Flow-induced noise problems of propellers

WU Jiafeng; HUANG Xun

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0180

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Flow-induced noise problems of propellers

更新时间：2026-05-28

- Flow-induced noise problems of propellers
- Vol. 40, Issue 3, Pages: 10-21(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京大学工学院航空航天工程系,北京,100871
  2. 北京大学湍流与复杂系统国家重点实验室,北京,100871
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0180
  CLC： O427.4;V211.3
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴佳峰, 黄迅. 螺旋桨中的流动噪声问题[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(3): 10−21.

WU Jiafeng, HUANG Xun. Flow-induced noise problems of propellers[J]. 2022, 40(3): 10-21.
吴佳峰, 黄迅. 螺旋桨中的流动噪声问题[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(3): 10−21. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0180

WU Jiafeng, HUANG Xun. Flow-induced noise problems of propellers[J]. 2022, 40(3): 10-21. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0180.

摘要

螺旋桨噪声在航空航天和水中装备等领域广泛存在，是气动声学领域的重要问题和难点问题。螺旋桨噪声问题涉及时间和空间上非均匀各向异性的湍流来流，乃至多尺度的湍流结构与叶片之间的复杂干涉作用，对于螺旋桨噪声问题中的物理机制尚需进一步探索。本文首先针对20世纪70年代提出的螺旋桨吸入湍流噪声的基线问题，详述了50年来螺旋桨噪声研究的发展历史，分析和归纳了螺旋桨噪声在理论、试验和计算等方面的研究成果，并对一些尚未解决的难点进行了阐述。接着介绍了转静干涉、吸入边界层湍流等螺旋桨噪声的若干基本问题。最后，结合实际需求，对下一代飞行器、无人机和水中装备等领域的研究历史和发展现状进行了阐述，并对螺旋桨噪声研究的未来发展方向和潜在应用进行了展望。

Abstract

Propeller noise is widespread in the fields of aeronautics and underwater systems

and represents a significant and difficult problem in aeroacoustics. Propeller noise problem is closely related to spatially and temporally inhomogeneous and anisotropic turbulent flows as well as complex interactions between multi-scale turbulent structures and rotating blades

which request further investigations. To show potential research directions in the near future

this article first introduces the baseline problem of flow-induced noise of propellers

and elaborates the history of propeller noise studies in the past half-century. Next

the research progresses of propeller noise in theoretical

experimental

and computational studies are analyzed and summarized

with the emphasis on some unresolved difficult problems. Then

some fundamental and important aerodynamic problems of propeller noise

including the rotor-stator interaction noise and boundary-layer ingestion noise

are introduced. Last but not least

the related important applications such as next-generation aircrafts

unmanned aerial vehicles

and underwater systems are discussed. The corresponding future development directions and potential applications of the propeller noise problem are proposed at the end of this article.

关键词

Keywords

references

WESTLEY R, LILLEY G M. An investigation of the noise field from a small jet and methods for its reduction[R ] . College of Aeronautics Cranfield, Report_No_53-1952. https://core.ac.uk/reader/137922

LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1952, 211(1107): 564-587. DOI:10.1098/rspa.1952.0060

ZHONG S Y, HUANG X. A review of aeroacoustics and flow-induced noise for beginners[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 363-371. (in Chinese)

SHARLAND I J. Sources of noise in axial flow fans[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1964, 1(3): 302-322. DOI:10.1016/0022-460X(64)90068-9

KAJI S, OKAZAKI T. Generation of sound by rotor-stator interaction[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1970, 13(3): 281-307. DOI:10.1016/S0022-460X(70)80020-7

HUANG X, CHEN X X, MA Z K, et al. Efficient computation of spinning modal radiation through an engine bypass duct[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(6): 1413-1423. DOI:10.2514/1.31136

SEVIK M. Sound radiation from a subsonic rotor subjected to turbulence[C ] //Fluid Mechanics, Acoustics, and Design of Turbomachinery, Part 2, 1974: 493-511. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19750003123/downloads/19750003123.pdf

THOMPSON D E. Propeller unsteady thrust due to operation in turbulent inflows[C]//ASME 1978 International Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show, Volume 1A: General. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, London, England, 1978. doi:10.1115/78-GT-94

WIDNALL S E, WOLF T L. Effect of tip vortex structure on helicopter noise due to blade-vortex interaction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1980, 17(10): 705-711. DOI:10.2514/3.44681

