A review of large eddy simulation of aviation turbulence

SONG Junqiang; BAI Haokun; CHENG Bin; ZHANG Ning; ZHANG Weimin; LENG Hongze; ZHAO Wenjing; ZHANG Ze

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0104

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A review of large eddy simulation of aviation turbulence

更新时间：2026-05-28

- A review of large eddy simulation of aviation turbulence
- Vol. 41, Issue 8, Pages: 26-43(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 国防科技大学气象海洋学院,长沙,410073
  2. 南京大学大气科学学院,南京,210023
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0104
  CLC： P429;P435+.1;P456.7;V328.1
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
宋君强, 白皓坤, 程彬, 等. 大涡模拟技术在航空湍流研究中的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(8): 26−43.

SONG Junqiang, BAI Haokun, CHENG Bin, et al. A review of large eddy simulation of aviation turbulence[J]. 2023, 41(8): 26-43.
宋君强, 白皓坤, 程彬, 等. 大涡模拟技术在航空湍流研究中的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(8): 26−43. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0104

SONG Junqiang, BAI Haokun, CHENG Bin, et al. A review of large eddy simulation of aviation turbulence[J]. 2023, 41(8): 26-43. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0104.

摘要

航空湍流是威胁飞行安全的重要因素，它的形成机制复杂，一直是航空气象研究中的重点难点问题之一。近年来，随着大涡模拟（large eddy simulation，LES）技术的发展，LES已经成为研究航空湍流问题的重要方法。本文围绕在飞机起降阶段的飞机尾涡和低空湍流以及巡航阶段的对流湍流、山地波湍流和晴空湍流这五类航空湍流对飞机颠簸造成的影响，综述了LES技术在相关方向的研究进展，并对LES技术应用中亟需解决的问题及未来的重点研究方向进行了总结与展望。整体来看，航空湍流的LES模拟研究已经取得较大进展，高分辨率的LES可以更加明确航空湍流的来源和生命周期，显著提升了对航空湍流的机制认知和诊断预警能力。但在机制方面，对各种复杂湍流过程的相互影响机制仍然不够清楚；在数值模式技术方面，LES模拟与模式初始状态、边界条件和模式参数化方案的敏感性问题仍然有待解决。未来，LES与中尺度区域模式变网格嵌套技术、动态网格技术、集合预报与概率预报技术的发展，以及与深度学习等方法的结合都将进一步有效提升LES在航空湍流模拟方面的计算效率和预报能力。

Abstract

Aviation turbulence is an essential factor threatening flight safety. However

due to its complex mechanism

which study has been one of the key issues faced by the aviation industry. In recent years

with the development of large eddy numerical simulation (LES)

which has become an important method to solve aviation turbulence problems. This study reviews the research progress of LES technology in the past few decades

focusing on the impact of aircraft trailing vortex wakes and low-level turbulence during the takeoff and landing phase

as well as convective induced turbulence

mountain wave turbulence

and clear air turbulence during the cruise phase on aircraft turbulence. It also summarizes and prospects the urgent problems to be solved in the application of LES technology and future key research directions. Overall

LES simulation research on aviation turbulence has got much achievement

which can clarify the source and lifecycle of aviation turbulence more clearly

significantly improving the mechanism cognition

quantitative diagnosis

prediction and warning capabilities. However

in terms of mechanism

the interaction mechanism of various complex turbulent processes is still unclear; in terms of numerical model techniques

the predictive skill of LES of aviation turbulence is still limited by errors in initial conditions

boundary conditions

and the models themselves (e.g.

parameterizations

dynamical methods). In the future

the development of nesting and dynamic grid technology between LES and mesoscale regional models

high-resolution ensemble prediction methods and probability prediction approaches

as well as the combination with deep learning methods will further improve the computational efficiency and prediction ability of LES on aviation turbulence simulation and forecasting.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHOU J H. Aviation meteorological service[M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2011 (in Chinese).

