Modeling methodology for complex chemical mechanism involved in supersonic combustion simulation

WU Kun; FAN Xuejun

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0027

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Modeling methodology for complex chemical mechanism involved in supersonic combustion simulation

更新时间：2026-05-28

- Modeling methodology for complex chemical mechanism involved in supersonic combustion simulation
- Vol. 38, Issue 3, Pages: 552-576(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院力学研究所高温气体动力学国家重点实验室,北京,100190
  2. 中国科学院大学工程科学学院,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0027
  CLC： V235.21;V211.22
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴坤, 范学军. 超声速燃烧数值模拟中复杂化学反应的建模方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(3): 552-576.

WU Kun, FAN Xuejun. Modeling methodology for complex chemical mechanism involved in supersonic combustion simulation[J]. 2020, 38(3): 552-576.
吴坤, 范学军. 超声速燃烧数值模拟中复杂化学反应的建模方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(3): 552-576. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0027.

WU Kun, FAN Xuejun. Modeling methodology for complex chemical mechanism involved in supersonic combustion simulation[J]. 2020, 38(3): 552-576. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0027.

摘要

高保真度的数值模拟有助于研究超声速条件下点火、熄火、火焰传播以及稳焰等关键物理-化学过程，推动对冲压发动机中复杂燃烧现象的准确理解与可靠预测。然而，实际发动机中碳氢燃料燃烧导致的广泛时空尺度对湍流燃烧的建模带来了极大的挑战。为此，必须首先解决超声速燃烧数值模拟中复杂化学反应的高保真建模问题。本文对超声速燃烧模拟中湍流-化学反应相互作用模型、机理简化以及求解加速方法的研究现状进行了总结。以典型燃料燃烧建模为主线，介绍了复杂化学反应的高保真建模方法以及不同化学反应机理在超燃模拟中的适用性及其影响。以反应机理三层次保真度评估体系为基础，进一步明确了简化机理在超燃数值模拟中的优势与不足，阐明了动态自适应化学方法在研究超声速条件下细致燃烧过程的必要性和可行性。

Abstract

High-fidelity numerical simulation is considered as an indispensable approach to reveal key physical-chemical process such as ignition

extinction

flame propagation

and stabilization in supersonic flows

and promotes accurate understanding and reliable prediction of complex combustion phenomenon in ramjet engines. However

the extensive spatiotemporal scales caused by the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels in actual engines pose great challenges to turbulent combustion modeling. To overcome these challenges

high-fidelity modeling of complex chemistries in numerical simulation of supersonic combustion should be carefully handled. This paper gives a summary of the main research progresses in turbulence-combustion interaction model

mechanism reduction

and solution acceleration methods in supersonic combustion simulation. Taking typical fuels as prototypes

the high-fidelity modeling of complex chemistries

as well as applicability and influences of different chemical mechanisms in supersonic combustion are introduced. Based on the three-level fidelity evaluation methodology of chemical mechanism

the advantages and disadvantages of reduced mechanism are further clarified

and the necessity and feasibility of using dynamic adaptive chemistry method in the investigation of detailed combustion processes in supersonic flows are also elaborated.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG Z G, LIANG J H, DING M, et al. A review on hypersonic airbreathing propulsion system[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(6):716-739. (in Chinese)

YUG, FAN X J. Supersonic combustion and hypersonic propulsion[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2013, 43(5):449-471. (in Chinese)

MAURICE L, EDWARDS T, GRIFFITHS J. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels for hypersonic propulsion[M ] //CURRAN E T, MURTHY S N B. Scramjet Propulsion, 2000: 757-822. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600866609.0757.0822

WU K, ZHANG P, YAO W, et al. Numerical investigation on flame stabilization in DLR hydrogen supersonic combustor with strut injection[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2017, 189(12):2154-2179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2017.1365847

LU T F, LAW C K. Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009, 35(2):192-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.10.002

CHEN Z. Studies on the initiation, propagation and extinction of premixed flames[D]. Princeton: Princeton University, 2009.

