
1. 太原理工大学原位改性采矿教育部重点实验室,山西,太原,030024
2. 太原理工大学国家油页岩原位注热开采分中心,山西,太原,030024
3. 太原理工大学矿业工程学院,山西,太原,030024
Published Online:10 May 2025,
Published:2025
移动端阅览
康志勤, 武致辉, 王磊, 杨栋, 赵静, 韩贺旭, 赵阳升. 油页岩无水、近/超临界水热解细观结构演变及宏观力学响应[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 801-815.
Kang Zhiqin, Wu Zhihui, Wang Lei, et al. Microscopic structure evolution and macroscopic mechanical response of oil shale under anhydrous and near/supercritical water pyrolysis[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 801-815.
康志勤, 武致辉, 王磊, 杨栋, 赵静, 韩贺旭, 赵阳升. 油页岩无水、近/超临界水热解细观结构演变及宏观力学响应[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 801-815. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504010.
Kang Zhiqin, Wu Zhihui, Wang Lei, et al. Microscopic structure evolution and macroscopic mechanical response of oil shale under anhydrous and near/supercritical water pyrolysis[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 801-815. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504010.
对流加热技术是油页岩地下原位干馏技术中关键可行的技术之一。以水蒸汽作为载热流体的方式已被证明在技术流程和经济性方面具有显著优势
深部高地应力环境会使低压高温蒸汽转变为近/超临界水状态。通过无水传导加热、近/超临界水加热热解油页岩的实验
结合显微CT扫描技术、三轴渗透测试以及单轴压缩力学试验对比研究了不同热解环境下油页岩细观孔隙裂隙结构演化过程以及宏观渗透、力学变化规律
阐释了由不同环境热解引发的油页岩宏细观特性差异机制。研究结果表明
近/超临界水热解条件下油页岩的孔隙度、裂隙发育程度远高于无水热解条件
其中
孔隙度相差近10倍
无水热解、近/超临界水热解环境下裂隙最大宽度分别由约30 μm增加至约150 μm
近/超临界水热解后矿物的变化显著影响了油页岩的细观结构
形成的伊/蒙混层之间具有大量的微米—纳米级孔隙。不同地应力及孔隙压力条件下
无水热解的渗透率均低于0.04 mD
而近/超临界水环境的渗透率达到了0.1~0.7 mD
两者相差20~50倍。超临界水具备更强的渗透性、传热性、溶解性和携带性
油页岩在超临界水热解环境中不仅会形成大量的平行层理方向裂隙
同时会产生沟通层理方向的层间交叉裂隙
表现为细观结构更复杂及渗流通道更通畅。近/超临界水环境下油页岩的抗压强度显著小于同温度无水环境
近/超临界水的参与明显加快了有机质的分解
使得油页岩能在更低温度情况下出现离层。研究结果为深部油页岩等富有机质岩的对流加热开采提供了理论前提。
Convective heating technology is one of the key feasible technologies in the in-situ retorting of oil shale. The use of steam as a heat-carrying fluid has been shown to have significant advantages in terms of technical process and economy. In deep high-stress environments
low-pressure high-temperature steam can be transformed into near/supercritical water. In this study
experiments were performed on oil shale pyrolysis through anhydrous conduction heating and near/supercritical water heating. Combined with micro-CT scanning
triaxial permeability tests
and uniaxial compression mechanical tests
an in-depth comparative study was conducted on the evolution of microscopic pore and fracture structures of oil shale as well as the macroscopic permeability and mechanical changes under different pyrolysis environments
thus explaining the differential mechanisms of macro and micro oil shale characteristics induced by different pyrolysis conditions. The porosity and fracture development degree of oil shale under near/supercritical water pyrolysis conditions are much higher than those under anhydrous pyrolysis condition
with the porosity differences of nearly ten times. The maximum crack width is increased from around 30 μm to about 150 μm under near/supercritical water conditions. The changes in minerals after near/supercritical water pyrolysis significantly affect the microscopic structure of oil shale
forming numerous micro-nano pores between the illite-smectite mixed layers. Under different stress and pore pressure conditions
the permeability achieved by anhydrous pyrolysis is below 0.04 mD
while the permeability under near/supercritical water conditions reaches 0.1-0.7 mD
differing by nearly 20 to 50 times. By contrast
supercritical water has stronger permeability
heat transfer capacity
solubility
and carrying capacity. In the supercritical water pyrolysis environment
oil shale forms numerous fractures along parallel beddings and interlaminar cross fractures connecting beddings
shown as more complex microscopic structures and smoother flow channels. The compressive strength of oil shale under near/supercritical water conditions is significantly lower than that in an anhydrous environment at the same temperature. The participation of near/supercritical water accelerates the decomposition of organic matter
causing oil shale to delaminate at a lower temperature. The results provide a theoretical basis for the convective heating exploitation of deep oil shale and other organic-rich rocks.
WANG Lei,YANG Dong,ZHANG Yuxing,et al. Research on the reaction mechanism and modification distance of oil shale during high-temperature water vapor pyrolysis[J].Energy,2022,261:125213.
徐凤银,王成旺,熊先钺,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J].石油学报,2023,44(11):1764-1780.
