CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Research status and development trend of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(3): 311-337. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0030(in Chinese)

AN F X, LI L, SU W, et al. Key issues in hypersonic vehicle aerodynamic design [J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica Astronomica), 2021, 51(10): 2-21. DOI: 10.1360/SSPMA-2021-0135 (in Chinese)

LI Z W, YUAN H T, HUANG B, et al. The hypersonic boundary-layer transition: a perspective from the view of system design[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(4): 26-38. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0061(in Chinese)

FEDOROV A. Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43: 79-95. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160750

ZHOU H. My scientific research experience[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 282-285. (in Chinese)

LUO J S. Transition and prediction for hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 357-372. (in Chinese)

XIE S F, YANG W B, SHEN Q. Review of progresses in hypersonic boundary layer transition mechanism and its applications[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 714-723. (in Chinese)

SU C H. Progress in key scientific problems of hypersonic bounary-layer transition prediction: receptivity, evolution of disturbances and transition criterion[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 355-367. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0056(in Chinese)

JIANG X Y, LI C B. Review of research on the receptivity of hypersonic boundary layer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160129(in Chinese)

LIU X H, LAI G W, WU J. Boundary-layer transition experiments in hypersonic flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 196-212. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0017(in Chinese)

HUANG Z F, WAN B B, DUAN M C. Progresses in engineering application research on hypersonic flow stability and transition[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 368-378. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0047(in Chinese)

DUAN Y, YAO S Y, LI S Y, et al. Review of progress in some issues and engineering application of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 391-403. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0041(in Chinese)

YANG W B, SHEN Q, ZHU D H, et al. Tendency and current status of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 183-195. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0011(in Chinese)

XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, CHEN J Q, et al. Progress in transition models for cross-flow instabilities[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 254-264, 180. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0041(in Chinese)

ZHANG W, LIU P Q, GUO H, et al. Review of transition prediction methods[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 28(6): 1-12, 38. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20140030(in Chinese)

TU G H, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al. Progress in flight tests of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2021, 37(11): 1589-1609. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-021-01153-4

CHEN X L, FU S. Progress in the research of hypersonic and high-enthalpy boundary layer instabilities and transition[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(11): 2937-2957. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-184(in Chinese)

YANG H S, LIANG H, GUO S G, et al. Research Progress of hypersonic boundary layer transition control experiments[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2022, 4(1): 1-54. DOI: 10.1186/s42774-022-00105-1

NIU H B, YI S H, LIU X L, et al. Experimental study of crossflow instability in a Mach 6 delta wing flow[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(13): 134701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.70.20201777(in Chinese)

NIU H B, YI S H, HUO J J, et al. Experimental study on hypersonic crossflow instability over a swept flat plate by flow visualization[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2021, 37(9): 1395-1403. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-021-01109-8

ZHAO L. Study on unsteady vortex instability of cross-flow in hypersonic swept blunt plate boundary layer[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2016(in Chinese).

MA S X, DUAN Y, HUANG Z F, et al. Improved nonlinear parabolized stability equations approach for hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2021, 30(5): 054701. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abd2a3

XU G L, CHEN J Q, LIU G, et al. The secondary instabilities of stationary cross-flow vortices in a Mach 6 swept wing flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 873: 914-941. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.397

CHEN J Q, DONG S W, CHEN X, et al. Stationary cross-flow breakdown in a high-speed swept-wing boundary layer[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(2): 024108. DOI: 10.1063/5.0039901

CHEN X L, XI Y C, REN J, et al. Cross-flow vortices and their secondary instabilities in hypersonic and high-enthalpy boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 947: A25. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.607

SONG R J, ZHAO L, HUANG Z F. Improvement of the parabolized stability equation to predict the linear evolution of disturbances in three-dimensional boundary layers based on ray tracing theory[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(3): 033901. DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.033901

PAREDES P, GOSSE R, THEOFILIS V, et al. Linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over an elliptic cone[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 804: 442-466. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.536

