Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data

DENG Chen; CHEN Gong; WANG Wenzheng; ZHENG Fengqi; SHI Mengji

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data

更新时间：2026-05-28

- Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data
- Vol. 40, Issue 6, Pages: 45-50(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 空气动力学国家重点实验室,绵阳,621000
  2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
  3. 电子科技大学航空航天学院,成都,611731
  4. 飞行器集群智能感知与协同控制四川省重点实验室,成都,611731
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257
  CLC： V211.3;TP18
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
邓晨, 陈功, 王文正, 等. 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 45−50.

DENG Chen, CHEN Gong, WANG Wenzheng, et al. Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data[J]. 2022, 40(6): 45-50.
邓晨, 陈功, 王文正, 等. 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 45−50. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257

DENG Chen, CHEN Gong, WANG Wenzheng, et al. Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data[J]. 2022, 40(6): 45-50. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257.

摘要

飞行试验受飞行轨迹和试验激励的限制，通过飞行遥测数据辨识得到的实飞气动数据只能分布于飞行轨迹上的少量特征段。风洞试验由于受地面模拟能力的限制，试验数据与实飞飞行数据存在一定的天地差异。为了弥补飞行试验辨识数据和风洞试验数据的“缺陷”，以一种典型轴对称飞行器为研究对象，对上述两种不同来源的气动数据进行数据融合方法研究。首先，通过气动力参数辨识方法得到飞行器沿实际飞行轨迹的六分量真实气动数据，然后比较与地面试验数据的差异性和一致性；最后分别采用基于梯度信息和基于高斯过程回归的数据融合方法对两种来源的气动数据进行融合。融合建模结果表明，两种融合模型预测数据均比单源模型精度更高；如果高、低精度数据的梯度信息较为一致，则基于梯度信息的数据融合方法效果更好；而基于高斯过程回归的数据融合方法能够给出融合数据的置信区间，有利于分析不确定度。

Abstract

Due to the correlation between flight and ground test data

there is a certain difference between the wind tunnel test data and the flight test data. Limited by the flight trajectory and test excitation

the flight test data distributes in a small characteristic sections of the flight trajectory. And due to the limitation of ground simulation capabilities

wind tunnel tests have certain differences between the test data and the actual flight data. In order to remedy these limitations

researches of the data fusion algorithm based on above two different sources of aerodynamic data are conducted. Firstly

through the aerodynamic parameter identification method

the six-component real aerodynamic data of the aircraft along the actual flight trajectory are obtained

and then compare the difference and consistency with the wind tunnel test data. Finally

two kinds of data fusion methods based on gradient information and Gaussian process regression were used to fuse the two sources of aerodynamic datas. The results show that both the prediction data of the two fusion models are more accurate than the single source model; if the gradient information of the high and low precision data is more consistent

the data fusion method based on the gradient information is more effective; while the data fusion method based on the Gaussian process regression could obtain the confidence interval of the fusion data

which is useful to the analysis of uncertainty.

关键词

Keywords

references

YANG Y, ZHANG H, ZHENG H T. Difficulties in aerodynamic design problems of the winged hypersonic reentry vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 49-57. (in Chinese)

YE L. Research of variable forward-sweep wing tailless aircraft aerodynamic configuration design[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2019, 37(2): 36-40. (in Chinese)

HE K F, QIAN W Q, WANG Q, et al. Application of data fusion technique in aerodynamics studies[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 777-782. (in Chinese)

WANG W Z, GUI Y W, HE K F, et al. Aerodynamic data fusion technique exploration[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 524-528. (in Chinese)

HE K F, WANG W Z, QIAN W Q. Mathematic modeling for the missile aerodynamics with tail- wing according to wind-tunnel test results[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 18(4): 62-66. (in Chinese)

ZHAO Q J, LIU R Y. Modeling of aircraft nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics at high angle attack based on random forest[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(11): 1171-1177. (in Chinese)

LI F G, ZHAO H. Modeling a plane-symmetric flight vehicle under limited states[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2016, 39(3): 417-421, 443. (in Chinese)

CHEN D H, ZHAO X H, WU K Y, et al. The correlation study of nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics of aircrafts with low aspect ratio[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2002, 20(1): 72-77. (in Chinese)

LUO C T, HU Z M, LIU Y F, et al. Research progress on ground-to-flight correlation of aerodynamic force and heating data from hypersonic wind tunnels[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(3): 78-89. (in Chinese)

MORELLI E A, KLEIN V. Accuracy of aerodynamic model parameters estimated from flight test data[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1997, 20(1): 74-80. DOI:10.2514/2.3997

MORELLI E. Flight test maneuvers for efficient aerodynamic modeling[C]//Proc of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2011. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-6672

WANG W Z, ZHENG K P, CHEN G, et al. Application research of data-mining method to flight test data analysis and aerodynamic parameter identification[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(6): 778−782 (in Chinese).

YANG M, WANG Q, HE K L. UAV flight test parameter identification research[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(4): 77-80. (in Chinese)

LI S Y, GAO Z B, LIU Z Y, et al. Study on UAV's aerodynamic parameter identification method based on telemetry data[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(3): 32-36. (in Chinese)

WANG Q, HE K F, QIAN W Q, et al. Aerodynamic modeling of spatial maneuvering aircraft at high angle of attack[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2004, 25(5): 447-450. (in Chinese)

HUANG D, ZHENG W X. Unsteady aerodynamic modeling method using differential equations based on wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2014, 46(4): 599-602. (in Chinese)

HAN Z H. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: a review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225. (in Chinese)

LI B Y, ZHANG L G, QIU Q H, et al. An advanced first order and second moment method based on gradient analytical solution of Kriging surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 222629. (in Chinese)

SUN B, YAO H T, LIU T. Short-term wind speed forecasting based on Gaussian process regression model[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(29): 104-109, 5. (in Chinese)

SEEGER M. Gaussian processes for machine learning[J]. International Journal of Neural Systems, 2004, 14(2): 69-106. DOI:10.1142/s0129065704001899

HE Z K, LIU G B, ZHAO X J, et al. Overview of Gaussian process regression[J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 28(8): 1121-1129, 1137. (in Chinese)

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Multi-fidelity aerodynamic modeling method based on GPR model

Optimization design method of automobile aerodynamic shape based on multi-fidelity deep neural network

Research on few-shot aerodynamic modeling methods for civil aircraft model with wide-range high Reynolds number

Multi-source aerodynamic data fusion modeling with XGBoost

Aerodynamic data fusion method based on physics-informed neural network

Related Author

Wang Qingfeng

Tang Lei

Huang Jun

Luo Xi

MA Long

GAO Ran

WU Xiaojing

NING Chenjia

Related Institution

Southwest University of Science and Technology Sichuan Tianfu New Area Innovation Research Institute, Chengdu

School of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang

School of Civil Aviation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an

High Speed Aerodynamics Institute of China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang

College of Aerospace Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an

AI问答

⁰