Su Huanhuan, Ge Xin, Yue Minnan, et al. STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE PROTECTIVE DEVICES[J]. 2025, 46(3): 602-610.
Su Huanhuan, Ge Xin, Yue Minnan, et al. STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE PROTECTIVE DEVICES[J]. 2025, 46(3): 602-610. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-1884.
STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE PROTECTIVE DEVICES
In order to analyze the influence of the diameter-to-height ratio on the performance of the protective device when the offshore wind turbine is impacted by the ship
this paper uses ANSYS/LS-DYNA software to study the anti-collision performance and deformation mode of Ogden
Mooney-Rivlin constitutive rubber and aluminum foam protective device with different diameter-to-height ratios. The results show that with the increase of the ratio of diameter to height
the change of the maximum depression depth of the two constitutive rubber devices shows an opposite trend. When the diameter-height ratio is 2.061
the maximum depression depth of the foam aluminum device is reduced by 60.5%
the maximum contact force of the foam aluminum material is increased by 28.05%
and the maximum contact force of the Ogden material and Mooney-Rivlin material rubber protection device is reduced by 27.9% and 14.5%. The protective effect of the protective device is affected by the plastic deformation caused by local depression and overall bending. With the change of the diameter-height ratio
the change of the deformation form of the device affects the crashworthiness of the protective device with different constitutive materials. When the diameter-height ratio is less than 1.5 and the wall thickness is less than 3 m
the deformation of the protective device is mainly local depression. When the diameter-height ratio is greater than 1.5 and the thickness is greater than 5 m
the protective device mainly produces bending deformation.
JIANG D, ZHUANG D F, HUANG Y H, et al.Evaluating the spatio-temporal variation of China’s offshore wind resources based on remotely sensed wind field data[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2013, 24: 142-148.
ZHAO X G, REN L Z.Focus on the development of offshore wind power in China: Has the golden period come?[J]. Renewable energy, 2015, 81: 644-657.
DAI L J, EHLERS S, RAUSAND M, et al.Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines[J]. Reliability engineering & system safety, 2013, 109: 18-31.
LE S H, PIRE T, HSIEH J R, et al.New analytical developments to study local and global deformations of an offshore wind turbine jacket impacted by a ship[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures (ICCGS’16). Ulsan, Korea, 2016: 15-18.
JIA H K, QIN S Y, WANG R M, et al.Ship collision impact on the structural load of an offshore wind turbine[J]. Global energy interconnection, 2020, 3(1): 43-50.
LIU C G, HAO E T, ZHANG S B.Optimization and application of a crashworthy device for the monopile offshore wind turbine against ship impact[J]. Applied ocean research, 2015, 51: 129-137.
REN N X, OU J.A crashworthy device against ship-OWE collision and its protection effects on the tower of offshore wind farms[J]. China ocean engineering, 2009, 23: 593-602.
YUE X Z, HAN Z W, LI C, et al.The study on structure design of fender of offshore wind turbine based on fractal feature during collision with ship[J]. Ocean engineering, 2021, 236: 109100.
龚曙光,边炳传.有限元基本理论及应用[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2022.
WU S R.A variational principle for dynamic contact with large deformation[J]. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2009, 198(21-26): 2009-2015.
LIM H K, LEE J S.On the structural behavior of ship’s shell structures due to impact loading[J]. International journal of naval architecture and ocean engineering, 2018, 10(1): 103-118.
OGDEN R W.Non-linear elastic deformations[M]. Massachusetts: Courier Corporation, 1997.
ERIKSSON A, NORDMARK A.Non-unique response of Mooney-Rivlin model in bi-axial membrane stress[J]. Computers & structures, 2014, 144: 12-22.
HAO E T, LIU C G.Evaluation and comparison of anti-impact performance to offshore wind turbine foundations: Monopile, tripod, and jacket[J]. Ocean engineering, 2017, 130: 218-227.
NOKOB M H, YEUNG R W.Added mass of thin flat plates of arbitrary shapes with possible openings[J]. Applied ocean research, 2018, 79: 149-159.
GU H B, STANSBY P, STALLARD T, et al.Drag, added mass and radiation damping of oscillating vertical cylindrical bodies in heave and surge in still water[J]. Journal of fluids and structures, 2018, 82: 343-356.
NIE Y H, FANG H, MENG X J.Ship collision mitigation for offshore wind turbine monopile foundations via high-general/low-collision-stiffness steel fenders[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 299: 117272.
ELLINAS C P, WALKER A C.Damage on offshore tubular bracing members[C]//IABSE Colloquium on Ship Collisions With Bridges and Offshore Structures. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1983.
JONES N, BIRCH R S.Low-velocity impact of pressurised pipelines[J]. International journal of impact engineering, 2010, 37(2): 207-219.
CERIK B C, SHIN H K, CHO S R.A comparative study on damage assessment of tubular members subjected to mass impact[J]. Marine structures, 2016, 46: 1-29.
INSTITUTE A P.Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms[M]. United States: American Petroleum Institute, 1987.