SUN M B, FAN Z Q, LIANG J H, et al. Evaluation of partially premixed flamelet approach in supersonic combustion[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2010, 40(6):634-641. (in Chinese)

YANG Y, YOU J P, SUN M B. Modeling of turbulence-chemistry interactions in numerical simulations of supersonic combustion[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):261-273. (in Chinese)

FUREBY C. Large eddy simulation modelling of combustion for propulsion applications[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2009, 367(1899):2957-2969. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0271

JU Y. Recent progress and challenges in fundamental combustion research[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2014, 44(1):26-97. https://doi.org/10.6052/1000-0992-14-011

MAGNUSSEN B F, HJERTAGER B H. On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977, 16(1):719-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(77)80366-4

KASSEM H I, SAQR K M, ALY H S, et al. Implementation of the eddy dissipation model of turbulent non-premixed combustion in OpenFOAM[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2011, 38(3):363-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.12.012

SPALDING D B. Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1971, 13(1):649-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(71)80067-X

PETERS N. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1984, 10(3):319-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(84)90114-x

GOLOVITCHEV V I, NORDIN N, JARNICKI R, et al. 3-D diesel spray simulations using a new detailed chemistry turbulent combustion model[R]. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1891, 2000. https: //doi.org//10.4271/2000-01-1891

POPE S B. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1985, 11(2):119-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4

GHODKE C, CHOI J, SRINIVASAN S, et al. Large eddy simulation of supersonic combustion in a cavity-strut flameholder[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, AIAA 2011-323. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-323

SUN M B, WANG Z G, LIANG J H, et al. Flame characteristics in supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(4):688-696. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34970

ZHANG M, HU Z, HE G, et al. Large-eddy simulation of kerosene spray combustion in a model scramjet chamber[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(9):949-960. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100jaero738

WILLIAMS F. Progress in knowledge of flamelet structure and extinction[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(4/5/6):657-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00012-5

GAO Z X, LEE C. A flamelet model for turbulent diffusion combustion in supersonic flow[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(12):3379-3388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4169-z

SAGHAFIAN A, TERRAPON V E, PITSCH H. An efficient flamelet-based combustion model for compressible flows[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(3):652-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.007

LADEINDE F, LOU Z P. Improved flamelet modeling of supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):750-761. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36779

ZHAO G Y, SUN M B, WANG H B, et al. Investigation of combustion characteristics in a scramjet combustor using a modified flamelet model[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 148:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.005

SHAN F L, HOU L Y, CHEN Z, et al. Linearized correction to a flamelet-based model for hydrogen-fueled supersonic combustion[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16):11937-11944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.100

LI X P, ZHANG T C, QI L, et al. Characteristic scales and influential factors in supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(7):1458-1466. (in Chinese)

QIN F, HUANG Z W, HE G Q, et al. Flame stabilization mechanism study in a hydrogen-fueled model supersonic combustor under different air inflow conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(33):21360-21370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.237

BERGLUND M, FUREBY C. LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2):2497-2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.074

HUANG Z W, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Large eddy simulation of flame structure and combustion mode in a hydrogen fueled supersonic combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(31):9815-9824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.011

HUANG Z W, HE G Q, WANG S, et al. Simulations of combustion oscillation and flame dynamics in a strut-based supersonic combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(12):8278-8287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.142

MENON S, GENIN F, CHERNYAVSKY B. Large eddy simulation of scramjet combustion using a subgrid mixing/combustion model[C]//12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, Norfolk, Virginia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-7035. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-7035

FUREBY C. LES for supersonic combustion[C]//18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2012-5979. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-5979

FEDINA E, FUREBY C. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for an axisymmetric dump combustor[J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2011, 12:N24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2011.582586

FUREBY C. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for a swirl stabilized flame[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2012, 134(4):041503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004718

SABELNIKOV V, FUREBY C. LES combustion modeling for high Re flames using a multi-phase analogy[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(1):83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.09.008

GONZALEZ-JUEZ E D, KERSTEIN A R, RANJAN R, et al. Advances and challenges in modeling high-speed turbulent combustion in propulsion systems[J]. Progress in Energy andCombustion Science, 2017, 60:26-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.12.003

LAW C K, SUNG C J, WANG H, et al. Development of comprehensive detailed and reduced reaction mechanisms for combustion modeling[J]. AIAAJournal, 2003, 41(9):1629-1646. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7289

TURÁNYI T, TOMLIN A S. Reduction of reaction mechanisms[M]//Analysis of Kinetic Reaction Mechanisms. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014:183-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44562-4_7

OLUWOLE O O, SHI Y, WONG H W, et al. An Exact-Steady-state Adaptive Chemistry method for combustion simulations:Combining the efficiency of reduced models and the accuracy of the full model[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(7):2352-2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.011

