WANG Xiao, SHEN Tianrong, PAN Ying, et al. Influence of rake number on steady-state distortion characteristics measurement of intake tract[J]. 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
WANG Xiao, SHEN Tianrong, PAN Ying, et al. Influence of rake number on steady-state distortion characteristics measurement of intake tract[J]. 2024, 42(1): 26-32.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0043.
Influence of rake number on steady-state distortion characteristics measurement of intake tract
due to complex factors such as low-speed auxiliary inlet opening
stealth of large S-bend pipes
and high angles of attack sideslip flight attitude
flow field distortion in the intake tract is large
and the test results from different numbers of rakes differ greatly. There are many studies on the measurement and calculation of steady-state distortion of outlet flow in the intake tract at home and abroad
but few comprehensive comparative studies have been conducted for the influence of the rake number on the measurement of steady-state distortion in the intake tract. In this study
by measuring the large pressure gradient region
low pressure region and steady-state distortion in the intake tract
a comparative study is conducted on the commonly used forms of 6 and 8 rakes in the intake wind tunnel test
full-scale advance joint bench test
and advance matching flight test. The research results show that
for complex shaped fighter inlet
the measurement of outlet flow field of the intake tract requires as many as 8 measuring rakes to achieve satisfactory results. Particularly
in the shipboard environment
flow in the intake tract is more complex due to factors such as bow inflow and deflector reflection
and the engine requires more stringent requirements for the stability of the advance matching as operated in a special reheating state; thus
it is more necessary to adopt the measurement with 8 rakes under this circumstance.
关键词
Keywords
references
LIU D X, YE P L, HU T, et al. Guidelines for the assessment of total pressure distortion of aviation turbojets and turbofan engines[S]. GJB/Z 64-1994 (in Chinese).
LIU D X, HOU M J, YE P L et al. Guidelines for the assessment of total pressure distortion of aviation turbojets and turbofan engines[S]. GJB/Z64A-2004 (in Chinese).
LIU Z Y, MA Q R, LIU D G, et al. Requirements for combined temperature-pressure distortion test of turbojet and turbofan engines on the ground[S]. HB 20227-2014 (in Chinese).
S-16 Turbine Engine Inlet Flow Distortion Committee. Inlet / engine compatibility: From model to full scale development[S]. Inc. printed USA: SAE AIR 5687, 2011: 1-94.
AMIN N F, HOLLWEGER D J. F/A-18 inlet/engine compatibility flight test results[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1983, 20(8): 641−649. doi: 10.2514/3.44924
YUHAS A J, STEENKEN W G, WILLIAMS J G, et al. F/A-18A Inlet flow characteristics during maneuvers with rapidly changing angle of attack[R] NASA Technical Memorandum 104327.
DAVIS M, HALE A L, KLEPPER J, et al. Demonstration of an integrated test and evaluation(ITE) process for airframe-propulsion systems asapplied to a current weapon system program[C]// 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Viriginia: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-1039
LI D W, MA D L, CHEN X L. Comparison of experimental ground testing and computational fluid dynamics for S-shaped inlet and JT15D-4 engine[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(4): 449−452,458 (in Chinese).
ZHONG Y F, MA H W, LI J Y, et al. Technological progress of ground test measurement of aeroengine inlet total pressure distortion[J]. Aeroengine, 2020, 46(6): 62−77 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2020.06.011
ZHANG X F, JIANG J, FU X G. Research in inlet time-varant distortion in flight test based on IIR filter[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(1): 255−261 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.01.049
WEHLE P, WENGER U. Development of the Rolls-Royce 10 stage high pressure compressor family[R]. ISABE 2009-1300, 2009.
BUI T T, OATES D L. Design and evaluation of a new boundary-layer measurement rake for flight testing[R]. NASATM-2000-209014 , 2000.
QUINN R D, GONG L. In-flight boundary-layer measurements on a hollow cylinder at Mach number of 3.0[R]. NASATP-1980-1764, 1980.
WANG T, JIANG J, SHI J B. Acquisition and processing of total pressure distortion data in inlet/engine compatibility flight test[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2012, 25(2): 54−58 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2012.02.012
TU B F, HU J. Effect of total pressure distortion on aerodynamic stability of compressor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(2): 167−173 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2012.02.002
ZHAO H G, JIANG J, WANG T. The test flight was developed with a large bypass ratio turbofan engine imported distortion measurement rake[C]// Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Engine Test and Testing Technology, 2016: 267-275 (in Chinese).
ZHAO H G, ZHAO D T, WANG T, et al. Measurement and characteristic analysis of inlet distortion rake for high bypass ratio turbofan in wind tunnel[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2014, 27(3): 59−62 (in Chinese).