WANG Lei,YANG Dong,KANG Zhiqin.Evolution of permeability and mesostructure of oil shale exposed to high-temperature water vapor[J].Fuel,2021,290:119786.
康志勤,赵阳升,杨栋,等.油页岩原位注蒸汽开采油气中试与多模式原位热采技术的适用性分析[J].石油学报,2021,42(11):1458-1468.
邓勇,胡德胜,朱继田,等.北部湾盆地油气成藏规律与勘探新领域、新类型、资源潜力[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):202-225.
王磊,张睿,赵阳升,等.地应力约束下米级油页岩高温蒸汽压裂与渗流-传热特征[J].中国矿业大学学报,2024,53(1):68-78.
李守定,李晓,王思敬,等.页岩油化学生热原位转化开采理论与方法[J].工程地质学报,2022,30(1):127-143.
杨立红,朱超凡,曾皓,等.油页岩自生热原位转化直井与水平井开发效果数值模拟——以鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区油页岩为例[J].石油学报,2023,44(8):1333-1343.
JIA Yichao,HUANG Xudong,YANG Dong,et al.Thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling in oil shale:investigating permeability and heat transfer under high-temperature steam injection[J].Case Studies in Thermal Engineering,2024,61:104862.
YANIK J,YVKSEL M,SA LAM M,et al.Characterization of the oil fractions of shale oil obtained by pyrolysis and supercritical water extraction[J].Fuel,1995,74(1):46-50.
EL HARFI K,BENNOUNA C,MOKHLISSE A,et al.Supercritical fluid extraction of Moroccan (Timahdit)oil shale with water[J].Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,1999,50(2):162-264.
DENG Sunhua,WANG Zhijun,GU Qiang,et al.Extracting hydrocarbons from Huadian oil shale by sub-critical water[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2011,92(5):1062-1067
LEWAN M D,ROY S.Role of water in hydrocarbon generation from Type-I kerogen in Mahogany oil shale of the Green River Formation[J].Organic Geochemistry,2011,42(1):31-41.
NASYROVA Z R,KAYUKOVA G P,ONISHCHENKO Y V,et al.Conversion of high-carbon Domanic shale in sub-and supercritical waters[J].Energy & Fuels,2020,34(2):1329-1336.
SAIF T,LIN Qingyang,BUTCHER A R,et al.Multi-scale multi-dimensional microstructure imaging of oil shale pyrolysis using X-ray micro -tomography,automated ultra-high resolution SEM,MAPS Mineralogy and FIB-SEM[J].Applied Energy,2017,202:628-647.
康志勤,李翔,杨涛,等.基于传导、对流不同加热模式的 油页岩孔隙结构变化的对比研究[J].岩石力学与工程学 报,2018,37(11):2565-2575.
TIWARI P,DEO M,LIN C L,et al.Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT[J].Fuel,2013,107:547-554.
耿毅德,梁卫国,刘剑,等.不同温压条件下油页岩孔裂隙结构演化试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(11):2510-2519.
ESEME E,KROOSS B M,LITTKE R.Evolution of petrophysical properties of oil shales during high-temperature compaction tests:implications for petroleum expulsion[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,31(1):110-124.
国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.沉积岩中总有机碳测定:GB/T 19145—2022[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2022.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.岩石热解分析:GB/T 18602—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
国家能源局.沉积岩中黏土矿物和常见非黏土矿物X射线衍射分析方法:SY/T 5163—2018[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2018.
高浩东,安然,孔令伟,等.干燥失水条件下膨胀土的细观裂隙演化特征研究[J].岩土力学,2023,44(2):442-450.
WANG Lei,ZHAO Yangsheng,YANG Dong,et al.Effect of pyrolysis on oil shale using superheated steam:a case study on the Fushun oil shale,China[J].Fuel,2019,253:1490-1498.
GU Jingjing,DENG Sunhua,FU Huafei,et al.Pyrolysis characteristics and evolution of the organics in Nong’an oil shale lump during sub-critical water extraction[J].Fuel,2024,364:131064.
GU Jingjing,DENG Sunhua,SUN Youhong,et al.Pyrolysis behavior and pyrolysate characteristics of Huadian oil shale kerogen catalyzed by nickel-modified montmorillonite[J].Advances in Geo-Energy Research,2024,11(3):168-180.
冯龙飞,王双明,王海,等.彬长矿区典型顶板水害矿井洛河组砂岩微观孔隙特征研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2023,51(8):208-218.
董川龙,滕腾,李志虎,等.考虑微观孔隙几何的砂岩自发渗吸理论模型[J].矿业科学学报,2021,6(4):418-428.
罗宁,柴亚博,李鹏龙,等.甲烷/氧气燃爆下页岩应力波衰减及损伤规律研究[J].矿业科学学报,2024,9(6):858-869.
骆汀汀,张宸毅,杨维好,等.含天然气水合物饱和粉质沉积物三轴剪切试验[J].石油学报,2024,45(6):1019-1030.
TRIPATHI P M,BASU S.Insights into the dynamics of supercritical water flow using a two-phase approach[J].Physics of Fluids,2021,33(4):043304.
胡少斌,庞烁钢,王恩元,等.超临界水热冲击致裂技术研究初探[J].工程爆破,2023,29(2):95-101.
0
Views
49
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621