
国防科技大学 空天科学学院,长沙,410073
Published:2021
移动端阅览
孔令发,刘伟,董义道. 黎曼边界条件在高阶精度非结构有限体积方法中的验证与应用[J]. 空气动力学学报,2021,39(3):21−32.
KONG Lingfa, LIU Wei, DONG Yidao. Verification and application of Riemann boundary condition on high-order unstructured finite volume methods[J]. 2021, 39(3): 21-32.
孔令发,刘伟,董义道. 黎曼边界条件在高阶精度非结构有限体积方法中的验证与应用[J]. 空气动力学学报,2021,39(3):21−32. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0087
KONG Lingfa, LIU Wei, DONG Yidao. Verification and application of Riemann boundary condition on high-order unstructured finite volume methods[J]. 2021, 39(3): 21-32. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0087.
黎曼边界条件是一种弱施加边界条件。通过引入有限波模型,对亚声速入口、出口以及远场边界可采用精确求解黎曼问题来统一处理,有效简化了此类边界条件的施加过程,避免了基于特征关系式与黎曼不变量的推导,并已在二阶精度非结构有限体积方法中取得了较好的数值表现。为进一步验证该边界条件的实用价值,将其推广至高阶精度非结构有限体积离散。通过基于制造解方法(Method of Manufactured Solutions
MMS)的流动、亚声速无黏圆柱绕流及添加初始高斯脉冲扰动的非定常流动这三类数值算例,分别检验了黎曼边界条件在高阶精度非结构有限体积求解器中的数值表现。从计算结果来看,施加黎曼边界条件不会破坏离散格式的设计精度,同时,相比基于一维黎曼不变量的无反射边界条件,黎曼边界条件的施加过程简便,且维持了较好的出口特性,为基于非结构有限体积方法的高精度数值模拟提供了一种更加简单有效的亚声速边界处理方式。
Riemann boundary condition is one of the boundary conditions with weak-imposition approach
which employs the finite wave model to treat boundary conditions of subsonic inlet
outlet and far field by solving the corresponding Riemann problems. Hence
such an imposition process is effectively simplified
and complex derivations based on the characteristic relation and Riemann invariants are completely avoided. By the introduction of this weak-imposition approach
a better numerical performance on second-order unstructured finite volume methods has already been achieved. In order to further verify the application value of this novel boundary condition
it is extended to high-order unstructured finite volume discretization in this study. The numerical performance of this boundary condition is verified in the flow with manufactured solutions (MMS) and real subsonic flows including the inviscid circular flow and the unsteady flow with initial gauss pulse disturbances. Based on computational results
the designed order of accuracy is not deteriorated by the employment of the Riemann boundary condition
and characteristics at the outlet is well reflected compared to the commonly used non-reflective boundary condition based on one-dimensional Riemann invariants. This novel boundary condition is simpler to impose
and provides a more efficient subsonic boundary processing method for high-order numerical simulations based on unstructured finite volume methods.
MAVRIPLIS D J. Unstructured grid techniques[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 29: 473-547.
WANG N H, LI M, ZHANG L P. Accuracy analysis and improvement of viscous flux schemes in unstructured second-order finite-volume discretization[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018, 50(3): 527-537. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-037.
LISEIKIN V D. Grid generation methods[M ] . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999.doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03949-6 .
ZHAO H, ZHANG Y B, CHEN J T, et al. The accuracy assessment of gradient computation methods on unstructured grids[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 844-854. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0092.
XIA Y D, WANG C J, LUO H, et al. Assessment of a hybrid finite element and finite volume code for turbulent incompressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 307: 653-669.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.022.
PANDARE A K, LUO H. A hybrid reconstructed discontinuous Galerkin and continuous Galerkin finite element method for incompressible flows on unstructured grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 322: 491-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.002.
DANG Y B, LIU K L, SUN Y F, et al. Implicit high order discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible laminar and turbulent flow simulation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 535-541. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0183.
DISKIN B, THOMAS J L, NIELSEN E J, et al. Comparison of node-centered and cell-centered unstructured finite-volume discretizations: viscous fluxes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(7): 1326-1338.DOI: 10.2514/1.44940.
DISKIN B, THOMAS J L. Comparison of node-centered and cell-centered unstructured finite-volume discretizations: inviscid fluxes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(4): 836-854.DOI: 10.2514/1.J050897.
JAMESON A, MAVRIPLIS D J. Finite volume solution of the two-dimensional Euler equations on a regular triangular mesh[J]. AIAA Journal, 1986, 24(4): 611-618.DOI: 10.2514/3.9315.
