Differential hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Sinian-Cambrian shales as well as shale gas accumulation processes in western Hubei area

于泰炎; 冯乾乾; 邱楠生; 腾格尔; 李萱; 曾帅; 宋佳霖

doi:10.7623/syxb202512008

English Version Reader LoginJournal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Differential hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Sinian-Cambrian shales as well as shale gas accumulation processes in western Hubei area

更新时间：2026-02-02

- Differential hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Sinian-Cambrian shales as well as shale gas accumulation processes in western Hubei area
- ACTA PETROLEI SINICA Vol. 46, Issue 12, Pages: 2318-2331(2025)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 油气资源与工程全国重点实验室, 中国石油大学(北京),北京,102249
  2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京,102249
  3. 中国石油大学(北京)碳中和示范性能源学院,北京,102249
  4. 中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心,北京,100083
  5. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院,北京,102206
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7623/syxb202512008
  CLC： TE122.3
- Published Online：09 January 2026，
  
  Published：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
于泰炎, 冯乾乾, 邱楠生, 腾格尔, 李萱, 曾帅, 宋佳霖. 鄂西地区震旦系—寒武系页岩差异生烃演化及页岩气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2318-2331.

于泰炎, 冯乾乾, 邱楠生, et al. Differential hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Sinian-Cambrian shales as well as shale gas accumulation processes in western Hubei area[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(12): 2318-2331.
于泰炎, 冯乾乾, 邱楠生, 腾格尔, 李萱, 曾帅, 宋佳霖. 鄂西地区震旦系—寒武系页岩差异生烃演化及页岩气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2318-2331. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202512008.

于泰炎, 冯乾乾, 邱楠生, et al. Differential hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Sinian-Cambrian shales as well as shale gas accumulation processes in western Hubei area[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(12): 2318-2331. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202512008.

摘要

震旦系—寒武系古老页岩气藏是当前页岩气勘探开发的重要领域

但由于其埋藏历史漫长、成熟度高且经历多期构造-热事件叠加

页岩的生烃演化与成藏过程研究面临着显著挑战。以鄂西地区震旦系—寒武系页岩为研究对象

综合运用低温热年代学和沥青反射率等多种古温标

恢复了鄂西地区古生代以来的热演化史

重建了典型钻井内震旦系—寒武系页岩的埋藏—生烃演化过程。在此基础上

结合流体包裹体分析

明确了页岩生油与成气过程的时间、温度和成熟度条件

为页岩气成藏过程的重建提供了关键依据。研究结果表明

黄陵隆起区在早古生代埋藏阶段的埋深较小(约为2 500 m)

其页岩的热演化程度较低

生烃潜力得以有效保存

而湘鄂西坳陷区在同期的埋深较大(约为5 000 m)

其页岩的热演化程度高

并在晚奥陶世—早志留世快速经历了生油与生气高峰

过早丧失了生烃能力并转入保存状态。流体包裹体揭示黄陵隆起区的震旦系陡山沱组页岩经历了3个生烃演化阶段:早二叠世达到生油高峰并大量生油

三叠纪进入生气高峰并伴随液态烃大量裂解为气态烃

以及早白垩世发生页岩气散失;寒武系牛蹄塘组页岩记录了2个生烃演化阶段:三叠纪进入生气高峰和早白垩世发生页岩气散失。

Abstract

The Sinian-Cambrian ancient shale gas reservoirs represent a key field for current hydrocarbon exploration and development. However

owing to their prolonged burial history

high thermal maturity

and the superimposition of multiple tectono-thermal events

the research on shale hydrocarbon generation and evolution as well as gas accumulation processes faces significant challenges. This study targets at the Sinian-Cambrian shales in western Hubei area. The combination of multiple paleothermometers

including low-temperature thermochronology and bitumen reflectance

enables the restoration of the thermal evolution history in western Hubei area since the Paleozoic

and reconstructed the burial and hydrocarbon generation processes of Sinian-Cambrian shale in typical wells. Based on this

in combination with fluid inclusion analyses

the time

temperature

and maturity conditions for shale oil-gas generation are determined

providing key evidence for reconstructing the shale gas accumulation process. The results indicate that during the Early Paleozoic burial stage

the Huangling paleo-uplift experienced a relatively shallow burial depth (approximately 2 500 m)where the shale had a low degree of thermal evolution

thereby preserving its hydrocarbon generation potential. In contrast

the western Hunan-Hubei depression reached greater burial depths (approximately 5 000 m)during the same period

where the shale underwent a high level of thermal evolution and rapid peaks of oil-gas generation during the Late Ordovician to Early Silurian

resulting in an early loss of hydrocarbon generation capacity and a subsequent transition into the preservation stage. Fluid inclusion analyses reveal that the Sinian Doushantuo Formation shale in Huangling paleo-uplift experienced three evolutionary stages

i.e.

an oil-generation peak with substantial oil production during Early Permian

a gas-generation peak accompanied by large-scale cracking of liquid hydrocarbons into gaseous hydrocarbons in Triassic

and shale gas dissipation during Early Cretaceous. In contrast

the Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale recorded two stages

including a gas-generation peak in Triassic and shale gas dissipation in Early Cretaceous.

