Adjoint-based design optimization considering both aerodynamic and near-field sonic boom

LIU Fengbo; HAO Haibing; LI Dian; LIANG Yihua

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0388

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Adjoint-based design optimization considering both aerodynamic and near-field sonic boom

更新时间：2026-05-28

- Adjoint-based design optimization considering both aerodynamic and near-field sonic boom
- Vol. 41, Issue 5, Pages: 48-58(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  中国航空工业集团公司西安航空计算技术研究所航空气动数值模拟重点实验室,西安,710065
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0388
  CLC： V211.3
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘峰博, 郝海兵, 李典, 等. 兼顾气动和近场声爆特性的伴随优化[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(5): 48−58.

LIU Fengbo, HAO Haibing, LI Dian, et al. Adjoint-based design optimization considering both aerodynamic and near-field sonic boom[J]. 2023, 41(5): 48-58.
刘峰博, 郝海兵, 李典, 等. 兼顾气动和近场声爆特性的伴随优化[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(5): 48−58. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0388

LIU Fengbo, HAO Haibing, LI Dian, et al. Adjoint-based design optimization considering both aerodynamic and near-field sonic boom[J]. 2023, 41(5): 48-58. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0388.

摘要

发展气动/声爆伴随优化设计方法对于研制新一代超声速客机具有重大意义。典型的气动/声爆伴随优化设计方法分为两种：近场信号的伴随优化和远场声爆预测耦合伴随设计优化。将最新发展的基于离散伴随理论的近场声爆信号反设计与气动特性优化结合，提出兼顾气动和近场声爆特性的伴随优化策略。首先，概述了伴随方程梯度求解和提出的基于信号射线方法的近场过压提取及目标过压装配过程，并验证了优化流程中近场信号及地面波形预测的准确性。其次，针对超声速民机标模，开展了低阻优化、近场低声爆反设计、兼顾气动和近场声爆特性的伴随优化三种策略的对比研究，结果表明兼顾气动和近场声爆特性优化策略的伴随优化在综合提升气动和低声爆特性上表现更优。最后与文献中相同算例的优化结果进行对比分析，进一步证明了该优化策略在超声速民机设计中的应用潜力。

Abstract

The development of aerodynamicsonic boom accompanied optimization design method is of great significance to the development of the generation of supersonic passenger aircraft. The typical aerodynamicsonic boom accompanying optimization design methods are classified as two types: the adjoint inverse design optimization of the near-field signal and the far-field sonic boom prediction coupling adjoint design optimization. Combining the latest development of discrete adjoint method near-field signal inverse design optimization with aerodynamic characteristics optimization

a near-field sonic boom adjoint inverse design strategy that takes into account aerodynamic characteristics is proposed. Firstly

it summarizes the solution of the adjoint equation gradient and the proposed near-field overvoltage extraction and target overvoltage assembly process based on the signal ray method

and verifies the accuracy of the near-field signal and ground waveform prediction during the optimization process. Secondly

for the standard model of supersonic civil aircraft

a comparative study of three optimization strategies was carried out: low drag optimization

near-field low-boom inverse design

and near-field low-boom inverse design with aerodynamic characteristics. The results show that the near-field low-boom inverse design with aerodynamic characteristics strategy performs better in the comprehensive improvement of aerodynamic and low-boom characteristics

and further proves the application potential of the proposed optimization strategy in the design of supersonic civil aircraft.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHU Z Q, LAN S L. Study of supersonic commercial transport and reduction of sonic boom[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 2507-2528. (in Chinese)[万方]

CHUDOBA B, COLEMAN G, ROBERTS K, et al. What price supersonic speed? -A design anatomy of supersonic transportation - part 1[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2007: 851. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-851

COWART R A, GRINDLE T. An overview of Gulfstream/NASA Quiet SpikeTM flight test program: AIAA-2008-0123[R]. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2008.

ZHANG Y D, HUANG J T, GAO Z H. Far field simulation and applications of sonic boom based on augmented Burgers equation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(7): 96-107. (in Chinese)[万方]

MAKINO Y, KROO I. Robust objective functions for sonic-boom minimization[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(5): 1301-1306. DOI:10.2514/1.19442[LinkOut]

FARHAT C, MAUTE K, ARGROW B, et al. Shape optimization methodology for reducing the sonic boom initial pressure rise[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(5): 1007-1018. DOI:10.2514/1.27607[LinkOut]

HAO X, SU C, LIU F, et al. Optimization design research on low sonic boom configuration for supersonic transport[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 327-333. (in Chinese)[万方]

QIAO J L, HAN Z H, SONG W P. An efficient surrogate-based global optimization for low sonic boom design[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 62-75. (in Chinese)[万方]

ZHANG Y D, HUANG J T, GAO Z H, et al. Inverse design of low boom configurations using proper orthogonal decomposition and augmented Burgers equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(6): 1380-1389. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2019.03.017[LinkOut]

RALLABHANDI S K, MAVRIS D N. Sonic boom minimization using inverse design and probabilistic acoustic propagation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(6): 1815-1828. DOI:10.2514/1.20457[LinkOut]

CHUNG H S, ALONSO J. Design of a low-boom supersonic business jet using cokriging approximation models[C]//9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2002: 5598. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-5598

CHAN M K. Supersonic aircraft optimization for minimizingdrag and sonic boom[D]. Palo Alto: Stanford University, 2003.

