
1. 中国航空研究院,北京,100012
2. 西北工业大学,西安,710072
Published:2022
移动端阅览
华俊, 钟敏, 郑遂, 等. CAE-AVM标模巡航构型的设计和数据库应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 133−147.
HUA Jun, ZHONG Min, ZHENG Sui, et al. Design and database applications of CAE-AVM model cruise configuration[J]. 2022, 40(4): 133-147.
华俊, 钟敏, 郑遂, 等. CAE-AVM标模巡航构型的设计和数据库应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 133−147. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0012
HUA Jun, ZHONG Min, ZHENG Sui, et al. Design and database applications of CAE-AVM model cruise configuration[J]. 2022, 40(4): 133-147. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0012.
受计算流体力学(CFD)与风洞数据相关性研究以及新型远程飞机设计能力建设等需求驱动,巡航马赫数0.85量级气动标模的研发日益得到重视,并受益于先进CFD方法和风洞精细化试验验证技术的发展,得以顺利开展。本文介绍了民机标模CAE-AVM巡航构型及其原准机的总体布局和气动方案设计,给出了远程商务飞机和该速域下气动标模的设计特点分析,提出了气动标模风洞试验的特别要求和解决方案。文章同时给出了CFD与风洞数据的对比验证结果,以及CAE-AVM标模数据库建设状况和典型应用案例。研究表明,CAE-AVM标模在马赫数0.85、升力系数0.5、雷诺数2×10
7
的设计状态下,升阻比为17.6,抖振升力系数和阻力发散马赫数等参数均满足设计要求。研究中实现了同步测力、测压、测变形和测转捩的精细化试验技术,试验前针对包含模型机翼气动弹性变形和支撑机构的真实试验外形的CFD预评估有效提高了试验效率。CAE-AVM数据库及其在CFD软件验证、CFD-风洞数据相关性研究、风洞动态和精细化试验技术开发以及民机设计分析方面的应用,表明了共用标模的必要性和实用性。
Driven by the need of CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics)-wind tunnel data correlation research and new long-haul aircraft development
the aerodynamic standard model at a cruise Mach number of 0.85 has drawn special attentions worldwide
and research work in this aspect has been carried out smoothly thanks to advanced CFD methods and high-precision wind tunnel test techniques. In this study
the cruise configuration of the civil aircraft model CAE-AVM (Chinese Aeronautical Establishment-Aerodynamic Validation Model) as wel
l as the overall layout and aerodynamic design of the baseline aircraft are introduced. The design characteristics of the long-range business aircraft and the aerodynamic standard model in this speed range are given
and special requirements and solutions for the wind tunnel test of the aerodynamic standard model are put forward. The CFD-experimental data correlation and the CAE-AVM database applications are also demonstrated. Results show that
under the condition of
Ma
= 0.85
lift coefficient
C
L
= 0.5 and Reynolds number 20 million
the estimated lift to drag ratio is 17.6
the buffet lift coefficient and the drag divergence Mach number all meet the design requirements. Simultaneous measurement of forces/moments
pressure distribution
wing aero-elastic deformation and transition front is achieved. Pre-test CFD analysis of the real test model with estimated wing deformation and model support greatly improves the efficiency of wind tunnel tests. The CAE-AVM database and its applications in CFD validation
CFD-test data correlation
modern wind tunnel test capacity development and civil aircraft design analysis demonstrate the theoretical and engineering values of the aerodynamic standard model in modern aircraft design.
艾德·奥波特, 著. 运输类飞机的空气动力设计[M]. 顾诵芬, 吴兴世, 杨新军, 译. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2010.
REDEKER G, MLLER R. A comparison of experimental results for the transonic flow around the DFVLR-F4 wing body configuration[R]. GARTEUR/TE-018, DFVLR-IB 129–83/71, 1983.
LAVY D W, VASSBERG J C, WAHLS R A, et al. Summary of data from the first AIAA cfd drag predictioon workshop[C ] //40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, AIAA-2002-0841, 2002. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030007848/downloads/20030007848.pdf doi: 10.2514/6.2002-841
ROSSOW C C, GODARD J L, HOHEISEL H, et al. Investigations of propulsion integration interference effects on a transport aircraft configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(5): 1022-1030. DOI:10.2514/3.46605
LAFLIN K, BRODERSEN O, RAKOWITZ M, et al. Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop (invited)[C]//42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA 2004-555, 2004. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-555
VASSBERG J, DEHAAN M, RIVERS M, et al. Development of a common research model for applied CFD validation studies[C]//26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA 2008-6919, 2008. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-6919
VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M R, et al. Summary of the fourth AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4): 1070-1089. DOI:10.2514/1.C032418
YU Y G, ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1 for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 505-513. (in Chinese)
WANG Y T, LIU G, CHEN Z B. Summary of the first aeronautical computational fluid dynamics credibility workshop[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2): 247-261, 246. (in Chinese)
LEVY D W, LAFLIN K R, TINOCO E N, et al. Summary of data from the fifth computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4): 1194-1213. DOI:10.2514/1.C032389
HUA J, KONG F M, WANG J J, et al. Recent examples on design aerodynamics for transport aircraft[C ] //23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Science, ICAS-2002-2.5. 2, 2002. https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2002/PAPERS/252.PDF
HUA J, ZHANG Z Y. Transonic wing design for transport aircraft[C]//17th International Congress of Aeronautical Science, ICAS 90-3.7. 4, 1990: 1316-1322.
ZHAO T. Aerodynamic optimization design of supercritical wing based on structure weight/deformation performance[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016: 88G90. (in Chinese)
HUA J, ZHENG S, ZHONG M, et al. Recent development of a CFD-wind tunnel correlation study based on CAE-AVM investigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 419-428. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.017
ZHONG M, ZHENG S, WANG G L, et al. Correlation analysis of combined and separated effects of wing deformation and support system in the CAE-AVM study[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 429-438. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.015
GEBBINK R, WANG G L, ZHONG M. High-speed wind tunnel test of the CAE aerodynamic validation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 439-447. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.010
KURSAKOV I, KAZHAN E, GEBBINK R. Computational study of wing deformation and sting interference effects with the CAE-AVM test case[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(10): 1954-1961. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.05.018
ZHONG M, HUA J, SUN X S, et al. Data correlation between aerodynamic validation model and CFD-wind tunnel[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2020, 31(1): 1-16. (in Chinese)
ZHAO Y, ZHANG M, LIU T J, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics correction with aeroelasticity[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2016, 46(5): 89-91. (in Chinese)
COJOCARU M G, ZHONG M, NICULESCU M L, et al. Improvement of CFD-wind tunnel correlation near buffet onset by using scale resolving simulations[M]//HRLM 2016: Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, 2018: 417-429. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70031-1_35
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621