
1. 湖南科技大学 机械设备健康维护湖南省重点实验室,湘潭,411201
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 气动噪声控制重点实验室,绵阳,621000
Published:2023
移动端阅览
崔盼望, 冯和英, 仝帆, 等. 桨叶数目对对转螺旋桨气动和噪声特性的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(12): 61−73.
CUI Panwang, FENG Heying, TONG Fan, et al. Influence of the number of blades on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of counter-rotating propeller[J]. 2023, 41(12): 61-73.
崔盼望, 冯和英, 仝帆, 等. 桨叶数目对对转螺旋桨气动和噪声特性的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(12): 61−73. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0205
CUI Panwang, FENG Heying, TONG Fan, et al. Influence of the number of blades on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of counter-rotating propeller[J]. 2023, 41(12): 61-73. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0205.
对转螺旋桨的高效率与低油耗等优点已引起人们越来越多的关注。然而,噪声是对转螺旋桨研制过程中亟需解决的关键问题。基于非线性谐波法和声类比理论,研究了转子桨叶数目对对转螺旋桨气动特性和噪声的影响规律及其物理机制。以某型对转螺旋桨为基准对象,研究了7种不同桨叶数组合的对转螺旋桨模型。研究发现,增加对转螺旋桨前/后排转子桨叶数,前/后排转子拉力系数和功率系数将增大,而其波动幅值则明显减小,但这也将损害对转螺旋桨的总推进效率。提出在增加前/后排转子桨叶数的同时适当降低前/后排转子转速,结果表明,该方案既可以保证对转螺旋桨总推力及总效率不受影响,还可以在干涉噪声频率下,获得比单纯增加桨叶数更明显、更宽广的降噪效果。
The advantages of high efficiency and low fuel consumption of the contra-rotating propellers have attracted more and more attention. However
noise is the key problem that needs to be solved urgently in the development process of the contra-rotating propeller. Based on the nonlinear harmonic method and the theory of acoustic analogy
the influence of the number of rotor blades on the aerodynamic characteristics and noise of the contra-rotating propeller and its physical mechanism are studied. Taking a certain type of contra-rotating propeller as the reference object
seven kinds of contra-rotating propeller models with different combinations of blade numbers were studied. The study found that increasing the number of blades in the front/rear rotors of the contra-rotating propeller will increase the tension coefficient and power coefficient of the front/rear rotors
and the fluctuation amplitude will be significantly reduced
but it will also damage the total propulsion efficiency of the contra-rotating propeller. The paper proposes to increase the number of front/rear rotor blades while appropriately reducing the front/rear rotor speed. The results show that this scheme has two beneficial facets: On the one hand it ensure the total thrust and total efficiency of the counter-rotating propeller to be unaffected; on the other hand
under the interference noise frequency
it can obtain a more obvious and wider noise reduction effect than simply increasing the number of blades.
VAN ZANTE D E. Progress in open rotor research: A U. S. perspective[C]// ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015. doi: 10.1115/GT2015-42203
VAN ZANTE D E, COLLIER F, ORTON A, et al. Progress in open rotor propulsors: the FAA/GE/NASA open rotor test campaign[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2014, 118(1208): 1181-1213. DOI: 10.1017/s0001924000009842
PETERS A, SPAKOVSZKY Z S. Rotor interaction noise in counter-rotating propfan propulsion systems[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, 134(1): 11-22. DOI: 10.1115/1.4003223
HORVÁTH C, ENVIA E, PODBOY G G. Limitations of phased array beamforming in open rotor noise source imaging[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(8): 1810-1817. DOI: 10.2514/1.J052952
KINGAN M J, PARRY A B. Acoustic theory of the many-bladed contra-rotating propeller: the effects of sweep on noise enhancement and reduction[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 468: 89-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115089
PARRY A B, KINGAN M J. Acoustic theory of the many-bladed contra-rotating propeller: physics of the wake interaction noise critical sources[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 880: 1-12. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.755
PARRY A B, VIANELLO S. A project study of open rotor noise[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2012, 11(2): 247-258. DOI: 10.1260/1475-472x.11.2.247
STUERMER A, YIN J P. Low-speed aerodynamics and aeroacoustics of CROR propulsion systems[C]// 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Miami, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 3134. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-3134
SPALART P, TRAVIN A, SHUR M, et al. Initial noise predictions for open rotors using first principles[C]// 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 3793. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-3793
JANARDAN B, GLIEBE P. Acoustic power level comparisons of model-scale counterrotating unducted fans[C]// 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1991: 595. doi: 10.2514/6.1991-595
YI S, KWON H I, IM D, et al. Parameter study of low noise CROR system[C]// 34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Washington, D. C. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 3878. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3878
SMITH D A, FILIPPONE A, BOJDO N. A parametric study of counter rotating open rotor noise[C]// 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 2570. doi: 10.2514/6.2019-2570
YAN W H, TANG S J, WANG F M, et al. Unsteady aerodynamic interactions of contra rotating propeller[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(7): 1398-1405 (in Chinese).
