Review of numerical studies on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield

WANG Yibin; MA Chenyang; LI Tong; ZHAO Ning; ZHU Chunling

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0066

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Review of numerical studies on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield

更新时间：2026-05-28

- Review of numerical studies on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield
- Vol. 41, Issue 3, Pages: 45-66(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京航空航天大学非定常空气动力学与流动控制工业和信息化部重点实验室,南京,210016
  2. 中国船舶集团有限公司系统工程研究院,北京,100094
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0066
  CLC： V211.3
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王逸斌, 马晨阳, 李通, 等. 舰载直升机-舰船耦合流场数值计算研究综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(3): 45−66.

WANG Yibin, MA Chenyang, LI Tong, et al. Review of numerical studies on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield[J]. 2023, 41(3): 45-66.
王逸斌, 马晨阳, 李通, 等. 舰载直升机-舰船耦合流场数值计算研究综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(3): 45−66. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0066

WANG Yibin, MA Chenyang, LI Tong, et al. Review of numerical studies on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield[J]. 2023, 41(3): 45-66. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0066.

摘要

舰载直升机舰面起降是海上舰载直升机最危险的作业之一，而舰船表面的复杂气流干扰是造成该问题的主要因素之一。本文从孤立舰船舰面流场主要特征分析出发，分别总结了航空母舰与非航空母舰类舰船的主要流动特征，以及舰载直升机-舰船耦合流场的主要流动特征。在此基础上，根据舰船表面流场计算采用的数值方法分类，从无黏流场到黏性流场计算、从定常数值计算到非定常数值计算，系统介绍了国内外的发展情况与主要研究工作。对舰载直升机-舰船耦合流场数值研究，根据采用的模型与耦合方法分类，从动量盘简化耦合模型到完整直升机模型、从单向耦合到双向耦合，介绍了国外的发展历程及主要相关工作。期望舰面流场以及机-舰耦合流场数值计算主要方法的探讨，能为后期机-舰耦合流场研究及机-舰适配性研究提供参考。

Abstract

For shipborne helicopters

one of the most dangerous operations at sea is the taking-off and landing operation on a ship. The complex airflow interaction on the surface of the ship is one of the main causes of this problem. Starting from the analysis of flow features of a single ship air wake

the vortex structures of the carrier and non-carrier ships as well as the flow features of the ship-helicopter coupled flowfield are summarized. Based on this

we then review the research development and main studies in the numerical simulation of ship surface air flow

which ranges from inviscid to viscous flow simulations

and from steady to unsteady numerical simulations. For the numerical study of ship-helicopter coupled flow

according to the numerical model and coupling method

the development process abroad is introduced

from the simplified actuator disk model to the complete helicopter model

from one-way coupling to two-way coupling; meanwhile the relevant work in China is also introduced. The content discussed in this study outlines the main methods for numerical simulations of the ship surface air flow and the ship-helo coupled flow

which can provide a reference for studies of the ship-helo coupled flowfield and the aircraft-ship adaptability.

关键词

Keywords

references

ARMALY B F, DURST F, PEREIRA J C F, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 127(1): 473-496. DOI:10.1017/S0022112083002839

DRIVER D M, SEEGMILLER H L. Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1985, 23(2): 163-171. DOI:10.2514/3.8890

CHIANG T P, SHEU T W H. A numerical revisit of backward-facing step flow problem[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(4): 862-874. DOI:10.1063/1.869958

NIE J H, ARMALY B F. Three-dimensional convective flow adjacent to backward-facing step - effects of step height[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2002, 45(12): 2431-2438. DOI:10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00345-3

NIE J H, ARMALY B F. Reverse flow regions in three-dimensional backward-facing step flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(22): 4713-4720. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.05.027

CHEN Y T, NIE J H, HSIEH H T, et al. Three-dimensional convection flow adjacent to inclined backward-facing step[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2006, 49(25-26): 4795-4803. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.06.014

RANI H P, SHEU T W H, TSAI E S F. Eddy structures in a transitional backward-facing step flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 588: 43-58. DOI:10.1017/s002211200700763x

RATHA D, SARKAR A. Analysis of flow over backward facing step with transition[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 71-81. DOI:10.1007/s11709-014-0270-x

CHOI H H, NGUYEN V T, NGUYEN J. Numerical investigation of backward facing step flow over various step angles[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 154: 420-425. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.508

DRIVER D M, SEEGMILLER H L, MARVIN J G. Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1987, 25(7): 914-919. DOI:10.2514/3.9722

HUNT J C R, ABELL C J, PETERKA J A, et al. Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86(1): 179-200. DOI:10.1017/s0022112078001068

SU Q. Numerical study of coupled flow field between helicopter and warship[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020 (in Chinese).

