
1. 西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,710072
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
Published:2024
移动端阅览
赵欢, 王摄昆, 高正红, 等. 飞行器气动稳健优化设计方法研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(9): 37−69.
ZHAO Huan, WANG Shekun, GAO Zhenghong, et al. Research progress on aerodynamic robust design optimization methods for air vehicles[J]. 2024, 42(9): 37-69.
赵欢, 王摄昆, 高正红, 等. 飞行器气动稳健优化设计方法研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(9): 37−69. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0234
ZHAO Huan, WANG Shekun, GAO Zhenghong, et al. Research progress on aerodynamic robust design optimization methods for air vehicles[J]. 2024, 42(9): 37-69. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0234.
随着对现代飞行器性能需求的不断提高,面向工程应用的先进气动外形设计方法要求能兼顾多学科高性能和稳健性,以突破传统设计方法设计的外形稳健性差、难以实现工程应用的难题。针对这一问题,飞行器气动稳健优化设计方法脱颖而出并取得了快速发展,多种高效实用的不确定量化和稳健优化方法被相继提出,成为了满足工程型号气动外形设计要求最有力的手段之一。本文以建立工程实用的高效气动稳健优化设计方法为需求,综述了飞行器气动稳健优化设计相关理论和方法的最新研究进展。首先,系统介绍了飞行器气动稳健优化设计方法的研究现状和最新进展,对不确定建模、不确定量化和稳健优化等关键技术的发展现状进行了详细介绍和讨论;然后,结合当前最受关注的工程应用问题,陈述和讨论了气动稳健优化设计方法在跨声速翼型/机翼、自然层流外形、叶栅/旋翼外形3类典型复杂气动设计问题中的应用效果和进展,同时结合多学科分析与优化设计需要,调研了气动/隐身/声爆/结构多学科稳健优化设计在工程设计问题中的最新进展和发展方向;最后,结合文献综述,讨论了飞行器气动稳健优化设计理论和方法在发展和应用上面临的难题和挑战,并展望了未来研究方向。
The demand for advanced aerodynamic shape design methods that can balance the multidisciplinary high performance and robustness of air vehicles is ever-increasing. Traditional aerodynamic design methods often fall short of robustness
hindering their ability to achieve optimal performance and limiting their practical engineering applications. The robust aerodynamic design optimization (RADO) method for air vehicles
which seamlessly integrates the strengths of aerodynamic shape optimization techniques with robust design principles
has become one of the most viable approaches to satisfy the engineering requirements for aerodynamic configuration design with the advent of various efficient and practical uncertainty quantification (UQ) and robust optimization methods. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in RADO for air vehicles
addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of aerodynamic shape optimization and highlighting promising research directions for future exploration. This paper begins with a systematic review of state-of-the-art and research trends of RADO for air vehicles. Recent advancements in related key techniques
including uncertainty modeling
UQ
and robust optimization
are presented in detail. Concurrently
the application of RADO in three representative aerodynamic design problems—transonic airfoil/wing
natural laminar flow wing
and compressor blades/rotor blades—are reviewed and discussed thoroughly
focusing on the most pertinent engineering challenges. Next
the progress and development of aerodynamic/stealth/sonic boom/structural multidisciplinary robust optimization design (MRDO) in practical application are investigated. Finally
drawing from the comprehensive literature review
challenges and difficulties encountered in developing and applications of RADO for air vehicles are discussed.
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XU F, et al . Review of robust aerodynamic design optimization for air vehicles[J ] . Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2019 , 26 ( 3 ): 685 − 732 .
YAO W, CHEN X Q, LUO W C, et al . Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011 , 47 ( 6 ): 450 − 479 .
ZANG T A, HEMSCH M J, HIBURGER M W, et al. Needs and opportunities for uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design methods for aerospace vehicles: NASA/TM-2002-211462[R]. NASA Langley Research Center, 2002.
CHAUDHURI A, WAYCASTER G, PRICE N, et al . NASA uncertainty quantification challenge: An optimization-based methodology and validation[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2015 , 12 ( 1 ): 10 − 34 .
CRESPO L G, KENNY S P, GIESY D P. The NASA Langley multidisciplinary uncertainty quantification challenge [C]//16th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, National Harbor, Maryland, 2014.
EISFELD B. The German national joint project MUNA: Management and minimization of uncertainties and errors in numerical aerodynamics [C]//5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
TEKASLAN H E, YILDIZ S, DEMIROGLU Y, et al. Implementation of multidisciplinary multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification methods in sonic boom prediction[C]// AIAA Aviation 2021 forum, virtual event, Reston, Virginia, 2021.
ROGERS M M. Progress towards the CFD vision 2030 [C]// United Technologies Research Center “Digital Thread: Turbomachinery Design” Workshop, East Hartford, CT, 2018.
ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, HUANG Y, et al. CFD technology in aeronautic engineering field: Applications, challenges and development[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(3): 20891−020891(in Chinese).
PARK G J, LEE T H, LEE K H, et al . Robust design: An overview[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2006 , 44 ( 1 ): 181 − 191 .
HUYSE L. Free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty using maximum expected value and second-order second-moment strategies[M]. Hampton, Va. : Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, NASA Langley Research Center, 2001.
PADULA S L, GUMBERT C R, LI W . Aerospace applications of optimization under uncertainty[J ] . Optimization and Engineering, 2006 , 7 ( 3 ): 317 − 328 .
LEDOUX S T, VASSBERG J C, YOUNG D P, et al . Study based on the AIAA aerodynamic design optimization discussion group test cases[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2015 , 53 ( 7 ): 1910 − 1935 .
LI W, HUYSE L, PADULA S L . Robust airfoil optimization to achieve drag reduction over a range of Mach numbers[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002 , 24 ( 1 ): 38 − 50 .
ZINGG D W, ELIAS S . Aerodynamic optimization under a range of operating conditions[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2006 , 44 ( 11 ): 2787 − 2792 .
CHEN Y C, ZHANG M H, ZHANG M, et al . Review of large civil aircraft aerodynamic design[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019 , 40 ( 1 ): 522759 (in Chinese).
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XIA L . Efficient robust aerodynamic design optimization method for high-speed NLF airfoil[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022 , 43 ( 1 ): 124894 (in Chinese).
ZHAO K, GAO Z H, HUANG J T . Robust design of natural laminar flow supercritical airfoil by multi-objective evolution method[J ] . Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2014 , 35 ( 2 ): 191 − 202 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, WANG C, et al. Robust design of high speed natural-laminar-flow airfoil for high lift[C]// 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia, 2017.
NAJM H N . Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2009 , 41 ( 1 ): 35 − 52 .
XIAO H, CINNELLA P . Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019 , 108 : 1 − 31 .
BERAN P, STANFORD B, SCHROCK C . Uncertainty quantification in aeroelasticity[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2017 , 49 : 361 − 386 .
TAGUCHI G, CHOWDHURY S, TAGUCHI S. Robust engineering[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
LI W, HYUSE L, PADULA S L. Robust airfoil optimization to achieve consistent drag reduction over a Mach range: NASA/CR-2001-211042[R]. NASA Langley Research Center, 2001.
PADULA S L, LI W. Options for robust airfoil optimization under uncertainty[C]// 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia, 2002.
KEANE A J . Cokriging for robust design optimization[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2012 , 50 ( 11 ): 2351 − 2364 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, GAO Y, et al . Effective robust design of high lift NLF airfoil under multi-parameter uncertainty[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017 , 68 : 530 − 542 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H . Uncertainty-based design optimization of NLF airfoil for high altitude long endurance unmanned air vehicles[J ] . Engineering Computations, 2019 , 36 ( 3 ): 971 − 996 .
LI J. Research on aerodynamic configuration design methods for high performance aircraft[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014(in Chinese).
ZHAO K. Complex aerodynamic optimization and robust design method based on computational fluid dynamics[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015(in Chinese).
LI J, GAO Z H, HUANG J T, et al . Robust design of NLF airfoils[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013 , 26 ( 2 ): 309 − 318 .
LI J Z, GAO Z H . The application of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and surrogate model to aerodynamic robust optimization design[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012 , 30 ( 1 ): 46 − 51 (in Chinese).
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XU F, et al . An efficient adaptive forward–backward selection method for sparse polynomial chaos expansion[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019 , 355 : 456 − 491 .
ZHAO K, GAO Z H, HUANG J T, et al . Uncertainty quantification and robust design of airfoil based on polynomial chaos technique[J ] . Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2014 , 46 ( 1 ): 10 − 19 .
LI J Z, GAO Z H . Multi objective optimization methodology for airfoil robust design under geometry uncertainty[J ] . Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011 , 43 ( 3 ): 611 − 615 (in Chinese).
HUANG J T, GAO Z H, BAI J Q, et al . Study of robust winglet design based on arbitrary space shape FFD technique[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013 , 34 ( 1 ): 37 − 45 (in Chinese).
ZANG T A, HEMSCH M J, HILBURGER M W, et al.Needs and opportunities for uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design methods for aerospace vehicles: L-18174[R]. NASA, 2002.
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, GAO Y. Design optimization of natural-laminar-flow airfoil for complicated flight conditions[C]// 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia, 2017.
HUYSE L, PADULA S L, LEWIS R M, et al . Probabilistic approach to free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2002 , 40 : 1764 − 1772 .
HUYSE L, BUSHNELL D M. Free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty using maximum expected value and second-order second-moment strategies: NASA/CR-2001-211020[R]. NASA Langley Research Center, 2001.
CROICU A M . Robust airfoil optimization using a conditional expected maximum value approach[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2022 , 60 ( 11 ): 6473 − 6477 .
