风暴潮荷载作用下海上风电多桶导管架基础动力响应

卢明皎; 张陈蓉; 田抒平

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0166

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

风暴潮荷载作用下海上风电多桶导管架基础动力响应

更新时间：2026-07-22

- 风暴潮荷载作用下海上风电多桶导管架基础动力响应
- Vol. 47, Issue 6, Pages: 384-393(2026)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0166
  CLC： TU473
- Online First：08 July 2026，
  
  Published：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
卢明皎, 张陈蓉, 田抒平. 风暴潮荷载作用下海上风电多桶导管架基础动力响应[J]. 2026, 47(6): 384-393.
DOI：

卢明皎, 张陈蓉, 田抒平. 风暴潮荷载作用下海上风电多桶导管架基础动力响应[J]. 2026, 47(6): 384-393. DOI： 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0166.

摘要

为研究风暴潮荷载下吸力桶导管架基础风力机结构的动力响应

采用自定义荷载波形加载装置开展室内1 g模型试验

分析不同荷载工况下风力机结构位移响应和频率演化

并通过数值模拟讨论风暴潮荷载下吸力桶不同深径比对土体和结构的影响。结果表明：结构水平位移极值随风暴潮工况风速的增加而增大

水平位移放大系数呈“先增后减”变化趋势;机舱位置加速度Fourier幅值谱峰值随荷载的增加而增大

峰值频率则呈“先减后增”趋势。随着吸力桶深径比的增加

结构水平位移极值和放大系数均依次减小;L/D=0.5为最不利深径比

此深径比不能抵抗风暴潮荷载;深径比1.0与1.5区别并不明显

综合考虑可靠性和经济性

深径比1.0为最优形式;不同深径比对吸力桶导管架基础的旋转中心也有影响。

Abstract

To investigate the dynamic response of the multi-bucket jacket foundation of offshore wind turbines under storm surge load

this paper conducts a series of 1 g model tests using the motor servo random dynamic loading equipment. Then

the influence of different depth-to-diameter ratios of the suction bucket on the soil and structure is further investigated through numerical simulations. The results indicate that the extreme horizontal displacement of the structure rises as wind speed increases under storm surge conditions

and the amplification coefficient of horizontal displacement follows a trend of “increasing initially before decreasing”. The peak value of the Fourier amplitude spectrum for the nacelle position acceleration increases with the load

while the peak frequency exhibits a pattern of “decreasing first and then increasing”. As the depth-to-diameter ratio of the suction bucket increases

both the extreme horizontal displacement and the amplification of the structures coefficient corresponding decrease. A depth-to-diameter ratio of /= 0.5 is the least favorable

as it cannot withstand storm surge loads. The difference between depth-to-diameter ratios of 1.0 and 1.5 is negligible. Taking into account reliability and economy

a depth-to-diameter ratio of 1.0 is the optimal type. Different depth-to-diameter ratios also have the influence onthe rotation center of the SBJ foundation.

关键词

Keywords

references

FAN Q X, WANG X, YUAN J, et al.A review of the development of key technologies for offshore wind power in China[J]. Journal of marine science and engineering, 2022, 10(7): 929.

WU X N, HU Y, LI Y, et al.Foundations of offshore wind turbines: a review[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 104: 379-393.

WANG X F, ZENG X W, LI J L, et al.A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2018, 158: 103-119.

汤春生, 麦子浚, 沈良朵. 台风梅花对海上风电场海床演变数值模拟研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(6): 522-530.

HALLOWELL S T, MYERS A T, ARWADE S R, et al.Hurricane risk assessment of offshore wind turbines[J]. Renewable energy, 2018, 125: 234-249.

LI J L, WU W G, WEI Y, et al.Study on dynamic response of offshore wind turbine structure under typhoon[J]. Polish maritime research, 2022, 29(1): 34-42.

柯世堂, 王硕, 赵永发, 等. 台风-浪-流耦合作用下海上10 MW级特大型风力机风荷载特性分析[J]. 振动工程学报, 2023, 36(2): 299-310.

黎鹏飞, 王志明, 慕仝, 等. 基于台风-浪时间历程荷载的风机-吸力筒导管架基础耦合分析研究[J]. 核科学与工程, 2022, 42(2): 246-254.

LI J W, BIAN J Y, MA Y X, et al.Impact of typhoons on floating offshore wind turbines: a case study of typhoon mangkhut[J]. Journal of marine science and engineering, 2021, 9(5): 2-21.

张陈蓉, 田抒平, 张纪蒙. 砂土中大直径单桩风机动力响应模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(S2): 16-19.

秦梦飞, 施伟, 柴威, 等. 台风过境下大型单桩式海上风机结构动力特性研究[J]. 力学学报, 2022, 54(4): 881-891.

李琪, 周文杰, 童建国, 等. 台风环境中典型海上风机结构的动力响应数值分析[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2019, 34(3): 32-39.

芦直跃, 马宏旺, 李玉韬, 等. 台风对海上风电单桩基础累积变形影响试验研究[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2019, 38(6): 75-82.

ANTONIOU M, KOURKOULIS R, GELAGOTI F, et al.Simplified method for performance-based seismic design of suction caissons supporting jacket offshore wind turbines[J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2022, 155: 107169.

DING H Y, PAN C, ZHANG P Y, et al.Shaking table tests and seismic response of three-bucket jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2022, 21(3): 719-736.

GB/T 50123—2019, 土工试验方法标准[S].

向国威. 屏障隔振措施的数值分析与试验研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2011.

TRAN M N, RANDOLPH M F.Variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand[J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(1): 1-11.

DNV (DET NORSKE VERITAS). DNV-ST-0126: support structures for wind turbines[S].

LOMBARDI D, BHATTACHARYA S, MUIR WOOD D.Dynamic soil-structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil[J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2013, 49: 165-180.

SIMPSON R H, SAFFIR H.The hurricane disaster-potential scale[J]. Weatherwise, 1974, 27(4): 169-186.

GB/T 19201—2006, 热带气旋等级标准[S].

王文华, 李昕, 李颖, 等. 地震荷载作用下海上风力机结构动力模型试验[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(7): 2018-2026.

ZHANG C R, WANG R L, WANG Z Y.Natural frequency of offshore wind turbines on monopiles in sand[J]. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 2024, 1334(1): 012044.

LAI H Y, GU X Q, TU W B, et al.Effects of soil small strain nonlinearity on dynamic impedance of horizontally loaded suction caisson for offshore wind turbines[J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2023, 165: 107731.

YU D W, YE J H, YIN C Q.Dynamics of offshore wind turbine and its seabed foundation under combined wind-wave loading[J]. Ocean engineering, 2023, 286: 115624.

乐丛欢, 任建宇, 姜明涛, 等. 砂土中四筒导管架风机基础抗弯承载力研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2021, 39(2): 12-19.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON LATERAL BEARING BEHAVIOR OF CEMENT COMPOSITE MONOPILES

黄土中风电扩底桩基础-塔筒的随机加载装置与模型试验研究

海上风电结构新型阻尼装置研究

海上风电筒型基础新型安装平台水平承载特性研究

湿陷性黄土地区风电桩基础负摩阻力计算方法研究

Related Author

Wei Guqiang

He Zirui

Liu Guangdong

Hu Congchuan

Gao Luchao

张勋

刘佳

徐洪呈

Related Institution

School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University

Duchengweiye Group Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Wind Power Generation Technology

Windey Energy Technology Group Co., Ltd.

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology

AI问答

⁰