BRENTNER K S. Prediction of helicopter rotor discrete frequency noise for three scale models[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1988, 25(5): 420-427. DOI:10.2514/3.45598

MARTIN R M, HARDIN J C. Spectral characteristics of rotor blade/vortex interaction noise[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1988, 25(1): 62-68. DOI:10.2514/3.45542

HANSON D B. Noise of counter-rotation propellers[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1985, 22(7): 609-617. DOI:10.2514/3.45173

PARRY A, CRIGHTON D. Prediction of counter-rotation propeller noise[C]//12th Aeroacoustic Conference, San Antonio, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1989. doi:10.2514/6.1989-1141

TINNEY C E, SIROHI J. Multirotor drone noise at static thrust[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2816-2826. DOI:10.2514/1.j056827

LEE H, LEE D J. Rotor interactional effects on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of a small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(4): 047107. DOI:10.1063/5.0003992

CASALINO D, GRANDE E, ROMANI G, et al. Definition of a benchmark for low Reynolds number propeller aeroacoustics[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 113: 106707. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2021.106707

GOJON R, JARDIN T, PARISOT-DUPUIS H. Experimental investigation of low Reynolds number rotor noise[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021, 149(6): 3813-3829. DOI:10.1121/10.0005068

LIEBECK R H. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1): 10-25. DOI:10.2514/1.9084

LYU Z J, MARTINS J R R A. Aerodynamic design optimization studies of a blended-wing-body aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(5): 1604-1617. DOI:10.2514/1.C032491

BROWN M, VOS R. Conceptual design and evaluation of blended-wing body aircraft[C]//2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Session: Blended/Hybrid Wing Body Design. Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018. AIAA 2018-0522. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-0522

WANG G, ZHANG M H, TAO Y J, et al. Research on analytical scaling method and scale effects for subscale flight test of blended wing body civil aircraft[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106: 106114. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2020.106114

SEARS W R. Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1941, 8(3): 104-108. DOI:10.2514/8.10655

BLAKE W K. Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration, Volume 2: Complex flow-structure interactions[M]. Academic Press, 1986.

KIRSCHNER I N, CORRICEAU P J, MUENCH J D, et al. Validation of propeller turbulence ingestion acoustic radiation model using wind tunnel measurements[J ] . ASME-Flow Noise Model, Measure, Control, 1991, 168: 175. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a245326.pdf

JIANG C W, CHANG M, LIU Y. The effect of turbulence ingestion on propeller broadband thrust[C]//Naval Hydrodynamics, 19th Symposium, Seoul, Korea. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press, 1994: Session XIII: 751.

MARTINEZ R. Asymptotic theory of broadband rotor thrust, part I: manipulations of flow probabilities for a high number of blades[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1996, 63(1): 136-142. DOI:10.1115/1.2787188

MARTINEZ R. Asymptotic theory of broadband rotor thrust, part II: analysis of the right frequency shift of the maximum response[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1996, 63(1): 143-148. DOI:10.1115/1.2787189

MARTINEZ R. Broadband sources of structure-borne noise for propulsors in "haystacked" turbulence[J]. Computers Structures, 1997, 65(3): 475-490. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00261-1

MINNITI R J, BLAKE W K, MUELLER T J. Inferring propeller inflow and radiation from near-field response, part 1: analytic development[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(6): 1030-1036. DOI:10.2514/2.1443

MINNITI R J, BLAKE W K, MUELLER T J. Inferring propeller inflow and radiation from near-field response, part 2: empirical application[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(6): 1037-1046. DOI:10.2514/2.1444

WOJNO J P, MUELLER T J, BLAKE W K. Turbulence ingestion noise, part 1: experimental characterization of grid-generated turbulence[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(1): 16-25. DOI:10.2514/2.1636

WOJNO J P, MUELLER T J, BLAKE W K. Turbulence ingestion noise, part 2: rotor aeroacoustic response to grid-generated turbulence[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(1): 26-32. DOI:10.2514/2.1637

CATLETT M, ANDERSON J, STEWART D. Aeroacoustic response of propellers to sheared turbulent inflow[C]//18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Colorado Springs, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi:10.2514/6.2012-2137

ANDERSON J M, CATLETT M R, STEWART D O. Modeling rotor unsteady forces and sound due to homogeneous turbulence ingestion[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 53(1): 81-92. DOI:10.2514/1.J052874

XIONG Z Y, SUN H X, ZHU X Q. Prediction of low-frequency broadband noise induced by the interaction between injected turbulence and propeller[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2014, 55(3): 1-11. (in Chinese)

YAO H Y, CAO L L, WU D Z, et al. Generation and distribution of turbulence-induced forces on a propeller[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 206: 107255. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107255

JIANG J W, QI J T, CAI H P, et al. Prediction and optimisation of low-frequency discrete- and broadband-spectrum marine propeller forces[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 98: 102114. DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2020.102114

Sevik M. Hydroacoustic considerations in marine propulsor design[C]//21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Trondheim, Norway. 1996.