CHOI S, ALONSO J, KROO I, et al. Multi-fidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic business jets[C]//10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, New York. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2004: 4371. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-4371

KIRZ J. Surrogate based shape optimization of a low boom fuselage wing configuration[C]//Proc of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 3489. doi: 10.2514/6.2019-3489

FENG X Q, SONG B F, LI Z K, et al. Hybrid optimization approach research for low sonic boom supersonic aircraft configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(8): 1768-1777. (in Chinese)[万方]

NADARAJAH S K, JAMESON A, ALONSO J J. Sonic boom reduction using an adjoint method for wing-body configurations in supersonic flow[C]//9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2002: 5547. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-5547

AFTOSMIS M J, NEMEC M, CLIFF S E. Adjoint-based low-boom design with Cart3D[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference , Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 3500 doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3500

ORDAZ I, GEISELHART K A, FENBERT J W. Conceptual design of low-boom aircraft with flight trim requirement[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(3): 932-939

MUNGUÍA B C, ECONOMON T D, ALONSO J J. A discrete adjoint framework for low-boom supersonic aircraft shape optimization[C]//18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 3326. doi:10.2514/6.2017-3326

RALLABHANDI S K. Sonic boom adjoint methodology and its applications[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 3497. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3497

HUANG J T, ZHANG Y D, GAO Z H, et al. Sonic boom optimization of supersonic jet based on flow/sonic boom coupled adjoint equations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 46-56. (in Chinese)[万方]

NIELSEN E J, LU J, PARK M A, et al. An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids[J]. Computers Fluids, 2004, 33(9): 1131-1155. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.09.005[LinkOut]

LIU F B, JIANG C, MA T L, et al. Aerodynamic optimization design of large civil aircraft using pressure distribution inverse design method based on discrete adjoint[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 144-159. (in Chinese) [万方]

LIU F B, HAO H B, LI D, et al. Application of discrete adjoint method in aerodynamic shape optimization design[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2017, 47(2): 33-36, 40. (in Chinese)[万方]

MORGENSTERN J, BUONANNO M, CHAI S, et al. Overview of sonic boom reduction efforts on the lockheed martin N+2 supersonic validations program[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014: 2138. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2138

THOMAS C L. Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by the waveform parameter method: NASA TND-6832[R]. Washington, D. C. : NASA, 1972.

RALLABHANDI S K. Advanced sonic boom prediction using the augmented Burgers equation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(4): 1245-1253. DOI:10.2514/1.C031248[LinkOut]

STEVENS S S. Perceived level of noise by mark VII and decibels (E)[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972, 51(2B): 575-601. DOI:10.1121/1.1912880[LinkOut]

UENO A, KANAMORI M, MAKINO Y. Multi-fidelity low-boom design based on near-field pressure signature[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 2033. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-2033

SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models[J]. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 1986, 20(4): 151-160. DOI:10.1145/15886.15903[LinkOut]

WINTZER M, KROO I. Optimization and adjoint-based CFD for the conceptual design of low sonic boom aircraft[C]//50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012: 963. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-963

RALLABHANDI S K. Application of adjoint methodology in various aspects of sonic boom design[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014: 2271. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2271

LI W, RALLABHANDI S. Inverse design of low-boom supersonic concepts using reversed equivalent-area targets[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(1): 29-36. DOI:10.2514/1.C031551[LinkOut]

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

An investigation of thermochemical reaction and aerodynamic ablation model on leading edges of reentry vehicles considering rarefaction effect

Impact of inter-wing spacing on aerodynamic noise in multi-flapping wing configurations

Research on helicity modification turbulence model based on the AENS simulation platform

Effect of pitch angle on the flapping flight and sound generation

Numerical simulation of the effect of transition position on static and dynamic aerodynamic characteristics of cones

Related Author

Chen Song

Zhang Yonghao

Xiao Tianbai

Wang Xu

Meng Xueguang

Chen Zengshuang

Xie Yuxin

LUO Pengzhong

Related Institution

International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing

School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Fluids, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

AI问答

⁰