LU T F, JU Y G, LAW C K. Complex CSP for chemistry reduction and analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 126(1/2):1445-1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-2180(01)00252-8

MAAS U, POPE S B. Simplifying chemical kinetics:Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1992, 88(3/4):239-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-m

REIN M. The partial-equilibrium approximation in reacting flows[J]. Physics of Fluids A:Fluid Dynamics, 1992, 4(5):873-886. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858267

TOMLIN A S, TURNYI T, PILLING M J. Low-Temperature Combustion and Autoignition, Chapter 4: Mathematical tools for the construction, investigation and reduction[M ] //Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics. Elsevier, 1997, 35: 293-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0069-8040(97)80019-2

TURÁNYI T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications[J]. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1990, 5(3):203-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01166355

NIEMEYER K E. Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels[D]. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University, 2010.

LU T F, LAW C K. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1):1333-1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.145

PEPIOTDESJARDINS P, PITSCH H. An efficient error-propagation-based reduction method for large chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 154(1/2):67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.020

NIEMEYER K E, SUNG C J, RAJU M P. Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels using directed relation graph with error propagation and sensitivity analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(9):1760-1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.12.022

SUN W T, CHEN Z, GOU X L, et al. A path flux analysis method for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7):1298-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.006

GAO X, YANG S, SUN W T. A global pathway selection algorithm for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 167:238-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.007

LIANG L, STEVENS J G, FARRELL J T. A dynamic adaptive chemistry scheme for reactive flow computations[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1):527-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.073

CHEN J Y, KOLLMANN W, DIBBLE R W. Pdf modeling of turbulent nonpremixed methane jet flames[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1989, 64(4/5/6):315-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208908924038

TURÁNYI T. Parameterization of reaction mechanisms using orthonormal polynomials[J]. Computers Chemistry, 1994, 18(1):45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-8485(94)80022-7

CHRISTO F C, MASRI A R, NEBOT E M, et al. An integrated PDF/neural network approach for simulating turbulent reacting systems[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(96)80198-6

TONSE S R, MORIARTY N W, BROWN N J, et al. PRISM:piecewise reusable implementation of solution mapping. An economical strategy for chemical kinetics[J]. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 1999, 39(1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.199900010

Maurice L, Edwards T, Griffiths J. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels for hypersonic propulsion[M]//Scramjet Propulsion, Chapter 12. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600866609.0757.0822

PANDEY K M, AZAD B K, SAHU S P, et al. Computational analysis of mixing in strut based combustion at air inlet Mach number 2[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2011, 2(1):73-80. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2011.V2.100

XIAO B G, YANG S H, XING J W, et al. An application of parallel in situ adaptive tabulation method in calculation of supersonic combustion[J ] . Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(4):412-417. (in Chinese)

MONTGOMERY C, ZHAO W, ADAMS B, et al. CFD simulations of supersonic combustion using reduced mechanisms and ISAT[C]//16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-3547. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-3547

WU K, CONTINO F, YAO W, et al. On the application of tabulated dynamic adaptive chemistry in ethylene-fueled supersonic combustion[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 197:265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.012

FAN X J, YU G. Analysis of thermophysical propertiesof Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(2):187-192. (in Chinese)

MICKA D, DRISCOLL J. Reaction zone imaging in a dual-mode scramjet combustor using CH-PLIF[C]//44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Hartford, CT. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2008-5071. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-5071

SCHULTZ I A, GOLDENSTEIN C S, SPEARRIN R M, et al. Multispecies midinfrared absorption measurements in a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014, 30(6):1595-1604. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35261

YUAN Y M, ZHANG T C, YAO W, et al. Characterization of flame stabilization modes in an ethylene-fueled supersonic combustor using time-resolved CH * chemiluminescence[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2):2919-2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.040

NARAYANASWAMY K, PITSCH H, PEPIOT P. A component library framework for deriving kinetic mechanisms for multi-component fuel surrogates:Application for jet fuel surrogates[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 165:288-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.013

MARINOV N M, WESTBROOK C K, PITZ W J. Detailed and global chemical kinetics model for hydrogen[R]. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-JC——120677, CONF-9510158——1, 1995. https: //digital.library.unt.edu/ark: /67531/metadc794810/

ROGERS R C, CHINITZ W. Using a global hydrogen-air combustion model in turbulent reacting flow calculations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(4):586-592. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8117

EKLUND D, STOUFFER S. A numerical and experimental study of a supersonic combustor employing sweep ramp fuel injectors[C]//30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1994-2819. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-2819

ZHUKOV V P. Verification, validation, and testing of kinetic mechanisms of hydrogen combustion in fluid-dynamic computations[J]. ISRN Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 2012:1-11. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/475607

JACHIMOWSKI C J. An analytical study of the hydrogen-air reaction mechanism with application to scramjet combustion[R].NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-2791, 1988.

