LENG Yan, QIAN Zhansen, LIU Zhongchen. Analysis on typical parameters of bodies of revolution affecting the sonic boom[J]. 2019, 37(4): 655-662, 689.DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0291.
Analysis on typical parameters of bodies of revolution affecting the sonic boom
Sonic boom is one of the key technologies for supersonic aircraft
particularly with regard to commercial air transport. The ARI_Boom in house code was used based on the near-field CFD simulation and far-field propagation model. Based on bodies of revolution
several flight and shape parameters were considered for investigating their effects on the sonic boom signature including overpressure and impulse. Mach numbers were varied from 1.41 to 6.0 due to some wind tunnel and flight tests results available for reference. Firstly
the method which used by the ARI_Boom was given and verified by a typical case. Secondly
flight and shape parameters were considered for investigating their effects on the sonic boom based on the ARI_Boom. According to the parametric analysis
it is found that sonic boom can be reduced by increasing flight altitude
decreasing cone half-angle
increasing fineness ratio or decreasing Mach number. However
with the increase of bluntness parameter
overpressure first decreases and then increases.
关键词
Keywords
references
WHITHAM G B. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile[J]. Communications on Pure Applied Mathematics, 1952, 5(3):301-348.
WALKDER F. Theshock pattern of a wing-body combination, far from the flight path[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1958, 9(2):164-194.
CARLSON H W. Simplified sonic-boom prediction[R]. NASA TP-1978-1122, 1978.
PLOTKIN J K. A rapid method for the computation of sonic booms[R]. AIAA 1993-4433, 1993.
YAMASHITA R, SUZUKI K. Full-field sonic boom simulation in real atmosphere[R]. AIAA 2014-2269, 2014.
YAMASHITA R, SUZUKI K. Full-field sonic boom simulation in stratified atmosphere[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10):3223-3231.
KANDIL O A, YANG Z, BOBBITT P J. Prediction of sonic boom signature using Euler-full potential CFD with grid adaptation and shock fitting[R]. AIAA 2002-2542, 2002.
OZCERI A I. Sonic boom prediction using Euler/full potential methodology[R]. AIAA 2007-369, 2007.
BUSEMANN A. The relation between minimized drag and noise at supersonic speed[C]//Proceedings of the conference on high-speed aeronautics, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, 1955: 133-144.
RYHMINGI L. The supersonic boom of a projectile related to drag and volume[J]. J. Aerospace Sciences, 1961, 28:113-118.
HAYES W D, HAEFILI R C, and KULSVUD H E. Sonic boom propagation in a stratified atmosphere, with computer program[R]. NASA CR-1299, 1969.
GEORGE A R, SEEBASS R. Sonic boom minimization including both front and rear shocks[J]. AIAA Journal, 1971, 9(10):2091-2093.
DARDEN C M. Minimization of sonic boom parameters in real and isothermal atmospheres[R]. NASA TND-7842, 1975.
HEARING E A Jr, MURRAY J E, PURIFOY D D, et al. Airborne shaped sonic boom demonstration pressure measurements with computational fluid dynamics comparisons[R]. AIAA 2005-0009, 2005.
PAWLOWSKI J W, GRAHAM D H, BOCCADORO C H, et al. Origins and overview of the shaped sonic boom demonstration program[R]. AIAA 2005-0005, 2005.
KANDILO, KHASDEO N, OZCER I A. Sonic boom mitigation through thickness, camber and nose angle optimizations for a delta wing[R]. AIAA 2006-6636, 2006.
KANDILO, KHASDEO N, OZCER I A. Optimization of delta wing geometry parameters for sonic boom mitigation[R]. AIAA 2007-4109, 2007.
CARLSON H W, MACK R J, MORRIS O A. A wind-tunnel investigation of the effect of body shape on sonic-boompressure distributions[R]. NASA TN D-3160, November 1965.
SBROUT B L, MACK R J, DOLLYBIGB S M. A wind-tunnel investigation of sonic-boom pressure distributions of bodies of revolution at Mach 2.96, 3.83 and 4.63[R]. NASA TN D-6195, 1971.
LENG Y, QIAN Z S. Sonic boom signature prediction and analysis for a type of hypersonic long-range civil vehicle[R]. AIAA 2017-4422, 2017.
LI H M, QIAN Z S. Implementation of three different transition methods and comparative analysis of the results computed by OVERSET software[R]. AIAA 2016-3491, 2016.
LI X F, QIAN Z S. Applications of overset grid technique to CFD simulation of high Mach number multi-bodyinteraction/separation flow[C]//Proceeding of 2014 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, Shanghai, China, August 22nd-24th, 2014.
LIU Y, WANG L, QIAN Z S. Numerical investigation on the assistant restarting method of variable geometry for high Mach number inlet[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 79:647-657.
THOMAS C L. Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by the waveform parameter method[R]. TND-6832, 1972.
THOMAS, C L. Extrapolation of wind-tunnel sonic boom signatures without use of a Whitham F-Function[R]. NASA SP-255, 1970.
PLOTKIN J K. Ground data collection of shaped sonic boom experiment aircraft pressure signature[R]. AIAA 2005-0010, 2005.