关键词

Keywords

references

马新华,谢军. 川南地区页岩气勘探开发进展及发展前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(1):161-169.

何希鹏.四川盆地东部页岩气甜点评价体系与富集高产影响因素[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):59-71.

郭旭升,赵永强,申宝剑,等.中国南方海相页岩气勘探理论:回顾与展望[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):172-182.

翟刚毅,王玉芳,刘国恒,等.鄂西地区震旦系—寒武系页岩气成藏模式[J].地质力学学报,2020,26(5):696-713.

邹才能,杨智,朱如凯,等.中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J].地质学报,2015,89(6):979-1007.

金之钧,胡宗全,高波,等.川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):1-10.

邹才能,董大忠,熊伟,等.中国页岩气新区带、新层系和新类型勘探进展、挑战及对策[J].石油与天然气地质,2024,45(2):309-326.

赵文智,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):499-510.

熊亮.四川盆地及周缘下寒武统富有机质页岩孔隙发育特征[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(9):1319-1331.

高波,刘忠宝,舒志国,等.中上扬子地区下寒武统页岩气储层特征及勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(2):284-294.

张同伟,张亚军,贾敏,等.中国南方寒武系海相页岩含气性主控因素的科学问题[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2018,37(4):572-579.

张同伟,罗欢,孟康.我国南方不同地区寒武系页岩含气性差异主控因素探讨[J].地学前缘,2023,30(3):1-13.

张金川,史淼,王东升,等.中国页岩气勘探领域和发展方向[J].天然气工业,2021,41(8):69-80.

ZHANG Junfeng,ZHAI Gangyi,WANG Daming,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Huangling dome and its control effect on shale gas preservation in the north margin of the Yangtze block,South China[J].China Geology,2020,3(1):28-37.

邱楠生,何丽娟,常健,等.沉积盆地热历史重建研究进展与挑战[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(5):790-802.

任战利,杨鹏,祁凯,等.羌塘盆地构造-热演化史研究现状及进展[J].地学前缘,2025,32(5):12-27.

冯乾乾,邱楠生,付小东,等.川北地区超深层古老层系热史恢复及其对油气成藏的约束[J].地质学报,2025,99(9):3122-3132.

LI Jianzhong,BAI Bin,BAI Ying,et al.Fluid evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation model of ultra-deep gas reservoirs in Permian Qixia Formation of northwest Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(4):719-730.

邓宾,田腾振,李泽奇,等.米仓山震旦系灯影组流体充注特征及油气成藏过程[J].中国石油勘探,2024,29(2):98-111.

刘卫红,李浩,彭涌,等.塔里木盆地东部英东构造带上寒武统碳酸盐岩油气成藏演化过程——基于英东1井流体包裹体分析[J].天然气地球科学,2025 ,36(10):1804-1814.

李浩涵,陈科,包书景,等.鄂西黄陵背斜南翼震旦系陡山沱组有利目标区页岩气资源潜力评价[J].石油实验地质,2019,41(1):31-37.

翟刚毅,王玉芳,包书景,等.我国南方海相页岩气富集高产主控因素及前景预测[J].地球科学,2017,42(7):1057-1068.

许露露,文剑航,张焱林,等.中扬子鄂西地区陡山沱组页岩气成藏地质条件与综合评价[J].海相油气地质,2023,28(2):196-208.

许露露,周向辉,陈威,等.鄂西地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气保存条件研究[J].海相油气地质,2021,26(2):113-122.

陈科,翟刚毅,包书景,等.华南黄陵隆起构造演化及其对页岩气保存的控制作用[J].中国地质,2020,47(1):161-172.

王步清,肖粤新,徐秋晨.宜昌黄陵隆起构造演化及其对中下扬子页岩气勘探的启示[J].地质力学学报,2022,28(4):561-572.

VERMEESCH P.IsoplotR:a free and open toolbox for geochronology[J].Geoscience Frontiers,2018,9(5):1479-1493.

HURFORD A J.Standardization of fission track dating calibration:recommendation by the fission track working group of the I.U.G.S.subcommission on geochronology[J].Chemical Geology:Isotope Geoscience Section,1990,80(2):171-178.

中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心.湘鄂西地区古生界海相页岩镜质体反射率实验报告[R].北京:中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心,2023.

