On the stability of a split form CPR scheme in under-resolved flows

JIA Feiran; ZHU Huajun; YAN Hong; YAN Zhenguo; SHI Jingchang

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0128

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

On the stability of a split form CPR scheme in under-resolved flows

更新时间：2026-05-28

- On the stability of a split form CPR scheme in under-resolved flows
- Vol. 41, Issue 11, Pages: 103-115(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北工业大学动力与能源学院,西安,710000
  2. 空气动力学国家重点实验室,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0128
  CLC： V211.3
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
贾斐然, 朱华君, 严红, 等. 一种分裂形式CPR格式在欠解析流动中的稳定性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(11): 103−115.

JIA Feiran, ZHU Huajun, YAN Hong, et al. On the stability of a split form CPR scheme in under-resolved flows[J]. 2023, 41(11): 103-115.
贾斐然, 朱华君, 严红, 等. 一种分裂形式CPR格式在欠解析流动中的稳定性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(11): 103−115. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0128

JIA Feiran, ZHU Huajun, YAN Hong, et al. On the stability of a split form CPR scheme in under-resolved flows[J]. 2023, 41(11): 103-115. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0128.

摘要

基于重构的修正过程（correction procedure via reconstruction

CPR）方法是一种适用于非结构网格、紧致高效的高阶方法，但在离散非线性对流项时容易因为混淆误差的累积而出现数值不稳定。本文研究了基于LG （Legendre-Gauss）点分裂形式的CPR方法在欠解析流动中的稳定性，并将其与子单元限制技术结合，求解含激波的欠解析流动问题。结果表明：经过边界通量修正的LG点分裂形式CPR格式能够满足离散守恒律，且与子单元限制相结合后守恒律依然成立；在无激波的欠解析流动问题中，相比于散度形式CPR格式，分裂形式明显提高了计算的稳定性，而且比使用LGL（Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto）点的分裂形式CPR格式具有更小的数值误差；在含激波的欠解析流动求解中，相比基于LGL点的间断伽辽金谱元法子单元限制策略，基于LG点的分裂形式CPR格式子单元限制策略具有更高的分辨率和更小的振荡。

Abstract

The correction procedure via reconstruction (CPR) method is a compact and efficient high-order method suitable for unstructured grids. However

when discretizing the nonlinear convection term

it is easy to cause numerical instability due to the accumulation of aliasing errors. In the present work

we study the stability of the split form CPR method based on LG (Legendre-Gauss) points in under-resolved flows

and combine the method with the subcell limiting technique to solve under-resolved flows with shock waves. First

numerical tests are carried out to verify that the split form CPR method based on LG points with the boundary flux correction can satisfy the discrete conservation law

and such conservation is still preserved under subcell limiting. In the simulation of under-resolved flows without shock waves

compared to the divergence form CPR method

the split form significantly improves the stability of the calculation

and has smaller numerical errors than the split form CPR method using LGL (Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto) points. When solving under-resolved flows with shock waves

compared to the subcell limiting strategy of discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method based on LGL points

the subcell limiting strategy of split form CPR scheme based on LG points developed in this paper has higher resolution and less oscillation.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG Z J, HUYNH H T. A review of flux reconstruction or correction procedure via reconstruction method for the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 2016, 3(1): 15-00475-15-00475. DOI:10.1299/mer.15-00475

HUYNH H T. A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous Galerkin methods[C]// 18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Miami, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2007: 1-42.doi: 10.2514/6.2007-4079

WANG Z J, GAO H Y A unifying lifting collocation penalty formulation including the discontinuous Galerkin, spectral volume/difference methods for conservation laws on mixed grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228(21): 8161-8186. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.036

WANG Z J, GAO H Y. A unifying lifting collocation penalty formulation for the Euler equations on mixed grids[C]// 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 401. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-401

WANG Z J, GAO H Y, HAGA T. A unifying discontinuous CPR formulation for the Navier –Stokes equations on mixed grids[C]//Computational Fluid Dynamics 2010, 2011: 401. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17884-9_5

HESTHAVEN J S, WARBURTON T. Nodal discontinuous Galerkin methods[M]. New York: Springer New York NY, 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-72067-8

VINCENT P E, CASTONGUAY P, JAMESON A. A new class of high-order energy stable flux reconstruction schemes[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2011, 47(1): 50-72. DOI:10.1007/s10915-010-9420-z

DU J, SHU C-W, ZHANG M. A simple weighted essentially non-oscillatory limiter for the correction procedure via reconstruction (CPR) framework[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2015, 95: 173-198. DOI:10.1016/j.apnum.2014.01.006

WANG Z J, LI Y, JIA F, et al. Towards industrial large eddy simulation using the FR/CPR method[J]. Computers Fluids, 2017, 156: 579-589. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.04.026

ABE Y, MORINAKA I, HAGA T, et al. Stable, non-dissipative, and conservative flux-reconstruction schemes in split forms[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 353: 193-227. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.007

KIRBY R M, KARNIADAKIS G E. De-aliasing on non-uniform grids: algorithms and applications[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 191(1): 249-264. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00314-0

GASSNER G J, WINTERS A R, KOPRIVA D A. Split form nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for the compressible Euler equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 327: 39-66. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.013

GASSNER G J, BECK A D. On the accuracy of high-order discretizations for underresolved turbulence simulations[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2013, 27(3-4): 221-237. DOI:10.1007/s00162-011-0253-7

BLAISDELL G A, SPYROPOULOS E T, QIN J H. The effect of the formulation of nonlinear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 1996, 21(3): 207-219. DOI:10.1016/0168-9274(96)00005-0

WINTERS A R, MOURA R C, MENGALDO G, et al. A comparative study on polynomial dealiasing and split form discontinuous Galerkin schemes for under-resolved turbulence computations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 372: 1-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.06.016