HU B Y, TANG J P, WANG S Y. Future change of clear-air turbulence over East Asia: base on CORDEX-WRF downscaling technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2022, 65(7): 2432-2447. (in Chinese)

LESTER P F. Turbulence: A mew perspective for pilots[M]. Jeppesen Sanderson, 1993.

SHARMAN R D, CORNMAN L B, MEYMARIS G, et al. Description and derived climatologies of automated in situ eddy-dissipation-rate reports of atmospheric turbulence[J ] . Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2014, 53(6): 1416-1432. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-1 3-0329.1

SANDERS S. 125 Questions: Exploration and discovery [M]. Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office, 2021.

LAMB H. Hydrodynamics, sixth edition [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1932.

STEWART R W. Turbulence and waves in a stratified atmosphere[J]. Radio Science, 1969, 4(12): 1269-1278. DOI: 10.1029/rs004i012p01269

GAGE K S. Atmospheric turbulence and mesoscale meteorology: Dynamic processes contributing to the mesoscale spectrum of atmospheric motions[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

SHARMAN R D, TRIER S B, LANE T P, et al. Sources and dynamics of turbulence in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: a review[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2012, 39(12). doi: 10.1029/2012gl051996

FEDOROVICH E E, ROTUNNO R, STEVENS B, et al. Atmospheric turbulence and mesoscale meteorology: scientific research inspired by Doug Lilly[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

KÜHNLEIN C, DÖRNBRACK A, GERZ T. Advanced numerical modeling of turbulent atmospheric flows[M]//SCHUMANN U. Atmospheric Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 529-542. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_32

SMAGORINSKY J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1963, 91(3): 99-164. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)0910099: gcewtp2.3.co;2

DEARDORFF J. A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1970, 41: 453-480. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112070000691

LANE T P, SHARMAN R D, CLARK T L, et al. An investigation of turbulence generation mechanisms above deep convection[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2003, 60(10): 1297-1321. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2003)601297: aiotgm2.0.co;2

MOENG C H, DUDHIA J, KLEMP J, et al. Examining two-way grid nesting for large eddy simulation of the PBL using the WRF model[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2007, 135(6): 2295-2311. DOI: 10.1175/mwr3406.1

KIM J H, CHUN H Y. A numerical study of clear-air turbulence (CAT) encounters over South Korea on 2 April 2007[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2010, 49(12): 2381-2403. DOI: 10.1175/2010jamc2449.1

ÓLAFSSON H, ÁGÚSTSSON H. Gravity wave breaking in easterly flow over Greenland and associated low level barrier- and reverse tip-jets[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2009, 104(3): 191-197. DOI: 10.1007/s00703-009-0024-9

TALBOT C, BOU-ZEID E, SMITH J. Nested mesoscale large-eddy simulations with WRF: performance in real test cases[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2012, 13(5): 1421-1441. DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-11-048.1

RAI R K, BERG L K, KOSOVIĆ B, et al. Comparison of measured and numerically simulated turbulence statistics in a convective boundary layer over complex terrain[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2017, 163(1): 69-89. DOI: 10.1007/s10546-016-0217-y

MUÑOZ-ESPARZA D, KOSOVIĆ B, MIROCHA J, et al. Bridging the transition from mesoscale to microscale turbulence in numerical weather prediction models[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2014, 153(3): 409-440. DOI: 10.1007/s10546-014-9956-9

MUÑOZ-ESPARZA D, SHARMAN R, SAUER J, et al. Toward low-level turbulence forecasting at eddy-resolving scales[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(16): 8655-8664. DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078642

DOYLE J D, REYNOLDS C A. Implications of regime transitions for mountain-wave-breaking predictability[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2008, 136(12): 5211-5223. DOI: 10.1175/2008mwr2554.1

LANE T P, DOYLE J D, SHARMAN R D, et al. Statistics and dynamics of aircraft encounters of turbulence over Greenland[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2009, 137(8): 2687-2702. DOI: 10.1175/2009mwr2878.1