PAUL B S, UHLMAN J S. Development and validation of turbulence ingestion prediction capability of TONBROD[C]//ASME 2012 Noise Control and Acoustics Division Conference at InterNoise 2012, New York City, New York, USA. 2013: 7-13. doi: 10.1115/NCAD2012-0109

TIAN J, YAO D, WU Y D, et al. Experimental study on rotating instability mode characteristics of axial compressor tip flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59(4): 63. DOI:10.1007/s00348-018-2517-0

PEAKE N, PARRY A B. Modern challenges facing turbomachinery aeroacoustics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 44(1): 227-248. DOI:10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101231

GOURDAIN N. Prediction of the unsteady turbulent flow in an axial compressor stage. Part 1: Comparison of unsteady RANS and LES with experiments[J]. Computers Fluids, 2015, 106: 119-129. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.09.052

CASALINO D, HAZIR A, MANN A. Turbofan broadband noise prediction using the lattice Boltzmann method[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 56(2): 609-628. DOI:10.2514/1.J055674

ROMANI G, YE Q Q, AVALLONE F, et al. Numerical analysis of fan noise for the NOVA boundary-layer ingestion configuration[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 96: 105532. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105532

LIU X, JIANG H B, HUANG X, et al. Theoretical model of scattering from flow ducts with semi-infinite axial liner splices[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 786: 62-83. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2015.633

TONG F, QIAO W Y, XU K B, et al. On the study of wavy leading-edge vanes to achieve low fan interaction noise[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018, 419: 200-226. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.017

POLACSEK C, CADER A, BUSZYK M, et al. Aeroacoustic design and broadband noise predictions of a fan stage with serrated outlet guide vanes[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(10): 107107. DOI:10.1063/5.0020190

GIACCHÉ D, XU L P, COUPLAND J. Optimization of bypass outlet guide vane for low interaction noise[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(6): 1145-1158. DOI:10.2514/1.J052003

ZHANG W G, WANG X Y, JING X D, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of vane sweep effects on fan interaction noise[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 391: 73-94. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.12.014

GUNN E J, HALL C A. Nonaxisymmetric stator design for boundary layer ingesting fans[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 141(7): 071010. DOI:10.1115/1.4043343

ZDRAVKOVICH M M. Flow around circular cylinders, Volume 1: Fundamentals[M]. Oxford Science Publications, 1997.

ALEXANDER W N, MOLINARO N J, HICKLING C, et al. Phased array measurements of a rotor ingesting a turbulent shear flow[C]//22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Lyon, France. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016. doi:10.2514/6.2016-2994

GONZALEZ-MARTINO I, ROMANI G, WANG J Y, et al. Rotor noise generation in a turbulent wake using lattice-boltzmann methods[C]//2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018. doi:10.2514/6.2018-3447

WANG J Y, WANG K, WANG M. Computational prediction and analysis of rotor noise generation in a turbulent wake[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 908: A19. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2020.783

BERLAND J, LAFON P, CROUZET F, et al. A parametric study of the noise radiated by the flow around multiple bodies: direct noise computation of the influence of the separating distance in rod-airfoil flow configurations[C]//17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011. doi:10.2514/6.2011-2819

JIANG Y, MAO M L, DENG X G, et al. Numerical investigation on body-wake flow interaction over rod–airfoil configuration[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 779: 1-35. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2015.419

LEFEBVRE J N, JONES A R. Influence of wake interference and freestream turbulence on airfoil performance in the cylinder-airfoil configuration[C]//AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1054

PLAS A P. Performance of a boundary layer ingesting(BLI) propulsion system[C ] //45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007. AIAA 2007-45 0. http://silentaircraft.org/object/download/1922/doc/AIAA-2007-450-464.pdf doi:10.2514/6.2007-450

CLARK I A, THOMAS R H, GUO Y P. Aircraft system noise of the NASA D8 subsonic transport concept[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2021: 1-15. DOI:10.2514/1.C036259

