WANG Hao, WANG Yuntao, MENG Dehong, et al. On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method[J]. 2021, 39(2): 81-90.
WANG Hao, WANG Yuntao, MENG Dehong, et al. On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method[J]. 2021, 39(2): 81-90.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0051.
On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method
To evaluate the time domain accuracy of flutter simulations
three coupling methods
i.e.
loose coupling method
improved loose coupling method and tight coupling method
are used to simulate Isogai Wing and AGARD 445.6 Wing models fluttering in the time domain. In analogy to the grid convergence analysis
a time accuracy analysis approach based on the generalized Richardson extrapolation method for time domain flutter simulations is proposed
with which the time convergence and accuracy analysis of flutter boundary simulations in the time domain is performed
and the time discretization independent result is obtained. The analysis shows that time domain simulation results of both Isogai Wing and AGARD 445.6 Wing flutter have good time convergence. The time accuracy obtained by generalized Richardson extrapolation method is basically consistent with that of the theoretical analysis. Within an appropriate time step range
the influence of time step selection for the analysis can be neglected. The present study suggests that it is feasible to establish a time accuracy analysis method based on the generalized Richardson extrapolation method for flutter simulations in the time domain.
关键词
Keywords
references
DENG X G, ZONG W G, ZHANG L P, et al. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(2): 279-288. (in Chinese).
AIAA. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations: AIAA G-077-1998[S]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Strandards Department, 1998: 1-29.
RICHARDSON L F. IX. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1911, 210(459-470): 307-357.DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1911.0009.
RICHARDSON L F, ARTHUR GAUNT J. VIII. The deferred approach to the limit[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1927, 226(636-646): 299-361.DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1927.0008.
ROACHE P J, KNUPP P M. Completed Richardson extrapolation[J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1993, 9(5): 365-374.DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1640090502.
Celik I, Ghia U, Roache P J, et al. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(7): 078001.
ROACHE P J. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1994, 116(3): 405-413.DOI: 10.1115/1.2910291.
SUN Y, HUANG Y, WANG Y T, et al. Development and precision validation of static aeroelastic computational module on flow solver TRIP[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 620-624. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0154.
WANG Y T, MENG D H, SUN Y, et al. Software development of ultra-scale numerical simulaiton for aero-elastic problem(2017)[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 1019-1026. (in Chinese).
WANG Y T, WANG G X, ZHANG Y L. Numerical simulation of DPW Ⅲ wing and wing-body configurations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(3): 264-269. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2011.03.002.
WANG Y T, ZHANG S J, MENG D H. Numerical simulation and study for DPW4 wing/body/tail[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(6): 739-744. (in Chinese).
LU Z L, GUO T Q, GUAN D. A study of calculation method for transonic flutter[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2004, 25(3): 214-217. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2004.03.002.
GUO T Q. Transonic unsteady aerodynamics and flutter computations for complex assemblies[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006 (in Chinese).
ZHANG W W, LÜ L L, YE Z Y. Improved time-marching technique for solving aeroelastic equations[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2005, 24(5): 118-120. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2005.05.036.
JIANG Y W, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Study of time-marching method for fluid/structure coupling solution based on CFD technique[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2007, 20(4): 396-400. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.16385/j.cnki.issn.1004-4523.2007.04.012.
AN X M, XU M, CHEN S L. Analysis for second order time accurate CFD/CSD coupled algorithms[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 547-552. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2009.05.008.
YANG G W, QIAN W. Numerical analyses of transonic flutter on an aircraft[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2005, 37(6): 769-776. (in Chinese).
YANG G W. Recent progress on computational aeroelasticity[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(4): 406-420. (in Chinese).
ISOGAI K. On the transonic-dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(7): 793-795.DOI: 10.2514/3.61226.
ISOGAI K. Transonic dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing. II[J]. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19(9): 1240-1242.DOI: 10.2514/3.7853.
ALONSO J, JAMESON A. Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions[C ] //32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1994: 1-12.doi: 10.2514/6.1994-56 .
YATES Jr E C. AGARD standard aeroelastic configuration for dynamic response, candidate configuration I.– Wing 445.6: NASA-TM-100492 [R]. NASA, 1987: 1-73.
SILVA W A, CHWALOWSKI P, PERRY B. Evaluation of linear, inviscid, viscous, and reduced-order modelling aeroelastic solutions of the AGARD 445.6 wing using root locus analysis[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2014, 28(3-4): 122-139.