MATTHEW T, LAKEBRINK, . Toward robust prediction of crossflow-wave instability in hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Computers Fluids, 2017, 144: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.11.016

CHEN X, DONG S W, TU G H, et al. Boundary layer transition and linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over a lifting body[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 938: A8. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.1125

LIU S Y, WAN B B, YUAN X X, et al. Linear modal global instabilities of hypersonic flow over an inclined cone[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7): 074108. DOI: 10.1063/5.0097358

MOYES A J, PAREDES P, KOCIAN T S, et al. Secondary instability analysis of crossflow on a hypersonic yawed straight circular cone[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 812: 370-397. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.793

CHOUDHARI M M, LI F, PAREDES P, et al. Computations of crossflow instability in hypersonic boundary layers[C]// 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 4300. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-4300

CHOUDHARI M M, CHANG C L, JENTINK T, et al. Transition analysis for the HIFiRE-5 vehicle[C]// 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, Texas. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2009: 4056. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-4056

LI X H, ZHANG S L, LIU J X, et al. Bi-Global instability of streamwise vortices near minor-axis of hypersonic elliptic cone[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 265-272. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0026(in Chinese)

CHOUDHARI M M, LI F, PAREDES P. Streak instabilities on HIFiRE-5 elliptic cone[C]// AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020: 0828. doi: 10.2514/6.2020-0828

CHEN X, CHEN J Q, DONG S, et al. Stability analyses of leeward streamwise vortices for a hypersonic yawed cone at 6 degree angle of attack[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 299-307.

LI X H, CHEN J Q, HUANG Z F, et al. Stability analysis and transition prediction of streamwise vortices over a yawed cone at Mach 6[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(12): 124110. DOI: 10.1063/5.0031057

LI X H, YANG Q, CHEN J Q, et al. Effect of three-dimensional smooth humps on hypersonic boundary layer instability of streamwise vortices over a yawed cone[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(6): 064109. DOI: 10.1063/5.0054396

ZHANG L G, DONG S W, LIU S Y, et al. Stability analysis of streamwise vortices over a blunt inclined cone under a hypersonic flight condition[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7): 074107. DOI: 10.1063/5.0099952

XI Y C, REN J, FU S. Hypersonic attachment-line instabilities with large sweep Mach numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 915: A44. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.66

PAREDES P, THEOFILIS V, REED H L. High-frequency instabilities along the windward face of a hypersonic yawed circular cone[C]// 7th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2774

CHEN X, DONG S W, CHEN J Q, et al. Mack-mode instabilities along the windward surface of a hypersonic yawed cone[C]// 19th National Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Nanjing, 2021.

YANG P, TANG Z G, CHEN J Q, et al. Temporal evolution of wavepackets on the windward side of an inclined hypersonic cone under a flight condition[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(S1): 98-106

EMMONS H W. The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer-part I[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1951, 18(7): 490-498. DOI: 10.2514/8.2010

DHAWAN S, NARASIMHA R. Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 3(4): 418-436. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112058000094

MAYLE R E, SCHULZ A. The path to predicting bypass transition[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1997, 119(3): 405-411. DOI: 10.1115/1.2841140

WILCOX D C. Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2): 247-255. DOI: 10.2514/3.59994

SCHMIDT R C. Two-equation low-Reynolds-number turbulence modeling of transitional boundary layer flows characteristic of gas turbine blades[D]. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 1988.

YAN M, SU X Y, WEI R, et al. Prediction of transitional flows using an improved low-Reynolds-number turbulence model with transition sensitivity[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(12): 2683-2688. (in Chinese)

FU S, WANG L. Progress in turbulence/transition modelling[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(3): 409-416. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-0992.2007.03.008(in Chinese)

MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part I—model formulation[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vienna, Austria. New York, NY, 2008: 57-67. doi: 10.1115/GT2004-53452

LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part II—test cases and industrial applications[C]// ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vienna, Austria. New York, NY, 2008: 69-79. doi: 10.1115/GT2004-53454

LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12): 2894-2906. DOI: 10.2514/1.42362

MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. DOI: 10.2514/3.12149

CHEN L L, GUO Z, DENG X L, et al. Aerodynamic performance and transition prediction of low-speed fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles in full configuration based on improved γ – Re model[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 107: 106281. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106281

LANGTRY R B, SENGUPTA K, YEH D T, et al. Extending the γ-Re θt local correlation based transition model for crossflow effects[C ] //45th AIAA Fluids Dynamics Conference, Dallas, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 2474.