LI T. Research on Kernel-Based associative memories, clustering algorithms and their applications[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022 (in Chinese).

SEDDON J, NEWMAN S. Basic helicopter aerodynamics[M]. BeiJing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014.

SEDDON J, NEWMAN S, 著. 直升机空气动力学基础[M]. 王建新, 等译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.

LI Z. Numerical study of Ship/Rotorcraft Coupled Airflow Field[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022 (in Chinese).

CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6): 1813-1832. DOI:10.2514/1.c032535

UK Civil Aviation Authority. Standards for offshore helicopter landing areas[S ] . CAA CAP 437, 2016. https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP437%20Ed8%20Am2%20(July2021).pdf

ZHAO W Y, LIU H, FU B X. Safe operating envelopes of onboard helicopter and its flight test[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2002, 20(4): 48-50, 60. (in Chinese)

TAI T C, CARICO D. Simulation of DD-963 ship airwake by Navier-Stokes method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32(6): 1399-1401. DOI:10.2514/3.46892

WILKINSON C, ZAN S J, GILBERT N, et al. Modelling and simulation of ship air wakes for helicopter operations : A collaborative venture[C]//Symposium on Fluid Dynamics Problems of Vehicles Operating Near or in the Air-Sea Interface, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999.

FORREST J S, OWEN I. An investigation of ship airwakes using Detached-Eddy Simulation[J]. Computers Fluids, 2010, 39(4): 656-673. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.11.002[LinkOut]

CHENEY B T, ZAN S J. CFD code validation data and flow topology for the technical cooperation program AEAR-TP2 simple frigate shape[R]. LTR-A-035.

REDDY K R, TOFFOLETTO R, JONES K R W. Numerical simulation of ship airwake[J]. Computers Fluids, 2000, 29(4): 451-465. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00033-X

TAI T C. Airwake simulation of modified TTCP/SFS ship[R ] . ADA 419015, 2003. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA419015.pdf

YESILEL H, EDIS F O. Ship airwake analysis by CFD methods[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2007, 936(1): 674-677. DOI:10.1063/1.2790239

SINGH S N, SRINIVASAN B, SHUKLA S. RANS study of flow characteristics over flight deck of simplified frigate ship[C]//DFD14 Meeting of the American Physical Society. 2014. doi: 10.13140/2.1.3132.4167

WOODSON S, GHEE T. A computational and experimental determination of the air flow around the landing deck of a US navy destroyer (DDG)[C]//23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-4958

WU Y P. The research and applications of CFD to calculation the flow field on warship deck[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2006(3): 1-4. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Discussion on comparability of scaled models for CFD numerical simulation for ship airwake[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2008, 3(6): 45-48. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Influences of different airflow situations for ship airwake[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2009, 31(9): 38-42. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Simplified evaluation of ship airwake characteristics for takeoff/landing of shipborne aircraft[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1): 39-42. (in Chinese)

QU F, LU C, JIANG Z F, et al. CFD numerical simulation of ship air-wake[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(5): 23-27. (in Chinese)

GAO Y, LIU C M. Numerical calculation of frigate ship airwake[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2013, 34(5): 599-603. (in Chinese)

GAO Y, LIU C M, HE Z. Research on CVN deck vortices structure characteristics caused by wind direction changes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(3): 310-315. (in Chinese)

LIU C M, GAO Y. Research on the airwake characteristics of flight deck for different frigate ship models[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46(3): 80-85. (in Chinese)

LIU C M. Numerical simulation of turbulent wind field around large-scale marine structures[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2014 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7666/d.D595371

WANG J L, GAO Y, LIU C M. Numerical simulation of typical frigate airwake on flight deck[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47(5): 86-90. (in Chinese)