DOYLE J D, GRUBIŠIĆ V, BROWN W O J, et al. Observations and numerical simulations of subrotor vortices during T-REX[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 66(5): 1229-1249. DOI: 10.1175/2008jas2933.1

LIU Y B, WARNER T, LIU Y W, et al. Simultaneous nested modeling from the synoptic scale to the LES scale for wind energy applications[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99(4): 308-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.013

ZHOU B W, CHOW F K. Large-eddy simulation of the stable boundary layer with explicit filtering and reconstruction turbulence modeling[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2011, 68(9): 2142-2155. DOI: 10.1175/2011jas3693.1

ZHOU B W, CHOW F K. Nested large-eddy simulations of the intermittently turbulent stable atmospheric boundary layer over real terrain[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 71(3): 1021-1039. DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-13-0168.1

CHU X A, XUE L L, GEERTS B, et al. A case study of radar observations and WRF LES simulations of the impact of ground-based glaciogenic seeding on orographic clouds and precipitation. part I: observations and model validations[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2014, 53(10): 2264-2286. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-14-0017.1

CHEN G X, ZHU X Y, SHA W M, et al. Toward improved forecasts of sea-breeze horizontal convective rolls at super high resolutions. part I: configuration and verification of a down-scaling simulation system (DS3)[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2015, 143(5): 1849-1872. DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-14-00212.1

JÄHN M, MUÑOZ-ESPARZA D, CHOUZA F, et al. Investigations of boundary layer structure, cloud characteristics and vertical mixing of aerosols at Barbados with large eddy simulations[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(2): 651-674. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-651-2016

SAUER J A, MUÑOZ-ESPARZA D, CANFIELD J M, et al. A large-eddy simulation study of atmospheric boundary layer influence on stratified flows over terrain[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2016, 73(7): 2615-2632. DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-15-0282.1

LENZ A, BEDKA K M, FELTZ W F, et al. Convectively induced transverse band signatures in satellite imagery[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2009, 24(5): 1362-1373. DOI: 10.1175/2009waf2222285.1

LANE T P, SHARMAN R D, TRIER S B, et al. Recent advances in the understanding of near-cloud turbulence[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2012, 93(4): 499-515. DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-11-00062.1

TRIER S B, SHARMAN R D, LANE T P. Influences of moist convection on a cold-season outbreak of clear-air turbulence (CAT) [J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2012, 140(8): 2477-2496.https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00353.1

WEI J H, ZHANG F Q. Mesoscale gravity waves in moist baroclinic jet–front systems[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 71(3): 929-952. DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-13-0171.1

MENEVEAU C, LUND T S, CABOT W H. A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 319: 353. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096007379

BARDINA J, FERZIGER J, REYNOLDS W. Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation[C]// 13th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1980: AIAA1980-1357. doi: 10.2514/6.1980-1357

BARDINO J, FERZIGER J, REYNOLDS W. Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulation of homogeneous, incompressible, turbulent flows[R]. NASA-CR-166541, 1983.

ZANG Y, STREET R L, KOSEFF J R. A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows[J]. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1993, 5(12): 3186-3196. DOI: 10.1063/1.858675

CUI G X, ZHOU H B, ZHANG Z S, et al. A new dynamic subgrid eddy viscosity model with application to turbulent channel flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(8): 2835-2842. DOI: 10.1063/1.1762911

CUI G X, XU C X, FANG L, et al. A new subgrid eddy-viscosity model for large-eddy simulation of anisotropic turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 582: 377-397. DOI: 10.1017/s002211200700599x

DEARDORFF J W. Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1980, 18(4): 495-527. DOI: 10.1007/BF00119502

MOENG C H. A large-eddy-simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1984, 41(13): 2052-2062. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)0412052: alesmf2.0.co;2

GOSSARD E E, HOOKE W H. Waves in the atmosphere [M]// VISCONTI G. Fundamentals of physics and chemistry of the atmosphere. Springer Cham, 1975: 297-337.

