Status and Responses of Coal-Fired Power Low-Carbon Transformation Path Under “Dual Carbon” Goal in China

HUANG Xiuxing; LI Qiaoyun; WEI Wenye; YANG Mei; HUANG Rubin; LI Hui

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2025.04.008

English Version Reader LoginJournal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Status and Responses of Coal-Fired Power Low-Carbon Transformation Path Under “Dual Carbon” Goal in China

更新时间：2025-12-08

- Status and Responses of Coal-Fired Power Low-Carbon Transformation Path Under “Dual Carbon” Goal in China
- Vol. 45, Issue 4, Pages: 49-55(2025)
- 作者机构：
  
  广西电力职业技术学院,广西,南宁,530299
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2025.04.008
  CLC： TK018
- Published Online：05 September 2025，
  
  Published：05 September 2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
黄修行, 李巧云, 韦文业, 杨眉, 黄儒斌, 李惠. “双碳”目标下中国煤电低碳转型路径的现状及应对[J]. 湖南电力, 2025, 45(4): 49-55.

HUANG Xiuxing, LI Qiaoyun, WEI Wenye, et al. Status and Responses of Coal-Fired Power Low-Carbon Transformation Path Under “Dual Carbon” Goal in China[J]. 2025, 45(4): 49-55.
黄修行, 李巧云, 韦文业, 杨眉, 黄儒斌, 李惠. “双碳”目标下中国煤电低碳转型路径的现状及应对[J]. 湖南电力, 2025, 45(4): 49-55. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2025.04.008.

HUANG Xiuxing, LI Qiaoyun, WEI Wenye, et al. Status and Responses of Coal-Fired Power Low-Carbon Transformation Path Under “Dual Carbon” Goal in China[J]. 2025, 45(4): 49-55. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2025.04.008.

摘要

生物质掺烧、绿氨掺烧、碳捕集利用与封存被列为煤电低碳化转型的三大重点路径。然而

现有技术推广和应用面临多重制约：生物质掺烧受限于原料供应波动性与锅炉适应性不足;绿氨掺烧因制氨成本高昂导致经济性不足;碳捕集利用与封存则存在能耗瓶颈及CO

利用市场缺失。针对上述瓶颈

从技术创新、经济优化和政策协同三个维度提出煤电低碳转型的优化对策

多维度协同推进生物质掺烧、绿氨掺烧和碳捕集利用与封存的应用

助力煤电低碳化转型。

Abstract

Biomass co-firing

green ammonia co-firing

and carbon capture

utilization

and storage (CCUS) have been identified as the three key pathways for the low-carbon transformation of coal-fired power. However

the practical promotion and application of these technologies is facing multiple constraints. For instance

biomass co-firing is limited by the volatility of raw material supply and the lack of boiler adaptability

green ammonia co-firing is economically unfeasible due to the high cost of green ammonia production

and CCUS is hindered by energy consumption and the lack of a CO

utilization market. To address these difficulties

this paper proposes optimization countermeasures for the low-carbon transformation of coal-fired power from thr

ee dimensions: technological innovation

economic optimization

and policy synergy. It aims to synergistically promote the application of biomass co-firing

green ammonia co-firing and CCUS

facilitating the low-carbon transformation of coal-fired power.

关键词

Keywords

references

孙宝东,滕霄云,张帆,等. 2025年中国能源形势和煤炭消费达峰时间的研判[J]. 中国煤炭,2025,51(3):33-41.

丁怡婷. 新能源发电装机规模首超煤电[N]. 人民日报,2024-07-24(01).

AGBOR E,ZHANG X L,KUMAR A.A review of biomass co-firing in North America[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2014,40:930-943.

盖志杰,王鹏辉. 燃煤电厂碳排放典型计算及分析[J]. 中国电力,2017,50(5):178-184.

李源,马仑,方庆艳. 660 MW燃煤机组掺烧生物质能耗及碳排放特性研究[J]. 热能动力工程,2024,39(6):123-130.

高清林,高嘉锜,李毅,等. 燃煤机组耦合生物质直燃发电综合分析[J]. 可再生能源,2023,41(12):1571-1578.

