CHEN Hao, YUAN Xianxu, BI Lin, et al. Simulation of flow around ridge precursors at different angles of attack[J]. 2021, 39(2): 53-61.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0121.
Simulation of flow around ridge precursors at different angles of attack
The advantages of good stealth and supersonic flight performance make the ridged precursor an ideal configuration for future high-performance fighters and cruise missiles. The ridged precursor has a dominant leeward vortex
and the shape of the precursor can have a great influence on the vortex as well as the aerodynamic forces. Although many research works have been carried out on the static aerodynamic characteristics of ridged forebodies
which have also been applied to engineering practices
the understanding on the flow evolution mechanism and the influence of ridged forebodies at high angles of attack is still insufficient. To overcome the difficulty in simulating separated turbulent flows at high attack angles for ridged precursor aircrafts
the present study adopts the IDDES hybrid turbulence model with a matched unsteady algorithm. This work focuses on the aerodynamic characteristics of ridged precursors at different attack angles
and gives the detailed evolution of flow structures
including the breakdown of the leeward vortex. The ridged precursors with different ridge angles and different ratios of height to width are selected for the computation
and the results show that when the attack angle is small
the leeward vortex of the ridged precursor gradually increases with the increase of the attack angle; above a certain attack angle
the leeward vortex breaks down. For a given attack angle
when the ridge angle becomes smaller
the leeward vortex gets stronger and the vortex lift gets larger. For precursors with the same ridge angle
when the ratio of the height to width for the upper half section becomes smaller
the strength of the leeward vortex gets larger
and the critical attack angle gets smaller
i.e.
the precursor vortex breaks down in advance.
关键词
Keywords
references
ATIQUE M S A, BARMAN S, NAFI A S, et al. Design of a fifth generation air superiority fighter[C ] //AIP Conference Proceedings, 1754(1): 2016. doi: 10.1063/1.4958444
JOGERST J D. The Fifth-Generation Fighter Pilot Force[J]. Air Space Power Journal, 2016, 30.
ERICKSON G, BRANDON J. Low-speed experimental study of the vortex flow effects of a fighter-forebody having unconventional cross-section[C ] //12th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Snowmass, CO, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1985. doi: 10.2514/6.1985-1798
FRANCIS M S, KEESEE J E. Airfoil dynamic stall performance with large-amplitude motions[J]. AIAA Journal, 1985, 23(11): 1653-1659.DOI: 10.2514/3.9146.
SKOW A M. An analysis of the Su-27 flight demonstration at the 1989 Paris airshow[C]//Aerospace Atlantic Conference Exposition. 1990.
ROOS F, MAGNESS C. Yaw effects on the high-alpha flow field of a chined forebody[C ] //32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1994. doi: 10.2514/6.1994-73
MANGE R L, BRAGG M B. The aerodynamic of a chined forebody oscillating in pitch[C ] //13th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 1995. doi: 10.2514/6.1995-1869
NIKITIN N V, NICOUD F, WASISTHO B, et al. An approach to wall modeling in large-eddy simulations[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(7): 1629-1632.DOI: 10.1063/1.870414.
YANG Y C, ZHA G C. Simulation of airfoil stall flows using IDDES with high order schemes[C ] //46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington, D. C.. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3185
GUSEVA E K, GARBARUK A V, STRELETS M K. Assessment of delayed DES and improved delayed DES combined with a shear-layer-adapted subgrid length-scale in separated flows[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2017, 98(2): 481-502.DOI: 10.1007/s10494-016-9769-7.
ZHU W Q, XIAO Z X, FU S. The effects of flight velocity on jet noise are simulated by improved delayed detached eddy simulation with the modification of grid scale definition[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 463-469. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0087.
ZHANG H, LI J, GONG Z B. Numerical simulation of the stall separated flow around an iced airfoil based on IDDES[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(3): 封2, 283-288. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0223.
KRAPPEL T, KUHLMANN H, KIRSCHNER O, et al. Validation of an IDDES-type turbulence model and application to a Francis pump turbine flow simulation in comparison with experimental results[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2015, 55: 167-179.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.07.019.
ZHANG H X. Non-oscillatory and non-free-parameter dissipation difference scheme[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1988, 6(2): 143-165. (in Chinese).
LIU W, ZHAO H Y, XIE Y F. Construction of third-order WNND scheme and its application in complex flow[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2005, 26(1): 32-39. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0887.2005.01.005.
HE G H, ZHANG H X. Numerical simulation of hypersonic viscous flows over capsule-type vehicles[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1994, 12(3): 252-261. (in Chinese).
JAMESON A. Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady fl ows past airfoils and wings[C ] //Proc of the 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1991. doi: 10.2514/6.1991-1596
DONG H T, CHEN Z, LIU F J. Split-type implicit scheme using flux splitting and dual-time step for Euler equations[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(5): 776-785. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0326.
CHEN Q, SI F F, CHEN J Q, et al. Study of protuberances in supersonic flow with RANS/LES method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(7): 1531-1537. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0271.
YUAN X X, DENG X B, XIE Y F, et al. Research on the RANS/LES hybrid method for supersonic/hypersonic turbulence flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(6): 723-728. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2009.06.017.
HALL R M. Influence of forebody cross-sectional shape on wing vortex-burst location[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(9): 645-652.