CONAIRE M Ó, CURRAN H J, SIMMIE J M, et al. A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation[J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2004, 36(11):603-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20036

BURKE M P, CHAOS M, JU Y G, et al. Comprehensive H 2 /O 2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion[J ] . International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2012, 44(7):444-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20603

POTTURI A, EDWARDS J. LES/RANS simulation of a supersonic combustion experiment[C]//50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2012-611. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-611

NING H B, LI Z R, LI X Y. Progress in combustion kinetics[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2016, 32(1):131-153. (in Chinese)

WU K. Investigation on the flame stabilization modes and chemical mechanism reduction in supersonic combustion[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018.

SLACK M W. Rate coefficient for H +O 2 + M=HO 2 + M evaluated from shock tube measurements of induction times[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 1977, 28:241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(77)90031-1

BHASKARAN K A, GUPTA M C, JUST T. Shock tube study of the effect of unsymmetric dimethyl hydrazine on the ignition characteristics of hydrogen-air mixtures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1973, 21(1):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(73)90005-9

HU E J, HUANG Z H, HE J J, et al. Experimental and numerical study on laminar burning velocities and flame instabilities of hydrogen-air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(20):8741-8755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.044

ZHOU X J, JIANG X, MIRA MARTINEZ D. The effects of chemical kinetic mechanisms on large eddy simulation (LES) of a nonpremixed hydrogen jet flame[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(26):11427-11440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.079

DAVIS S G, JOSHI A V, WANG H, et al. An optimized kinetic model of H 2 /CO combustion[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1):1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.252

HONG Z K, DAVIDSON D F, HANSON R K. An improved H 2 /O 2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(4):633-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002

BOIVIN P, JIMÉNEZ C, SÁNCHEZ A L, et al. An explicit reduced mechanism for H2-air combustion[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(1):517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.002

KEISTLER P, XIAO X D, HASSAN, et al. Simulation of the SCHOLAR supersonic combustion experiments[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2007-835. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-835

GERLINGER P, NOLD K, AIGNER M. Influence of reaction mechanisms, grid spacing, and inflow conditions on the numerical simulation of lifted supersonic flames[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 62(12):1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2076

KUMARAN K, BABU V. Investigation of the effect of chemistry models on the numerical predictions of the supersonic combustion of hydrogen[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(4):826-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.008

HSU K, JEMCOV A. Numerical investigations of detonation in premixed hydrogen-air mixture - Assessment of simplified chemical mechanisms[C]//Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2000-2478. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-2478

EDWARDS J R, BOLES J A, BAURLE R A. Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation of a supersonic reacting wall jet[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(3):1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.009

DAVIDENKO D, GÖKALP I, DUFOUR E, et al. Numerical simulation of hydrogen supersonic combustion and validation of computational approach[C]//12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, Norfolk, Virginia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-7033. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-7033

FUREBY C, FEDINA E, TEGNÉR J. A computational study of supersonic combustion behind a wedge-shaped flameholder[J]. Shock Waves, 2014, 24(1):41-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0459-2

LIU B, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Investigation of influence of detailed chemical kinetics mechanisms for hydrogen on supersonic combustion using large eddy simulation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(10):5007-5019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.005

MARINOV N M, PITZ W J, WESTBROOK C K, et al. Aromatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in a laminar premixed n-butane flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 114(1/2):192-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00275-7

WANG H, LASKIN A. A comprehensive kinetic model of ethylene and acetylene oxidation at high temperatures[R ] . Delaware: University of Delaware, 1998. http://ignis.usc.edu/Mechanisms/C2-C4/c2.pdf

KONNOV A. Development and validation of a detailed reaction mechanism for the combustion modeling[J]. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 2000, 2(3-4):257-264.

