High-precision IPDG based turbulence simulation and the numerical characteristics of flux schemes

HAO Shixi; DING Qiushi; WEI Tong; LIU Zhengxian; LIU Wei; LI Xiaojian; ZHAO Ming

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0149

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

High-precision IPDG based turbulence simulation and the numerical characteristics of flux schemes

更新时间：2026-05-28

- High-precision IPDG based turbulence simulation and the numerical characteristics of flux schemes
- Vol. 41, Issue 11, Pages: 94-102(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 天津大学机械工程学院,天津,300350
  2. 电子科技大学计算机科学与工程学院,成都,611731
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0149
  CLC： O354
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郝世熙, 丁秋实, 魏桐, 等. 高精度IPDG湍流模拟及通量格式数值特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(11): 94−102.

HAO Shixi, DING Qiushi, WEI Tong, et al. High-precision IPDG based turbulence simulation and the numerical characteristics of flux schemes[J]. 2023, 41(11): 94-102.
郝世熙, 丁秋实, 魏桐, 等. 高精度IPDG湍流模拟及通量格式数值特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(11): 94−102. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0149

HAO Shixi, DING Qiushi, WEI Tong, et al. High-precision IPDG based turbulence simulation and the numerical characteristics of flux schemes[J]. 2023, 41(11): 94-102. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0149.

摘要

为更高精度数值求解复杂湍流问题，在内罚间断伽辽金（internal penalty discontinuous Galerkin

IPDG）方法框架内发展了基于SST

k-ω

模型的湍流模拟方法，通过对亚/跨/超声速工况下流场的数值计算与湍流特征捕捉，验证了方法的适用性，进而系统分析了AUSM、Lax-F、HLL和Roe 4种通量格式在IPDG湍流模拟中的数值特性。结果表明：AUSM格式在超声速工况下脱体激波面“褶皱”现象明显；Lax-F格式和HLL格式数值耗散大，在激波解析方面精度较低，且Lax-F格式在激波脚后诱导产生流动分离；Roe格式具备宽速域适用性，计算精度较高且能精确解析激波结构。

Abstract

In this study

the SST

k-ω

turbulence model is applied within the framework of the internal penalty discontinuous Galerkin (IPDG) method. The applicability of the method is verified by numerical simulations of the flow fields and the turbulence characteristics under subsonic

transonic and supersonic conditions. Based on the present method

the numerical characteristics of four different flux schemes (AUSM

Lax F

HLL and Roe) for the convection term in the weak form of the RANS equations with IPDG are systematically analyzed. The results show that

the AUSM scheme presents an obvious folding phenomenon on the detached shock surface under supersonic condition. The Lax-F and HLL scheme

s have large numerical dissipation and perform poorly in the shock wave analysis. Moreover

flow separation is induced after the shock surface in the Lax-F scheme. The Roe scheme has the applicability for a wide range of velocity

and presents a high calculation accuracy that can precisely resolve the shock structure.

关键词

Keywords

references

COCKBURN B, LIN S Y, SHU C W. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: one-dimensional systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1989, 84(1): 90-113. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90183-6

COCKBURN B, SHU C W. The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection-diffusion systems[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1998, 35(6): 2440-2463. DOI: 10.1137/S0036142997316712

BASSI F, REBAY S, MARIOTTI G, et al. A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for inviscid and viscous turbomachinery flows[C]// 2nd European Conference on Turbomachinery, Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Technologisch Instituut, Antwerpen, Belgium, 1997: 99-108. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1996.5572

ARNOLD D N, BREZZI F, COCKBURN B, et al. Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 2002, 39(5): 1749-1779. DOI: 10.1137/s0036142901384162

HARTMANN R, HOUSTON P. An optimal order interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(22): 9670-9685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.07.015

HARTMANN R, HELD J, LEICHT T, et al. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for computational aerodynamics—3D adaptive flow simulation with the DLR PADGE code[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14(7): 512-519. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2010.04.002

BASSI F, CRIVELLINI A, REBAY S, et al. Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes and k - ω turbulence model equations[J ] . Computers Fluids, 2005, 34(4-5): 507-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.08.004

BASSI F, BOTTI L, COLOMBO A, et al. Assessment of a high-order accurate Discontinuous Galerkin method for turbomachinery flows[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2016, 30(4): 307-328. DOI: 10.1080/10618562.2016.1198783

SUN L, AN W, LIU X J, et al. On developing data-driven turbulence model for DG solution of RANS[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(8): 1869-1884. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.004

