
1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 超高速空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 跨流域空气动力学实验室,绵阳,621000
3. 西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,713800
Published:2023
移动端阅览
王宏宇, 闵夫, 解真东, 等. 直流放电控制高速带斜坡锥体气动力的有效性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9): 48−58.
WANG Hongyu, MIN Fu, XIE Zhendong, et al. Effectiveness of direct current discharge on high speed aerodynamic control of a conical model with ramps[J]. 2023, 41(9): 48-58.
王宏宇, 闵夫, 解真东, 等. 直流放电控制高速带斜坡锥体气动力的有效性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9): 48−58. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0195
WANG Hongyu, MIN Fu, XIE Zhendong, et al. Effectiveness of direct current discharge on high speed aerodynamic control of a conical model with ramps[J]. 2023, 41(9): 48-58. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0195.
基于直流放电激波重构气动力控制原理,开展了带斜坡锥体模型的高速(
Ma
= 6)气动力控制风洞试验,采用光纤天平技术,考察了模型在两种放电功率(284 W和517 W)下的气动力/力矩变化情况,并采用纹影成像研究了放电对流动拓扑的影响。纹影图像揭示了由于放电热阻塞和马赫数降低引起的波系重构现象,表现为放电诱导压缩波和再附激波弱化、角度减小。天平信号验证了放电使得模型的轴向力、法向力和俯仰力矩减小,放电功率较大时控制效果明显。通过求解带功率密度源项的Navier-Stokes方程模拟放电的加热效应,数值研究了模型气动力随功率密度的变化规律及加热位置对控制能力的影响。研究表明:模型气动力变化率与功率密度呈正相关;当以激励器的上游位置为参考点时,俯仰力矩变化显著;当加热位置靠近斜坡时,控制能力降低。
Based on the aerodynamic control principle that direct current discharge reconstructs the shock waves
wind tunnel experiments at Mach 6 were conducted for the hypersonic aerodynamic control of a conical model with ramps. The aerodynamic force/moment variations of the model at two discharge powers (284 W and 517 W) were acquired using the fiber optic balance (FOB)
and the corresponding flow topology change was studied using the Schlieren imaging. The visualisation reveals the shock wave reconstruction phenomenon caused by the discharge
which blocks the flow and reduces the local Mach number. Specifically
the discharge induces a compression wave
and reduces the strength and angle of the attachment shock. The balance signal shows that the axial force
normal force and pitching moment of the model are all decreased under the discharge
and the control effect is more prominent under a larger discharge power. The heating effect of discharge was simulated by solving the Navier-Stokes equations with an energy source
and the aerodynamic force variation with the power density
as well as the control effect of the heating position were quantified. The results show that
the aerodynamic changes are positively correlated with the power density; the pitch moment of the model changes significantly taking the position upstream of the actuator as the reference point; the control efficiency decreases when the heating zone is located closer to the ramp.
WATANABE Y, LEONOV S B, HOUPT A, et al. Plasma-assisted control of Mach-2 flowfield over ramp geometry[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 249: 012006. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/249/1/012006
DONG H B, LIU J, CHEN Z D, et al. Numerical investigation of lateral jet with supersonic reacting flow[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2018, 55(4): 928-935. DOI: 10.2514/1.A34096
ZHU J C, SHI Z W, FU J Q, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic airfoils based on jet flow control technology[J]. AIP Advances, 2021, 11(3): 035036. DOI: 10.1063/5.0033779
WU Y, LI Y H. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 381-405. (in Chinese)
LI Y H, WU Y. Research progress and outlook of flow control and combustion control using plasma actuation[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2020, 50(10): 1252-1273. (in Chinese)
CHEN J Z, HU G, FAN G C, et al. Bow shock wave control and drag reduction by plasma synthetic jet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 124773. (in Chinese)
WANG H Y, YANG Y G, HU W B, et al. Experimental study on unsteadiness characteristics of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency microsecond pulse discharge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 625905. (in Chinese)
WANG H Y, LI J, JIN D, et al. Resp onse of the shock wave/boundary layer interaction to the plasma synthetic jet[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(8): 084705. (in Chinese)
ZHOU Y, LUO Z B, WANG L, et al. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(3): 025027. (in Chinese)[万方]
SHANG J, YAN H, LIU F. A prospective of plasma actuators in aerospace engineering[J]. Physics of Gases, 2018, 3(2): 1-12. (in Chinese)
SHANG J S. Surface direct current discharge for hypersonic flow control[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(6): 1213-1222. DOI: 10.2514/1.37009
BISEK N, BOYD I, POGGIE J. Numerical study of energy deposition requirements for aerodynamic control of hypersonic vehicles[C]//46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2008. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-1109
TANG M, WU Y, WANG H Y. Experimental investigation on hypersonic shock-shock interaction control using plasma actuator array[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 198: 577-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.010
XIE W, LUO Z, ZHOU Y, et al. Experimental study on shock wave control in high-enthalpy hypersonic flow by using SparkJet actuator[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 188: 416-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.07.032
LEONOV S, FALEMPIN F, YARANTSEV D, et al. Active steering of shock waves in compression ramp by nonuniform plasma[C]//48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-260
LEONOV S B, FIRSOV A A, HOUPT A W. Suppression of reflected oblique shock wave by multi-filamentary plasma[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, 1112: 012005. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1112/1/012005
SHNEIDER M N, MACHERET S O, ZAIDI S H, et al. Virtual shapes in supersonic flow control with energy addition[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(5): 900-915. DOI: 10.2514/1.34136
WATANABE Y, SUZUKI K. Aerodynamic control effect of surface DC plasma discharge at Mach-7 hypersonic flow[C]//46th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Dallas, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-2342
CHENG B Q, SUN Q, LI J, et al. Ramp-induced shock wave control through plasma aerodynamic actuation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(2): 348-352. (in Chinese)
CHENG Y F, NIE W S, CHE X K, et al. Numerical simulation to the effect of arc discharge plasma flow control on supersonic boundary layer[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2012, 33(1): 27-32. (in Chinese)
YAN H, LIU F, XU J, et al. Study of oblique shock wave control by surface arc discharge plasma[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 56(2): 532-541. DOI: 10.2514/1.J056107
WANG H Y, XIE F, LI J, et al. Study on control of hypersonic aerodynamic force by quasi-DC discharge plasma energy deposition[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 187: 325-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.049
WANG H Y, XIE F, LI J, et al. Effectiveness of millisecond pulse discharge on hypersonic oblique shock wave[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(11): 116104. DOI: 10.1063/5.0065367
WANG H Y, MIN F, XIE Z D, et al. Quantitative study of the control of hypersonic aerodynamics using millisecond pulsed discharges[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(2): 021701. DOI: 10.1063/5.0081599
WANG H Y, XIE F, LI J, et al. Research on hypersonic aerodynamic force control by arc plasma energy deposition[J]. Aerodynamic Research Experiment, 2022, 34(01): 45-52 (in Chinese).
XIE Z D, HE X, XIAO Y Q, et al. Ultrasensitive all-fiber inline Fabry-Perot strain sensors for aerodynamic measurements in hypersonic flows[J]. ISA Transactions, 2020, 102: 388-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.02.020
ERDEM E, KONTIS K, YANG L. Steady energy deposition at Mach 5 for drag reduction[J]. Shock Waves, 2013, 23(4): 285-298. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-012-0405-8
KNIGHT D. Survey of aerodynamic drag reduction at high speed by energy deposition[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(6): 1153-1167. DOI: 10.2514/1.24595
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621