QIN Z W, LISSIANSKI V V, YANG H X, et al. Combustion chemistry of propane:a case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2):1663-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80565-2

XU C Q, KONNOV A A. Validation and analysis of detailed kinetic models for ethylene combustion[J]. Energy, 2012, 43(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.006

SEGAL C. The scramjet engine[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511627019

WU K, YAO W, FAN X J. Development and fidelity evaluation of a skeletal ethylene mechanism under scramjet-relevant conditions[J]. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31(12):14296-14305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03033

KALITAN D M, HALL J M, PETERSEN E L. Ignition and oxidation of ethylene-oxygen-diluent mixtures with and without silane[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(6):1045-1056. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8026

EGOLFOPOULOS F N, ZHU D L, LAW C K. Experimental and numerical determination of laminar flame speeds:Mixtures of C2-hydrocarbons with oxygen and nitrogen[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23(1):471-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80293-6

KUMAR K, MITTAL G, SUNG C J, et al. An experimental investigation of ethylene/O2/diluent mixtures:Laminar flame speeds with preheat and ignition delays at high pressures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 153(3):343-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.11.012

WESTBROOK C K, DRYER F L. Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1981, 27(1/2):31-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946970

SINGH D J, JACHIMOWSKI C J. Quasiglobal reaction model for ethylene combustion[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(1):213-216. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11972

LØVÅS T, MALIK N, MAUSS F. Global reaction mechanism for ethylene flames with preferential diffusion[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2010, 182(11/12):1945-1960 https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2010.497419

MONTGOMERY C. Optimized reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for ethylene and JP-8 combustion[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2007-771. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-771

YIN Y, YU G. Numerical study of supersonic combustion of ethylene[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 20(2):55-57, 77.

ZHONG F Q, CHEN L H, LI F, et al. Numerical simulation of ignition and combustion of ethylene in a supersonic model combustor with a reduced kinetic mechanism[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 185(4):548-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2012.730080

XIAO B G, ZHAO H Y, YANG S H, et al. Application of reduced chemical kinetic model for ethylene combustion in combustor calculation of HIFiRE[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(6):1287-1294. (in Chinese)

LUO Z Y, LU T F, LIU J W. A reduced mechanism for ethylene/methane mixtures with excessive NO enrichment[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(7):1245-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.009

ZHONG F Q, MA S G, ZHANG X Y, et al. Development of efficient and accurate skeletal mechanisms for hydrocarbon fuels and kerosene surrogate[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2015, 31(5):732-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0434-5

LI R, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Skeletal chemical kinetic model generation and analysis for combustion of ethylene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(9):2074-2083. (in Chinese)

XU X, CAI G B. Numerical simulation on combustion of hydrogen/hydrocarbon in supersonic airstream[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2002, 23(5):398-401. (in Chinese)

ZHANG L W, CHOI J Y, YANG V. Supersonic combustion and flame stabilization of coflow ethylene and air with splitter plate[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(5):1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35740

TIAN Y, LE J L, YANG S H, et al. Study on flow oscillation and its control methods in an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(7):961-967. (in Chinese)

LI J, ZHANG L W, CHOI J Y, et al. Ignition transients in a scramjet engine with air throttling part Ⅱ:reacting flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(1):79-88. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35269

BAURLE R, MATHUR T, GRUBER M, et al. A numerical and experimental investigation of a scramjet combustor for hypersonic missile applications[C]//34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1998-3121. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-3121

EKLUND D, BAURLE R, GRUBER M. Numerical study of a scramjet combustor fueled by an aerodynamic ramp injector in dual-mode combustion[C]//39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2001-379. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-379

LIU J W, TAM C, LU T F, et al. Simulations of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flows using reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms[C]//42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Sacramento, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2006-4862. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4862

COCKS P, DONOHUE J, BRUNO C, et al. IDDES of a dual-mode ethylene fueled cavity flameholder with an isolator shock train[C]//51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2013-116. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-116

EDWARDS T, MAURICE L Q. Surrogate mixtures to represent complex aviation and rocket fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17(2):461-466. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5765

DAGAUT P, CATHONNET M. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene:a review of experimental and kinetic modeling[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(1):48-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003

DAGAUT P, REUILLON M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Kerosene combustion at pressures up to 40 atm:Experimental study and detailed chemical kinetic modeling[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1):919-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80727-7

DOUTÉ C, DELFAU J L, AKRICH R, et al. Chemical structure of atmospheric pressurepremixed n -decane and kerosene flames[J ] . Combustion Science and Technology, 1995, 106(4/5/6):327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209508 907785

VOVELLE C, DELFAU J L, REUILLON M. Formation of aromatic hydrocarbons in decane and kerosene flames at reduced pressure[M]//Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994:50-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85167-4_4

