Ding Rong, Pang Xiongqi, Jia Chengzao, et al. Methods, principles and case study of evaluating deep coalbed methane based on Whole Petroleum System theory[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(3): 532-546.
DOI:
Ding Rong, Pang Xiongqi, Jia Chengzao, et al. Methods, principles and case study of evaluating deep coalbed methane based on Whole Petroleum System theory[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(3): 532-546. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202503004.
Methods, principles and case study of evaluating deep coalbed methane based on Whole Petroleum System theory
其在中国东部高热流盆地、中部中热流盆地和西部低热流盆地分别对应的埋深范围为1 000~3 600 m、1 500~7 500 m和3 000~8 500 m
预计这些有利领域内的煤炭总量约为80 596×10
8
t
煤层气原地资源量和可采资源量分别为115.91×10
12
m
3
和56.5×10
12
m
3
发展前景广阔。
Abstract
Significant breakthroughs have been made in exploration of deep coalbed methane (CBM) in China
demonstrating promising prospects for future development. However
due to the complex geological conditions and the high d
ifficulty in CBM development
the existing basic theoretical researches cannot fully explain the deep-seated issues such as the enrichment mechanism and development prospects of CBM. The research progress of global CBM exploration and development shows that the enrichment and accumulation conditions for CBM in deep reservoirs are superior to those in shallow layers. However
the deepening research on deep CBM faces a series of challenges
including multiple genetic types with unclear genetic relationship
undetermined mechanism and key controlling factors of deep CBM accumulation
lack of discrimination criteria for enrichment modes and critical accumulation conditions of CBM
difficulties in predicting and evaluating high-yield sweet spots and fully applying the exploration experience of deep CBM in the eastern Ordos Basin to other regions. To solve the problems
the Whole Petroleum System (WPS) theory and the hydrocarbon accumulation model with dynamic field are introduced to expound the differences
correlations
and united symbiotic relationships between conventional and unconventional coal-formed gas reservoirs in petroliferous basin
in an attempt to provide new theoretical and methodological guidance for the prediction and evaluation of high-yield and rich CBM areas. The preliminary research results on CBM in major petroliferous basins of China indicate that during the evolution process of the Coalbed Whole Petroleum System (CWPS)
the free hydrocarbon dynamic field is conducive to the enrichment and accumulation of CBM in an adsorbed state
whereas the confined hydrocarbon dynamic field is conducive to the enrichment of free gas in coal seams. In the free hydrocarbon dynamic field of coal seams
the amount of adsorbed gases increased with the increasing of burial depth and decreased after reaching a peak
while the free gas content has begun to increase. In the confined hydrocarbon dynamic field
the amount of gas trapped in coal seams in a free state continues to increase with the increasing of burial de
pth
and then decreases until it tends to disappear after reaching its peak. Vertically
the lower part of the free hydrocarbon dynamic field and the upper part of the confined hydrocarbon dynamic field (organic matter accumulation degree ranges from 0.50 % to 2.75 % ) are most favorable for multiphase enrichment and high production of CBM. The buried depths of the high heat flow basins of the eastern China
medium heat flow basins of the central China
and low heat flow basins of the western China are from 1 000 m to 3 600 m
1 500 m to 7 500 m
and 3 000 m to 8 500 m
respectively. In these favorable fields
the total amount of coal resources is about 80 596×10
8
t
and the in-situ and recoverable resources of CBM are 115.91×10
Principle and application of basin modeling technology for evaluation of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resource based on whole petroleum system theory
Spatiotemporal coupling between source-reservoir configurations and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Whole Petroleum System of Mahu sag, Junggar Basin
Quantitative evaluation of whole petroleum system:principle and application
Related Author
Pang Xiongqi
Jia Chengzao
Guo Qiulin
Chen Zhangxing
Wang Feiyu
Liu Guoyong
GaoYongjin
Shi Kanyuan
Related Institution
Oil and Gas Survey Center, China Geological Survey
PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N1N4
PetroChina Research Institute of Exploration and Development