ZHANG Z Z. Research on aerodynamic interference and matching between contra rotating prop-fan[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019 (in Chinese).
JIN H B, CHEN X L, QIN X G. Open-rotor engine noise analysis based on Mohring acoustic analogy[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(4): 785-791 (in Chinese).
ZHOU R Z, QI H B. Open rotor engine counter-rotating prop-fan matching characteristics research[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2014, 25(4): 69-73 (in Chinese).
ZHOU R Z, HAO Y Y, QI H B. Open rotor contra-rotating prop-fan design[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2014, 27(1): 1-5 (in Chinese).
QI H B, ZHOU R Z, HUANG H C, et al. Modeling of counter-rotating prop-fan performance of open rotor engine[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2012, 25(1): 20-24 (in Chinese).
XIA Z F, YANG Y. Unsteady numerical simulation of interaction effects of propeller and wing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(7): 1195-1201 (in Chinese).
WANG S J, CHENG Y S, GAO X. Prediction and numerical simulation of cavitation noise line-spectrum frequency induced by underwater counter-rotation propeller[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(3): 310-317 (in Chinese).
ZENG S, DU X M, FAN W. Numerical simulation and analysis of non-cavitation noise line-spectrum frequency of underwater counter-rotation propeller[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(6): 1052-1060 (in Chinese).
SHI W B, LI J. Numerical simulation of contra-rotating propeller flowfield aerodynamic interactions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(4): 829-837 (in Chinese).
XIA Z F, YANG Y. Characteristic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic interactions of contra rotating open rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(4): 835-843 (in Chinese).
DECONINCK T, HIRSCH C, CAPRON A, et al. Sensitivity study on computational parameters for the prediction of noise generated by counter-rotating open rotors[C]// 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 2765. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-2765
WANG L, LIU B. Validation of nonlinear harmonic method in dual-stage counter-rotating compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(7): 1448-1455 (in Chinese).
HE L, CHEN T, WELLS R G, et al. Analysis of rotor-rotor and stator-stator interferences in multi-stage turbomachines[C]// Turbo Expo 2002, Parts A and B, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ASMEDC, 2002. doi: 10.1115/gt2002-30355
ZHAO J, LIU B J. Deterministic stress modelling in transonic compressor based on nonlinear harmonic method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(10): 2440-2449 (in Chinese).
YAO X J, DONG J X, SHANG J, et al. Application of non-linear harmonic in turbomarchinery 3D flow field unsteady simulation[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(4): 632-639 (in Chinese).
WANG X D, KANG S. Nonlinear harmonic method in unsteady numerical simulation on a low speed axial turbine[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(6): 949-952 (in Chinese).
HIRSCH C, DECONINCK T, DE MEULENAERE A, et al. Prediction of near- and far-field noise generated by counter-rotating open rotors[C]// 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 3794. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-3794
FERRANTE P, VILMIN S, HIRSCH C, et al. Integrated “CFD - acoustic” computational approach to the simulation of a contra rotating open rotor at angle of attack[C]// 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013: 2242. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-2242
CUI P W, TONG F, FENG H Y, et al. Influence of rear rotor diameter on aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of counter-rotating proeller[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(8): 1749-1760 (in Chinese).
, et al. Pressure field measurements on large-scale propeller blades using pressure-sensitive paint[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2022, 38(2): 121366. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-021-09048-1
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621