LI X L, YANG Y, HAO H B, et al. Exploring high-order accurate discontinuous Galerkin method for numerical solution of compressible Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes (RANS) equations[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2012, 30(3): 407-411. (in Chinese)

YU J, YAN C, JIANG Z H. On the use of the discontinuous Galerkin method for numerical simulation of two-dimensional compressible turbulence with shocks[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics Astronomy, 2014, 57(9): 1758-1770. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-014-5424-2

HE L X, ZHANG L P, ZHANG H X. Discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on 3D arbitrary elements[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(2): 157-162. (in Chinese)

CHENG J, YANG X Q, LIU X D, et al. A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations on arbitrary grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 327: 484-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.049

YANG X Q, CHENG J, WANG C J, et al. A fast, implicit discontinuous Galerkin method based on analytical Jacobians for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations[C]// 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 1326. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1326

ZHANG T, LV H Q, QIN W L. Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow Based on Rotating Reference Frame Using High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin method[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2019, 51(04): 474-485. (in Chinese)

QIN W L, LYU) H Q, WU Y Z. Discontinuous Galerkin solution of RANS equations on curved mesh[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(5): 581-586. (in Chinese)

CHEN J W. Simulation of unsteady flow based on high-order discontinuous Galerkin method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017 (in Chinese).

ZHENG Q Y, CHEN F, LYU M D, et al. Comparison and analysis of two turbulence models in transonic flow[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 51(1): 84-88. (in Chinese)

TORO E F. Approximate-state Riemann solvers[M]//Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999: 293-313. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03915-1_9

HARTEN A, LAX P D, VAN LEER B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. SIAM Review, 1983, 25(1): 35-61. DOI: 10.1137/1025002

ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 135(2): 250-258. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5705

EDWARDS J R, LIOU M S. Low-diffusion flux-splitting methods for flows at all speeds[J]. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(9): 1610-1617. DOI: 10.2514/2.587

HU L J, ZHAO K L. A modified roe scheme and stability analysis[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2020, 41(10): 1110-1124. (in Chinese)

FU L, GAO Z H, ZHANG X D. Construction and application research of HLL-HLLC scheme[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(1): 116-122, 135. (in Chinese)

WANG X, LIU W, ZHAO M, et al. Numerical simulations of supersonic mixing layers with IPDG method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(2): 275-283. (in Chinese)

ZHAO B, ZHAO M, LIU W, et al. Chimera grid technology with IPDG method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(6): 1206-1216. (in Chinese)

HARTMANN R, HOUSTON P. Symmetric interior penalty DG methods for the compressible navier-stokes equations II: goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation[J]. Int J Numer Anal Mod, 2006, 3(2): 141-162.

WANG L, ANDERSON W K, ERWIN J T, et al. Discontinuous Galerkin and Petrov Galerkin methods for compressible viscous flows[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 100: 13-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.04.035

MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. DOI: 10.2514/3.12149

YAN C, QU F, ZHAO Y T, et al. Review of development and challenges for physical modeling and numerical scheme of CFD in aeronautics and astronautics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(5): 829-857. (in Chinese)

MUELLER B. Simple improvements of an upwind TVD scheme for hypersonic flow[C]// 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Buffalo, NY. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1989: 1977. doi: 10.2514/6.1989-1977

MCCROSKEY W J. A critical assessment of wind tunnel results for the NACA 0012 airfoil, NASA-TM-100019[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1987.

GU R P, SONG G P, LIU W. Numerical analysis on aerodynamic characteristics of the flows with high Reynolds number around two-dimensional airfoil[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(21): 162-166, 172. (in Chinese)

ZHOU Y, YAN C. Entropy correction analyses for Roe scheme[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009, 35(3): 356-360. (in Chinese)

LI W A. Research on the high order accurate numerical methods on unstructured grids[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012. (in Chinese)

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Immersed boundary method based on high-order discontinuous Galerkin method

A zonal coupled continuous/discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for vehicle structure analyses under aerodynamic force/heating effects

Review of development and challenges for physical modeling and numerical scheme of CFD in aeronautics and astronautics

Positivity-preserving strategies and their comparision based on staggered CPR methods

Multi-factor analysis and simulation of particle erosion characteristics of fan blades

Related Author

WANG Tingting

LYU Hongqiang

AN Wei

ZHAO Jianning

WEI Dong

DU Yanxia

LIU Donghuan

GUI Yewei

Related Institution

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics And Astronautics, Nanjing

School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing

China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University

School of Aeronautic, Northwestern Polytechnical University

AI问答

⁰