MORTON M, DEVENPORT W, ALEXANDER W, et al. Rotor inflow noise caused by a boundary layer: inflow measurements and noise predictions[C]//18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Colorado Springs, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi:10.2514/6.2012-2120

GLEGG S A L, DEVENPORT W, ALEXANDER N. Broadband rotor noise predictions using a time domain approach[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2015, 335: 115-124. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2014.09.007

ALEXANDER W N, DEVENPORT W J, GLEGG S A L. Noise from a rotor ingesting a thick boundary layer and relation to measurements of ingested turbulence[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 409: 227-240. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.056

MURRAY H H IV, DEVENPORT W J, ALEXANDER W N, et al. Aeroacoustics of a rotor ingesting a planar boundary layer at high thrust[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 850: 212-245. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2018.438

GONZALEZ-MARTINO I, CASALINO D. Noise from a rotor ingesting a turbulent boundary layer using very-large eddy simulations[C]//25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019. doi:10.2514/6.2019-2585

GLEGG S A, HICKLING C, AGASTYA BALANTRAPU N, et al. Beamforming of broadband rotor noise[C]//AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-2189

ZHOU D, WANG K, WANG M. Computation of rotor noise generation in a thick axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer[C]// AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM, VIRTUAL EVENT. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-2186

LANGSTON L S. Open rotor engines—still an open question?[J]. Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 140(12): S46-S48. DOI: 10.1115/1.2018-DEC-9

VAN ZANTE D E. Progress in open rotor research: a U. S. perspective[C ] //ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Volume: 1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2015. GT2015-42203. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150022391/downloads/20150022391.pdf doi:10.1115/GT2015-42203

FALISSARD F, CHELIUS A, BOISARD R, et al. Influence of blade deformations on open-rotor low-speed and high-speed aerodynamics and aeroacoustics[C]//23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017. doi:10.2514/6.2017-3869

DÜRRWÄCHTER L, KEßLER M, KRÄMER E. Numerical assessment of open-rotor noise shielding with a coupled approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(5): 1930-1940. DOI:10.2514/1.J057531

SMITH D A, FILIPPONE A, BOJDO N. Noise reduction of a Counter Rotating Open Rotor through a locked blade row[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 98: 105637. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105637

ZAMPONI R, CHIARIOTTI P, BATTISTA G, et al. 3D Generalized Inverse Beamforming in wind tunnel aeroacoustic testing: application to a Counter Rotating Open Rotor aircraft model[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 163: 107229. DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107229

TOKAJI K, SOÓS B, HORVÁTH C. Beamforming method for extracting the broadband noise sources of counter-rotating open rotors[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(7): 3028-3039. DOI:10.2514/1.J058934

TORMEN D, GIANNATTASIO P, ZANON A, et al. Semi-analytical tip vortex model for fast prediction of contrarotating open rotor noise[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(5): 1629-1644. DOI:10.2514/1.J059314

BRADLEY M K, DRONEY C K. Subsonic ultra green aircraft research: phase I final report[R ] . NASA/CR-2011-216847, 2011. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110011321/downloads/20110011321.pdf

FELDER J L. NASA N3-X with turboelectric distributed propulsion[C ] //Disruptive Green Propulsion Technologies Conference, 2014. GRC-E-DAA-TN19290. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150002081/downloads/20150002081.pdf

WELSTEAD J, FELDER J, GUYNN M, et al. Overview of the NASA STARC-ABL (rev. B) advanced concept[C ] //Boeing NASA Electric Aircraft Workshop, 2017. NF1676L-26767. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170005612/downloads/20170005612.pdf

FRIEDRICH C, ROBERTSON P A. Hybrid-electric propulsion for aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(1): 176-189. DOI:10.2514/1.c032660

FINGER D F, BRAUN C, BIL C. Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2020, 57(5): 843-853. DOI:10.2514/1.C035897

SZIROCZAK D, JANKOVICS I, GAL I, et al. Conceptual design of small aircraft with hybrid-electric propulsion systems[J]. Energy, 2020, 204: 117937. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117937

ZAWODNY N S, BOYD JR D D, BURLEY C L. Acoustic characterization and prediction of representative, small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft system components[C ] //American Helicopter Society (AHS) Annual Forum, West Palm Beach, FL, 2016. https://core.ac.uk/reader/83530863

CHEN W Q, PENG B, LIEM R P, et al. Experimental study of airfoil-rotor interaction noise by wavelet beamforming[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020, 147(5): 3248-3259. DOI:10.1121/10.0001209