WANG J L, GAO Y. The influence of ship tail structure to airwake on helicopter operation area[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(10): 148-154. (in Chinese)

WANG J L. Numerical research of ship airwake characteristic[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7666/d.Y3177578

GAO Y, XIE H S. The numerical simulation of flow around the warship during ramp ski-jump take-off[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2008, 26(4): 513-518. (in Chinese)

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Influence of ship motion on flow field over modified simple frigate shapes[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2021, 38(3): 520⁃534. DOI:10.16356/j.1005-1120.2021.03.016

LI C M, JIANG W J, CHENG J, et al. Comparisons of DES and LES turbulent model for simulation of surface ship airwake[C]//ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea. 2016 doi: 10.1115/OMAE2016-55037

POLSKY S. A computational study of unsteady ship airwake[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002: 1022. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-1022

LIU J M, LONG L N, MODI A. Higher order accurate solutions of ship airwake flow fields using parallel computers[C ] //The American Helicopter Society 54th Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 1998. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/l/n/lnl/papers/ahs_nato.pdf

HEALEY J. A data base for flight in the wake of a ship[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1992. AIAA-92-0295. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-295

SHARMA A, LONG L. Airwake simulations on an LPD 17 ship[C]//15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001: 2589. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-2589

SEZER-UZOL N, SHARMA A, LONG L N. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of ship airwake[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2005, 219(5): 369-392. DOI:10.1243/095441005x30306

ZAN S. Technical comment on “computational-fluid-dynamics based advanced ship-airwake database for helicopter flight simulation”[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(5): 1007. DOI:10.2514/2.6890

BOGSTAD M C, HABASHI W G, AKEL I, et al. Computational-fluid-dynamics based advanced ship-airwake database for helicopter flight simulators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39(5): 830-838. DOI:10.2514/2.3003

POLSKY S, BRUNER C. Time-accurate computational simulations of an LHA ship airwake[C]//18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000: 4126. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-4126

ZHANG F, XU H, BALL N. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow over SFS 2 ship model[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 81. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-81

POLSKY S. CFD prediction of airwake flowfields for ships experiencing beam winds[C]//21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-3657

POLSKY S, IMBER R, CZERWIEC R, et al. A computational and experimental determination of the air flow around the landing deck of a US navy destroyer (DDG): part II[C]//37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Miami, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2007: 4484. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-4484

SHUKLA S, SINGH S N, SRINIVASAN B, et al. A computational study of modified TTCP/SFS ship airwakes[C]// International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology, India, RINA, 2015. doi: 10.3940/rina.icsotin15.2015.01

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Numerical study of the flow over the modified simple frigate shape[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 235(12): 1551-1565. DOI:10.1177/0954410020977752

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Influence of sudden change in pitching motion on ship flow field[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(3): 80-89. (in Chinese)

THORNBER B, STARR M, DRIKAKIS D. Implicit large eddy simulation of ship airwakes[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2010, 114(1162): 715-736. DOI:10.1017/s0001924000004218

GRINSTEIN F, FUREBY C. Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows[C]//36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1998. doi: 10.2514/6.1998-537

VISBAL M R, RIZZETTA D P. Large-eddy simulation on curvilinear grids using compact differencing and filtering schemes[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124(4): 836-847. DOI:10.1115/1.1517564

VISBAL M, MORGAN P, RIZZETTA D. An implicit LES approach based on high-order compact differencing and filtering schemes (invited)[C]//16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003: 4098. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-4098

ZONG K, ZHAO P C, WANG J L, et al. Simulation application of S-A and MILES model in SFS 2 ship airwake[J ] . Ship Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 83-87. (in Chinese)

SPALART P R, JOU W H, STRELETS M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for winds, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C ] //Advances in DNS/LES, 1997: 137-148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236888805

SPALART P R, DECK S, SHUR M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181-195. DOI:10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0

SHUR M L, SPALART P R, STRELETS M K, et al. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001

FORREST J S, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Detached-Eddy Simulation of ship airwakes for piloted helicopter flight simulation[C ] //International Aerospace CFD Conference, Paris, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237730657_Detached-Eddy_Simulation_of_ship_airwakes_for_piloted_helicopter_flight_simulation

FORREST J S, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Ship-helicopter operating limits prediction using piloted flight simulation and time-accurate airwakes[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(4): 1020-1031. DOI:10.2514/1.C031525

CAO G, CHENG J, BI X B, et al. Investigation on the numerical simulation of ship airwake based on DES[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(3): 48-54. (in Chinese)

TAN H. The numerical simulation of frigate surface flow field with DES method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017 (in Chinese).