GRABOWSKI W W, CLARK T L. Cloud–environment interface instability: rising thermal calculations in two spatial dimensions[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1991, 48(4): 527-546. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1991)0480527: ciirtc2.0.co;2

KUDO A. The generation of turbulence below midlevel cloud bases: the effect of cooling due to sublimation of snow[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2013, 52(4): 819-833. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-12-0232.1

BEDARD A. Atmospheric turbulence aloft - A review of possible methods for detection, warning, and validation of prediction models[C]// 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1993: AIAA1993-847. doi: 10.2514/6.1993-847

FOLDVIK A, WURTELE M G. The computation of the transient gravity wave[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1967, 13(1-3): 167-185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1967.tb02152.x

LILLY D K, KLEMP J B. The effects of terrain shape on nonlinear hydrostatic mountain waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1979, 95(2): 241-261. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112079001452

BANNON J K. Weather systems associated with some occasions of severe turbulence at high altitude [J]. Meteorological Magazine, 1952: 97-101.

DUTTON J A, PANOFSKY H A. Clear air turbulence: a mystery may be unfolding[J]. Science, 1970, 167(3920): 937-944. DOI: 10.1126/science.167.3920.937

LANE T P, DOYLE J D, PLOUGONVEN R, et al. Observations and numerical simulations of inertia–gravity waves and shearing instabilities in the vicinity of a jet stream[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2004, 61(22): 2692-2706. DOI: 10.1175/jas3305.1

KOCH S E, JAMISON B D, LU C G, et al. Turbulence and gravity waves within an upper-level front[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2005, 62(11): 3885-3908.

STULL R B. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1988: 545-585. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8_13

SULLIVAN P P, MCWILLIAMS J C, MOENG C H. A grid nesting method for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1996, 80(1): 167-202. DOI: 10.1007/BF00119016

MUÑOZ-ESPARZA D, LUNDQUIST J K, SAUER J A, et al. Coupled mesoscale-LES modeling of a diurnal cycle during theCWEX-13 field campaign: from weather to boundary-layer eddies[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2017, 9(3): 1572-1594. DOI: 10.1002/2017ms000960

HALLOCK J N, HOLZÄPFEL F. A review of recent wake vortex research for increasing airport capacity[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2018, 98: 27-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.003

GERZ T, HOLZÄPFEL F, DARRACQ D. Commercial aircraft wake vortices[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(3): 181-208. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00004-0

ROBINS R E, DELISI D P, GREENE G C. Algorithm for prediction of trailing vortex evolution[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(5): 911-917. DOI: 10.2514/2.2851

SHEN S H, DING F, HAN J, et al. Numerical modeling studies of wake vortices - Real case simulations[C]//Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1999: AIAA1999-755. doi: 10.2514/6.1999-755

PROCTOR F, HAN J. Numerical study of wake vortex interaction with the ground using the terminal area simulation system[C]// 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1999: AIAA1999-754. doi: 10.2514/6.1999-754

JOHN WANG C H, ZHAO D, SCHLÜTER J, et al. LES study on the shape effect of ground obstacles on wake vortex dissipation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 63: 245-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.032

STEPHAN A, HOLZÄPFEL F, MISAKA T. Aircraft wake-vortex decay in ground proximity—physical mechanisms and artificial enhancement[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(4): 1250-1260. DOI: 10.2514/1.c032179

LIN M D, CUI G X, ZHANG Z S. Large eddy simulation of aircraft wake vortex with self-adaptive grid method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2016, 37(10): 1289-1304. DOI: 10.1007/s10483-016-2132-9

LIN M D, CUI G X, ZHANG Z S, et al. Large eddy simulation on the evolution and the fast-time prediction of aircraft wake vortices[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(6): 1185-1200. (in Chinese)