CHEN W Q, YANG Z D, PENG B, et al. On trailing edge noise from propellers with interactions to shear layers[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2021, 495: 115901. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115901

WU J F, JIANG H B, MA Z K, et al. Numerical investigation of airfoil-rotor interaction at low Reynolds number[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(2): 025118. doi: 10.1063/5.0082706

JIANG H B, ZHONG S Y, WU H, et al. Radiation modes of propeller tonal noise[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2022, 144(2): 021009. DOI:10.1115/1.4051864

MELIUS M S, MULLENERS K, CAL R B. The role of surface vorticity during unsteady separation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(4): 045108. DOI:10.1063/1.5006527

JIAO L R, CHEN Y J, WEN X, et al. Resolving vortex-induced pressure fluctuations on a cylinder in rotor wake using fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(5): 055106. DOI:10.1063/1.5092944

FFOWCS WILLIAMS J E, HAWKINGS D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Mathematical and Physical Engineering Sciences, 1969, 264(1151): 321-342. DOI:10.1098/rsta.1969.0031

GARTRELL C. A view of future technology needs for space transportation[C]//20th Joint Propulsion Conference, Cincinnati, OH. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1984. doi:10.2514/6.1984-1283

VERMA A, JANG H, MAHESH K. The effect of an upstream hull on a propeller in reverse rotation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 704: 61-88. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2012.214

JANG H, MAHESH K. Large eddy simulation of flow around a reverse rotating propeller[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 729: 151-179. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2013.292

KUMAR P, MAHESH K. Large eddy simulation of propeller wake instabilities[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 814: 361-396. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2017.20

DI MASCIO A, MUSCARI R, DUBBIOSO G. On the wake dynamics of a propeller operating in drift[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 754: 263-307. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2014.390

MUSCARI R, DUBBIOSO G, DI MASCIO A. Analysis of the flow field around a rudder in the wake of a simplified marine propeller[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 814: 547-569. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2017.43

MAGIONESI F, DUBBIOSO G, MUSCARI R, et al. Modal analysis of the wake past a marine propeller[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 855: 469-502. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2018.631

CHASE N, CARRICA P M. Submarine propeller computations and application to self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 60: 68-80. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.029

ÖZDEN M C, GÜRKAN A Y, ÖZDEN Y A, et al. Underwater radiated noise prediction for a submarine propeller in different flow conditions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 126: 488-500. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.012

SEZEN S, DOGRUL A, DELEN C, et al. Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff by RANS method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 150: 258-271. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051

GONG J, GUO C, ZHAO D, et al. A comparative DES study of wake vortex evolution for ducted and non-ducted propellers[J]. Ocean engineering, 2018, 160: 78-93. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.054.

GONG J, DING J, WANG L. Propeller–duct interaction on the wake dynamics of a ducted propeller[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(7): 074102. DOI:10.1063/5.0056383.

STARK C, SHI W, ATLAR M. A numerical investigation into the influence of bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles on the hydrodynamic performance of a benchmark ducted propeller[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 237: 109593. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109593

SUN Y, LIU W, LI T Y. Numerical investigation on noise reduction mechanism of serrated trailing edge installed on a pump-jet duct[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191: 106489. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106489

QIN D H, HUANG Q G, SHI Y J, et al. Comparison of hydrodynamic performance and wake vortices of two typical types of pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 224: 108700. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108700

QIN D H, HUANG Q G, PAN G, et al. Numerical simulation of vortex instabilities in the wake of a preswirl pumpjet propulsor[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(5): 055119. DOI:10.1063/5.0039935

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Installation effects on propeller tone noise

Effect of pitch angle on the flapping flight and sound generation

Research progress on aerodynamics, noise and optimization design for modern aviation propellers

Application of 5.5 m × 4 m aeroacoustic wind tunnel in Sino-Russia joint research collaboration on landing gear noise and its control

Research of moving noise source recognition based on microphone array

Related Author

Xu Chen

Hao Xuan

Zhou Jiajian

WANG Shizhao

ZHOU Zhiteng

WANG Yongtao

LIU Jinjing

LYU Changhao

Related Institution

Institute of Aerodynamics, China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing

Key Laboratory of Aerodynamic Noise Control, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang

Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing

Department of Instrumentations, AECC Commercial Aircraft Engine Co. Ltd, Shanghai

School of Engineering Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

AI问答

⁰