WANG Z L. Study of numerical simulation method for the air flow field around the ship deck[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2018(3): 6-10. (in Chinese)

VAN MUIJDEN J, BOELENS O, VAN DER VORST J, et al. Computational ship airwake determination to support helicopter-ship dynamic interface assessment[C]//21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013: 3078. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-3078

ZHAO R, RONG J L, LI H X, et al. Entropy-based detached-eddy simulation of the airwake over a simple frigate shape[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(11): 168781401561693. doi: 10.1177/1687814015616930

MORA R B. Experimental investigation of the flow on a simple frigate shape (SFS)[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014: 818132. DOI:10.1155/2014/818132

WATSON N A, KELLY M F, OWEN I, et al. Computational and experimental modelling study of the unsteady airflow over the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 172: 562-574. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.024

LI K W, ZHEN Z Y, SUN Y L. Effects of deck motion and ship airwake on Ski-Jump takeoff performance of carrier-based aircraft[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2016, 33(4): 510-518.

SUN W S, BI Y Q, BAI C H. Research on shipboard effect of naval helicopter[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2006, 36(2): 9-12. (in Chinese)

MOON J, DOMERCANT J C, MAVRIS D. A simplified approach to assessment of mission success for helicopter landing on a ship[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2015, 13(3): 680-688. DOI:10.1007/s12555-013-0092-y

YANG J. Study of influence of warship hangar door on helicopter's take-off and landing characteristics[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(4): 10-13. (in Chinese)

CHEN M H, CAO Y H. Flow field simulation and safety analysis of shipborne helicopter landing area [C]//2018 National Conference on Industrial Hydrodynamic. Beijing, 2018 (in Chinese).

MA S, WU J, WANG C, et al. Experimental study on the interference between rotor and ship in windless environment[C]//2019 National Conference on Industrial Hydrodynamic. Beijing, 2019: 209-220 (in Chinese).

CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Coupling flight mechanics and CFD: numerical simulation of shipborne rotors[J ] . The Aeronautical Journal. 2017, 122(1247): 42-82. doi: 10.1017/aer. 2017.112. https://1library.net/document/eqo2gw5y-coupling-flight-mechanics-cfd-numerical-simulation-shipborne-rotors.html

ERM L. A preliminary study of the airwake model used in an existing SH-60B/FFG- 7 helicopter/ship simulation program[R ] . ADA 28428, 1994. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA284282.pdf

FORTENBAUGH R. Progress in mathematical modeling of the aircraft operational environment of DD 963 class ships[C]//5th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference for Future Space Systems, Boulder, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1979: 1677. doi: 10.2514/6.1979-1677

WANG C R, ZHU Y B. A study on the method of calculation for helicopter-ship take-off/landing flight envelope[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1996, 14(1): 36-40. (in Chinese)

SUN C W, GAO Z, SUN W S. Analysis of unmanned helicopter hovering in ship flow field over flight deck[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 1999, 31(6): 614-619. (in Chinese)

XU G, HU G C, WANG Y L, et al. Research on helicopter hover on flight deck in complicated airflow field[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2015, 47(2): 205-211. (in Chinese)

JI H L, CHEN R L, LI P. Numerical simulation of a helicopter operating in a reconstructed ship airwake based on POD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(3): 771-779. (in Chinese)

LANDSBERG A, BORIS J, SANDBERG W, et al. Analysis of the nonlinear coupling effects of a helicopter downwash with an unsteady ship airwake[C]//33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1995. doi: 10.2514/6.1995-47

TATTERSALL P, ALBONE C, SOLIMAN M, et a l. Prediction of ship air wakes over flight decks using CFD[C ] //AGARD Fluid Dynamics Symposium on Fluid Dynamics of Vehicles Operating Near or In the Air-Sea Interface, 1998. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238395488_Prediction_of_Ship_Air_Wakes_over_Flight_Decks_using_CFD

WAKEFIELD N H, NEWMAN S J, WILSON P A. Helicopter flight around a ship's' superstructure[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2002, 216(1): 13-28. DOI:10.1243/0954410021533391

POLSKY S. Progress towards modeling ship/aircraft dynamic interface[C]//2006 HPCMP Users Group Conference (HPCMP-UGC'06), Denver, CO, USA. IEEE, 2006: 163-168. doi: 10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2006.59

HUANG B. Numerical study of coupled flowfield and flight envelop for shipborne helicopters[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016 (in Chinese).