SCHOENHERR J,LITTKE R,URAI J L,et al.Polyphase thermal evolution in the Infra-Cambrian Ara Group (South Oman Salt Basin)as deduced by maturity of solid reservoir bitumen[J].Organic Geochemistry,2007,38(8):1293-1318.

GUENTHNER W R,REINERS P W,KETCHAM R A,et al.Helium diffusion in natural zircon:radiation damage,anisotropy,and the interpretation of zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology[J].American Journal of Science,2013,313(3):145-198.

KETCHAM R A.Forward and inverse modeling of low-temperature thermochronometry data[J].Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,2005,58(1):275-314.

KETCHAM R A,CARTER A,DONELICK R A,et al.Improved modeling of fission-track annealing in apatite[J].American Mineralogist,2007,92(5/6):799-810.

张建坤,何生,易积正,等.岩石热声发射和盆模技术研究中扬子区西部下古生界海相页岩最高古地温和热成熟史[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):58-67.

HU Jianmin,CHEN Hong,QU Hongjie,et al.Mesozoic deformations of the Dabashan in the southern Qinling orogen,central China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2012,47:171-184.

沈传波,梅廉夫,刘昭茜,等.黄陵隆起中—新生代隆升作用的裂变径迹证据[J].矿物岩石,2009,29(2):54-60.

李天义,何生,何治亮,等.中扬子地区当阳复向斜中生代以来的构造抬升和热史重建[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):213-224.

刘安,周鹏,陈孝红,等.运用方解石脉包裹体和碳氧同位素评价页岩气保存条件——以中扬子地区寒武系为例[J].天然气工业,2021,41(2):47-55.

罗胜元,陈孝红,岳勇,等.中扬子宜昌地区沉积—构造演化与寒武系页岩气富集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(8):1052-1068.

罗胜元,陈孝红,李培军,等.鄂西宜昌地区寒武系常规、非常规天然气显示及勘探意义[J].地质通报,2020,39(4):538-551.

陈孝红,危凯,张保民,等.湖北宜昌寒武系水井沱组页岩气藏主控地质因素和富集模式[J].中国地质,2018,45(2):207-226.

沃玉进,周雁,肖开华.中国南方海相层系埋藏史类型与生烃演化模式[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2007,27(3):94-100.

B AO Shujing,ZHAI Gangyi,ZHOU Zhi,et al.The evolution of the Huangling uplift and its control on the accumulation and preservation of shale gas[J].China Geology,2018,1(3):346-353.

吴强.鄂西地区恩页1井重点层系页岩气成藏特征研究[D].北京:核工业北京地质研究院,2019.

张君峰,许浩,周志,等.鄂西宜昌地区页岩气成藏地质特征[J].石油学报,2019,40(8):887-899.

张或丹.黄陵背斜的形成和构造发展初析[J].江汉石油学院学报,1986(1):29-40.

ZHAI Gangyi,WANG Yufang,LIU Guoheng,et al.The Sinian-Cambrian Formation shale gas exploration and practice in southern margin of Huangling paleo-uplift[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,109:419-433.

YAN Danping,ZHANG Bing,ZHOU Meifu,et al.Constraints on the depth,geometry and kinematics of blind detachment faults provided by fault-propagation folds:an example from the Mesozoic fold belt of South China[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2009,31(2):150-162.

李文, 何生,张柏桥,等.焦石坝背斜西缘龙马溪组页岩复合脉体中流体包裹体的古温度及古压力特征[J].石油学报,2018,39(4):402-415.

董敏,张林炎,王宗秀,等.鄂西地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气成藏及保存条件分析:以XD1井为例[J].地球科学,2019,44(11):3616-3627.

刘秀岩,陈红汉,肖雪薇,等.页岩气成气过程的流体包裹体证据——以重庆秀山剖面下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J].地学前缘,2023,30(3):165-180.

刘安,陈孝红,肖七林,等.寒武系古流体地球化学特征及其对页岩气保存的指示意义——以中扬子地区寒武系页岩气发现井宜地2井为例[J].地质学报,2022,96(7):2573-2584.

肖雪薇.中国南方湘西、鄂西长阳地区下古生界牛蹄塘组流体演化及页岩气保存条件分析[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2023.

Views

102

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Activity time of strike-slip faults and their controlling effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in central Sichuan Basin: evidence from U-Pb dating and fluid inclusions of cements in fault zone

Related Author

Zhuang Xinbing

Gu Yi

Shao Zhibing

You Donghua

Ding Yong

Wan Yanglu

Luo Tao

Guo Xiaowen

Related Institution

Exploration and Production Research Institute, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company

Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology, Sinopec Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute

Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company

Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences

PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development

AI问答

⁰