MENTER F R, SMIRNOV P E, LIU T, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95(4): 583-619. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-015-9622-4

MENG D H, ZHANG Y L, WANG G X, et al. Application of γ-Re θ transition model to two-dimensional low speed flows[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(5): 792-801. (in Chinese)

YI M R, ZHAO H Y, LE J L. Hypersonic boundary layer transition simulation of complex configuration using γI M θ transition model[J ] . Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(4): 1-11(in Chinese). DOI: 10.117 29/syltlx20180019

YI M R, ZHAO H Y, LE J L. Roughness induced high speed boundary layer forced transition simulation using γ-Re θ transition model based on IDDES method[J ] . Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(4): 778-790. (in Chinese)

ZHANG H J, Li H Q, Kang H L, et al. Research on application and validation of compressibility correction γ-Re θ model for hypersonic boundary transition prediction[J ] . Aerospace Technology, 2022(4): 40-48. (in Chinese)

ZHU Z B, SHANG Q, SHEN Q. Crossflow modification of transition model for hypersonic boundary layer and its application[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 231-243(in Chinese). DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25685

HU Z Y, WANG Z L, CHEN J Q, et al. Prediction of crossflow transition based on deep neural networks[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(1)38-51(in Chinese). DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-448

KRAUSE M, BEHR M, BALLMANN J. Modeling of transition effects in hypersonic intake flows using a correlation-based intermittency model[C]// 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, Ohio. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2008: 2598. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-2598

ZHANG X D, GAO Z H. Numerical discuss to complete empirical correlation in Langtry’s transition model[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 544-552(in Chinese). DOI: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2010.05.005

YOU Y C, LUEDEKE H, EGGERS T. Application of the γ-Re θt transition model in high speed flows[C ] //18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012: 5972.

ALIAGA C, GUAN K, SELVANAYAGAM J, et al. Hypersonic applications of the laminar turbulent transition SST model in ANSYS fluent[C]// AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020: 3290. doi: 10.2514/6.2020-3290

LIU Q Y, LEI J M, LIU Z, et al. γIU θI -fRe transition model for compressible flow[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 321-331(in Chinese). DOI: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2016.04.004

XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, YUAN X X, et al. C: Re model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 188-196. DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25711(in Chinese)

ZHANG Y F, XIANG X H, WAN B B, et al. Cross flow transition experimental data expansion technology based on stability method: CN111380663B[P]. 2021-11-19 (in Chinese).

XIANG X H, REN H J, ZHANG Y F, et al. Transition prediction with hypersonic cross-flow model on HIFiRE-5[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1786(1): 012051. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1786/1/012051

XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, CHEN J Q, et al. Hypersonic transverse flow transition prediction method considering surface roughness effect: CN110702356B[P]. 2021-06-08(in Chinese).

ZHANG Y F, ZHANG Y R, CHEN J Q, et al. Numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on the flow solver chant 2.0[C]// 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Xiamen, China. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 2409. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-2409

CHEN J Q, LIU S S, LIU Z Y, et al. Standard model aerodynamic layout for transition research of hypersonic boundary layer and design method: CN109969374B[P]. 2021-05-18 (in Chinese).

