KE Shitang, LU Manman, WU Hongxin, et al. Experimental study on the post-flutter morphological chracteristics and energy dissipation of a 15 MW wind turbine blade[J]. 2022, 40(4): 169-180.
KE Shitang, LU Manman, WU Hongxin, et al. Experimental study on the post-flutter morphological chracteristics and energy dissipation of a 15 MW wind turbine blade[J]. 2022, 40(4): 169-180.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0417.
Experimental study on the post-flutter morphological chracteristics and energy dissipation of a 15 MW wind turbine blade
Most existing flutter analyses of wind turbine blades focus on predicting critical flutter states. While the post-flutter morphological evolution and the associated energy dissipation
well-known for the prominent non-linear effect
are usually ignored. To characterize this non-linear phenomenon
a three-dimensional aeroelastic model of ultra-long flexible blades is proposed using the variational progressive beam section method. And synchronous measurements of vibration and force are carried out in a wind tunnel using high-speed cameras and a high-frequency six-component balance. The flutter sensitivity of wind turbine blades to the wind direction and speed is firstly analyzed. Later
the post-flutter morphological characteristics and the energy dissipation of wind turbine blades subjected to wind-induced vibration are systematically studied. Results indicate that the proposed aeroelastic model and the experimental method can effectively capture the post-flutter dynamic process. The pitch angles of wind turbine blades prone to the wind-induced vibration fall in two ranges
namely 93° ~ 96° and 284° ~ 286°
in which high-frequency locking vibrations can occur beyond the critical wind speed. At the same time
the energy accumulation becomes particularly significant at higher wind speeds
indicating that the wind-induced vibrations are non-stationary. The negative post-flutter aerodynamic damping is the main reason for the divergence of structural systems.
关键词
Keywords
references
KE S T, WANG X H, WANG T G, et al. Study on wind-induced effects of large wind turbine system considering blade pitch angle and interference effect[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 280-288. (in Chinese)
WANG L, LIU X W, KOLIOS A. State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: Aeroelastic modelling[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 64: 195-210. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.007
KE S T, YU W L, WANG T G, et al. Aerodynamic performance and wind-induced effect of large-scale wind turbine system under yaw and wind-rain combination action[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 136: 235-253. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.123
CHEN X, XU J Z. Structural failure analysis of wind turbines impacted by super typhoon Usagi[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 60: 391-404. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.028
CHEN B, WANG K, LIU J, et al. The impact of super typhoon Saomai(0608)on the offshore environment near the Yangtze Estuary[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(8): 1402-1412. (in Chinese)
HUANG J D, XIA H J, LI D Y, et al. Nonlinear aeroelastic modal analysis of large wind turbine flexible blades[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(14): 180-187. (in Chinese)
VATNE S R. Aeroelastic instability and flutter for a 10MW wind turbine[D]. Norwegian: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2011.
ZHAO L, HU C X, ZHOU Z Y, et al. Post flutter energy map for H-shaped bridge girder[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2021, 51(5): 505-516. (in Chinese)
LI Y L, ZHU J Q, TANG H J. Aeroelastic simulation of vortex-induced vibration and flutter based on CFD/CSD coupling solution[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(12): 85-89, 114. (in Chinese)
YANG C, YANG L, XIE C C. Development of aerodynamic methods in aeroelastic analysis for high aspect ratio flexible wings[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 1009-1018, 983. (in Chinese)
XU F Y, YANG J, ZHANG M J, et al. Experimental investigations on post-flutter performance of a bridge deck sectional model using a novel testing device[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 217: 104752. DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104752
胡传新. 典型桥梁断面颤振迟滞效应和气动力演变机理[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2020.
TANG R Y, ZHAO M L, WU Y J. The application of the force measurement method on experimental study of airfoil dynamic stall[J]. Aerodynamic Experiment and Measurement Control, 1995(2): 16-20.
JIAO Y Q, ZHANG B Q, JIN C X, et al. Experimental technique on direct measuring of aerodynamics performance of airfoil[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 19 (2): 40-44.
YU J M, CHEN C, MENG F D, et al. Numerical studies of wind turbine blade gas film heating[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(4): 524-529. (in Chinese)
孙皓. 风力机翼型失速颤振的试验与数值模拟研[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
YU D O, KWON O J. Predicting wind turbine blade loads and aeroelastic response using a coupled CFD-CSD method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2014, 70: 184-196. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.033
YU W B, HODGES D H, VOLOVOI V, et al. On Timoshenko-like modeling of initially curved and twisted composite beams[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2002, 39(19): 5101-5121. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00399-2
SUATEAN B, GALETUSE S, COLIDIUC A, et al. Aeroelastic problems of wind turbine blades[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings, Rhodes (Greece). AIP, 2010, 1281(1). doi: 10.1063/1.3498270
BISPLINGHOFF R L, ASHLEY H. HALFMAN R L. Aeroelasticity[M]. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley publishing Company Incorporated, 1955.
LI D B, LU Q H. Test analysis of experiments in engineering vibration[M]. Tsinghua University Press, 2004.
EVAN G, JENNIFER R, LATHA S, et al. IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-megawatt offshore reference wind turbine[R ] . National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO, USA, 2020. NREL/TP-5000-75698. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf doi: 10.2172/1603478
ZHU L D, GAO G Z. Influential factors of soft flutter phenomenon for typical bridge deck sections[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(9): 1289-1294, 1382. (in Chinese)