The jet tab thrust vector control technology discussed in this paper has outstanding advantages in less thrust loss
faster response
stronger control forces
compared with jet vane technology
which meet the needs of future air combat for advanced air-to-air missile. In order to meet the requirements of control rate modeling and optimization of jet tab thrust vector control system
conical nozzle with spoilers in three different shapes
which are round
rectangle and sector
are numerically simulated. The effects of spoiler geometry parameters on the thrust vector performance are analyzed. The design method of reducing thrust loss of spoiler is presented. The results indicate that thrust vector angle and thrust loss ratio increases with increas
ing insertion depth of the spoiler. For the rectangular spoiler
thrust loss ratio decreases with the increase of spoiler width; and for the sector spoiler
thrust loss ratio decreases with the increase of the design parameter
l
. When the spoiler inserted depth and inserted area is constant
rectangle spoiler has the maximum thrust vector angle and thrust loss ratio
while round spoiler has the minimum.
关键词
Keywords
references
SHEN Z L, WU Z. Thrust vector control system of air to air missile[J]. Control Technology of Tactical Missile, 2002, (2)37:1-6.(in Chinese)
XIE Y Q, LI S, ZHOU X F, et al. The application analysis of thrust vector control systems of air to air missile[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2009, 20(9):6110-6113.(in Chinese)
BREVIG O, SLEIGH K, CASEBOLT R, et al. Underwater test qualification of the Tomahawk booster and jet tab TVC system Thrust Vector Control[C]//AIAA, Sae, Asme, Joint Propulsion Conference, Las Vegas, Nev, June, AIAA 13 P. 2013.
ZHONG H. Study on a thrust-vector control technique of the ejection-rocket with the spoiler[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2005.(in Chinese)
HOLLSTEIN H J. Jet tab thrust vector control[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1965, 2(6):927-930.
EATOUGH R G. Jet tab thrust vector control system demonstration[R]. AIAA-71-752, 1971.
EATOUGH R G. Improved jet tab thrust vector control for the RGM-34C Booster[R]. AD 9-13, 1986.
THANIGAIARASU S, JAYAPRAKASH S, et al. Influence of tab geometry and its orientation on under-expanded sonic jets[J]. Aerospace Engineering, 2007, 331-336.
STEFFEN C J, REDDY D R, ZAMAN K B M Q. Numerical modeling of jet entrainment for nozzles fitted with delta tabs[R]. AIAA-97-0709, 1997.
YANG X G, LIN X S. Structure analysis of thrust vector and aileron systems of R-73 missile[J]. Aero Weaponry, 1998, 2:11-16. (in Chinese)
HAN W C. Research on jet tab thrust vector control system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2011. (in Chinese)
CUI Y B, CHEN X, ZHOU C S, et al. Research on spoiler dynamic characteristic for thrust vector control[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(8):1030-1034. (in Chinese)
LI G Z. Research on thrust vector control of engine nozzle[D]. Heilongjiang: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014: 30-36. (in Chinese)
JIA H Y, WU X J, ZHOU N C, et al. Numerical investigation on coupling effects of multiple spouts and lateral jet interaction over missile missile configuration[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(6):857-840. (in Chinese)
BLAZEK J. Computational fluid dynamics:Principles and applications[M]. Switzerland:Alstom Power Ltd, 2001:41-45.
BACK L H, CUFFEL R F. Detection of oblique shocks in a conical nozzle with a circular-arc throat[J]. AIAA Journal, 1966, 12(4):2219-2221.