XIANG X H, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al. Cross-flow transition model predictions of hypersonic transition research vehicle[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 122: 107327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107327

SUZEN Y B, XIONG G, HUANG P G. Predictions of transitional flows in low-pressure turbines using intermittency transport equation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40: 254-266. DOI: 10.2514/3.15057

WARREN E S, HARRIS J E, HASSAN H A. Transition model for high-speed flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(8): 1391-1397. DOI: 10.2514/3.12687

WARREN E, HASSAN H. A transition model for swept wing flows[C]// 15th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997: 2245. doi: 10.2514/6.1997-2245

王亮. 高超音速边界层转捩的模式研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2008.

FU S, WANG L. RANS modeling of high-speed aerodynamic flow transition with consideration of stability theory[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 58: 36-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.004

HAO Z H, YAN C, ZHOU L. Parametric study of a k - ω - γ model in predicting hypersonic boundary-layer flow transition[J ] . Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2015, 47(2): 215-222. (in Chinese)

ZHOU L, LI R F, HAO Z H, et al. Improved k - ω - γ model for crossflow-induced transition prediction in hypersonic flow[J ] . International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 115-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.013

ZHOU L, ZHAO R, YUAN W. Application of improved k - ω - γ transition model to hypersonic complex configurations[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(5): 2214-2221. DOI: 10.2514/1.j057609

WANG G X, YANG M C, XIAO Z X, et al. Improved k - ω - γ transition model by introducing the local effects of nose bluntness for hypersonic heat transfer[J ] . International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 119: 185-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.103

ZHAO Y T, LIU H K, ZHOU Q, et al. . Quantification of parametric uncertainty in k - ω - γ transition model for hypersonic flow heat transfer[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 96: 105553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105553

Yang M C, Xiao Z X. Distributed roughness induced transition on wind-turbine airfoils simulated by four-equation k-ω-γ-A r transition model[J ] . Renewable Energy, 2019, 135: 1166-1177. DOI: 10.1016/j.r enene.2018.12.091

YANG M C, XIAO Z X. Improving the k-ω-γ-A r transition model by the field inversion and machine learning framework[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(6): 064101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0008493

ZHANG T X, CHEN J Q, ZENG F Z, et al. Improvement of transition prediction model in hypersonic boundary layer based on field inversion and machine learning framework[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(2): 024104. DOI: 10.1063/5.0137819

LIU H K, CHEN J Q, XIANG X H, et al. Improved k - ω - γ transition model for transition prediction of H IA D at different Reynolds numbers[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(6): 50-59. (in Chinese)

WALTERS D K, LEYLEK J H. A new model for boundary layer transition using a single-point RANS approach[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(1): 193-202. DOI: 10.1115/1.1622709

WALTERS D K, COKLJAT D. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes simulations of transitional flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(12): 1. DOI: 10.1115/1.2979230

SUN R P, ZHU W B, XU L Z, et al. Numerical simulation of coupled heat transfer for an innercooled blade by applying transition k-k L -ω transition model[J ] . Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(2): 274-282. (in Chinese)

CHEN C P, ZHAO Q J, SUN X. Investigation on a improved laminar kinetic energy transition model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(8): 1424-1428. (in Chinese)

KOŽÍŠEK M, FÜRST J, PŘÍHODA J, et al. Implementation of k-k L -ω turbulence model for compressible flow into OpenFOAM[J ] . Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2016, 821: 63-69. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.821.63

SALIMIPOUR E. A modification of the k - k L - ω turbulence model for simulation of short and long separation bubbles[J ] . Computers Fluids, 2019, 181: 67-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.01.003

DASH S, PAPP J. Hypersonic transitional modeling for scramjet and missile applications[C]// 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2002. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-155

PAPP J, DASH S. Modeling hypersonic laminar to turbulent transitional flows for 3D geometries using a two-equation onset and intermittency transport models: AIAA 2012-0449 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2012.https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-449

SHI M T, ZHU W K, LEE C B. Engineering model for transition prediction based on a hypersonic quiet wind tunnel[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(8): 3476-3485. DOI: 10.2514/1.j059054

MACK L M. Boundary-layer linear stability theory[R]. AGARD Rep. 709, 1984.

SMITH A, GAMBERONI N. Transition, pressure gradient, and stability theory[R]. Douglas aircraft report No. ES 26388, 1956.