CROICU A M, HUSSAINI M Y, JAMESON A, et al . Robust airfoil optimization using maximum expected value and expected maximum value approaches[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2012 , 50 ( 9 ): 1905 − 1919 .
CROICU A M, HUSSAINI M Y . On the expected optimal value and the optimal expected value[J ] . Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006 , 180 ( 1 ): 330 − 341 .
KUMAR A, KEANE A J, NAIR P B, et al. Robust design of compressor blades against manufacturing variations[C]// ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2008.
KEANE A J . Comparison of several optimization strategies for robust turbine blade design[J ] . Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009 , 25 ( 5 ): 1092 − 1099 .
KAMENIK J, VOUTCHKOV I, TOAL D J J, et al . Robust turbine blade optimization in the face of real geometric variations[J ] . Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018 , 34 ( 6 ): 1479 − 1493 .
HOSDER S, WALTERS R, PEREZ R. A non-intrusive polynomial chaos method for uncertainty propagation in CFD simulations[C]// 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina, 2006.
ZHANG Y, HOSDER S, LEIFSSON L, et al. Robust airfoil optimization under inherent and model-form uncertainties using stochastic expansions[C]// 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virigina, 2012.
SHAH H, HOSDER S, KOZIEL S, et al . Multi-fidelity robust aerodynamic design optimization under mixed uncertainty[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015 , 45 : 17 − 29 .
SHAH H, HOSDER S, WINTER T . Quantification of margins and mixed uncertainties using evidence theory and stochastic expansions[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2015 , 138 : 59 − 72 .
PADRON A S, ALONSO J J, ELDRED M S. Multi-fidelity methods in aerodynamic robust optimization[C]// 18th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia, 2016.
ELDRED M S, BURKARDT J. Comparison of non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty quantification[C]// 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia, 2009.
ELDRED M S, WEBSTER C, CONSTANTINE P. Design under uncertainty employing stochastic expansion methods[C]// 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Reston, Virginia, 2008.
PAPADIMITRIOU D I, PAPADIMITRIOU C . Aerodynamic shape optimization for minimum robust drag and lift reliability constraint[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016 , 55 : 24 − 33 .
PAPADIMITRIOU D I, GIANNAKOGLOU K C . Third-order sensitivity analysis for robust aerodynamic design using continuous adjoint[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013 , 71 ( 5 ): 652 − 670 .
PAPAGEORGIOU A K, PAPOUTSIS-KIACHAGIAS E M, GIANNAKOGLOU K C . Development and assessment of an intrusive polynomial chaos expansion-based continuous adjoint method for shape optimization under uncertainties[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2022 , 94 ( 1 ): 59 − 75 .
PAPADIMITRIOU D, PAPADIMITRIOU C. Robust reliability-based aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2014, 353-358.
PAPOUTSIS-KIACHAGIAS E M, PAPADIMITRIOU D I, GIANNAKOGLOU K C . Robust design in aerodynamics using third-order sensitivity analysis based on discrete adjoint. Application to quasi-1D flows[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2012 , 69 ( 3 ): 691 − 709 .
SHIMOYAMA K, OYAMA A, FUJII K. A new efficient and useful robust optimization approach - design for multi-objective six sigma[C]// 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Edinburgh, UK, 2005: 950-957.
SHIMOYAMA K, LIM J N, JEONG S, et al . Practical implementation of robust design assisted by response surface approximation and visual data-mining[J ] . Journal of Mechanical Design, 2009 , 131 ( 6 ): 061007 .
SHIMOYAMA K. Robust aerodynamic design of Mars exploratory airplane wing with a new optimization method [M]. School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Diss, 2006.
DODSON M, PARKS G T . Robust aerodynamic design optimization using polynomial chaos[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2009 , 46 ( 2 ): 635 − 646 .
GHISU T, JARRETT J P, PARKS G T . Robust design optimization of airfoils with respect to ice accretion[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2011 , 48 ( 1 ): 287 − 304 .
TIZIANO G. Robust aerodynamic design optimisation of compression systems[D]. Cambridge, East of England, UK: University of Cambridge, 2009.
GHISU T, PARKS G T, JARRETT J P, et al . Robust design optimization of gas turbine compression systems[J ] . Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2011 , 27 ( 2 ): 282 − 295 .
SCHULZ V, SCHILLINGS C. Optimal aerodynamic design under uncertainty[M]// Management and Minimisation of Uncertainties and Errors in Numerical Aerodynamics, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.
LITVINENKO A, MATTHIES H. Uncertainty quantification in numerical aerodynamics [J]. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 12.
SCHULZ V, SCHILLINGS C . Problem formulations and treatment of uncertainties in aerodynamic design[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2009 , 47 ( 3 ): 646 − 654 .