BIN X, PENG J, FENG X. A multi-moment finite volume method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured grids[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(2): 252-266. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2016.0013.
XU L, CUI G X, XU C X, et al. High accurate finite volume method on non-uniform meshes for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(3): 275-284. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2006.03.002.
ZHENG H S, ZHAO N, ZHU J. High order finite volume weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on two dimensional unstructured meshes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28(4): 446-451. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2010.04.015.
ZHANG L P, LIU W, HE L X, et al. A class of hybrid DG/FV methods for conservation laws Ⅰ: Basic formulation and one-dimensional systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(4): 1081-1103.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.010.
ZHANG L P, LIU W, HE L X, et al. A class of hybrid DG/FV methods for conservation laws II: Two-dimensional cases[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(4): 1104-1120.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.03.032.
JALALI A, OLLIVIER-GOOCH C. Higher-order unstructured finite volume RANS solution of turbulent compressible flows[J]. Computers Fluids, 2017, 143: 32-47.DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.11.004.
OLLIVIER-GOOCH C F, NEJAT A, MICHALAK K. Obtaining and verifying high-order unstructured finite volume solutions to the Euler equations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(9): 2105-2120.DOI: 10.2514/1.40585.
JALALI A, OLLIVIER GOOCH C F. Higher-order finite volume solution reconstruction on highly anisotropic meshes[C ] //21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013.doi: 10.2514/6.2013-2565 .
BARTH T, JESPERSEN D. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes[C ] // 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1989.doi: 10.2514/6.1989-366 .
BARTH T J. A 3-D upwind Euler solvers for unstructured meshes[C ] //10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1991.doi: 10.2514/6.1991-1548 .
LI W A. Research on the high order accurate numerical methods on unstructured grids[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012. (in Chinese).
KONG L F, DONG Y D, LIU W. The influence of global-direction stencil on gradient and high-order derivatives reconstruction of unstructured finite volume methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 52(5): 1334-1349. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-20-093.
KONG L F, DONG Y D, LIU W, et al. Extending the global-direction stencil with “face-area-weighted centroid” to unstructured finite volume discretization from integral form[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2020, 2(1): 1-43.DOI: 10.1186/s42774-020-00048-5.
MORETTI G. Importance of boundary conditions in the numerical treatment of hyperbolic equations[J]. The Physics of Fluids, 1969, 12: 11-13.DOI: 10.1063/1.1692426.
THOMPSON K W. Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1987, 68(1): 1-24.DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90041-6.
THOMPSON K W. Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems II[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1990, 89(2): 439-461.DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90152-Q.
POINSOT T J, LELEF S K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 101(1): 104-129.DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2.
GROSS A, FASEL H F. Characteristic ghost-cell boundary condition[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(1): 302-306.DOI: 10.2514/1.23130.
MOTHEAU E, ALMGREN A, BELL J B. Navier-Stokes characteristic boundary conditions using ghost cells[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(10): 3399-3408.DOI: 10.2514/1.J055885.
DONG Y D, DENG X G, GAO X, et al. A comparative study of boundary conditions for the density-based solvers in the framework of OpenFOAM[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 172: 284-300. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.031.
DONG Y D. Boundary condition treatments of unstructured finite volume algorithms and its application in detached eddy simulation[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018.
KOPRIVA D A, KOLIAS J H. A conservative staggered-grid Chebyshev multidomain method for compressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 125(1): 244-261. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0091.
KOPRIVA D A. A staggered-grid multidomain spectral method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 143(1): 125-158. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5956.
ATKINS H, CASPER J. Nonreflective boundary conditions for high-order methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(3): 512-518.DOI: 10.2514/3.12015.
FOLKNER D, KATZ A, SANKARAN V. Design and verification methodology of boundary conditions for finite volume schemes[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 96: 264-275. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.028.
WANG N H, ZHANG L P, LI M. Investigation on accuracy of gradient reconstruction and flow simulation on general unstructured grids based on downscaling method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 722-730. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0106.
ROACHE P J. Code verification by the method of manufactured solutions[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124: 4-10.DOI: 10.2172/759450.
KRIVODONOVA L, BERGER M. High-order accurate implementation of solid wall boundary conditions in curved geometries[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 211(2): 492-512.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.05.029.
ROE P L. Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 18: 337-365.DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.18.010186.002005.
SUBRAMANIAM A, WONG M L, LELE S K. A high-order weighted compact high resolution scheme with boundary closures for compressible turbulent flows with shocks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 397: 108822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.021.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621