HAN J, LIN Y L, SCHOWALTER D G, et al. Large eddy simulation of aircraft wake vortices within homogeneous turbulence - Crow instability[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38: 292-300. DOI: 10.2514/3.14409

PROCTOR F, AHMAD N, SWITZER G. Crosswind shear gradient affect on wake vortices[C]// 3rd AIAA Atmospheric Space Environments Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2011: AIAA2011-3038. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3038

ZHANG J D, ZUO Q H, LIN M D, et al. Evolution of vortices in the wake of an ARJ21 airplane: application of the lift-drag model[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2020, 10(6): 419-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2020.01.054

ZHANG J D, ZUO Q H, LIN M D, et al. Numerical simulation on near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane with crosswind[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 125043. (in Chinese)

PARAMASIVAM S, ZHAO D, SKOTE M, et al. Detailed study of effects of crosswind and turbulence intensity on aircraft wake-vortex in ground proximity[C]// 34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Washington, D. C. . Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: AIAA2016-4184. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-4184

LI D, XU Z M, ZHANG K, et al. Study on the influence of linear and nonlinear distribution of crosswind on the motion of aircraft wake vortex[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 235(14): 1981-1990. DOI: 10.1177/0954410020987430

LANE T P, SHARMAN R D. Some influences of background flow conditions on the generation of turbulence due to gravity wave breaking above deep convection[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2008, 47(11): 2777-2796. DOI: 10.1175/2008jamc1787.1

KIM J H, CHUN H Y. A numerical simulation of convectively induced turbulence above deep convection[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2012, 51(6): 1180-1200. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-11-0140.1

MADDOX R A. Large-scale meteorological conditions associated with midlatitude, mesoscale convective complexes[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1983, 111(7): 1475-1493. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1983)1111475: lsmcaw2.0.co;2

COTTON W R, LIN M S, MCANELLY R L, et al. A composite model of mesoscale convective complexes[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1989, 117(4): 765-783. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)1170765: acmomc2.0.co;2

RAYMOND D J, JIANG H. A theory for long-lived mesoscale convective systems[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1990, 47(24): 3067-3077. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)0473067: atfllm2.0.co;2

TRIER S B, DAVIS C A. Mesoscale convective vortices observed during BAMEX. part II: influences on secondary deep convection[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2007, 135(6): 2051-2075. DOI: 10.1175/mwr3399.1

TRIER S B, SHARMAN R D. Convection-permitting simulations of the environment supporting widespread turbulence within the upper-level outflow of a mesoscale convective system[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2009, 137(6): 1972-1990. DOI: 10.1175/2008mwr2770.1

ELLROD G P, KNAPP D I. An objective clear-air turbulence forecasting technique: verification and operational use[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 1992, 7(1): 150-165. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1992)0070150: aocatf2.0.co;2

SHARMAN R, TEBALDI C, WIENER G, et al. An integrated approach to mid- and upper-level turbulence forecasting[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2006, 21(3): 268-287. DOI: 10.1175/waf924.1

WOLFF J K, SHARMAN R D. Climatology of upper-level turbulence over the contiguous United States[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2008, 47(8): 2198-2214. DOI: 10.1175/2008jamc1799.1

CLARK T L, PELTIER W R. Critical level reflection and the resonant growth of nonlinear mountain waves[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1984, 41(21): 3122-3134. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)0413122: clratr2.0.co;2

BACMEISTER J T, SCHOEBERL M R. Breakdown of vertically propagating two-dimensional gravity waves forced by orography[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1989, 46(14): 2109-2134. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)0462109: bovptd2.0.co;2

ÓLAFSSON H, BOUGEAULT P. Nonlinear flow past an elliptic mountain ridge[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1996, 53(17): 2465-2489. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)0532465: nfpaem2.0.co;2