CHAN J, RANOCHA H, RUEDA-RAMÍREZ A M, et al. On the entropy projection and the robustness of high order entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin schemes for under-resolved flows[J]. Frontiers in Physics, 2022, 10: 898028. DOI:10.3389/fphy.2022.898028

ASTHANA K, JAMESON A. High-order flux reconstruction schemes with minimal dispersion and dissipation[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2015, 62(3): 913-944. DOI:10.1007/s10915-014-9882-5

BULL J R, JAMESON A. Simulation of the Taylor-green vortex using high-order flux reconstruction schemes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(9): 2750-2761. DOI:10.2514/1.J053766

JAMESON A. Formulation of kinetic energy preserving conservative schemes for gas dynamics and direct numerical simulation of one-dimensional viscous compressible flow in a shock tube using entropy and kinetic energy preserving schemes[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2008, 34(2): 188-208. DOI:10.1007/s10915-007-9172-6

RUEDA-RAMÍREZ A M, PAZNER W, GASSNER G J. Subcell limiting strategies for discontinuous Galerkin spectral element methods[J]. Computers Fluids, 2022, 247: 105627. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105627

KURGANOV A, PETROVA G, POPOV B. Adaptive semidiscrete central-upwind schemes for nonconvex hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2007, 29(6): 2381-2401. DOI:10.1137/040614189

ZHU H J, LIU H, YAN Z-G, et al. A priori subcell limiting based on compact nonuniform nonlinear weighted schemes of high-order CPR method for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Computers Fluids, 2022, 241: 105456. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105456

SHI G Q, ZHU H J, YAN Z G. A priori subcell limiting approach for the FR/CPR method on unstructured meshes[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2022, 31(4): 1215-1241. DOI:10.4208/cicp.oa-2021-0165

SHI G Q, YAN Z G, ZHU H J, et al. Troubled cell detection in subcell limiting for high-order CPR method on unstructured meshes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(2): 38−52(in Chinese). doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0406

ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2): 357-372. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5

SHU C W, OSHER S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 77(2): 439-471. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5

GOTTLIEB S, SHU C W, TADMOR E. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods[J]. SIAM Review, 2001, 43(1): 89-112. DOI:10.1137/s003614450036757x

FEIEREISEN W J, REYNOLDS W C, FERZIGER J H. Numerical simulation of a compressible homogeneous, turbulent shear flow[D].California: Stanford University, 1981.

KENNEDY C A, GRUBER A. Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier-Stokes equations for a compressible fluid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(3): 1676-1700. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.09.020

PERSSON P O, PERAIRE J. Sub-cell shock capturing for discontinuous Galerkin methods[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: 112. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-112

HENNEMANN S, RUEDA-RAMÍREZ A M, HINDENLANG F J. et al. A provably entropy stable subcell shock capturing approach for high order split form DG for the compressible Euler equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 426: 109935. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109935

MENGALDO G, MOURA R C, GIRALDA B, et al. Spatial eigensolution analysis of discontinuous Galerkin schemes with practical insights for under-resolved computations and implicit LES[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 169: 349-364. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.09.016

TONICELLO N, MOURA R C, LODATO G, et al. Fully-discrete spatial eigenanalysis of discontinuous spectral element methods: Insights into well-resolved and under-resolved vortical flows[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4010626

BASSI F, REBAY S. A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 131(2): 267-279. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1996.5572

TORO E F. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. doi: 10.1007/b79761

MOURA R C, MENGALDO G, PEIRÓ J, et al. On the eddy-resolving capability of high-order discontinuous Galerkin approaches to implicit LES/under-resolved DNS of Euler turbulence[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 330: 615-623. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.056

EINFELDT B. On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1988, 25(2): 294-318. DOI:10.1137/0725021

HARTEN A, LAX P D, van LEER B. On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws[J]. SIAM Review, 1983, 25(1): 35-61. Doi: 10.1137/1025002

TAYLOR G I, GREEN A E. Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1937, 158(895): 499-521. DOI:10.1098/rspa.1937.0036

WANG Z J, FIDKOWSKI K, ABGRALL R, et al. High-order CFD methods: current status and perspective: High-order CFD methods[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 72(8): 811-845. DOI:10.1002/fld.3767

VERMEIRE B C, NADARAJAH S, TUCKER P G. Implicit large eddy simulation using the high-order correction procedure via reconstruction scheme: Implicit large eddy simulation using the high-order correction procedure via reconstruction scheme[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2016, 82(5): 231-260.

CARTON DE WIART C, HILLEWAERT K, DUPONCHEEL M, et al. Assessment of a discontinuous Galerkin method for the simulation of vortical flows at high Reynolds number: Simulation of vortical flow at high Reynolds number using DGM [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2014, 74(7): 469-493. DOI:10.1002/fld.3859

SHU C W, DON W S, GOTTLIEB D, et al. Numerical convergence study of nearly incompressible, inviscid Taylor–green vortex flow[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2005, 24(1): 1-27. DOI:10.1007/s10915-004-5407-y

COX C, et al. Accuracy, stability, and performance comparison between the spectral difference and flux reconstruction schemes[J]. Computers Fluids, 2021, 221: 104922. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104922

RUEDA-RAMÍREZ A, GASSNER G. A subcell finite volume positivity-preserving limiter for DGSEM discretizations of the Euler equations[C]// 14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress, CIMNE, 2021. doi: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.038

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Research progress on noise reduction of centrifugal fans

Positivity-preserving strategies and their comparision based on staggered CPR methods

Installation effects on propeller tone noise

Analysis of damping and cross dynamic derivative characteristics for a quasi-HyTRV lifting body

An Ac-criteria-based optimal input design method

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

⁰