Chinese).
ARNOLDI W E . The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem[J ] . Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1951 , 9 ( 1 ): 17 − 29 .
BENDER C M, ORSZAG S A. Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory[M]. German: Springer, 1999.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621