SCHILLINGS C, SCHMIDT S, SCHULZ V . Efficient shape optimization for certain and uncertain aerodynamic design[J ] . Computers Fluids, 2011 , 46 ( 1 ): 78 − 87 .
SCHILLINGS C, SCHULZ V . On the influence of robustness measures on shape optimization with stochastic uncertainties[J ] . Optimization and Engineering, 2015 , 16 ( 2 ): 347 − 386 .
SCHULZ V, SCHILLINGS C. Optimal aerodynamic design under shape uncertainties [M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
SABATER C, BEKEMEYER P, GÖRTZ S . Robust design of transonic natural laminar flow wings under environmental and operational uncertainties[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2022 , 60 ( 2 ): 767 − 782 .
MARUYAMA D, LIU D S, GÖRTZ S. An efficient aerodynamic shape optimization framework for robust design of airfoils using surrogate models[C]// VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016), Crete Island, Greece, Athens, 2016.
MARUYAMA D, LIU D S, GÖRTZ S. Surrogate model-based approaches to UQ and their range of applicability[M]. Cham: Springer, 2019.
SABATER C, BEKEMEYER P, GÖRTZ S . Efficient bilevel surrogate approach for optimization under uncertainty of shock control bumps[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2020 , 58 ( 12 ): 5228 − 5242 .
MARUYAMA D, GÖRTZ S, LIU D S. Robust design measures for airfoil shape optimization[M]. Cham: Springer, 2019.
WANG Y Y, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Y C . Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method[J ] . Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2011 , 32 ( 10 ): 1161 − 1168 (in Chinese).
WANG Y. Uncertainty-based optimization method and its application in aircraft design[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010(in Chinese).
ZENG H H. Robust optimization for aerodynamic design and its application to design of a micro air vehicle[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006 (in Chinese).
ZHANG W, WANG Q, LU J C, et al . Robust optimization design under geometric uncertainty based on PCA-HicksHenne method[J ] . Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022 , 48 ( 12 ): 2473 − 2481 (in Chinese).
ZHANG W, WANG Q, ZENG F Z, et al . A novel robust aerodynamic optimization technique coupled with adjoint solvers and polynomial chaos expansion[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022 , 35 ( 10 ): 35 − 55 .
CHENG H Z, ZHOU C X, LU X G, et al . Robust aerodynamic optimization and design exploration of a wide-chord transonic fan under geometric and operational uncertainties[J ] . Energy, 2023 , 278 : 128011 .
CHENG H Z, ZHOU C X, LI Z L, et al . Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis on the aerodynamic performance of a micro transonic compressor[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023 , 141 : 108569 .
ZHANG J S, LI L, DONG X, et al . A discrete adjoint framework coupled with adaptive PCE for robust aerodynamic optimization of turbomachinery under flow uncertainty[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023 , 142 : 108592 .
LUO J Q, XIA Z H, LIU F . Robust design optimization considering inlet flow angle variations of a turbine cascade[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021 , 116 : 106893 .
LUO J Q, CHEN Z S, ZHENG Y . A gradient-based method assisted by surrogate model for robust optimization of turbomachinery blades[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022 , 35 ( 10 ): 1 − 7 .
LUO J Q, CHEN Z S, ZENG X . Robust aerodynamic design optimization of turbine cascades considering uncertainty of geometric design parameters[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020 , 41 ( 10 ): 123826 (in Chinese).
XIA Z H, LUO J Q, LIU F . Statistical evaluation of performance impact of flow variations for a transonic compressor rotor blade[J ] . Energy, 2019 , 189 : 116285 .
TANG Z L, PÉRIAUX J . Uncertainty based robust optimization method for drag minimization problems in aerodynamics[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012 , 217-220 : 12 − 24 .
TANG Z L, ZHANG L H . A new Nash optimization method based on alternate elitist information exchange for multi-objective aerodynamic shape design[J ] . Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019 , 68 : 244 − 266 .
TANG Z L . Uncertainty based robust optimization in aerodynamics[J ] . Modern Physics Letters B, 2009 , 23 ( 3 ): 477 − 480 .
CHEN Y F, RAO H Y, XIONG N, et al . Adjoint-based robust optimization design of laminar flow airfoil under flight condition uncertainties[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023 , 140 : 108465 .
CHEN Y F, RAO H Y, DENG Y J, et al . Adjoint-based robust optimization design of laminar flow wi ng under flight condition uncertainties[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023 , 36 ( 6 ): 19 − 34 .
COOK L W, JARRETT J P . Robust airfoil optimization and the importance of appropriately representing uncertainty[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2017 , 55 ( 11 ): 3925 − 3939 .
CHATTERJEE T, CHAKRABORTY S, CHOWDHURY R . A critical review of surrogate assisted robust design optimization[J ] . Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2019 , 26 ( 1 ): 245 − 274 .
ZHAO H. Research on efficient surrogate-based aerodynamic optimization and robust aerodynamic design methods[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020(in Chinese).