ÓLAFSSON H, BOUGEAULT P. The effect of rotation and surface friction on orographic drag[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1997, 54(1): 193-210. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)0540193: teoras2.0.co;2

EPIFANIO C C, DURRAN D R. Three-dimensional effects in high-drag-state flows over long ridges[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(9): 1051-1065. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)0581051: tdeihd2.0.co;2

BRETHERTON F P. Momentum transport by gravity waves[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1969, 95(404): 213-243. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49709540402

PALMER T N, SHUTTS G J, SWINBANK R. Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parametrization[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1986, 112(474): 1001-1039. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49711247406

PELTIER W R, CLARK T L. The evolution and stability of finite-amplitude mountain waves. part II: surface wave drag and severe downslope windstorms[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1979, 36(8): 1498-1529. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1979)0361498: teasof2.0.co;2

DURRAN D R. Another look at downslope windstorms. part I: the development of analogs to supercritical flow in an infinitely deep, continuously stratified fluid[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1986, 43(21): 2527-2543. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)0432527: aladwp2.0.co;2

SCHÄR C, SMITH R B. Shallow-water flow past isolated topography. part I: vorticity production and wake formation[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1993, 50(10): 1373-1400. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)0501373: swfpit2.0.co;2

THORPE A J, VOLKERT H, HEIMANN D. Potential vorticity of flow along the Alps[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1993, 50(11): 1573-1590. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)0501573: pvofat2.0.co;2

AEBISCHER U, SCHÄR C. Low-level potential vorticity and cyclogenesis to the lee of the Alps[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1998, 55(2): 186-207. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)0550186: llpvac2.0.co;2

DOYLE J D, DURRAN D R. Rotor and subrotor dynamics in the Lee of three-dimensional terrain[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2007, 64(12): 4202-4221.

CLARK T L, HALL W D, KERR R M, et al. Origins of aircraft-damaging clear-air turbulence during the 9 December 1992 Colorado downslope windstorm: numerical simulations and comparison with observations[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 57(8): 1105-1131. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)0571105: ooadca2.0.co;2

LEUTBECHER M, VOLKERT H. The propagation of mountain waves into the stratosphere: quantitative evaluation of three-dimensional simulations[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 57(18): 3090-3108. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)0573090: tpomwi2.0.co;2

DÖRNBRACK A, GERZ T, SCHUMANN U. Turbulent breaking of overturning gravity waves below a critical level[J]. Applied Scientific Research, 1995, 54(3): 163-176. DOI: 10.1007/BF00849114

GRUBIŠIĆ V, SMOLARKIEWICZ P K. The effect of critical levels on 3D orographic flows: linear regime[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1997, 54(15): 1943-1960. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)0541943: teoclo2.0.co;2

SHARMAN R D, DOYLE J D, SHAPIRO M A. An investigation of a commercial aircraft encounter with severe clear-air turbulence over western Greenland[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2012, 51(1): 42-53. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-11-044.1

ÁGÚSTSSON H, ÓLAFSSON H. Simulations of observed lee waves and rotor turbulence[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2014, 142(2): 832-849. DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-13-00212.1

REINECKE P, DURRAN D. Initial-condition sensitivities and the predictability of downslope winds[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 66(11): 3401-3418.

DOYLE J, JIANG Q F, SMITH R, et al. Three-dimensional characteristics of stratospheric mountain waves during T-REX[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2011, 139(1): 3-23.

DURRAN D R, GINGRICH M. Atmospheric predictability: why butterflies are not of practical importance[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 71(7): 2476-2488.