MAURICE L, BLUST J, LEUNG K, et al. Emissions from combustion of hydrocarbons in a well-stirred reactor[C]//37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1999-1038. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-1038

LINDSTEDT R P, MAURICE L Q. Detailed chemical-kinetic model for aviation fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(2):187-195. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5582

GUÉRET C, CATHONNET M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Experimental study and modeling of kerosene oxidation in a jet-stirred flow reactor[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23(1):211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80261-4

DAGAUT P. On the kinetics of hydrocarbons oxidation from natural gas to kerosene and diesel fuel[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2002, 4(11):2079-2094. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110787a

HONNET S, SESHADRI K, NIEMANN U, et al. A surrogate fuel for kerosene[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1):485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.218

DAGAUT P, EL BAKALI A, RISTORI A. The combustion of kerosene:Experimental results and kinetic modelling using 1- to 3-component surrogate model fuels[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7/8):944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.10.008

DOOLEY S, WON S H, CHAOS M, et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(12):2333-2339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.001

DOOLEY S, WON S H, HEYNE J, et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(4):1444-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.002

DAGAUT P, KARSENTY F, DAYMA G, et al. Experimental and detailed kinetic model for the oxidation of a Gas to Liquid (GtL) jet fuel[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(3):835-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.015

XIAO B G, YANG S H, ZHAO H Y, et al. Detailed and reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for RP-3 aviation kerosene combustion[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(9):1948-1955. (in Chinese)

ZENG W, LI H X, MA H A, et al. Reduced chemical reaction mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(8):1139-1145. (in Chinese)

MAO Y, YU L, WU Z, et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of ignition characteristics of RP-3 kerosene over low-to-high temperature ranges in a heated rapid compression machine and a heated shock tube[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 203:157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.015

LIU W, LIANG X, LIN B Y, et al. A comparative study on soot particle size distributions in premixed flames of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates[J ] . Fuel, 2020, 259: 116222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116222 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236119315765

XU J Q, GUO J J, LIU A K, et al. Construction of autoignition mechanisms for the combustion of RP-3 surrogate fuel and kinetics simulation[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4):643-652. (in Chinese)

YU J, GOU X L. Comprehensive surrogate for emulating physical and kinetic properties of jet fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):679-689. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36766

ZHENG D, YU W M, ZHONG B J. RP-3aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4):636-642. (in Chinese)

NAJJAR Y S H, GOODGER E M. Soot formation in gas turbines using heavy fuels. 1[J]. Fuel, 1981, 60(10):980-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(81)90096-x

ALY S L, SALEM H. Prediction of premixed laminar flame characteristics of commercial kerosene fuel[J]. Fuel, 1989, 68(9):1203-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90196-8

KUNDU K P, DEUR J M. A simplified reaction mechanism for calculation of emissions in hydrocarbon (Jet-A) combustion[C]//29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1993-2341. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2341

WANG T S. Thermophysics characterization of kerosene combustion[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2001, 15(2):140-147. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6602

CHOI J. A quasi global mechanism of kerosene combustion for propulsion applications[C]//47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, San Diego, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2011-5853. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-5853

FRANZELLI B, RIBER E, SANJOSÉ M, et al. A two-step chemical scheme for kerosene-air premixed flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7):1364-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.014

RAJASEKARAN A, BABU V. Numerical simulation of kerosene combustion in a dual mode supersonic combustor[C]//42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Sacramento, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2006-5041. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-5041

HUANG S H, XU S L, LIU X Y. Combustionflow of kerosene-fueled scramjet with 3D cavity (Ⅲ) Multi-step chemistry characteristics of kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2005, 26(2):101-105. (in Chinese)

KUMARAN K, BABU V. Mixing and combustion characteristics of kerosene in a model supersonic combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, 25(3):583-592. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40140

KUMARAN K, BEHERA P R, BABU V. Numerical investigation of the supersonic combustion of kerosene in a strut-based combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26(5):1084-1091. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46965

DHARAVATH M, MANNA P, SINHA P K, et al. Numerical analysis of a kerosene-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 2016, 8(1):011003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030699

HOU L Y, NIU D S, PAN P F, et al. Effects ofkerosene global reaction mechanisms on supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(7):938-943. (in Chinese)

KYNE A G, PATTERSON P, POURKASHANIAN M, et al. Prediction of premixed laminar flame structure and burning velocity of aviation fuel-air mixtures[C ] //ASME Turbo Expo 2001: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 2: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/2001-GT-0055ISBN:978-0-7918-7851-4