MATHELIN L, HUSSAINI M Y, ZANG T A . Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations[J ] . Numerical Algorithms, 2005 , 38 ( 1 ): 209 − 236 .
PUTKO M M, TAYLOR A C III, NEWMAN P A, et al . Approach for input uncertainty propagation and robust design in CFD using sensitivity derivatives[J ] . Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002 , 124 ( 1 ): 60 − 69 .
HELTON J, JOHNSON J, OBERKAMPF W . An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions[J ] . Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004 , 85 ( 1 ): 39 − 71 .
AGARWAL H, RENAUD J E, PRESTON E L, et al . Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2004 , 85 ( 1-3 ): 281 − 294 .
HELTON J C, JOHNSON J D, OBERKAMPF W L, et al . Sensitivity analysis in conjunction with evidence theory representations of epistemic uncertainty[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2006 , 91 ( 10-11 ): 1414 − 1434 .
DU X P . Reliability-based design optimization with dependent interval variables[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012 , 91 ( 2 ): 218 − 228 .
DU X S, LEIFSSON L T, KOZIEL S. Robust airfoil design optimization using stochastic expansions and utility theory[C]// 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia, 2017.
TURÁNYI T . Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications[J ] . Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1990 , 5 ( 3 ): 203 − 248 .
BUZZARD G T . Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos[J ] . Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2012 , 107 : 82 − 89 .
HELTON J C, JOHNSON J D, SALLABERRY C J, et al . Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2006 , 91 ( 10-11 ): 1175 − 1209 .
JACQUES J, LAVERGNE C, DEVICTOR N . Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs[J ] . Reliab ility Engineering and System Safety, 2005 , 91 ( 10 ): 1126 − 1134 .
CRESTAUX T, MAIˆTRE O L, MARTINEZ J M . Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2009 , 94 ( 7 ): 1161 − 1172 .
SUDRET B . Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2008 , 93 ( 7 ): 964 − 979 .
GUO J, DU X P . Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2007 , 45 ( 9 ): 2337 − 2349 .
BAE H R, GRANDHI R V, CANFIELD R A . Sensitivity analysis of structural response uncertainty propagation using evidence theory[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006 , 31 ( 4 ): 270 − 279 .
TRIPATHY R K, BILIONIS I . Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2018 , 375 : 565 − 588 .
PEHERSTORFER B, WILLCOX K, GUNZBURGER M . Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization[J ] . SIAM Review, 2018 , 60 ( 3 ): 550 − 591 .
XIU D B, KARNIADAKIS G E . Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2003 , 187 ( 1 ): 137 − 167 .
JANSSEN H . Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2013 , 109 : 123 − 132 .
DIAZ P, DOOSTAN A, HAMPTON J . Sparse polynomial chaos expansions via compressed sensing and D-optimal design[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018 , 336 : 640 − 666 .
HAMPTON J, DOOSTAN A . Compressive sampling of polynomial chaos expansions: Convergence analysis and sampling strategies[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2015 , 280 : 363 − 386 .
HADIGOL M, DOOSTAN A . Least squares polynomial chaos expansion: A review of sampling strategies[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018 , 332 : 382 − 407 .
PEHERSTORFER B, GUNZBURGER M, WILLCOX K . Convergence analysis of multifidelity Monte Carlo estimation[J ] . Numerische Mathematik, 2018 , 139 ( 3 ): 683 − 707 .
HU X Z, CHEN X Q, PARKS G T, et al . Review of improved Monte Carlo methods in uncertainty-based design optimization for aerospace vehicles[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016 , 86 : 20 − 27 .
LEE S H, CHEN W, KWAK B M . Robust design with arbitrary distributions using Gauss-type quadrature formula[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009 , 39 ( 3 ): 227 − 243 .
RAHMAN S, XU H . A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics[J ] . Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004 , 19 ( 4 ): 393 − 408 .
XU H, RAHMAN S . A generalized dimension-reduction method for multidimensional integration in stochastic mechanics[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004 , 61 ( 12 ): 1992 − 2019 .
PADULO M, CAMPOBASSO M S, GUENOV M D . Novel uncertainty propagation method for robust aerodynamic design[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2011 , 49 ( 3 ): 530 − 543 .
GERSTNER T, GRIEBEL M . Numerical integration using sparse grids[J ] . Numerical Algorithms, 1998 , 18 ( 3 ): 209 − 232 .
XIU D B, KARNIADAKIS G E . The wiener-askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations[J ] . SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2002 , 24 ( 2 ): 619 − 644 .
CAMERON R H, MARTIN W T . The orthogonal development of non-linear functionals in series of fourier-Hermite functionals[J ] . The Annals of Mathematics, 1947 , 48 ( 2 ): 385 .
BLATMAN G, SUDRET B . Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2011 , 230 ( 6 ): 2345 − 2367 .