梁波,王永征,梁艳杰,等. 煤与生物质混燃锅炉结渣评价指标分析[J]. 热力发电,2025,54(4):51-60.

郭宗涛,马心行,辛振华. 工业煤粉锅炉与生物质燃料耦合燃烧分析[J]. 上海节能,2023(1):94-98.

郭慧娜,吴玉新,王学斌,等. 燃煤机组耦合农林生物质发电技术现状及展望[J]. 洁净煤技术,2022,28(3):12-22.

李玲. 稳妥有序推进煤电机组掺烧生物质[N]. 中国能源报,2024-08-05(002).

钟洪玲. 燃煤电站低碳化改造面临的挑战及实施路径[J]. 中国电力企业管理,2025(4):69-72.

段伦博,李天新. 氨燃烧特性及稳燃技术研究进展[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(7):41-54.

TANIGUCHI. Flame propagation velocity for co-combustion of pulverized coals and gas fuels[J]. ENERGY & Fuels,2021,35(7):6305-6314.

刘小伟,雷乐,周子健,等. 双碳背景下燃煤电站掺氨燃烧研究进展与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2024,44(18):7221-7235.

ZHANG J W,ITO T,ISHII H,et al.Numerical investigation on ammonia co-firing in a pulverized coal combustion facility:Effect of ammonia co-firing ratio[J]. Fuel,2020,267:117166.

AO Q P,LI R Y,WANG Y K,et al.Feasibility analysis of coupling hydrogen-derived fuel on a coal-fired boiler for power generation[J]. Energy&Fuels,2023,37(1):477-491.

ITO S,UCHIDA M,SUDA T,et al.Development of ammonia gas turbine co-generation technology[J]. Engineering,Environmental Science,2020,53(1):1-6.

吉平,林伟芳,冯长有,等. 氢能发电技术发展制约因素及未来方向综述[J]. 全球能源互联网,2025,8(2):165-175.

翁爽. 煤电低碳化改造面临多重挑战[J]. 中国电力企业管理,2024(25):16-21.

陈科宇,徐金鑫,吴桂波,等. 绿氨产业现状及发展展望[J]. 化工进展,2024,43(5):2544-2553.

韩学义. 电力行业二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存现状与展望[J]. 中国资源综合利用,2020,38(2):110-117.

黄占斌. 碳达峰碳中和导论[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2024.

赵震宇,姚舜,杨朔鹏,等.“双碳”目标下:中国CCUS发展现状、存在问题及建议[J]. 环境科学,2023,44(2):1128-1138.

徐顺智,赵瑞彤,王孝全,等. 燃煤发电行业低碳化发展路径分析[J]. 洁净煤技术,2023,29(12):83-94.

刘飞,关键,祁志福,等. 燃煤电厂碳捕集、利用与封存技术路线选择[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(7):1-13.

桑树勋,滕卫卫,刘世奇,等. 火力电厂大规模全流程CCUS技术研究进展与前瞻[J]. 天然气工业,2024,44(12):187-198.

张佳凯. 煤与生物质积灰结渣防沾污特性研究与低温硫酸氢铵积灰特性及其消除机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2020.

SCHÜTZ A,GÜNTHNER M,MOTZ G,et al. High temperature(salt melt)corrosion tests with ceramic-coated steel[J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics,2015,159:10-18.

张屿,赵义军,曾光,等. 氨燃料强化燃烧技术研究进展[J]. 能源环境保护,2023,37(5):129-144.

李宇航,田舒嫚,张普选,等. 燃煤电站锅炉掺氨燃烧特性及对锅炉影响研究进展[J]. 热力发电,2025,54(5):13-24.

HSATOSHI H,KAZUHIKO S.Ammonia combustion catalysts[J]. Chemistry Letters,2021,50(4):752-759.

孙书桩,郭亚飞,赵传文,等. 二氧化碳捕集与利用一体化技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术,2025,31(6):53-107.

朱文韬,杜振,张杨,等. 燃煤烟气固体吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J].热力发电,2025,54(6):64-78

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

⁰