VAN I. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary-layer region[R]. Delft, Holland, report No. VTH74, 1956.

CEBECI T, SHAO J P, CHEN H H, et al. The preferred approach for calculating transition by stability theory[C]// International Conference on Boundary and Interior Layers, Toulouse, France: 2004.

THEOFILIS V. Global linear instability[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43: 319-352. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160705

TU G H, YANG Q, CHEN J Q, et al. Preliminary conception and test of global stability decomposition for flow stability analysis[C]// 10th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Barcelona, Spain, 2018.

TAIRA K, HEMATI M S, BRUNTON S L, et al. Modal analysis of fluid flows: applications and outlook[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(3): 998-1022. DOI: 10.2514/1.j058462

MALIK M R. COSAL: A black-box compressible stability analysis code for transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary layers[R]. NASA CR-65925, 1982.

MALIK M R. Boundary-layer transition prediction toolkit[C]// 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, Co, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997: 1904.doi: 10.2514/6.1997-1904

LAU K Y. Hypersonic boundary-layer transition: application to high-speed vehicle design[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(2): 176-183. DOI: 10.2514/1.31134

ELIAS T, EISWIRTH E. Stability studies of planar transition in supersonic flows[C]// 2nd International Aerospace Planes Conference, Orlando, FL, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1990: 5233. doi: 10.2514/6.1990-5233

SCHNEIDER S P. Development of quiet-flow supersonic wind tunnels for laminar-turbulent transition research[R]. NASA Langley Grant NAG-1-1133. 2003.

KIMMEL R L, KLEIN M A, SCHWOERKE S N. Three-dimensional hypersonic laminar boundary-layer computations for transition experiment design[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1997, 34(4): 409-415. DOI: 10.2514/2.3236

KIMMEL R, ADAMCZAK D, BERGER K, et al. HIFiRE-5 flight vehicle design[C]// 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 4985. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-4985

DOLVIN D. Hypersonic international flight research and experimentation (HIFiRE) fundamental science and technology development strategy[C]// 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, Ohio. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2008: 2581. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-2581

DOLVIN D. Hypersonic international flight research and experimentation technology development and flight certification strategy[C]// 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, Germany. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 7228. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-7228

CHANG C L. The langley stability and transition analysis codes (LASTRAC): LST, linear nonlinear PSE for 2D, axisymmetric, and infinite swept wing boundary layers[C]// 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003: 974. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-974

CHANG C L. Langley stability and transition analysis code (LASTRAC) Version 1.2 user manual[R]. NASA/RM-2004-213233, 2004

KLINE H L, CHANG C L, LI F. Hypersonic chemically reacting boundary-layer stability using LASTRAC[C]// 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018: 3699. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-3699

VOGEL E, VENKATACHARI B S, PAREDES P, et al. CFD integrated transition modeling for high-speed flows via coupled OVERFLOW-LASTRAC analysis[C]// AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, National Harbor, MD Online. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2023: 0438. doi: 10.2514/6.2023-0438

LI F, CHOUDHARI M, CHANG C L, et al. Stability analysis for HIFiRE experiments[C]// 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, New Orleans, Louisiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012: 2961. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-2961

LI F, CHOUDHARI M, CHANG C L, et al. Analysis of instabilities in non-axisymmetric hypersonic boundary layers over cones[C]// 10th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference, Chicago, Illinois. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 4643. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-4643

CHANG C L, CHOUDHARI M, HOLLIS B, et al. Transition analysis for the Mars science laboratory entry vehicle[C]// 41st AIAA Thermophysics Conference, San Antonio, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 4076. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-4076

MALIK M, R LIAO W, LEE-RAUSCH E M, et al. Computational analysis of the G-III laminar flow glove[C]// 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 3525. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3525

LIAO W, MALIK M R, LEE-RAUSCH E M, et al. Boundary-layer stability analysis of the mean flows obtained using unstructured grids[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(1): 49-63. DOI: 10.2514/1.c032583