PERKÓ Z, GILLI L, LATHOUWERS D, et al . Grid and basis adaptive polynomial chaos techniques for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2014 , 260 : 54 − 84 .
DONOHO D L . Compressed sensing[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006 , 52 ( 4 ): 1289 − 1306 .
RAUHUT H, WARD R . Sparse Legendre expan sions via l 1 -minimization[J ] . Journal of Approximation Theory, 2012 , 164 ( 5 ): 517 − 533 .
TROPP J A, GILBERT A C . Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007 , 53 ( 12 ): 4655 − 4666 .
PENG J, HAMPTON J, DOOSTAN A . A weighted-minimization approach for sparse polynomial chaos expansions[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2014 , 267 : 92 − 111 .
GUO L, NARAYAN A, ZHOU T . A gradient enhanced ℓ1-minimization for sparse approximation of polynomial chaos expansions[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2018 , 367 : 49 − 64 .
SALEHI S, RAISEE M, CERVANTES M J, et al . An efficient multifidelity ℓ1-minimization method for sparse polynomial chaos[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018 , 334 : 183 − 207 .
JUNG D H, LEE B C . Development of a simple and efficient method for robust optimization[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002 , 53 ( 9 ): 2201 − 2215 .
GENEVA N, ZABARAS N . Quantifying model form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged turbulence models with Bayesian deep neural networks[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2019 , 383 : 125 − 147 .
ASAFUDDOULA M, SINGH H K, RAY T . Six-sigma robust design optimization using a many-objective decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2015 , 19 ( 4 ): 490 − 507 .
JAMESON A. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory[C]// 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina, 1995.
QUEIPO N V, HAFTKA R T, SHYY W, et al . Surrogate-based analysis and optimization[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005 , 41 ( 1 ): 1 − 28 .
RALLABHANDI S K, WEST T K, NIELSEN E J . Uncertainty analysis and robust design of low-boom concepts using atmospheric adjoints[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2016 , 54 ( 3 ): 902 − 917 .
FRAGKOS K B, PAPOUTSIS-KIACHAGIAS E M, GIANNAKOGLOU K C . pFOSM: An efficient algorithm for aerodynamic robust design based on continuous adjoint and matrix-vector products[J ] . Computers Fluids, 2019 , 181 : 57 − 66 .
BONS N P, HE X L, MADER C A, et al . Multimodality in aerodynamic wing design optimization[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2019 , 57 ( 3 ): 1004 − 1018 .
POOLE D J, ALLEN C B, RENDALL T C S . Global optimization of wing aerodynamic optimization case exhibiting multimodality[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2018 , 55 ( 4 ): 1576 − 1591 .
CHERNUKHIN O, ZINGG D W . Multimodality and global optimization in aerodynamic design[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2013 , 51 ( 6 ): 1342 − 1354 .
WU X J, ZHANG W W, SONG S F . Robust aerodynamic shape design based on an adaptive stochastic optimization framework[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018 , 57 ( 2 ): 639 − 651 .
LEE S W, KWON O J . Robust airfoil shape optimization using design for six sigma[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2006 , 43 ( 3 ): 843 − 846 .
HUANG B Q, DU X P . A robust design method using variable transformation and Gauss–Hermite integration[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006 , 66 ( 12 ): 1841 − 1858 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XIA L . Novel multi-fidelity surrogate model assisted many-objective optimization method[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023 , 44 ( 6 ): 126962 (in Chinese).
HU W, LI M, AZARM S, et al . Multi-objective robust optimiz ation under interval uncertainty using online approximation and constraint cuts[J ] . Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011 , 133 ( 6 ): 061002 .
GUNAWAN S, AZARM S . Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005 , 29 ( 1 ): 50 − 60 .
MESSAC A, ISMAIL-YAHAYA A . Multiobjective robust design using physical programming[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002 , 23 ( 5 ): 357 − 371 .
DU X P, VENIGELLA P K, LIU D S . Robust mechanism synthesis with random and interval variables[J ] . Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009 , 44 ( 7 ): 1321 − 1337 .
WU X J, ZHANG W W, SONG S F . Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of transonic aerodynamics with geometric uncertainty[J ] . International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017 , 2017 : 8107190 .
IULIANO E . Global optimization of benchmark aerodynamic cases using physics-based surrogate models[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017 , 67 : 273 − 286 .
LYU Z J, KENWAY G K W, MARTINS J R R A . Aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the common research model wing benchmark[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2014 , 53 ( 4 ): 968 − 985 .
LIEM R P, MARTINS J R R A, KENWAY G K W . Expected drag minimization for aerodynamic design optimization based on aircraft operational data[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017 , 63 : 344 − 362 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XU F, et al . Adaptive multi-fidelity sparse polynomial chaos-Kriging metamodeling for global approximation of aerodynamic data[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021 , 64 ( 2 ): 829 − 858 .
