XUE Sidan, HE Jiahua, LIU Qiuhong, et al. Numerical analysis of the aerodynamic noise characteristics of a three-element airfoil[J]. 2022, 40(6): 92-101.
XUE Sidan, HE Jiahua, LIU Qiuhong, et al. Numerical analysis of the aerodynamic noise characteristics of a three-element airfoil[J]. 2022, 40(6): 92-101.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0134.
Numerical analysis of the aerodynamic noise characteristics of a three-element airfoil
A hybrid computational aeroacoustics technique was performed to investigate the aerodynamic noise characteristics of a three-element airfoil. The aerodynamic source was simulated with an improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) method and the far-field aerodynamic noise was computed by Curle's equation. The noise generated by a low Mach number flow past the rod-airfoil configuration was evaluated by the numerical approach and compared with the experimental data. The comparison shows that IDDES method can accurately describe the flow characteristics including the vortex shedding
detachment
and reattachment
and provide detailed sources for the prediction of the acoustic far-field. The Curle's equation can evaluate the far-field noise accurately and efficiently. The quadrupole source can be neglected for the acoustic far-field of a low Mach number flow. Therefore
the aeroacoustics and aerodynamics characteristics of the three-element airfoil at Reynolds number of 1.71×10
6
Mach number 0.17 and angle of attack 7.5° were analyzed. The pressure fluctuation on the surface of the flap exerts largest influence on the acoustic far-field while the slat exerts minimum. The peak values of the noise near 1000 Hz are generated by the shear layer flow separation and the vortex shedding at the trailing edge of the flap. The vortex shedding
fusion and collision in the slat cove mainly induce noise below 500 Hz. The noises near 4500 Hz are resulted from the vortex shedding at the trailing edge of the flap and the flow separation at the trailing edge of the main wing suction surface.
关键词
Keywords
references
LIU P Q, LI L, XING Y, et al. Developments of aeroacoustic investigation on high-lift device for large aircrafts[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4): 472-484. (in Chinese)
FFOWCS WILLIAMS J E, HAWKING D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1969, A264: 321-342.
MAO Y J. Development of acoustic analogy for low Mach numbers flow and its applications [D]. Xi’an, Xi`an Jiaotong University, 2010 (in Chinese).
PIOMELLI U. Large-eddy simulation: achievements and challenges[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999, 35(4): 335-362. DOI:10.1016/S0376-0421(98)00014-1
SPALART P R, JOU W H, STRELETS M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach [M]. Proceedings of the 1st AFSOR International Conference on DNS/LES, Greyden Press, Columbus, OH, 1997: 137-147.
SPALART P R, DECK S, SHUR M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181-195. DOI:10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0
LI W P. Review of the mechanism and noise control of high-lift device noise[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 372-384, 409. (in Chinese)
PASCIONI K, CATTAFESTA L N, CHOUDHARI M M. An experimental investigation of the 30P30N multi-element high-lift airfoil[C]// 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-3062
BALAJI R, BRAMKAMP F, HESSE M, et al. Effect of flap and slat riggings on 2-D high-lift aerodynamics[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(5): 1259-1271. DOI:10.2514/1.19391
LI L, LIU P Q, GUO H, et al. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic experimental investigation of 30P30N high-lift configuration[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2018, 132: 43-48. DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.11.002
FEJTEK I, FEJTEK I. Summary of code validation results for a multiple element airfoil test case[C]// 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997 doi: 10.2514/6.1997-1932
LU Q H, CHEN B. Analysis of aeroacoustics characteristics of high lift device using LES method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(4): 448-455 (in Chinese).
ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X, WANG K, et al. Aeroacoustic prediction of a multi-element airfoil using wall-modeled large-eddy simulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(12): 4219-4233. DOI:10.2514/1.J055853
TERRACOL M, MANOHA E, MURAYAMA M, et al. Aeroacoustic calculations of the 30P30N high-lift airfoil using hybrid RANS/LES methods: modeling and grid resolution effects[C]// 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Dallas, TX. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015 doi: 10.2514/6.2015-3132
CHEN Y C, LI Y L, YE J K, et al. Study progress about high-lift system of C919 airplane[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2010, 1(1): 1-5. (in Chinese)
CURLE N. The influence of solid boundaries on aerodynamic sound [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1955, 213A, 1187: 505-514.
JIN Y, LIAO F, CAI J S, et al. Investigation on rod-airfoil noise with high-order cell-centered finite difference method and acoustic analogy[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 102: 105851. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2020.105851
MACCORMACK R, MACCORMACK R. A new implicit algorithm for fluid flow[C]// 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1997. doi: 10.2514/6.1997-2100
JACOB M C, BOUDET J, CASALINO D, et al. A rod-airfoil experiment as a benchmark for broadband noise modeling[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19(3): 171-196.