ROACH W T. Clear air turbulence and its detection. proceedings of a symposium held at boeing scientific research laboratories, Seattle, Washington, 14–16 August 1968. edited by Y. H. YAO and A. GOLDBURG. plenum press, 1969.542 pp. $22.50, £9.4[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1970, 44: 825-828. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112070222181

O'SULLIVAN D, DUNKERTON T J. Generation of inertia–gravity waves in a simulated life cycle of baroclinic instability[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1995, 52(21): 3695-3716. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)0523695: goiwia2.0.co;2

ZHANG F Q. Generation of mesoscale gravity waves in upper-tropospheric jet–front systems[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2004, 61(4): 440-457. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)0610440: gomgwi2.0.co;2

PLOUGONVEN R, SNYDER C. Inertia–gravity waves spontaneously generated by jets and fronts. part I: different baroclinic life cycles[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2007, 64(7): 2502-2520. DOI: 10.1175/jas3953.1

SNYDER C, MURAKI D J, PLOUGONVEN R, et al. Inertia–gravity waves generated within a dipole vortex[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2007, 64(12): 4417-4431. DOI: 10.1175/2007jas2351.1

VIÚDEZ Á. The origin of the stationary frontal wave packet spontaneously generated in rotating stratified vortex dipoles[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 593: 359-383. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112007008816

WANG S G, ZHANG F Q, SNYDER C. Generation and propagation of inertia-gravity waves from vortex dipoles and jets[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 66(5): 1294-1314.

BÜHLER O, MCINTYRE M E. Wave capture and wave–vortex duality[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 534: 67-95. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112005004374

PLOUGONVEN R, SNYDER C. Gravity waves excited by jets: propagation versus generation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(18). doi: 10.1029/2005gl023730

LU C G, KOCH S E. Interaction of upper-tropospheric turbulence and gravity waves as obtained from spectral and structure function analyses[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2008, 65(8): 2676-2690. DOI: 10.1175/2007jas2660.1

WU D L, ZHANG F Q. A study of mesoscale gravity waves over the North Atlantic with satellite observations and a mesoscale model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004, 109(D22). doi: 10.1029/2004jd005090

MIRZAEI M, ZÜLICKE C, MOHEBALHOJEH A, et al. Structure, energy, and parameterization of inertia-gravity waves in dry and moist simulations of a baroclinic wave life cycle[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 71(7): 2390-2414.

ZHANG F Q, ZHANG M, WEI J H, et al. Month-long simulations of gravity waves over North America and North Atlantic in comparison with satellite observations[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2013, 27(3): 446-454. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-013-0301-x

PLOUGONVEN R, HERTZOG A, ALEXANDER M J. Case studies of nonorographic gravity waves over the Southern Ocean emphasize the role of moisture[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2015, 120(4): 1278-1299. DOI: 10.1002/2014jd022332

WILLIAMS P D, JOSHI M M. Intensification of winter transatlantic aviation turbulence in response to climate change[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(7): 644-648. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1866

HU B Y, TANG J P, DING J F, et al. Regional downscaled future change of clear-air turbulence overEast Asia underRCP8.5 scenario within theCORDEX-EA-II project[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2021, 41(10): 5022-5035. DOI: 10.1002/joc.7114

ZHOU Z D, WANG S Z, JIN G D. A structural subgrid-scale model for relative dispersion in large-eddy simulation of isotropic turbulent flows by coupling kinematic simulation with approximate deconvolution method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(10). doi: 10.1063/1.5049731

JOFRE L, DOMINO S P, IACCARINO G. A framework for characterizing structural uncertainty in large-eddy simulation closures[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2018, 100(2): 341-363. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-017-9844-8

XIE C Y, WANG J C, LI H, et al. Artificial neural network mixed model for large eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(8): 085112. DOI: 10.1063/1.5110788

XIE C Y, YUAN Z L, WANG J C. Artificial neural network-based nonlinear algebraic models for large eddy simulation of turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(11): 115101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0025138

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

An Ac-criteria-based optimal input design method

Dynamic ablation morphology measurement of thermal protection materials using structured light vision

Numerical simulation on gust responses of high aspect ratio aircraft

Multi-factor analysis and simulation of particle erosion characteristics of fan blades

Impact of inter-wing spacing on aerodynamic noise in multi-flapping wing configurations

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

⁰