ZHAO H, GAO Z H. Robust design optimization of benchmark aerodynamic case based on polynomial chaos expansion [C]// 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2018.
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XIA L . Efficient aerodynamic analysis and optimization under uncertainty using multi-fidelity polynomial chaos-Kriging surrogate model[J ] . Computers Fluids, 2022 , 246 : 105643 .
DU X P, CHEN W . Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design[J ] . Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000 , 122 ( 4 ): 385 − 394 .
AHN J, KIM S, KWON J H . Reliability-based wing design optimization using trust region-sequential quadratic programming framework[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2005 , 42 ( 5 ): 1331 − 1336 .
PAIVA R M, CRAWFORD C, SULEMAN A . Robust and reliability-based design optimization framework for wing design[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2014 , 52 ( 4 ): 711 − 724 .
GAO Z H. Advanced laminar flow aerodynamic configuration optimization design for green aviation[C]// 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia, 2014.
KRISHNAN K S G, BERTRAM O, SEIBEL O . Review of hybrid laminar flow control systems[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2017 , 93 : 24 − 52 .
SABATER C , BEKEMEYER P , GÖRTZ S . Robust design of transonic natural laminar flow wings under environmental and operational uncertainties[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2021 , 60 ( 2 ): 1 − 16 .
XIONG N, TAO Y, LIU Z Y, et al . Uncertainty quantification-based robust aerodynamic optimization of laminar flow nacelle[J ] . Modern Physics Letters B, 2018 , 32 : 1840048 .
YAO Y, MA D L, YANG M Q, et al . Adaptive-surrogate-based robust optimization of transonic natural laminar flow nacelle[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021 , 34 ( 10 ): 36 − 52 .
TANG Z L, ZHANG M F, HU X . Optimal shape design and transition uncertainty analysis of transonic axisymmetric natural lami nar flow nacelle at high Reynolds number[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022 , 121 : 107345 .
YANG T H, CHEN Y F, SHI Y Y, et al . Stochastic investigation on the robustness of laminar-flow wings for flight tests[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2022 , 60 ( 4 ): 2266 − 2286 .
SHI Y Y, LAN Q S, LAN X Y, et al . Robust optimization design of a flying wing using adjoint and uncertainty-based aerodynamic optimization approach[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023 , 66 ( 5 ): 110 .
QUAGLIARELLA D, IULIANO E . Robust design of a supersonic natural laminar flow wing-body[J ] . IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2017 , 12 ( 4 ): 14 − 27 .
QUAGLIARELLA D, IULIANO E. UQ sensitivity analysis and robust design optimization of a supersonic natural laminar flow wing-body[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
ZHAO H, GAO Z H, WANG C, et al . Resear ch on computational grid suitable for high-speed laminar airfoil[J ] . Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2018 , 35 ( 2 ): 351 − 357 (in Chinese).
WANG X D, HIRSCH C, LIU Z Y, et al . Uncertainty-based robust aerodynamic optimization of rotor blades[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013 , 94 ( 2 ): 111 − 127 .
KUMAR A, KEANE A J, NAIR P B, et al . Robust design of compressor fan blades against erosion[J ] . Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006 , 128 ( 4 ): 864 − 873 .
TANG X Z, WANG Z, XIAO P, et al . Uncertainty quantification based optimization of centrifugal compressor impeller for aerodynamic robustness under stochastic operational conditions[J ] . Energy, 2020 , 195 : 116930 .
KESHAVARZZADEH V, GHANEM R G, TORTORELLI D A . Shape optimization under uncertainty for rotor blades of horizontal axis wind turbines[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019 , 354 : 271 − 306 .
JUN S, YEE K, LEE J, et al . Robust design optimization of unmanned aerial vehicle coaxial rotor considering operational uncertainty[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2011 , 48 ( 2 ): 353 − 367 .
KWON H, CHOI S, KWON J H, et al . Surrogate-based robust optimization and design to unsteady low-noise open rotors[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2016 , 53 ( 5 ): 1448 − 1467 .
FUSI F, GUARDONE A, QUARANTA G, et al . Multifidelity physics-based method for robust optimization applied to a hovering rotor airfoil[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2015 , 53 ( 11 ): 3448 − 3465 .
JAEGER L, GOGU C, SEGONDS S, et al . Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization under both model and design variables uncertainty[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2013 , 50 ( 2 ): 528 − 538 .
SAPORITO M, DA RONCH A, BARTOLI N, et al . Robust multidisciplinary analysis and optimization for con ceptual design of flexible aircraft under dynamic aeroelastic constraints[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023 , 138 : 108349 .
LIU G, HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, et al . Investigation of supersonic low sonic boom aerodynamic configuration design[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020 , 38 ( 5 ): 858 − 865 (in Chinese).
QIAN Z S, HAN Z H . Progress and challenges of sonic boom research[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019 , 37 ( 4 ): 601 − 619 (in Chinese).
