
1. 同济大学 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海,200092
2. 同济大学 土木工程学院 桥梁工程系,上海,200092
3. 同济大学 桥梁结构抗风技术交通行业重点实验室,上海,200092
Published:2023
移动端阅览
钱程, 朱乐东, 朱青. 中央开槽箱梁颤振非线性特性和振动分叉现象及其机理[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(2): 98−109.
QIAN Cheng, ZHU Ledong, ZHU Qing. Nonlinear characteristics of flutter and vibration bifurcation phenomenon of a centrally-slotted box deck and their mechanisms[J]. 2023, 41(2): 98-109.
钱程, 朱乐东, 朱青. 中央开槽箱梁颤振非线性特性和振动分叉现象及其机理[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(2): 98−109. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0302
QIAN Cheng, ZHU Ledong, ZHU Qing. Nonlinear characteristics of flutter and vibration bifurcation phenomenon of a centrally-slotted box deck and their mechanisms[J]. 2023, 41(2): 98-109. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0302.
为探究超大跨度缆索承重桥梁在大攻角范围内的颤振稳定性,通过节段模型风洞试验对中央开槽箱梁在风攻角±10°范围内的颤振非线性特性和振动分叉现象及其机理进行了研究。结果显示:当风攻角为−2°~10°时,节段模型系统未发生颤振;当风攻角为−3°和−4°时,观察到了含振动分叉的非线性颤振现象,且起振幅值随风速的增加而减小;当风攻角为−5°~−10°时,颤振无需人工激励就会自动发生。两种非线性颤振均为弯扭耦合颤振,并最终做极限环振动。非线性颤振的起振风速随着负攻角的增大而减小,耦合程度随着折减风速的增加而增加。系统等效阻尼比-振幅曲线可以很好地解释非线性颤振机理,曲线的零点为系统平衡点,其中斜率为正的零点为稳定平衡点,对应稳态振幅;斜率为负的零点为不稳定平衡点,对应起振振幅。对于含振动分叉的非线性颤振,系统存在一个稳定平衡点和一个不稳定平衡点;而对于无需人工初始激励的非线性颤振,系统只有一个稳定平衡点。
In order to investigate the flutter stability of super-long-span cables supported bridges at large angles of attack (AoAs)
the nonlinear flutter characteristics
vibration bifurcation phenomenon and mechanism of a centrally-slotted box deck with AoAs ranging between ±10° were investigated through wind tunnel tests of the sectional model. The results show that no flutter occurs for the sectional model system with AoAs between −2°~10°
nonlinear flutter with vibration bifurcation is observed with AoAs of −3° and −4°
and flutter appears automatically without any artificial initial excitation with AoAs between −5° ~ −10°. Both kinds of flutter are coupled vertical bending and torsional motions and finally attain a stable state of the limit circle oscillation (LCO). The onset wind speed of such nonlinear flutter descends with the increasing absolute value of the negative AoA
and the coupling extent increases with the reduced wind speed. The mechanism of the nonlinear flutter can be well explained by the curve of the system damping ratio against the amplitude. With zero points of the curve representing equilibrium states of the system
a positive slope indicates the stable equilibrium
corresponding to the steady-state amplitude
and a negative slope for the unstable equilibrium and the onset amplitude. For the nonlinear flutter with vibration bifurcation
the system has one stable equilibrium point and one unstable equilibrium point
while for the flutter not requiring any artificial excitation
the system has only one stable equilibrium point.
SCANLAN R H, TOMKO J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1971, 97(6): 1717-1737. DOI:10.1061/jmcea3.0001526
LIU L, GUAN Q H, LI J W, et al. Study on flutter mechanism and identification of flutter derivatives based on energy equivalence[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(2): 224-231. (in Chinese)
GAO G Z, ZHU L D, LI J W, et al. A novel two-degree-of-freedom model of nonlinear self-excited force for coupled flutter instability of bridge decks[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 480: 115406. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115406
ZHU L D, GAO G Z. A nonlinear self-excited force model for soft flutter phenomenon of a twin-side-girder bridge section[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(21): 29-35. (in Chinese)
DAITO Y, MATSUMOTO M, ARAKI K. Torsional flutter mechanism of two-edge girders for long-span cable-stayed bridge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12-15): 2127-2141. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00329-X
XU F Y, CHEN A R. Flutter test and analysis for the Suramadu Bridge in Indonesia[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(1): 35-40. (in Chinese)
MATSUMOTO M, SHIRATO H, HIRAI S. Torsional flutter mechanism of 2-D H-shaped cylinders and effect of flow turbulence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1992, 41(1-3): 687-698. DOI:10.1016/0167-6105(92)90480-X
TANG Y, HUA X G, CHEN Z Q, et al. Experimental investigation of flutter characteristics of shallow Π section at post-critical regime[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019, 88: 275-291. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.05.010
KUBO Y, SADASHIMA K, YAMAGUCHI E, et al. Improvement of aeroelastic instability of shallow π section[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(14-15): 1445-1457. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00151-9
ZHENG S X, GUO J F, ZHU J B, et al. Characteristics and suppression measures for soft flutter of main girder with П-shaped cross section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(03): 458-65. ( in chinese )
FANG G S, YANG Y X, GE Y J. Flutter performance of PK section girders for long-span bridges[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(9): 25-31, 60. (in Chinese)
GAO G Z, ZHU L D, WANG F, et al. Experimental investigation on the nonlinear coupled flutter motion of a typical flat closed-box bridge deck[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(2): 568. DOI:10.3390/s20020568
ZHANG M J, XU F Y, ZHANG Z B, et al. Energy budget analysis and engineering modeling of post-flutter limit cycle oscillation of a bridge deck[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 188: 410-420. DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.010
ZHU L D, GAO G Z. Influential factors of soft flutter phenomenon for typical bridge deck sections[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(9): 1289-1294, 1382. (in Chinese)
AMANDOLESE X, MICHELIN S, CHOQUEL M. Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 43: 244-255. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.002
WU B, WANG Q, LIAO H L. Characteristics of amplitude dependence of a flat box girder in a post-flutter state[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(10): 96-106. (in Chinese)
WU B, WANG Q, LIAO H L, et al. Hysteresis response of nonlinear flutter of a truss girder: experimental investigations and theoretical predictions[J]. Computers Structures, 2020, 238: 106267. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106267
LARSEN A. Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 48(2-3): 261-285. DOI:10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A
LARSEN A, SAVAGE M, LAFRENIÈRE A, et al. Investigation of vortex response of a twin box bridge section at high and low Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(6-7): 934-944. DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.020
ZHANG H J, ZHU L D, HU X H. Wind tunnel test on wind-resistant stability of super-kilometer cable stayed bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(4): 62-68. (in Chinese)
ZHU L D, ZHU Q, GUO Z S. Effect of wind-induced static torsional angle on flutter performance of bridges via sectional model test[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(5): 23-26, 31. (in Chinese)
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621