YE Shuran, ZHANG Zhen, SONG Xudong, et al. Applications of autoencoder in reduced-order modeling of flow field[J]. 2019, 37(3): 498-504.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0039.
Applications of autoencoder in reduced-order modeling of flow field
autoencoder is widely used for dimensional reduction and image denoising. It can be used in flow field identification and data processing as a reduced-order method. Moreover
massive labeled flow field data makes it promising to apply machine learning in fluid dynamics. Taking the flow around a cylinder as an example
the autoencoder model of the velocity field behind the cylinder is established to reduce the order and extract features from the original data. This model encodes the 1394 velocity components into 32-dimensional data
and trains them through self-supervised learning. For well-trained autoencoder models
the basis for evaluating them is to discuss whether the original flow field could be reconstructed. The application of the low dimensional encoded data is explored by correlating it with the flow field sensitive outputs
and a neural network for the regression of surface pressure of cylinder based on encoded data is established. It is verified that the result of the autoencoder has inherited the main information in the original velocity field. The root mean square error of the decoded velocity field compared with the original field is less than 0.02
and the root mean square error of the pressure coefficient regression network can be less than 0.1. The above results indicate that the autoencoder can be used in the future as a feature extraction and order reduction method of flow field.
关键词
Keywords
references
LECUN Y, BENGIO Y, HINTON G. Deep learning.[J]. Nature, 2015, 521:436-444.
TRANCY B D, DURAISAMY K, ALONSO J J. A machine learning strategy to assist turbulence model development[R]. AIAA 2015-1287, 2015.
LING J, KURZAWSKI A, TEMPLETON J. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 807:155-166.
STROFER, CARLOS M, WU J, et al. Data-driven, physics-based feature extraction from fluid flow fields[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2018, 25(3):625-650.
JIN X, CHENG P, CHEN W L, et al. Prediction model of velocity field around circular cylinder over various Reynolds numbers by fusion convolutional neural networks based on pressure on the cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(4):047105.
FARAHAT A K, GHODSI A, KAMEL M S. Efficient greedy feature selection for unsupervised learning[J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013, 35(2):285-310.
KAISER E, NOACK B R, CORDIER L, et al. Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 754:365-414.
O'SHEA T J, HOYDIS J. An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications Networking, 2017, 3(4):563-575.
LIOU C Y, HUANG J C, YANG W C. Autoencoder for words[J]. Neurocomputering, 2014, 139:84-96.
ILIADIS M, SPINOULAS L, KATSAGGELOS A K. Deep fully-connected networks for video compressive sensing[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2017:S1051200417302130.
ZHANG Z, SONG X D, YE S R, et al. Application of deep learning method to Reynolds stress models of channel flow based on reduced-order modeling of DNS data[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 31(11):58-65.
NAIR V, HINTON G E. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning. Haifa, ILMS: 2010: 807-814.
CHAI T, DRAXLER R R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?-Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2014, (7):1247-1250.
KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. Image net classification with deep convolutional neural networks[C]//Neural Information Processing Systems-Volume 1(NIPS'12), 2012: 1097-1105.
CHEN H, QIAN W Q, HE L. Aerodynamic coefficient prediction of airfoils based on deep learning[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):294-299. (in Chinese)
SUN W, SHAO S, ZHAO R, et al. A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification[J]. Measurement, 2016, 89(ISFA):171-178.
SCHAFER M, TUREK S, DURST F, et al. Benchmark computations of laminar flow around a cylinder[J]. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 48:547-566.
HINTON G E, SALAKHUUTDINOV R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks[J]. Science, 2006, 313:504-507.