MONTGOMERY C, CANNON S, MAWID M, et al. Reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for JP-8 combustion[C ] //40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2002-336. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-336

LUCHE J, REUILLON M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Reduction of large detailed kinetic mechanisms:application to kerosene/air combustion[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2004, 176(11):1935-1963. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200490504571

STRELKOVA M I, KIRILLOV I A, POTAPKIN B V, et al. Detailed and reduced mechanisms of jet a combustion at high temperatures[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 180(10/11):1788-1802. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200802258379

WANG Q D, FANG Y M, WANG F, et al. Skeletal mechanism generation for high-temperature oxidation of kerosene surrogates[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(1):91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.05.019

WANG Q D, FANG Y M, WANG F, et al. Systematic analysis and reduction of combustion mechanisms for ignition of multi-component kerosene surrogate[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1):187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.011

ZHONG B J, PENG H S. Development of a skeletal mechanism for aviation kerosene surrogate fuel[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(3):645-651. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b37421

YAO W, WU K, LEE Y, et al. Influence of chemical mechanisms on supersonic combustion characteristics fueled by kerosene[C]//2018 Joint Propulsion Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio. Reston, Virginia: AIAA. AIAA 2018-4740. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4740

FAN X F, WANG J F, ZHAO F M, et al. Applications of reduced reaction mechanism for numerical calculations in supersonic combustion of kerosene fuel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6):974-982. (in Chinese)

YAO W, WU K, FAN X J. Development of skeletal kerosene mechanisms and application to supersonic combustion[J]. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32(12):12992-13003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03350

YAO W, LU Y, WU K, et al. Modeling analysis of an actively cooled scramjet combustor under different kerosene/air ratios[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(4):975-991. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36866

YAO W, YUAN Y M, LI X P, et al. Comparative study of elliptic and round scramjet combustors fueled by RP-3[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):772-786. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36721

YAO W, WU K, FAN X J. Influences of domain symmetry on supersonic combustion modeling[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(2):451-465. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b37227

SCHWER D A, LU P S, GREEN Jr W H. An adaptive chemistry approach to modeling complex kinetics in reacting flows[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 133(4):451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-2180(03)00045-2

LIANG L, STEVENS J G, FARRELL J T. A dynamic multi-zone partitioning scheme for solving detailed chemical kinetics in reactive flow computations[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2009, 181(11):1345-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200903190836

GOLDSBOROUGH S S, BANYON C, MITTAL G. A computationally efficient, physics-based model for simulating heat loss during compression and the delay period in RCM experiments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(12):3476-3492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.07.010

CONTINO F, FOUCHER F, DAGAUT P, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of nitric oxide effect on the ignition of iso-octane in a single cylinder HCCI engine[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(8):1476-1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.02.028

REN Z Y, LIU Y F, LU T F, et al. The use of dynamic adaptive chemistry and tabulation in reactive flow simulations[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(1):127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.018

WEI H Q, ZHOU L, ZHOU H, et al. Toward efficient chemistry calculations in engine simulations through static adaptive acceleration[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2017, 189(4):623-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2016.1229312

YANG S, RANJAN R, YANG V, et al. Parallel on-the-fly adaptive kinetics in direct numerical simulation of turbulent premixed flame[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2):2025-2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.021

CONTINO F, JEANMART H, LUCCHINI T, et al. Coupling of in situ adaptive tabulation and dynamic adaptive chemistry:an effective method for solving combustion in engine simulations[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2):3057-3064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.08.002

AN J, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Dynamic adaptive chemistry with mechanisms tabulation and in situ adaptive tabulation (ISAT) for computationally efficient modeling of turbulent combustion[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 2019, 206:467-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.05.016

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Recent research progress on flame characteristics in strut-equipped scramjet combustor

Overview on the research progress of unsteady supersonic combustion

Progress of the studies on the extension of flamelet models to supersonic combustion flows

Optimization of hot-air anti-icing structures based on neural networks and genetic algorithms

Numerical simulation on gust responses of high aspect ratio aircraft

Related Author

ZHANG Junlong

CHANG Juntao

WANG Xuan

BAO Wen

SUN Mingbo

CAI Zun

WANG Yanan

ZHAO Guoyan

Related Institution

School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology

National Laboratory for Computational Fluid Dynamics, Beihang University

AI问答

⁰