HUANG B, XU G H, SHI Y J. Research on influence of hangar door opening and closing on landing flowfield for shipborne helicopters[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2015, 47(2): 198-204. (in Chinese)

ZHAO W Y. Research on test approach to complex wake between the helicopter rotor induced flow and the warship airwake[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2007, 25(2): 72-74, 77. (in Chinese)

SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Numerical simulatin of coupled flow field of helicopter/ship[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 520853. (in Chinese)

DU Y H. Numerical simulation of coupled flow field of helicopter/ship[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese).

CHEN H J, XU G H, SHI Y J, et al. Coupled flow field numerical simulation study of ship-borne tilt-rotor aircraft landing area[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2020, 38(1): 21-26, 34. (in Chinese)

SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H. Numerical study of the rotational direction effect on aerodynamic loading characteristics of shipborne helicopter rotor[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2019, 123(1263): 635-657. DOI:10.1017/aer.2019.20

HU C J, AN Q L, WANG X C. Calculation of shipboard helicopter's landing operating envelope by CFD method[J]. Science Technology Review, 2019, 37(13): 70-75. (in Chinese)

WANG C. Numerical simulation of flowfield in a helicopter landing process[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2019 (in Chinese).

GENG X, SUN P, ZHONG J J. Influence of wind direction on flow field structure of the ship-borne helicopter rotor[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(3): 465-471. (in Chinese)

GENG X. The study of composite flow field of the helicopter rotor and ship deck[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2014 (in Chinese).

SUN P, GENG X, ZHAO J, et al. Influence of wind directions on the flow field structures of helicopter rotor and deck[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(8): 1802-1810. (in Chinese)

ZHANG S J, ZHAO J, SUN P, et al. Numerical study of influence of multiple helicopter rotors on warship deck flow field[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2015, 55(5): 457-463. (in Chinese)

STEIJL R, BARAKOS G, BADCOCK K. A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in hover and forward flight[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2006, 51(8): 819-847. DOI:10.1002/fld.1086

ROSENFELD N, KIMMEL K, SYDNEY A J. Investigation of ship topside modeling practices for wind tunnel experiments[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 0245. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-0245

SCHWARZ T, PAHLKE K. Generation of an advanced helicopter experimental aerodynamic data base for CFD validation–The European GOAHEAD project[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 19(1): 1-2. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2011.09.007

LEE R G, ZAN S J. Wind tunnel testing of a helicopter fuselage and rotor in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50(4): 326-337. DOI:10.4050/1.3092869

Li T, Wang YB, Zhao N, et al. Numerical simulation study on the coupled flow field of ship/helicopter above the motion deck[C]//19th National Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Nanjing, 2021 (in Chinese).

LEE Y, SILVA M. CFD-modeling of rotor flowfield aboard ship[C]//48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-867

ZONG K, ZONG W, LI H X, et al. Research of simulation methods on landing flow field for shipborne helicopters[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(3): 124-130, 139. (in Chinese)

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Numerical analysis of cylindrical circumflow control based on pore scale porous medium

Numerical study of the effects of corner expansion ratio and installation angle of guide vanes on flow fields in BHAW wind tunnel

Analysis of personnel operation safety caused under airflow on the ship deck

Influence of pitching on ship-helicopter coupled flowfield subject to oblique winds

Reivew of active wake control for horizontal-axis wind turbines

Related Author

PAN Fanfan

XIANG Qian

LIU Yong

ZHANG Yihui

QU Qiulin

ZHANG Jin

CHEN Yue

LIU Peiqing

Related Institution

School of Aircraft Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang

China Aviation Research Institute, Beijing

Key Laboratory of Aeroacoustics of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beihang University, Beijing

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing

Sino-French Engineer School/School of General Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing

AI问答

⁰