COLONNO M, ALONSO J. Sonic boom minimization revisited: the robustness of optimal low-boom designs[C]// 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, Texas. Reston, Virginia, 2010.
SCHAEFER J A, LAZZARA D S, LEDOUX S T. Robust Design of Sonic Boom Performance using Spatially Accurate Polynomial Chaos[C]// AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, National Harbor, MD Online. Reston, Virginia, 2023.
Shimoyama K, Inoue A . Uncertainty quantification by the nonintrusive polynomial chao s expansion with an adjustment strategy[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2016 , 54 ( 10 ): 3107 − 3116 .
George A, Seebass R . Sonic boom minimization including both front and rear shocks[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1971 , 9 ( 10 ): 2091 − 2093 .
TEKASLAN E H, YILDIZ S, DEMIROGLU Y, et al . Implementation of multidisciplinary and multifidelity uncertainty quantification methods for sonic boom prediction[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2022 , 60 ( 2 ): 410 − 422 .
ZHAO H, HUANG Y J, XING H N . Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos-based flow field/sonic boom uncertainty quantification under multi-parameter uncertainties[J ] . Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023 , 55 ( 9 ): 2027 − 2042 (in Chinese).
PAN X Y, WANG X J, WANG R X, et al . Infrared radiation and stealth characteristics prediction for supersonic aircraft with uncertainty[J ] . Infrared Physics Technology, 2015 , 73 : 238 − 250 .
PAGANI P, MINVIELLE-LARROUSSE P, SESQUES M. Uncertainty quantification for the RCS of a coated target using an IBC-based metamodel[C]// 2021 51st European Microwave Conference (EuMC), London, United Kingdom, 2022.
WANG K C, HE Z, DING D Z, et al . Uncertainty scattering analysis of 3-D objects with varying shape based on method of moments[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2019 , 67 ( 4 ): 2835 − 2840 .
NIE Y, YU X Q. Research on robust optimization design of electromagnetic scattering characteristics of wing stealth structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(增): 104-108(in Chinese).
赵欢, 高正红. 基于新型多可信度代理模型的高效气动稳健设计方法[C], 第二届中国空气动力学大会, 天津, 2022.
ALLEN M, MAUTE K . Reliability-based design optimization of aeroelastic structures[J ] . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004 , 27 ( 4 ): 228 − 242 .
ALLEN M, MAUTE K . Reliability-based sha pe optimization of structures undergoing fluid–structure interaction phenomena[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005 , 194 ( 30-33 ): 3472 − 3495 .
STANFORD B, BERAN P . Direct flutter and limit cycle computations of highly flexible wings for efficient analysis and optimization[J ] . Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013 , 36 : 111 − 123 .
MANI K, MAVRIPLIS D J . Unsteady discrete adjoint formulation for two-dimensional flow problems with deforming meshes[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2008 , 46 ( 6 ): 1351 − 1364 .
NIKBAY M, KURU M N . Reliability based multidisciplinary optimization of aeroelastic systems with structural and aerodynamic uncertainties[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2013 , 50 ( 3 ): 708 − 715 .
VERHOOSEL C V, SCHOLCZ T P, HULSHOFF S J, et al . Uncertainty and reliability analysis of fluid-structure stability boundaries[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2009 , 47 ( 1 ): 91 − 104 .
MANAN A, COOPER J . Design of composite wings including uncertainties: A probabilistic approach[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2009 , 46 ( 2 ): 601 − 607 .
SCARTH C, COOPER J E, WEAVER P M, et al . Uncertainty quantification of aeroelastic stability of composite plate wings using lamination parameters[J ] . Composite Structures, 2014 , 116 : 84 − 93 .
HOSDER S, WALTERS R, BALCH M. Efficient uncertainty quantification applied to the aeroelastic analysis of a transonic wing[C]// 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia, 2008.
MISSOUM S, DRIBUSCH C, BERAN P . Reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear aeroelasticity problems[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2010 , 47 ( 3 ): 992 − 998 .
SCARTH C, SARTOR P, COOPER J E, et al. Robust aeroelastic design of a composite wing-box[C]// 17th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia, 2015.
SCARTH C, SARTOR P N, COOPER J E, et al . Robust and reliability-based aeroelastic design of composite plate wings[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2017 , 55 ( 10 ): 3539 − 3552 .
DA RONCH A, DROFELNIK J, VAN ROOIJ M P C, et al . Aerodynamic and aeroelastic uncertainty quantification of nato sto avt-251 unmanned combat aerial vehicle[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019 , 91 : 627 − 639 .
PHILLIPS B D, WEST T K. Aeroelastic uncertainty quantification of a low-boom aircraft configuration[C]// 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia, 2018.
ELDRED M S, SWILER L P, TANG G . Mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification with stochastic expansions and optimization-based interval estimation[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2011 , 96 ( 9 ): 1092 − 1113 .
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621