HILDEBRAND N J, CHANG C L, CHOUDHARI M M, et al. Coupling of the FUN3D unstructured flow solver and the LASTRAC stability code to model transition[C]// AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA Virtual. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2022: 1952. doi: 10.2514/6.2022-1952

WHEATON B M, BERRIDGE D C, WOLF T D, et al. Boundary layer transition (BOLT) flight experiment overview[C]// 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018: 2892. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-2892

WHEATON B M, BERRIDGE D C, WOLF T D, et al. Final design of the boundary layer transition (BOLT) flight experiment[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2021, 58(1): 6-17. DOI: 10.2514/1.a34809

LAKEBRINK M T, BOWCUTT K G, WINFREE T, et al. Optimization of a Mach-6 quiet wind-tunnel nozzle[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2018, 55(2): 315-321. DOI: 10.2514/1.a33794

SCHRAUF G. LILO 2.1. User's Guide and Tutorial[R]. GSSC Technical Report 6, 2004.

KRUMBEIN A. e N transition prediction for 3D wing configurations using database methods and a local, linear stability code[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2008, 12(8): 592-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2008.01.005

KRUMBEIN A. Automatic transition prediction and application to 3D wing configurations[C]// 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: 914. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-914

MACK A, HANNEMANN V. Validation of the unstructured DLR-TAU-code for hypersonic flows[C]// 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, St. Louis, Missouri. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002: 3111. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-3111

ARNAL D, HOUDEVILLE R, SERAUDIE A, et al. Overview of laminar-turbulent transition investigations at ONERA Toulouse[C]// 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 3074. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3074

NEBEL C, RADESPIEL R, WOLF T. Transition prediction for 3D flows using a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes code and N-factor methods[C]// 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003: 3593. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-3593

SCHWAMBORN D, GERHOLD T, HEINRICH R. The DLR TAU-code: Recent applications in research and industry[C]// ECCOMAS CFD 2006 Conference Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 2006.

SCHWAMBORN D, GARDNER A D, VON GEYR H, et al. Development of the TAU-code for aerospace applications[C]// 50th NAL International Conference on Aerospace Science and Technology, Banglore, India, 2008.

KRUMBEIN A, KRIMMELBEIN N, SCHRAUF G. Automatic transition prediction for three-dimensional aircraft configurations using the DLR TAU code[M]// Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 101-108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14243-7_13

KRIMMELBEIN N, KRUMBEIN A. Automatic transition prediction for three-dimensional configurations with focus on industrial application[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(6): 1878-1887. DOI: 10.2514/1.c031230

KRIMMELBEIN N, KRUMBEIN A. Transition prediction for the NASA CRM-NLF with the e N -method using incompressible and compressible linear stability analysis[C ] // AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Dieyo, CA Virtual. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2022: 1953.doi: 10.2514/6.2022-1953

WAN B B, CHEN X, CHEN J Q, et al. Applications of HyTEN software for predicting three-dimensional boundary-layer transition in typical hypersonic models[J]. Aerospace Technology, 2023(1): 150-158. (in Chinese)

YUAN X X, CHEN J Q, DU Y X, et al. Research progress on fundamental CFD issues in National Numerical Windtunnel Project[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 23-40. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0159有误?(in Chinese)

SU C H, ZHOU H. Transition prediction of hypersonic sharp cone boundary layer at small angle of attack and improvemeNt of en method[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica Astronomica), 2009, 39(1): 123-130. (in Chinese)

YU G T, LUO J S. Application of eN method in three-dimensional hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(9): 2047-2054. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.09.005(in Chinese)

QIN L H, HAN Y F, CAO W. Effect of bluntness on the stability of hypersonic blunt cone boundary layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2023, 40(2): 264-274. (in Chinese)

YANG X N, SU C H. Reliability of the eN method applied to hypersonic blunt cone boundary layers for transition prediction[J]. Physics of Gases, 2023, 8(2): 44-55. DOI: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.0987(in Chinese)

HUANG Z F, LU X Z, YU G T. Cross-flow instability analysis and transition prediction of airfoil boundary layer[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(1): 14-20. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2012.0062(in Chinese)

HUANG Z F, XIAO L C, LUO J S. Transition prediction eN method and its software development for supersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 279-285. . DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0023(in Chinese)

WAN B B, TU G H, YUAN X X, et al. Identification of traveling crossflow waves under real hypersonic flight conditions[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(4): 044110. DOI: 10.1063/5.0046954

TU G H, WAN B B, CHEN J Q, et al. Study on the stability of MF-1 blunt cone boundary layer and the correlation between transition and heaven and earth[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica Astronomica), 2019, 49(12): 114-124. (in Chinese)

LEE S B, DUAN M C, TU G H, et al. Investigation on transition correlation of conical boundary layer in hypersonic wind tunnel experiments[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 201: 329-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.029

CHEN J Q, TU G H, WAN B B, et al. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 253-268. (in Chinese)

JOHNSON H, CANDLER G. Hypersonic boundary layer stability analysis using PSE-chem[C]// 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005: 5023. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-5023

NOMPELIS I, DRAYNA T, CANDLER G. A parallel unstructured implicit solver for hypersonic reacting flow simulation[C]// 17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005: 4867. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-4867

SCHMISSEUR J D. Hypersonics into the 21st century: a perspective on AFOSR-sponsored research in aerothermodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 72: 3-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.09.009

OLIVIERO N B, KOCIAN T S, MOYES A, et al. EPIC: NPSE analysis of hypersonic crossflow instability on yawed straight circular cone[C]// 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Dallas, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 2772. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-2772

ARNAL D, CASALIS G. Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, 36(2): 173-191. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00002-6

CLIQUET J, HOUDEVILLE R, ARNAL D. Application of laminar-turbulent transition criteria in navier-stokes computations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5): 1182-1190. DOI: 10.2514/1.30215

ELIASSON P, HANIFI A, PENG S H. Influence of transition on high-lift prediction with the NASA trap wing model[C]// 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 3009. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3009

BOIKO A V, NECHEPURENKO Y M, ZHUCHKOV R N, et al. Laminar-turbulent transition prediction module for LOGOS package[J]. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2014, 21(2): 191-210. DOI: 10.1134/S0869864314020061

BOIKO A V, DEMYANKO K V, KIRILOVSKIY S V, et al. Modeling of transonic transitional three-dimensional flows for aerodynamic applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(9): 3598-3610. DOI: 10.2514/1.j060174

SONG W P, WU M M, ZHU Z, et al. Transition prediction methods towards significant drag reduction via laminar flow technology[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 213-228. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0035(in Chinese)

ZHU Z, SONG W P, HAN Z H. Automatic transition prediction for wing-body configurations using dual eN method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(2): 123-134. DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.21707(in Chinese)

NIE H, SONG W P, HAN Z H, et al. Automatic transition prediction for natural-laminar-flow wing design of supersonic transports[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 163-181. . DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0047(in Chinese)

HAN Z H, CHEN J, ZHU Z, et al. Aerodynamic design of transonic natural-laminar-flow (NLF) wing via surrogate-based global optimization[C]// 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 2041. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-2041

CHEN Y F, WANG Y W, DENG Y J, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of natural laminar flow wing glove[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 323-334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.03.007(in Chinese)

HAN Z H, GAO Z H, SONG W P, et al. On airfoil research and development: history, current status, and future directions[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(6): 1-36. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0396(in Chinese)

DONG J, GAO D F, REN Y J, et al. Coupling and application of eN-database method to transition prediction in a 3 D unstructured solver[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace Ace University, 2015, 32(2): 11-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2015.02.003(in Chinese)

WEI C, ZHANG T J, QIAN Z S. Number simulations on stall characteristic for high-lift configuration based on e N transition method[J ] . Aeronautical Science Technology, 2019, 30(9): 33-39. (in Chinese)